A Booklist for Women https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/10/31/a-booklist-for-women/
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 22:15:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322663545495035904
A Booklist for Women https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/10/31/a-booklist-for-women/
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 22:15:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322663545495035904
For a female psyche, what sources would you recommend to learn—-in what order?
1) For women the primary difficulties are (a) it has to be useful to you to maintain motivation. The explanatory power is empowering because it makes psychology very simple process of ‘what are you trying to get?” (b) Women have to overcome the true/not vs approval/not problem.
2) So you have to add a step of self-reflection and analysis. Some women love it because it really is a superpower. Some don’t because the true/no vs approval/not dichotomy is impossible for them to overcome (lack of agency).
3) after that the dummies guide really is just something you walk thru and practice. My opinion is that it’s a lot easier than it looks but I’d need to make ‘posters’ for that to work. There are a small number of fixed concepts. But using them together is overwhelming at first.
4) I think for most people if you get reciprocity and property in toto you can get morality down. From there you learn verbal reciprocity (language) which is the epistemology. That’s the same Idea but more complex. Then you learn the grammars which is a simple table of ‘logics’.
5) From there you learn disambiguation by serialization and operationalization. And from there we work through making complete sentences (transactions) in operational language. At that point you get it.
6) Hmm… I never really thought about a reading list for women before. The Male Brain and the Female Brain, both by Louann Brizendine. I might add “the Essential Difference“(male and female brains) by baron-cohen. Most people need to read Economics in One Lesson. To appeal to the female interests Gary becker’s books A Treatise on the Family, or The Economics of Human Behavior. Something by Elenor Ostrom (commons). And maybe Jane Jacobs Economy of Cities and Schumacher’s Small is Beautiful.
7) That’s really what’s needed. That’s it.
For a female psyche, what sources would you recommend to learn—-in what order?
1) For women the primary difficulties are (a) it has to be useful to you to maintain motivation. The explanatory power is empowering because it makes psychology very simple process of ‘what are you trying to get?” (b) Women have to overcome the true/not vs approval/not problem.
2) So you have to add a step of self-reflection and analysis. Some women love it because it really is a superpower. Some don’t because the true/no vs approval/not dichotomy is impossible for them to overcome (lack of agency).
3) after that the dummies guide really is just something you walk thru and practice. My opinion is that it’s a lot easier than it looks but I’d need to make ‘posters’ for that to work. There are a small number of fixed concepts. But using them together is overwhelming at first.
4) I think for most people if you get reciprocity and property in toto you can get morality down. From there you learn verbal reciprocity (language) which is the epistemology. That’s the same Idea but more complex. Then you learn the grammars which is a simple table of ‘logics’.
5) From there you learn disambiguation by serialization and operationalization. And from there we work through making complete sentences (transactions) in operational language. At that point you get it.
6) Hmm… I never really thought about a reading list for women before. The Male Brain and the Female Brain, both by Louann Brizendine. I might add “the Essential Difference“(male and female brains) by baron-cohen. Most people need to read Economics in One Lesson. To appeal to the female interests Gary becker’s books A Treatise on the Family, or The Economics of Human Behavior. Something by Elenor Ostrom (commons). And maybe Jane Jacobs Economy of Cities and Schumacher’s Small is Beautiful.
7) That’s really what’s needed. That’s it.
7) I never really thought about a reading list for women before. That’s really intersting. I might add “the Essential Difference”(male female brains). by baron-cohen. The male Brain and the Female Brain, both by Louann Brizendine.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 22:07:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322661486792216578
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322660561532776448
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TruthQuest11 6) Hmm… most people need to read Economics in One Lesson. Gary becker’s books A Treatise on the Family, or The Economics of Human Behavior. And maybe Jane Jacobs Economy of Cities and Schumacher’s Small is Beautiful. Something by Elenor Ostrom (commons).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322660561532776448
6) Hmm… most people need to read Economics in One Lesson. Gary becker’s books A Treatise on the Family, or The Economics of Human Behavior. And maybe Jane Jacobs Economy of Cities and Schumacher’s Small is Beautiful. Something by Elenor Ostrom (commons).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 22:03:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322660561532776448
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322659116054204417
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TruthQuest11 5) From there you learn disambiguation by serialization and operationalization. And from there we work through making complete sentences (transactions) in operational langauge. At that point you get it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322659116054204417
3) after that the dummies guide really is just something you walk thru and practice. My opinion is that it’s a lot easier than it looks but I’d need to make ‘posters’ for that to work. There are a small number of fixed concepts. But using them together is overwhelming at first.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 21:54:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322658351822610433
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322658006627160065
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TruthQuest11 2) So you have to add a step of self-reflection and analysis. Some women love it because it really is a superpower. Some don’t because the true/no vs approval/not dichotomy is impossible for them to overcome (lack of agency).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322658006627160065
4) I mean, why do we teach people reading, writing arithemetic and anything else, but we no longer teach fitness, and the semites destroyed our method of mindfulness (stoicism, epicureanism, and social harmony).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 17:55:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322597986401243138
Reply addressees: @cbstrohl
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322591949786959877
I keep on trying to teach the pigs to sing. They’re stupid. They don’t want to listen. They won’t even practice, but if we try we might find a few. 😉 So yeah, it’s frustrating. It’s like teaching the slow kids.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-30 19:38:37 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105125427080910297
I keep on trying to teach the pigs to sing. They’re stupid. They don’t want to listen. They won’t even practice, but if we try we might find a few. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-30 18:46:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322248609815998465
Reply addressees: @TQ________
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322248084676554752
This is why you’re a better teacher than I am. lol 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 21:52:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321932886522679301
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @Nationalist7346 @PotsPol @RonNoble7 @ThruTheHayes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321930813043363840