Civic Duty: Help Identify Right Wing Npc’s https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/civic-duty-help-identify-right-wing-npcs/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:34:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265848910716813313
Theme: Education
-
Civic Duty: Help Identify Right Wing Npc’s
‘”FED!!!” RIGHT WING NPC IDENTIFICATION POSTER’ Therapy can help. Education is useless.
by NJ Gregory: It’s definitely true, we on the right have our own NPCs and they sure do spend an inordinate amount of time calling others “feds”. Imagine if they just used that same time doing something productive like learning or starting a business or something. I wonder what percentage of those accused of being a fed actually are… like maybe: .00000000001%? Reeks of ‘noia.
-
Can We Recreate ‘european Thinking’ and ‘european Sense Making’
Can We Recreate ‘european Thinking’ and ‘european Sense Making’ https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/can-we-recreate-european-thinking-and-european-sense-making/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:09:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265842584917868546
-
Can We Recreate ‘european Thinking’ and ‘european Sense Making’
May 23, 2020, 12:23 PM I dont know how many times I read through the entire Encyclopedia Britannica but I am pretty sure it’s the best general education you can still get. The question is, can we recreate ‘european thinking’ and ‘european sense making’ now that the (((program))) to undermine european thinking and sense making has been as successful using the second abrahamic revolution in deceit as it was in the first abrahamic revolution in deceit.
-
Can We Recreate ‘european Thinking’ and ‘european Sense Making’
May 23, 2020, 12:23 PM I dont know how many times I read through the entire Encyclopedia Britannica but I am pretty sure it’s the best general education you can still get. The question is, can we recreate ‘european thinking’ and ‘european sense making’ now that the (((program))) to undermine european thinking and sense making has been as successful using the second abrahamic revolution in deceit as it was in the first abrahamic revolution in deceit.
-
Education Is a Via Negativa Like Manners, Ethics, Morals, and Self Sufficiency
Education Is a Via Negativa Like Manners, Ethics, Morals, and Self Sufficiency https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/education-is-a-via-negativa-like-manners-ethics-morals-and-self-sufficiency/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:01:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265840593776902145
-
Education Is a Via Negativa Like Manners, Ethics, Morals, and Self Sufficiency
May 26, 2020, 2:05 PM Nonsense. Let me help. You can’t and don’t have a right to education. You have a responsibility to educate your offspring in the defense of others, a responsibility to obtain education in defense of others, and others insure themselves against the harm you or your offspring do by lacking an education, and the moral hazard you place yourself and others into if you fail to educate, obtain and education, and insure others against a lack of education.
-
Education Is a Via Negativa Like Manners, Ethics, Morals, and Self Sufficiency
May 26, 2020, 2:05 PM Nonsense. Let me help. You can’t and don’t have a right to education. You have a responsibility to educate your offspring in the defense of others, a responsibility to obtain education in defense of others, and others insure themselves against the harm you or your offspring do by lacking an education, and the moral hazard you place yourself and others into if you fail to educate, obtain and education, and insure others against a lack of education.
-
No. There Aren’t “Too Many Notes”. 😉
May 26, 2020, 3:05 PM
—“lotta words here”—Greg Allen
what do you think i should say in response to your “lotta words” which is a classic example of “too many notes”.
—“can u just be less gobbledegook and more concise? aren’t you trying to educate ppl?”—Greg Allen
Not everyone can learn economics and calculus, but most can learn the general rules produced by economics and calculus. Similarly, not everyone can learn P-logic since it is a combination of programming, economics, and law, but most people can learn the general rules produced by P-logic and it’s combination of programming, economics, and law. I am trying to educate people who can be educated in a technical discipline like P-logic that is as hard as any other STEM education. I leave teaching the general rules produced by P-logic to those who specialize in it: John Mark and In Truth Victorious Most of P-law (operational logic) makes use of SERIES of fully disambiguated definitions). Those series of definitions are consistent and coherent with other definitions. Those definitions can be used to construct arguments in operational grammar that looks like programming accounting transactions of human actions. Together they produce a precise system of measurement. That system of measurement serves to render commensurable all cognitive, metaphysical-linguistic, psychological and social sciences. In this case, someone asked for the meaning of calculation, and then Brandon Hayes correctly suggested that I complete the explanation by providing the relationship between calculation and decidability. This is a technical question. Most very very smart people take six months to understand P. Others take years. its not all that difficult to understand. It is fairly difficult to DO. Although Martin, Brandon and others will help you if you need it.
-
No. There Aren’t “Too Many Notes”. 😉
May 26, 2020, 3:05 PM
—“lotta words here”—Greg Allen
what do you think i should say in response to your “lotta words” which is a classic example of “too many notes”.
—“can u just be less gobbledegook and more concise? aren’t you trying to educate ppl?”—Greg Allen
Not everyone can learn economics and calculus, but most can learn the general rules produced by economics and calculus. Similarly, not everyone can learn P-logic since it is a combination of programming, economics, and law, but most people can learn the general rules produced by P-logic and it’s combination of programming, economics, and law. I am trying to educate people who can be educated in a technical discipline like P-logic that is as hard as any other STEM education. I leave teaching the general rules produced by P-logic to those who specialize in it: John Mark and In Truth Victorious Most of P-law (operational logic) makes use of SERIES of fully disambiguated definitions). Those series of definitions are consistent and coherent with other definitions. Those definitions can be used to construct arguments in operational grammar that looks like programming accounting transactions of human actions. Together they produce a precise system of measurement. That system of measurement serves to render commensurable all cognitive, metaphysical-linguistic, psychological and social sciences. In this case, someone asked for the meaning of calculation, and then Brandon Hayes correctly suggested that I complete the explanation by providing the relationship between calculation and decidability. This is a technical question. Most very very smart people take six months to understand P. Others take years. its not all that difficult to understand. It is fairly difficult to DO. Although Martin, Brandon and others will help you if you need it.