Theme: Education

  • Well a BA is a gut degree for the midwits. I was doing electron microscopy at RI

    Well a BA is a gut degree for the midwits. I was doing electron microscopy at RIT at 17.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 02:04:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636549023636004865

    Reply addressees: @MaybeAnnatar @iamzheanna

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636548202173288449

  • There is a good reason a lot of people find my work impenetrable. But if you got

    There is a good reason a lot of people find my work impenetrable. But if you got that far with it. Far enough to come up with that name TDM, then you clearly get it. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-16 03:50:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636213259693879296

    Reply addressees: @AmerLibertyTree

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636212849197432832

  • And worse, they’re followed by GenZ and GenAlpha – the least educated, least kno

    And worse, they’re followed by GenZ and GenAlpha – the least educated, least knowledgeable, least intelligent, least responsible generations in our history. So we’re automating dunces and breeding dunces at the same time. How charming.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 12:08:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635976198382649345

    Reply addressees: @CarlaGericke

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635975014104047616

  • RT @EPoe187: I’m amazed by the volume of smart people who are not only ignorant

    RT @EPoe187: I’m amazed by the volume of smart people who are not only ignorant of the scholarly consensus on IQ gaps, but who also are too…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 12:08:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635976164731678722

  • Democratic bias. I catch the supernerds here. And that’s who I”m looking for. Yo

    Democratic bias.
    I catch the supernerds here.
    And that’s who I”m looking for.
    You’d be surprised how my work spreads through the conservative mind by suggestion repetition and osmosis.
    I sure am.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 23:13:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635781213012082691

    Reply addressees: @GigaThad @LynAldenContact

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635780706147106817

  • Trickle down problem. I answer the hard questions. It’s up to other people to fi

    Trickle down problem.
    I answer the hard questions.
    It’s up to other people to figure out how to communicate them to neurotypicals. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 22:19:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635767687795097607

    Reply addressees: @WALLABEEDON @WhereAmIWrong

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635755585122566152

  • EDUCATING THE PUBLIC AND PRESS: THE FOUR POSTERS NECESSARY FOR THE WALLS OF THE

    EDUCATING THE PUBLIC AND PRESS: THE FOUR POSTERS NECESSARY FOR THE WALLS OF THE WHITEHOUSE PRESS BRIEFING ROOM
    The US DOES have a long term strategy. We just don’t state it, or publish it. The US does have decision criteria for that long term strategy. And the US does practice…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 17:56:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635701344588685313

  • EDUCATING THE PUBLIC AND PRESS: THE FOUR POSTERS NECESSARY FOR THE WALLS OF THE

    EDUCATING THE PUBLIC AND PRESS: THE FOUR POSTERS NECESSARY FOR THE WALLS OF THE WHITEHOUSE PRESS BRIEFING ROOM
    The US DOES have a long term strategy. We just don’t state it, or publish it. The US does have decision criteria for that long term strategy. And the US does practice it.

    So IMO the White House (if not congress as well) should have a bunch of posters on the wall in the press room stating the hierarchy of decisions that drive anglo american policy and behavior. If these were posted on those walls, almost every question asked by the press and public would result in explaining the answer in the context of these four points:

    1) The european group evolutionar strategy of prohibition on authority by the reciprocal insurance of self determination by self determined means (freedom), by sovereignty and reciprocity in demonstrated interest, truth and duty to the commons before self and family, resulting in markets in everything (liberty). This strategy is why the west ‘was faster and more innovated that the rest in the bronze, iron, and steel ages of man’.

    2) The laws (principles) of our rule of law, by the empirical, natural(scientific), common law (negative conflict resolution), concurrent legislation(positive preference selection), and government(houses) as a market for the negotiation of commons between the classes, with the president (monarcy) as a judge of last resort, thereby depriving any and all of authority.

