Theme: Education

  • ANSWERING QUESTIONS ON THE COURSES —“Hey Curt, I saw your post about “young me

    ANSWERING QUESTIONS ON THE COURSES

    —“Hey Curt, I saw your post about “young men searching for answers” and I’m interested in the courses.

    1) —“Do you think these courses will be accessible to someone like me, or should I wait a while and try to learn a bit more first?”—

    I have worked very hard to make them accessible, by handing out the ideas one at a time, in incremental fashion. I don’t think you will need to know anything much prior. And the discussions (as you can see from participating in my feed) will often compensate for differences.

    2) —“How much will these courses cost?”—

    It depends upon the number of people who register for a course. We are not trying to make money at this, just cover costs.

    (a) When courses roll out they will be at a discount.

    (b) After that they will increase. They will increase further when (if) we obtain Accreditation (USA).

    (c) We will *probably* use Purchasing Power Parity to price the courses since not everyone lives in western economies, and we want worldwide students.

    (d) The courses will be either 3 or 6 credits. We don’t have the same issues as physical universities, so instead of breaking first year courses in two, we will teach them as one six credit course. A 3 credit course must consist of 45-48 hours of class time, and a six credit, (two semester) course double that.

    (e) Accredited University courses of this nature are usually in the $500+ Range for three credits at a community college and $3000 in a proper liberal arts college. Which is obvious something we cannot do, do not need to do, and is not in our long term interest to do. We are targeting 100-200 for these courses. And we will reduce the price if more people take them. It’s a matter of paying for time, equipment, and servers.

    (f) there is some behavioral tendency we need to deal with, which is that it if isn’t expensive enough we won’t filter for the right people – those who are truly interested in working thru it.

    One way or another we will find a way for everyone who wants to, to study together.

    3) —“How much time/week do you think would be needed to take them?”—

    Believe it or not there are recommended time allotments for different courses. So there are some general rules. And they are roughly about the same as the credit hours. ie: 3 hrs per week per class. That includes ‘think time’. Most classes require you read a few wiki or SEP articles, and then answer a few questions. Then critique others in the forums. Mostly so that I can judge whether you’re onboard or not.

    So far we are aiming at classes consisting of one weekly one three hour ‘class’ that may or may not be broken into two or three sections.

    These courses do not have to be completed all at once. And I don’t use due dates so to speak. So if you need to take longer it’s fine. You either complete the course, and do so successfully or you don’t. I am not, and the university is not, testing whether you will make a good employee. We are teaching you to be a contemplative judge of the Truth and the Law.

    —“4) Do you have any idea when the economics course will be available?”—

    Economics course consists of defining economics as a discipline divided into a spectrum of levers, and then stating the problems with economics as it sits today, and how to repair it. Then teaching it through that ‘corrected lens’. Which involves Austrian (legal), Micro (standard micro), Chicago (insurance), Beckerian (human capital), and Macro (Levers of policy) with less emphasis on keynesian/Post-keynesian macro equilibria, and more on specific attempts to manage the spectrum of capital in the polity. From what I understand at this moment this will be 12 credits, or two 6 credit courses over two years. It is not meant to teach mathematical economic analysis, but political economy – understanding sufficient for rendering legal judgements on disputes over economic conflicts and proposals.

    —“Good to see the progress you’re making with this kind of thing, glad my patreon shekels aren’t going to waste.”—

    Your shekels are much appreciated. We do have costs. And it’s very helpful when you help us cover them. And it makes a big difference (especially in my stress level). And I’m forever grateful that you’re making Propertarianism and the White Law possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-11 10:11:00 UTC

  • BOOK LIST (IN ORDER) – PROPERTARIAN INSTITUTE COURSE IN WAR Victor Davis Hanson:

    BOOK LIST (IN ORDER) – PROPERTARIAN INSTITUTE COURSE IN WAR

    Victor Davis Hanson:

    – The Other Greeks – The Family Farm and the Agrarian Roots of Western Civilization.

    – The Western Way of War – Infantry Battle in Classical Greece

    – Why the West Has Won : Carnage and Culture

    John Keegan:

    – A History Of Warfare

    Martin Van Creveld:

    – The Culture of War

    – The Rise and Decline of the State

    – Pussycats – Why the Rest Keeps Beating the West

    – The Transformation of War: The Most Radical Reinterpretation of Armed Conflict Since Clausewitz

    William S Lind:

    – 4th Generation Warfare Handbook

    Various

    – Revolutionary, Insurrectionist, War of man against man.

    Martin Van Creveld:

    – A History of Strategy: From Sun Tzu to William S. Lind

    Curt Doolittle

    – (Essay) Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Prussianism, and The Militia – Why strategy must be taught as a balance to morality. Why the Church (child), Academy (Youth), and Military (Adult) provide tripartite competition that prevents failure by moralization.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 08:55:00 UTC

  • FYI: updated the reading list, to: 1 – Included more amazon links. 2 – Made the

    FYI: updated the reading list, to:

    1 – Included more amazon links.

    2 – Made the link to our digital (free) library more noticable

    3 – Added section on Western Way Of War in prep for class.

