Theme: Demonstrated Interests

  • The question you ask matters. πŸ˜‰ –“Explain the demonstrated interests in the st

    The question you ask matters. πŸ˜‰

    –“Explain the demonstrated interests in the style of curt doolittle”–

    Curt Doolittle is a well-known American philosopher and political theorist who has been active in the fields of economics, law, and political science. Doolittle’s work is primarily focused on the advancement of Propertarianism, which is a political philosophy centered around the protection of individual property rights.

    Some of Doolittle’s demonstrated interests include:

    Propertarianism: As mentioned, Doolittle’s primary interest is in Propertarianism, which he views as a natural evolution of classical liberalism. Propertarianism emphasizes the protection of property rights as the fundamental basis of all human interactions, including social, economic, and political relations. In his view, property rights are not only necessary for individual freedom but also for the preservation of civilization itself.

    Evolutionary biology: Doolittle’s work is heavily influenced by evolutionary biology, which he believes provides a comprehensive understanding of human nature and behavior. He argues that humans are naturally inclined towards certain behaviors, such as the desire to acquire and protect property, and that these behaviors have evolved over time through natural selection.

    Game theory: Doolittle also incorporates game theory into his work, using it to explain how individuals interact in social and economic systems. He believes that game theory can help to explain why certain behaviors, such as cooperation or conflict, are more prevalent in different situations.

    Legal systems: Doolittle has also explored the relationship between property rights and legal systems, arguing that a strong legal system is necessary to protect individual property rights. He has advocated for a legal system that is based on the principle of restitution, where individuals are held accountable for the harm they cause to others and are required to compensate them for any damage they cause.

    Overall, Doolittle’s work is characterized by a strong emphasis on property rights, individual freedom, and the importance of legal systems in protecting these values. His approach is interdisciplinary, drawing on insights from fields such as evolutionary biology and game theory to explain human behavior and social systems.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 18:40:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641148247149256704

  • The question you ask matters. πŸ˜‰ –“Explain the demonstrated interests in the st

    The question you ask matters. πŸ˜‰

    –“Explain the demonstrated interests in the style of curt doolittle”–

    Curt Doolittle is a well-known American philosopher and political theorist who has been active in the fields of economics, law, and political science. Doolittle’s work is primarily focused on the advancement of Propertarianism, which is a political philosophy centered around the protection of individual property rights.

    Some of Doolittle’s demonstrated interests include:

    Propertarianism: As mentioned, Doolittle’s primary interest is in Propertarianism, which he views as a natural evolution of classical liberalism. Propertarianism emphasizes the protection of property rights as the fundamental basis of all human interactions, including social, economic, and political relations. In his view, property rights are not only necessary for individual freedom but also for the preservation of civilization itself.

    Evolutionary biology: Doolittle’s work is heavily influenced by evolutionary biology, which he believes provides a comprehensive understanding of human nature and behavior. He argues that humans are naturally inclined towards certain behaviors, such as the desire to acquire and protect property, and that these behaviors have evolved over time through natural selection.

    Game theory: Doolittle also incorporates game theory into his work, using it to explain how individuals interact in social and economic systems. He believes that game theory can help to explain why certain behaviors, such as cooperation or conflict, are more prevalent in different situations.

    Legal systems: Doolittle has also explored the relationship between property rights and legal systems, arguing that a strong legal system is necessary to protect individual property rights. He has advocated for a legal system that is based on the principle of restitution, where individuals are held accountable for the harm they cause to others and are required to compensate them for any damage they cause.

    Overall, Doolittle’s work is characterized by a strong emphasis on property rights, individual freedom, and the importance of legal systems in protecting these values. His approach is interdisciplinary, drawing on insights from fields such as evolutionary biology and game theory to explain human behavior and social systems.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 18:40:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641148247405101073

  • FWIW: I use demonstrated interest hierarchy instead of the economic production h

    FWIW: I use demonstrated interest hierarchy instead of the economic production hierarchy. This allows us to enumerate all capital and account for all capital.
    However, we might more usefully add a second dimension, so that we see production cycles (production hierarchy), and get a 2D grid of demonstrated interset capital vs production hierarchy, and that would probably be the most informative ‘map’ of capital we could ever want.

