Theme: Education

  • (Fascinating – NLI) Trump is enacting almost every single policy recommendation

    (Fascinating – NLI)
    Trump is enacting almost every single policy recommendation we put forward other than financial sector reform, marriage reform, and education reform. I mean, we’re going to run out of things to complain about at this rate… 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-29 01:26:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884412834186158087

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: THE CHURCH & CHARITY You have an education problem & an NGO pr

    RT @ThruTheHayes: THE CHURCH & CHARITY

    You have an education problem & an NGO problem.

    As in they are both criminal factions waging war a…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-28 15:55:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884269000655515739

  • Agreed. It’s why I’m not in the academy. I’d be fired for what I said, and never

    Agreed. It’s why I’m not in the academy. I’d be fired for what I said, and never given the time to produce the answers I was seeking. I tried to put a dissertation committee together and it wasn’t possible – worse, they perceived it as hostile.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-24 19:32:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882874195954274657

    Reply addressees: @CuriousKonkie

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882873675562803262

  • This subject is becoming your specialty. And you’re addressing it methodological

    This subject is becoming your specialty. And you’re addressing it methodologically and correctly.
    Personally I’m glad that you’ve taken it on. Because it didn’t make me particularly happy working on it – like so many subjects that are the taboos. And martin takes the subject…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-24 19:03:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882866716906254834

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882847627139821568

  • Our org has put a painful degree of hard work into reforming education (as well

    Our org has put a painful degree of hard work into reforming education (as well as other subjects) and it’s fascinating to see that others come to the similar or same conclusions and recommendations.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-23 17:01:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882473727331631235

    Reply addressees: @SRCHicks

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1882455070765355248

  • “I don’t see the public education system adapting fast enough to reshape the fut

    –“I don’t see the public education system adapting fast enough to reshape the future workforce”– A Friend

    Well, you know, it’s been going backward for decades and now we want it to move forward? We need to clean academic house in most fields, and we need to alter incentives for analysis, engineering, and design rather than financialization. And that competition within the states is going to be tough because money is going to keep flying to the states for the foreseeable future.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-21 22:10:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881826790341304320

  • The wisdom is not in the books per se but in knowing which books are nonsense an

    The wisdom is not in the books per se but in knowing which books are nonsense and which are sense. 😉

    Clearly that wisdom has escaped you.

    Reading list.
    https://naturallawinstitute.com/reading-list/


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 19:53:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880342797615833110

    Reply addressees: @EmbitteredThe @OooBardam @nayibbukele

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880303624804528557

  • Again, in most cases, you can paste any of my statements into perplexity to obta

    Again, in most cases, you can paste any of my statements into perplexity to obtain common references – though recursive expansion might be helpful:
    https://www.perplexity.ai/search/1-dysgenic-selection-in-women-Rv_0NvmeRZOE2ZMc3R6E3w

    Or into Chatgpt (which knows much of my work) for explanation even though it prevaricates against postwar… https://t.co/IHMBCmCDoj


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-15 01:43:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879343660405514403

    Reply addressees: @TheSovereignMD @strichtarn @whstancil

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879311527544852651

  • Again, in most cases, you can paste any of my statements into perplexity to obta

    Again, in most cases, you can paste any of my statements into perplexity to obtain common references – though recursive expansion might be helpful:
    https://t.co/byBVk9nRPS

    Or into Chatgpt (which knows much of my work) for explanation even though it prevaricates against postwar ‘political correctness’.
    https://t.co/uPcbrKFre6

    In this case I can’t afford to dump decades of research in a twitter post. That said, you can either wait for us to publish, or start with what I’ve given you, and spend some time with google, Grok, perplexity, and ChatGPT on neotenic selection / domestication syndrome (migration of stem cells from the neural tube). Neotenic selection as the principle direction of all human social and cooperative evolution. Climatological effects on isolation and speciation in favor of neoteny when living in close proximity (indoors). Human self domestication. Relationships between domesticated animals and human self domestication. The relationship between domestication, aggression/impulsivity, agency, and intelligence. Causal relationship between Sex(strength-speed, risk tolerance, responsibility tolerance vs seeking, resulting consumption vs capitalization as mate signaling, and empathizing-verbal-pictoral vs systematizing-spatio-temporal-mechanical), class(genetic load), race(neoteny, class size) differences. And if you really want to get deep, then sex difference in neurological development and resulting brain organization both in utero and post partum. And perhaps most importantly in the female under maturity where the nervous system is expanded to cover children solipsistically.

    However all synthesis of cross disciplinary research in an era of postwar suppression of population differences as a largely progressive-to-marxist-to-feminist counter revolution against eugenics whether sex, class, culture, civilization, or race requires relatively current knowledge. ie: IQ and Conscientiousness by 2000, sex differences by 2012, race differences by 2018.
    This is why we founded the institute outside of the university setting, (it was impossible to put together a dissertation committee, both for the suppression of those areas of research and the challenge of synthesis across disciplines), just as cognitive science had to overcome the pseudoscience of psychology, and just as Perimeter et al had to do their work in physics outside of the academy.

    If you have specific questions that don’t require me to write essays in response I will try to accomodate you.

    (Image below from our presentation on the subject matter.)

    Affections.
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-15 01:43:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879343660107796480

  • GROK IS FREE whenever you can’t understand one of my posts. Curt Doolittle’s pos

    GROK IS FREE whenever you can’t understand one of my posts.

    Curt Doolittle’s post discusses the concept of time preference, which is the preference for immediate rewards over future ones, and how it relates to maintaining societal structures like aristocracy. Time preference influences economic behavior, where a low (long) time preference encourages investment over consumption, crucial for preserving civilizational capital.📷

    The post suggests that aristocracy, with its inherent long-term orientation, naturally promotes a low time preference, which is vital for sustainable economic practices. This contrasts with democratic systems where short-termism might prevail, leading to capital consumption rather than preservation.📷

    Financialization, mentioned as a driver of short-term time preferences, has been criticized for promoting consumption and short-term gains over long-term investment, leading to the erosion of civilizational capital. Curt Doolittle suggests controlling private sector credit expansion as a method to foster longer time preferences.📷


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-13 00:31:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1878600744791928832

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1878595620598153532



    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    How do you maintain low (long) time preference without aristocracy? You must have aristocracy because they will naturally emerge as and evolve an aristocracy with low (long) time preference if lawfulness is preserved vs lawlessness. Without their time preference all polities, and especially democratic polities, will eventually burn capital in favor of consumption, whether by individualism instead of familism, consumerism instead of commons-ism, corruption instead of nationalism. The financialization drove recursive shortening of time preference, and the destruction of civilizational capital. There are many lessons here, but the prohibition on credit expansion in the private sector is the principle means of preventing it, and instead, forcing invsetment in longer time preferences instead of shorter consumer and consumption preferences.

    (Brad and I today.)

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1878595620598153532