I call it demonstrated evidence. 😉
I mean. That’s the proper term.
What evidence do we have of your achievements?
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul
Theme: Demonstrated Interests
-
I call it demonstrated evidence. 😉 I mean. That’s the proper term. What evidenc
-
Ability, talent, skill, general knowledge, sex, personality, wants = demonstrate
Ability, talent, skill, general knowledge, sex, personality, wants = demonstrated intelligence. I wouldn’t desire to be a chess master, logician, or mathematician (immaterial, boring), or a doctor (unclean), or politician (popularity). Others would. So: tech, biz, law, acad, war.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-26 14:40:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309865415905095687
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11 @SammySc44817825
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309830871768236032
-
Ability, talent, skill, general knowledge, sex, personality, wants = demonstrate
Ability, talent, skill, general knowledge, sex, personality, wants = demonstrated intelligence. I wouldn’t desire to be a chess master, logician, or mathematician (immaterial, boring), or a doctor (unclean), or politician (popularity). Others would. So: tech, biz, law, acad, war.
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11 @SammySc44817825 -
The problems with educational pseudoscience are not less than: 1) Teaching needs
The problems with educational pseudoscience are not less than:
1) Teaching needs to be professionalized, and as a second career, with demonstrated life experience, demonstrated parenting, and demonstrated success.
2) Teaching needs to convert from instruction to game playing, which means ‘automating’, with teachers serving as referee, and coach not instructor. We must automate education in the sense that it is cheap to produce ‘large scale simulations and games’
3) Developing Harmony under Adversarialism is more important than developing harmony at the cost of adversarialism.
4) Grooming, Dress, and Manners; grammar, vocabulary, and diction; natural law (ethics and morals) and economics, are as important as math and reading. Most of what is taught today is secular religion and it’s a sick religion.
5) IQ and Consciousness are equally influential. As surprising as it may seem, the living environment or education has no impact on general intelligence in adulthood. They only way to improve demonstrated intelligence in the absence of IQ is through general knowledge(IQ), and ritual(conscientiousness). Both general knowledge and ritual produce mindfulness. The optimum mindfulness is epicureanism (joy within your means), stoicism (continuous self-authoring), sport (public positive adversarialism), civic projects (public participatory production of commons), and civic festivals (public participatory holidays). (My favorite example is responsibility for the sidewalk and street in front of your home.)
6) We need to harmonize all knowlege through operationalism and the gramamrs so that we learn all knowledge all action all of the universe is a contiuum of very simple rules. this will ensure that every field is equally accessible to every person, and taht the environment saturates individuals with that knoweldge rather than conflicts with it.
7) History is the skeleton upon which education is crafted with the clay of knowlege..
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-25 10:10:00 UTC
-
(a) You didn’t make a counter-argument, just an accusation. (b) I never err. It’
(a) You didn’t make a counter-argument, just an accusation.
(b) I never err. It’s my job to compensate for the rest of you.
If I said it. It’s true. I’m right. It is. Sorry.
Demonstrate otherwise. 😉
Reply addressees: @BoiledFries -
(a) You didn’t make a counter-argument, just an accusation. (b) I never err. It’
(a) You didn’t make a counter-argument, just an accusation.
(b) I never err. It’s my job to compensate for the rest of you.
If I said it. It’s true. I’m right. It is. Sorry.
Demonstrate otherwise. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-04 00:28:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1301678563276578821
Reply addressees: @BoiledFries
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1301668642958880768
-
“Q: Can you explain capitalism in a single line?”— Rule of Law by the Natural
—“Q: Can you explain capitalism in a single line?”—
Rule of Law by the Natural Law Requiring Reciprocity in Demonstrated Interests in display, word, and deed will produce moral markets free of externality, and the Arbitrary Rule By Law against Material interests will produce immoral markets full of irreciprocity and externality we call ‘capitalism’.
In other words, Just as Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity is more important than the method of government under it, Rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity is more important than the economic model under it.
The capitalism vs socialism debate was a cunning deception to circumvent rule of law vs arbitrary rule that made the debate even possible.
We were ok constraining the aristocracy from arbitrary rule. We created a system of government to constrain the republic from arbitrary rule.
We expanded the franchse AND abandoned arbitrary rule.
Then we licenced the industrialization of free riding, lying, defamation, propaganda, false promise, and baiting into hazard.
Natural Law = Empirical Law. Empirical Law = Empirical Govermnet. Empirical Government depends on Empirical Speech.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-24 23:58:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104747074756443861
-
(Agreed. We made the same observation back in 2013. Unfortunately, each right fa
(Agreed. We made the same observation back in 2013. Unfortunately, each right faction wants a Trump that will likewise fail. The only solution is recruiting someone with demonstrated ability already. That’s either Trump, Carlson a General, and conservative commentariat backing.)
Reply addressees: @couragemylads @jamesfoxhiggins -
(Agreed. We made the same observation back in 2013. Unfortunately, each right fa
(Agreed. We made the same observation back in 2013. Unfortunately, each right faction wants a Trump that will likewise fail. The only solution is recruiting someone with demonstrated ability already. That’s either Trump, Carlson a General, and conservative commentariat backing.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-08 15:26:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292119904309706753
Reply addressees: @couragemylads @jamesfoxhiggins
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1291998537857802241
-
5) All sciences EVOVLED from law: the law of tort (property), by demonstrated in
5) All sciences EVOVLED from law: the law of tort (property), by demonstrated interests of the individual regardless of rank, before the judge and jury. That’s why only europeans developed science.
Because we’re the only people of natural law.
Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11