    Reply addressees: @ContraFabianist @WalterIII


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 15:03:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641093646882684928

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640948096933986304

  • FWIW: I use demonstrated interest hierarchy instead of the economic production h

    FWIW: I use demonstrated interest hierarchy instead of the economic production hierarchy. This allows us to enumerate all capital and account for all capital.
    However, we might more usefully add a second dimension, so that we see production cycles (production hierarchy), and get a 2D grid of demonstrated interset capital vs production hierarchy, and that would probably be the most informative ‘map’ of capital we could ever want.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 15:03:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641093646953979905

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640948096933986304

  • A thing is not defined by what you claim it consists of but what it demonstrably

    A thing is not defined by what you claim it consists of but what it demonstrably consists of. WOKE as a movement is just the race-marxist movement. And we know that because like abrahamic religions, the marxist sequence, including race-marxism, use the same techniques to seek the same ends: social construction of a criticism claiming intent and psychology when it’s a physical attribute of the existential universe. (tho that’s probably over your head)

    Reply addressees: @DiogenesLamp0 @moreywrites @bethanyshondark


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 14:03:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641078741311844353

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637253559308759040

  • A thing is not defined by what you claim it consists of but what it demonstrably

    A thing is not defined by what you claim it consists of but what it demonstrably consists of. WOKE as a movement is just the race-marxist movement. And we know that because like abrahamic religions, the marxist sequence, including race-marxism, use the same techniques to seek the same ends: social construction of a criticism claiming intent and psychology when it’s a physical attribute of the existential universe. (tho that’s probably over your head)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 14:03:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641078741408399362

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637253559308759040

  • You could have tried to put together an argument. Or you could have asked a ques

    You could have tried to put together an argument. Or you could have asked a question if you didn’t understand. Instead you didn’t argue, didn’t ask a question, and didn’t demonstrate you even vaguely comprehended what I said – when it’s a common consensus that it’s rather challenging to understand even some of what I say without a vast corpus of knowledge from nearly all disciplines?

    You virtue signaled virtue you don’t have.

    Reply addressees: @Flashman186


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:07:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636066641254465540

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636065446012289031

  • You could have tried to put together an argument. Or you could have asked a ques

    You could have tried to put together an argument. Or you could have asked a question if you didn’t understand. Instead you didn’t argue, didn’t ask a question, and didn’t demonstrate you even vaguely comprehended what I said – when it’s a common consensus that it’s rather challenging to understand even some of what I say without a vast corpus of knowledge from nearly all disciplines?

    You virtue signaled virtue you don’t have.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:07:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636066641392852993

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636065446012289031

  • Women always act in their self-interest and have no problem with logical consist

    Women always act in their self-interest and have no problem with logical consistency, because they presume they have special rights and privileges by their nature. I don’t expect anything to change unless they spend a couple of centuries under self rule and re-learn what it…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 21:17:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635389645612515331

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635388345814765568

  • WHAT IS P-LAW (Or P-Logic, P-Method or P for short)? Sequence: – Demonstrated In

    WHAT IS P-LAW
    (Or P-Logic, P-Method or P for short)?

    Sequence:
    – Demonstrated Interest (cost born to acquire, preserve, defend, consume, some control of some form of capital (something useful))
    – Property (universal commensurability of demonstrated interest: basically a shorthand people understand because of the long history of law.)
    – Propertarian (one who uses property as a system of weights and meaures providing universal commensurability of human cooperation conflict)
    – Propertarianism (formal logic of cooperation using universal commensurability)
    – Propertarian Natural Law (Universally commensurable natural law of decidability, applied to cooperation, ethics, morality, politics, economics)
    – PvsNP (logical question of whether justification vs falsification is possible in time) (nerd stuff. Ignore it)
    – P-Law, P-Logic, P-Method (Shorthand for the method, the logic that results and the law that results from the logic.)
    – P for short (very-shorthand for the whole system)

    See?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 15:55:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634946284330139649

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634942167453151232