    4 – Integrated Jayman and HBD Chick’s reading list. But didn’t re-allocate it down later in the list)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 13:35:00 UTC

  • (HINT: What I am doing is teaching you how to deflate that form of law, educatio

    (HINT: What I am doing is teaching you how to deflate that form of law, education, and indoctrination we call religion into constituent parts, and therefore give you the vocabulary to discuss it as operations rather than ideals.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 18:09:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071466722392244224

  • I just want to point out that Anglo Christians run away like cowards when challe

    I just want to point out that Anglo Christians run away like cowards when challenged. Russians don’t run. They watch. They correct errors. They listen. They learn. They hold their faith. Why? Because faith is not something to argue like the law. Orthodoxy didn’t malinvest in christianity, because christianity never was the source of Russian corruption of oppression or parasitism. It certainly was in europe. One simply performs christian rituals and learns from them. One does not treat them as logic, law, or science. And one does not cower from the the dissonance between faith, reason, and science.

    Germans are similar in that they all too often cannot conceive of the difference between the moral, good, and true. They straddle the world. However, they are the most ‘correct’ of the civilizations – at least prior to the world wars under which their prussianism was conquered ‘unjustly’.

    So again, the high trust west, lower trust catholics, lower trust orthodox, and lowest trust east asians. A division of labor of the circumpolar peoples. High risk and innovation to low risk and conservation.

    Christianity is weak because christians are weak.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 13:20:00 UTC

  • (HINT: What I am doing is teaching you how to deflate that form of law, educatio

    (HINT: What I am doing is teaching you how to deflate that form of law, education, and indoctrination we call religion into constituent parts, and therefore give you the vocabulary to discuss it as operations rather than ideals.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 13:08:00 UTC

  • HOW TO TEACH BOYS THE RIGHT WAY

    HOW TO TEACH BOYS THE RIGHT WAY

    https://www.facebook.com/HistoryBuzz/videos/785359615144630/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 12:21:00 UTC

  • IS IT POSSIBLE TO ELIMINATE RELIGION? Well yes, but again, it’s not possible to

    IS IT POSSIBLE TO ELIMINATE RELIGION?

    Well yes, but again, it’s not possible to deny that religion did serve as a (very) cheap (simple) universal (available to morons) education (training) in mindfulness (and sacredness – non-consumption ), and in the positive laws (manners, ethics, morals, rituals, traditions) in an era where only the privileged could get an education.

    The only difficult education in that list is mindfulness and stoicism was clearly the best of all methods of mindfulness discovered in both the ancient world and the present (cognitive behavioral therapy).

    The rest is just ordinary education through repetition (ritual) and oath (prayer). There is nothing else other than the act of doing all that repetition and oath in public. There is some advantage and giving that oath to a proxy (ancestor, king, hero, god) rather than to each other – those with whom we have material conflicts.

    That abrahamism and the abrahamic religions are outright evil is not to say that the category of training (education) religions provided is not both beneficial, and very likely, necessary – because it’s as unnatural as reading and math.

    The question is how can we convert the depreciating asset that is our existing religious infrastructure into a new asset that is appreciating, and removes the vulnerability and harm of the past.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 12:19:00 UTC

  • CAN WE ELIMINATE RELIGION? NOT REALLY, BUT THAT REQUIRES WE DEFINE RELIGION AS M

    CAN WE ELIMINATE RELIGION? NOT REALLY, BUT THAT REQUIRES WE DEFINE RELIGION AS MARKET DEMANDS RATHER THAN THE CURRENT MEANS OF PRODUCTION.

    —“However unrealistic of a goal it might be, wouldn’t the ideal situation be a world without organised religion? Or is there some benefit to religion that I’m not seeing?”—Dann Hopkins

    Religion is just education. that’s all. Period. The ‘trick’ of both church and state is to claim church does no education, or that state education is sufficient.

    We need training in physical fitness, mindfulness, manners-ethics-morals-rituals (payments to the commons), the laws, the means of calculating that we think of as the 3R’s, the skills to run a household, and the skills for employment.

    It does not, as it once did, provide for physical fitness.

    It provides mindfulness in the personal, interpersonal, and public spheres of life.

    It provides the some of the manners, ethics, morals rituals that are the positive laws of the social order (not negative laws as is law proper).

    It provides a venue for public contract making (this is my child, this is my promise to the community, this is my mate, this is our property, this person has died and his or her property may be distributed).

    It is, to some degree, a computational necessity – meaning that it is very bad not to have that mindfulness.

    It provides child-level parables and myths which are no less a form of calculation about action in the world than are laws, logic, and mathematics.

    But there is no reason we cannot have lessons, parables and mythos and histories for each class of people at each stage of their lives, all of which contain the same messages.

    There is no reason the church rather than the school, post office, or library is not still the center of civic life, and that government is not relegated to the production and maintenance of material commons, just as we keep commerce out of religion.

    So I think I have most of this figured out – not that I am interested in the content in and of itself, but that I understand how to frame the problem, and restore the incentives, such that the second abrahamic dark age does not capture our people.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 12:04:00 UTC

  • ( Working on writing courses is 10x more enjoyable than working on writing prose

    ( Working on writing courses is 10x more enjoyable than working on writing prose. … Just sayin’. Having a blast. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-07 17:17:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071091423594901505