Agreed. Its painful to go through Harvard (and Yale, and Columbia) curriculum and lectures.
It’s not science, it’s not law, and it’s not even philosophy – it’s moral sophistry.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-01 18:54:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345081021113491457
Reply addressees: @DMashak @1776PatHenry
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345080544015609856
(Listening to harvard law jurisprudence class, with college age students, that are all capable (libertarians obviously most capable), but frustrated by the quality of the discussion vs P-law. It’s philosophical in the anglo legal tradition – but ideal positiva.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-31 17:33:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1344698085822394370
… In my life experience we are born intellectually and emotionally mature, but socially immature. And that this is a natural direction of human evolution, just as limiting aggression in exchange for agency was a natural direction of human evolution: greater adaptivity at scale.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-31 15:46:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1344671207942189057
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1344670530293686272
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
… I consider my cost of social development a fair price for the long term rewards of system thinking. So the problem is (a) the equality pretense (b) education as if we are equal in any respect vs a cognitive division of labor (c)political pursuit of that ‘religious’ falsehood.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1344670530293686272
… I consider my cost of social development a fair price for the long term rewards of system thinking. So the problem is (a) the equality pretense (b) education as if we are equal in any respect vs a cognitive division of labor (c)political pursuit of that ‘religious’ falsehood.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-31 15:43:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1344670530293686272
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1344670528901165057
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
… where system thinking is increasingly valuable in mechanical, industrial, technological, as well as judicial, economic, political, military, strategic domains, at the cost of slower social development, with low functioning autism, where it’s a disability in all of life. …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1344670528901165057
While there was a benefit to unifying autistic behaviors under the label ‘autism spectrum disorder’ in that it recognizes a common cause, it was negative in the sense that it conflated the masculine mind, preference for system thinking, decreased awareness of emotional states …
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-31 15:43:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1344670527676362753
No just making a point about the future direction of education.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-27 23:39:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1343340715343028225
Reply addressees: @Mysteryjellocat @WorMartiN @ThruTheHayes @primalpoly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1343340380444643335
Go to college if you’re unattractive, unpleasant, undesirable and uncompetitive. Otherwise, you’re forgoing opportunity for income, experience, debt avoidance, and reproduction.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-27 22:42:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1343326449990819843
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @ThruTheHayes @primalpoly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1343323700863655936
MATH: math is alienating for most because it’s not described operationally (scientifically) when it is in fact a simple discipline with an ever-increasing set of tools for describing constant relations with increasing dimensions of cause, and increasing dimensions of measurement.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-27 19:26:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1343277007153606658
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1343239529910722562
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
MATH: Mathematics consists of a paradigm, vocabulary, grammar, and logic of ordinal names expressed in positional naming; is consistent b/c ordinal-positional names are (a) unique (b) have only one property (order) as ratio; and therefore can describe ALL constant relations.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1343239529910722562
BTW: Love you man. 😉
So Czechia didn’t keep any of the communist holidays? Communists loved holidays almost as much as the Romans. Did you at least get ‘snow days’ from school? (Ukraine has catholic, orthodox, old slavic, and communist holidays. lol)
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-27 02:21:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1343019100864393223
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1343016487393628160
Cheers. BTW: I use visualization aids (illustrations) and even then I find some people can follow through the steps and others cant. I think basic exposure to programming and AI helps a bit.
layers upon layers upon layers
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-26 18:41:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1342903351470678020
Reply addressees: @rothosphere
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1342902496868651010