Theme: Education

  • NLI IQ Capability Table This document is an attempt to illustrate the vulnerabil

    NLI IQ Capability Table

    This document is an attempt to illustrate the vulnerability of the population to deception.


    Source date (UTC): 2026-01-12 01:34:26 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/2010525748134887513

  • Yes. (Though my present interlocutor @ContntofChrchtr happears intellectually ho

    Yes. (Though my present interlocutor
    @ContntofChrchtr
    happears intellectually honest so I will continue to presume so.) No one outside of our organization understands teh level of linguistic analysis we apply, our knowledge of the grammars, of deception, of coercion, or of transfer of group strategy by narrative myth history and tradition. So they are not aware that their sex class cultural, and yes genetic (population) bias is evident in their usage.
    The west has been at the truth before face, testimonial truth, aristotelian reasoning, and particularly our ancestral logic of law a very long time. Thankfully modern science and technology and increasingly economics are predicated on those foundations. So the west achieves through indirection and suggestion what cultures resist by direct transformation.
    This is why I’ve been amazed so much over twenty plus years at the effect of smartphones in mud huts so to speak and world-unification. The only places it is having a hard time is russia where propaganda is ancestral, islam which is anti-modern, and china which it’s policy. Otherwise the world is moving quite nicely – albiet not as fast as our population ratio is diminishing our influence.
    The reality is that most of these cultures cannot integrate unless they are equally or greater neotenous and equally or greater of a genetic distribution whose regression to the mean remains above 105 or so.
    I’ve said forever that I can detect the feminine cognition in ashkenazim even after full integration. And they have a saying for that in russia that is too uncivil for repetition here.
    I am also keenly aware of the cognitive difference in amerindians, particularly north american amerindians (amerasians to be precise). I find them fascinating. I can detect the difference in east asian cognition. And anything MENA is too obvious to discuss. Even after three to four generations.
    But then again, you can tell the moral bias of a european, and from that bias determine what crop his or her ancestors raised.
    So it’s not just genetics, it’s familial transfer.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-12-26 23:39:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004698632696811978

  • 1) Women in the workforce 2) Women in universities consuming largely gut courses

    1) Women in the workforce
    2) Women in universities consuming largely gut courses. Partly to do with the prohibition on IQ and personality tests for admission to jobs, which are trivial costs and produce the same selection process.
    3) Creating debt sufficient to cover a house purchase.
    4) To provide sufficient surplus to tax to pay for elites, to discourage saving, and to create dependency upon redistribution, that is close to bankrupting us because we are not producing sufficient children to pay off the debt.
    5) The increases in mortgage duration raising housing prices and total costs.
    6) Unnecessary concentration of population in cities creating spatial costs (housing) in order to access lower opportunity costs (proximity), made possible by debt both both personal and governmental.
    7) Immigration suppressing entry level and low skill employment that effectively shift lifetime earnings for the natural population downward.
    8) All suppressing the capacity to bear children. ANd while we think the cost of children has increased, it’s not meainingful. the increase has been about 16%. It’s the cost of everything else from housing, mortgages, appliances, cars, to taxes, and now to food and electricity that has increased while real wages (purchasing power) have remained stagnant. 1979 earnings equate to ~$1,039 weekly today—barely enough for one person’s modern living costs, let alone family expenses like child-rearing. To compare affordability, a 2025 family with two median earners (~$39,000 annual each, pre-tax) faces tighter budgets than in 1960, when one earner often sufficed.

    Since 1960, the real (inflation-adjusted) total cost of raising a child to age 17 has increased by about 16% (from ~$202,000 to ~$234,000 in 2015 dollars), but this masks stark shifts across categories. Basic necessities like food and clothing have declined as shares of the total budget due to technological efficiencies, global supply chains, and economies of scale. In contrast, service-oriented categories like child care/education and health care have surged, driven by structural changes (e.g., more dual-income families needing child care, medical inflation) and rising expectations for child outcomes.

    The bit ‘hits’ have been:
    – Health care: +155%
    – Child Care and Education: 1,175%

    We have also passed the ‘solve consumption’ phase of the industrial revolution. We have entered the ‘signaling phase’ as consumption of goods and services has been exhausted even by the poor who have dishwashers and televisions and cars, despite that it makes us unhappy. We have made a future with our present benefits impossible by doing so.

