Curt Doolittle updated his status.
The problem with teaching stoicism is that it’s expensive in teaching-time. Buddhism expensive in personal time. And by comparison religion allows mass production on the cheap.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-02 13:42:46 UTC
Yes, Peterson has a self authoring course, but not the ‘framing’, and I think Massimo puts books out on the framing but not a course.
Effectively speaking stocism is a scientific religion. Or rather a religious and philosophical system that does not conflict with science.
In my understanding, we are trying to (by accident) recreate the stoic philosophy (religion).
It was quite a while before I understood that’s what I was doing. I think Massimo is doing it intentionally. I haven’t got to peterson yet to ask if he’s knowingly doing it.
I have reasons to prefer peterson’s method. My only question is whether or not he should use biblical stories or not. And my preference is ‘no’, because I want to kill abrahamism (sophism) while at the same time preserve literary analogy (wisdom literature)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-02 10:14:00 UTC
The problem with teaching stoicism is that it’s expensive in teaching-time. Buddhism expensive in personal time. And by comparison religion allows mass production on the cheap.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-02 09:42:00 UTC
The problem with teaching stoicism is that it’s expensive in teaching-time. Buddhism expensive in personal time. And by comparison religion allows mass production on the cheap.
The problem with teaching stoicism is that it’s expensive in teaching-time. Buddhism expensive in personal time. And by comparison religion allows mass production on the cheap.
Yes, Peterson has a self authoring course, but not the ‘framing’, and I think Massimo puts books out on the framing but not a course. Effectively speaking stocism is a scientific religion. Or rather a religious and philosophical system that does not conflict with science. In my understanding, we are trying to (by accident) recreate the stoic philosophy (religion). It was quite a while before I understood that’s what I was doing. I think Massimo is doing it intentionally. I haven’t got to peterson yet to ask if he’s knowingly doing it. I have reasons to prefer peterson’s method. My only question is whether or not he should use biblical stories or not. And my preference is ‘no’, because I want to kill abrahamism (sophism) while at the same time preserve literary analogy (wisdom literature)
I do my job. My job is to teach. If teaching requires ‘unpleasant adjustment’ of your cognition, then that is just doing my job. Because I teach men. Because only Men are worth teaching. There are many males. Few of them are men.
I do my job. My job is to teach. If teaching requires ‘unpleasant adjustment’ of your cognition, then that is just doing my job. Because I teach men. Because only Men are worth teaching. There are many males. Few of them are men.
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Men divide cognitive labor more so than women. We have many tribes. Each tribe specializes in the conceptual tools that they best understand. This specialization as in all things reflects the class structure. That is what men have been doing for the past ten years: building tools. Not one – but many. Each ‘faction’ of the New (Scientific) Right is developing the tools that they know how to use. And when we are ready we will form an army with very special tools, for each tribe, and because of that variety of weapons we will win.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-30 15:26:04 UTC
ONLY MEN ARE WORTH TEACHING
I do my job. My job is to teach. If teaching requires ‘unpleasant adjustment’ of your cognition, then that is just doing my job. Because I teach men. Because only Men are worth teaching.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-30 13:44:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1013055709557264385