1. Ternary logic
2. Evolutionary Computation
3. Continuous recursive disambiguation
4. Disambiguation by enumeration serialization and operationalization
5. Operational Grammar
6. The Grammars
7. Acquisition, Demonstrated Interest, Reciprocity, Testimony.
8. Trifunctionalism.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-15 17:49:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1449069949243297803
The same applies to the doubling of the layers of the brain from three devoted to physical organization, to six enabling abstract organization. The adaptive returns on that doubling is as high or higher than all other ‘doublings’. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1447901795955744769
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-12 12:30:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1447902459104485380
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1447901795955744769
Ian McGilchrist irritates me with his woo. The divided brain is necessary for a bilateral life form to reach a state of decidability. Yes, he’s trying to make a point, then scale it to the problem of modernity’s psychological alienation. He’s not wrong. He just crosses the line.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-12 12:25:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1447901110480642055
A principal value of Mathematics is its scale independence. This means a general rule can scale. A principle value of P-Law is its scale independence. In other words, the first principle of the ternary logic of evolutionary computation scales infinitely.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-10 14:24:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1447206508584898569
This is a wonderful extension of the caution that all factions on the right tend to devolve into personality cults, because they have no other means of decidability. The P-Method is just science. It’s not man-dependent. It’s just science.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-09 18:49:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446910790511075330
Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446910155451506696
This isn’t worth my time. I stay out of the vaxx discussion on purpose because the science is not clear enough to make a judicial argument. Ergo the problem is choice. The herd people are afraid of those who choose differently. Violates social proof. You can’t change them.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-09 03:32:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446679904343445506
Reply addressees: @hoeberian @VeritateIn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446679531167825927
The vaccine question isn’t decidable. Period.
There is false information in both directions.
The question is only which risk do you take.
The majority of people dont’ want to and can’t choose.
So herd-people serve herd-people, by choosing for them.
Collectivist vs Individualist.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-09 03:28:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446679042799906816
Reply addressees: @hoeberian @VeritateIn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446678465407823872
That’s intellectually dishonest.
There is a case to be made for the vaccine.
There is a case to be made against it.
It’s undecidable.
So the solution is choice.
Violation of choice is political.
Some cog biases favor the herd.
They follow their instinct just like you do.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-09 03:13:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446675063927971840
Reply addressees: @hoeberian @VeritateIn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446671758321459200
No I’m the first person to complete the formal logic of decidability across all contexts, meaning that we can test for the reciprocity in display word(Truth) and deed in court. Bentham’s vision. Just was far harder than even Hayek imagined. No more Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin …
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-08 00:33:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446272613425221645
Reply addressees: @freeulysses_tj @woodruffbets
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446270425265229828
@alternative_right Correct answer. ALso, definition of ‘law’. I disambiguate “the law”, findings of the law (court), legislation, regulation, policies, and commands. IOW: natural law rules, and that is the only possible meaning of rule of law.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-07 17:14:04 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107061368847181317