    The net net is that the total economic contribution of women to the work force, on top of spending 70% of household income, and consuming 70% of government services, has resulted in debt provision for education, radical expense inflation for children, destroyed dating, marriage, and the family, while married white men over 35 are the only net contributors to taxation (consume less than they produce).

    We can’t afford women in the workforce at the cost of bearing children because it’s all consumed by taxes and child and healthcare.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-12-24 21:22:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2003939360241340695

  • Any book worth reading today is better understood as a twenty page white paper o

    Any book worth reading today is better understood as a twenty page white paper or series of articles. This allows you to consume far more information about a wider array of subjects in less time.
    I understand that the explanatory power of long text might better suit the ‘average person’ but that rarely if ever applies to anything current, novel, innovative, or revolutionary consumable by those with an existing body of knowledge.
    The amout of ‘fluff’ in all but a few books is absurd and exists exclusively to justify the book price.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-12-20 20:43:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2002479913182605490

  • @SissyJade @patriottakes Sharon (A Karen?); This technique of posting one’s repl

    @SissyJade

    @patriottakes

    Sharon (A Karen?);
    This technique of posting one’s replies assists those who follow you from not missing an argument that may be of use to them.
    You are irrelevant and demonstrating female undermining in lieu of competent argument and as such that’s evidence of why no one asks you to repost your replies.
    There are people who archive my posts for their own future use.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-12-18 21:51:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2001772288799314057

  • @sissyjade @patriottakes Sharon, I am not only a fan of intelligent women, I’ve

    @sissyjade

    @patriottakes

    Sharon,
    I am not only a fan of intelligent women, I’ve dated or married them. The problem is, you are, as a woman, neither educated nor trained, since you are demonstrating one of the most common female cognitive biases which is inverting the true for the preferable.

    You do this because you resist adaptation. You resist adaptation because it would force you to rely on reason instead of instinct and intuition. Your instinct and intuition are female.

    As far as I know I’m the world’s foremost expert in sex differences in cognition applied to deceptive negotiation. You don’t even know you’re engaged in magical thinking.

    The origin of our bias is the instinct to give children time to adapt rather than be ostracized, left behind, or worse.
    You just think it’s reason.
    Its not.
    Mostly it’s the organization of the female brain in favor of in-time empathizing instead of over-time systematizing combined with a healthy dose of oxytocin.
    You would notice a significant change in you upon your third or fourth child, and certainly the more traditional fifth or sixth – at which time the resolution of conflicts between your children would force you into the male systemizing frame of reference.

    Evolution did its work.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-12-18 21:42:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2001770004363301190

  • See: https:// chatgpt.com/share/693c5932 -b4f4-800e-8ae5-eb1f8619cdfa … The firs

    See:
    https://
    chatgpt.com/share/693c5932
    -b4f4-800e-8ae5-eb1f8619cdfa

    The first two answers are what you’re looking for. You can ask it to explain anything that you need help with. (This is one of our organization’s AIs)


    Source date (UTC): 2025-12-12 18:32:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1999548016743596495

  • Your disapproval as substitute for argument is not only evidence of intellectual

    Your disapproval as substitute for argument is not only evidence of intellectual frailty but a falsification of the education you claim. One of the indicators of the feminine mind is the substitution of argument, true or false, with approval or disapproval under the presumption that such approval or disapproval is of worth or merit rather than indicative of incompetence.
    In other words, you merely demonstrate empirically your incompetence and the invalidity of any of your opinions.

    You are not competent nor capable of argumentation – or intellectual honesty for that matter.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-27 17:27:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994095762620477629

  • Every discipline requires terms. Most disciplines increase the specificity of a

    Every discipline requires terms. Most disciplines increase the specificity of a term for their contexts. I cannot define terms in every post. My work spans volumes. And it takes at least six months of following me to be able to understand what I’m doing and what the institute is doing.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-20 16:50:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1991549703251808373

  • College education, outside of STEM, in the age of AI, is just impoverishment, wh

    College education, outside of STEM, in the age of AI, is just impoverishment, when with industrial repatriation, and basic apprenticeship, income is superior, requires no debt, and allows you to escape the education ‘signal game’ that causes you to use income to purchase signal goods instead of intertemporal goods.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-18 18:00:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1990842574291267897