Theme: Decidability

  • TERNARY TRUTH TABLE (IMPORTANT) Incoherent, Testifiable, Untestifiable(F) Undeci

    TERNARY TRUTH TABLE (IMPORTANT)
    Incoherent, Testifiable, Untestifiable(F)
    Undecidable, Possible, Impossible(F)
    Undecidable, Contingent, Inconsistent(F)
    Contingent, Sufficient, Insufficient(F)
    Sufficient(T), Complete(T), Tautological(F)

    Center column = Truth Hierarchy


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-19 15:23:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351550891703283713

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351549566273859586


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthQuest11 1. It’s not set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference, but operation(real, operational) logic of possibility. Ergo

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1351549566273859586

  • The Simplicity of the Langauge of Mathematics

    1 – All stimulation begins with sequences of pulses. That’s all nerves and neurons do – measurements of relations. – predicting fragments (of potential referents) 2 – All sequences of pulses produce relations – measurements of relations. = predicting components of objects (potential referents) 3 – All sequences of relations produce spaces, objects, and boundaries – measurements of relations. – predicting the objects (referents) 4 – All bodily actions on spaces, objects, or boundaries require measurements – of relations (possible actions) 5 – All language consists of sets of measurements of constant, contingent, and non-relations between measurements. (it must) 6 – The language of Mathematics consists of the language of commensurability between measurements of constant relations. 7 – The mathematical disciplines consist of systems of measurement for increasingly complex relations (Dimensions) 8 – Statistics is the beginning of the recursive loop the cycle of commensurability of references. 9 – This is why n-body particles (waves) in physics are calculated probabilistically (by quanta). 10 – The limit of mathematics is smaller than the limit of computability (permutation) (some descriptions are constructible, but not predictable, nor deducible.) 11 – Mathematics is the scale-independent, referent independent, language of commensurability between inter-dependent referents in constant relation. 12 – Unfortunately the intuitionistic program failed to reform mathematics into a science (operationalized). 13 – Unfortunately Babbage’s revolution failed, and Cantor, Bohr, and less so Einstien re=platonized mathematics, and math was built on sets (platonic) not operations (scientific). The structure of all language, and of the sub-language of mathematics can be put on a poster just like the periodic table. The archaic terminology replaced with operational terminology and children would find it much easier to learn. Math ‘works’ for constant relations (the physical world) less so for the economic world, and less so for the sentient world, because it’s dead simple. It has one property. “Order in the Sequence”, and every name in the sequence has a unique positional name, so the language of mathematics is closed to conflation, making it an ideal language for measurement. And because it is reference independent, it provides commensurability between referents, and because it is scale-independent it provides scale-independent, arbitrary precision. Math is a very simple thing. A stupid simple thing. it’s not the language of math itself that’s complicated. It’s that deducing increasingly complex measurements with that language is increasingly difficult unless you can learn to imagine mathematical structures in your mind by repetition.

  • The Simplicity of the Langauge of Mathematics

    1 – All stimulation begins with sequences of pulses. That’s all nerves and neurons do – measurements of relations. – predicting fragments (of potential referents) 2 – All sequences of pulses produce relations – measurements of relations. = predicting components of objects (potential referents) 3 – All sequences of relations produce spaces, objects, and boundaries – measurements of relations. – predicting the objects (referents) 4 – All bodily actions on spaces, objects, or boundaries require measurements – of relations (possible actions) 5 – All language consists of sets of measurements of constant, contingent, and non-relations between measurements. (it must) 6 – The language of Mathematics consists of the language of commensurability between measurements of constant relations. 7 – The mathematical disciplines consist of systems of measurement for increasingly complex relations (Dimensions) 8 – Statistics is the beginning of the recursive loop the cycle of commensurability of references. 9 – This is why n-body particles (waves) in physics are calculated probabilistically (by quanta). 10 – The limit of mathematics is smaller than the limit of computability (permutation) (some descriptions are constructible, but not predictable, nor deducible.) 11 – Mathematics is the scale-independent, referent independent, language of commensurability between inter-dependent referents in constant relation. 12 – Unfortunately the intuitionistic program failed to reform mathematics into a science (operationalized). 13 – Unfortunately Babbage’s revolution failed, and Cantor, Bohr, and less so Einstien re=platonized mathematics, and math was built on sets (platonic) not operations (scientific). The structure of all language, and of the sub-language of mathematics can be put on a poster just like the periodic table. The archaic terminology replaced with operational terminology and children would find it much easier to learn. Math ‘works’ for constant relations (the physical world) less so for the economic world, and less so for the sentient world, because it’s dead simple. It has one property. “Order in the Sequence”, and every name in the sequence has a unique positional name, so the language of mathematics is closed to conflation, making it an ideal language for measurement. And because it is reference independent, it provides commensurability between referents, and because it is scale-independent it provides scale-independent, arbitrary precision. Math is a very simple thing. A stupid simple thing. it’s not the language of math itself that’s complicated. It’s that deducing increasingly complex measurements with that language is increasingly difficult unless you can learn to imagine mathematical structures in your mind by repetition.

  • Q: “Under P-law, if the legislature does pass a law (that’s undecidable) but tha

    Q: “Under P-law, if the legislature does pass a law (that’s undecidable) but that is unconstitutional, the judicial system would be able to review it and return it to Congress. Is that correct?”-@TruthQuest11

    UK Lords ~= supreme court.
    USA no equivalent.
    We add court assent. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1350982485866381313

  • Jurisprudence by the Natural Law of Reciprocity is as regular, predictable, and

    Jurisprudence by the Natural Law of Reciprocity is as regular, predictable, and decidable as mathematics, and disambiguates Judiciary from Legislature.

    So case are decidable or not, and if not, they are matters for the legislature.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-17 17:44:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1350861609489608706

  • Unlike jewish intellectuals in their tradition I cannot criticize Fukuyama for p

    Unlike jewish intellectuals in their tradition I cannot criticize Fukuyama for pseudoscience or sophistry – only for failing to identify the criteria for decidability in politics isn’t


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-12 20:32:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349092008485388289

  • Secondly, so the difference is between internal consistency within and coherence

    Secondly, so the difference is between internal consistency within and coherence across. Technically we can argue under p that they are the same. But coherence provides for adversarialism between dimensions.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-12 19:04:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349069640522199040

    Reply addressees: @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349061180648779777


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @WorMartiN Logic = constant relations = test of internal consistency = falsification. I think us see where we’ve been disconnecting now. Foundations of the grammars. Need a white board to go over it with you.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1349061180648779777

  • I intended it as a complete list, and that say, a logical question must adhere o

    I intended it as a complete list, and that say, a logical question must adhere only to logical constraints and so on. But a court needs a complete list.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-10 20:28:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1348366131967483904

    Reply addressees: @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1348365660078956545

  • In P-Law we use ternary logic of decidability, not binary law of inference. So t

    In P-Law we use ternary logic of decidability, not binary law of inference. So to True/False and Yea/Nay we add “Undecidable”. Ergo in the case of judicial interpretation of legislation, the judge(s) can issue opinion(s) and return to the legislature for decision (clarification).


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-08 18:23:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1347609776029622276

  • P law focuses on Natural Law, Constitutional construction and Legislative constr

    P law focuses on Natural Law, Constitutional construction and Legislative construction and Jurisprudence (decidability). It is a technical discipline. And most importantly it solves the ancient question of truthful speech.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-08 03:55:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1347391440285032448