    3) The US postwar global strategy (replace empires with monopoly trade w federations in free trade). The postwar strategy was quite simple: the industrial revolution ended the necessity of territorial warfare when limited by agrarian production. ANd with that necessity ended the utility of empires, and the necessity of empires to suppress the self determination of ethnicities within them. So, given that empires that needed monopoly trade networks and colonization to create those networks were failed projects, and to prevent another world war because of those projects, the USA set about trying to create a smithian market of free trade that put everyone on the same level: as independent states seeking internal improvement of people, economiy, and government. This strategy did succeed in raising most of the world out of ignorance and poverty.
    Now we told teh world democracy was a good – and we lied. Rule of law is a good. Consumer capitalism is a good. But democracy is only a very risky privilege obtained by success at rule of law and consumer capitalism.
    Worse, we allowed the cultural, sex, family, and race marxists to capture liberalism, and while the world loves rule of law, and consumer capitalims, they want nothing of ‘liberal decadence’ that puts individual expression above the necessity of suppressing individual expression in favor of the production of intergenerational families that are willing to keep paying the high cost of continuation of intergenerational families, and the social needs that reinforce them. The world dosen’t reject the west or western values, it rejects the marxist-to-woke values that the west as tolerated without equally suppressing.
    But aside from that failure, we also did not defeat the three remaining empires: china, russia, and iran’s desire to restore the caliphate. Oddly. It’s because westerners were too respectful of human life. And as a consequence the project has failed.

    4) The US domestic economic strategy (keyensian velocity) and immigration to maintain it. In other words, white replacement is an integral part of american economic strategy because velocity, spending, redistribution and intergenerational redistribution force us to NOT reproduce, and in lieu of reproduction need immigration. But since the west has been at this longer than the rest we have run out of westerners to immigration. And lying and denying that (a) it’s not happening or (b) it won’t work – and lying and denying to preserve failed policy.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 17:56:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635701344261623809

  • “THE CRIME OF DISAPPROVAL OUT OF IGNORANCE” I can source all claims. Though it’s

    “THE CRIME OF DISAPPROVAL OUT OF IGNORANCE”
    I can source all claims. Though it’s an extraordinary amount of work. I keep a reading and reference list for that purpose. But I have no reason to do work when there is no evidence that your disapproval is backed by sources and claims. Ergo: if you want to object, you’re welcome to do so with sources and claims, and since you did the work, I can morally respond reciprocally with work myself. Otherwise you’re trying to ‘steal’ my time by false accusation. And because you’re human, and don’t know what you’re doing is coercive and intellectually dishonest, you’ll just make nonsense arguments unless you’re sufficiently informed to hold the discussion. ie: Don’t disapprove of what you can’t argue gainst. Disapproval isn’t argument. If you can’t argue against the matter with substance then you should also understand why you shouldn’t have an opinion on the matter. And you certainly should’t urinate on other’s firehydrants uninvited if you shouldn’t even have an opinion on the matter.

    In matters of truth or falsehood:
    Argument: systematizing (adult, human).
    -vs-
    Approval/Disapproval: empathizing (child, animal)

    It’s not complicated.
    (And no you don’t get a participation trophy either.)

    Reply addressees: @peaches_rhi @anniegread @Gridlad2 @FrailSkeleton


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 15:17:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635661336666308609

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635657174851502083

  • “THE CRIME OF DISAPPROVAL OUT OF IGNORANCE” I can source all claims. Though it’s

    “THE CRIME OF DISAPPROVAL OUT OF IGNORANCE”
    I can source all claims. Though it’s an extraordinary amount of work. I keep a reading and reference list for that purpose. But I have no reason to do work when there is no evidence that your disapproval is backed by sources and claims. Ergo: if you want to object, you’re welcome to do so with sources and claims, and since you did the work, I can morally respond reciprocally with work myself. Otherwise you’re trying to ‘steal’ my time by false accusation. And because you’re human, and don’t know what you’re doing is coercive and intellectually dishonest, you’ll just make nonsense arguments unless you’re sufficiently informed to hold the discussion. ie: Don’t disapprove of what you can’t argue gainst. Disapproval isn’t argument. If you can’t argue against the matter with substance then you should also understand why you shouldn’t have an opinion on the matter. And you certainly should’t urinate on other’s firehydrants uninvited if you shouldn’t even have an opinion on the matter.

    In matters of truth or falsehood:
    Argument: systematizing (adult, human).
    -vs-
    Approval/Disapproval: empathizing (child, animal)

    It’s not complicated.
    (And no you don’t get a participation trophy either.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 15:17:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635661336792162306

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635657174851502083