RT @bryanbrey: He’s not a cryptobro, nor a macroguy… but he’s one of best Natural Law guys who science decidability and cooperation. He e…
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-26 22:00:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1783979458778599601
Theme: Decidability
-
Again, the illustration defines dumizel’s conception, and his primary insight wa
Again, the illustration defines dumizel’s conception, and his primary insight was the decidability market produced between the three elites: judges, magicians, and priests and that these, like the rule of law, limit the aristocracy.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 22:41:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782177978203492799
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782175684007190915
-
Logic: Undecidable > Possibly True > False Physics: Entropy + Negative entropy =
Logic: Undecidable > Possibly True > False
Physics: Entropy + Negative entropy = Mass
(-) + (+) = (=) stable relation (persistence)
Charge:
……..(=)…….
…../………\….
(-)………….(+)
..or collapse
Behavior:
………..Neutral
………Reciprocity
………./……………\
Feminine ….. Masculine
Seduction……Force
Parasitism….. Predation
Care……………..Defense
Classes:
…….Middle
……/………..\
Lower…..Upper
Institutions:
…………..Law……….
……./………………..\
Religion ……… StateReply addressees: @jhnnminow
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-16 02:56:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1780067732865601536
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1780064471433859300
-
You are correct. In fact the last century has taken the study of probability (co
You are correct. In fact the last century has taken the study of probability (continuousness) such that they no longer model a physical (discreet) reality, and therefore prevent themselves from developing a theory that completes the project of physics. IMU (in my understanding), we know about everything we need to know to unify physics, and it turns out to be much more simple than expected. The universe is discreet. Not continuous.
Reply addressees: @Airmanareiks
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-15 20:38:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779972705590095873
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779948445341773909
-
Gary, I’ve worked on this problem longer than anyone else, and there is an ‘algo
Gary, I’ve worked on this problem longer than anyone else, and there is an ‘algorithm’ for ethics, morality (reciprocity) that is always decidable. And it’s not even that complicated. It’s just lagging because like science being falsificationary, logic being falsificationary,…
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-12 20:17:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778880191600689563
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778770765053374842
-
It is impenetrable because it uses 1) Continuous recursive disambiguation of ter
It is impenetrable because it uses
1) Continuous recursive disambiguation of terms by enumeration, operationalism, adversarialism, and serialization into a system of unambiguous measurement of any concept into one or more causal relations.
2) Promissory, Operational, language, absent the verb to-be, as complete transactions, in complete sentences.
3) Constructed from the ternary logic of evolutionary computation (the first cause), into the first principles (laws of nature) at each scale of emergent combinations (disciplines).
There is more, but in general, math is just the most reductive deflationary language, and ordinary language is an efficient one, while storytelling ( loading, framing, obscuring), fictions, the fictionalisms, evasion, denial, projection, accusation, undermining, sedition, treason and warefare are inflationary, conflationary, deceptive, and evasive.
I have employed the largest group of library science people I know of, worked with one of the largest organizations in the world on their analysis, and myself worked in early AI, as well as my own work in computational linguistics.
What I learned most from, was anti-social behavior, lying, fraud, fictionalisms, and evasion – particularly sex differences in lying.
There is more information there in the via-negativa than there was in all the efforts at rationalizing language.
And the new LLMs are merely proving the point every single day now.
Morality is just physics over time.Reply addressees: @privacyfocused @Y_I_K_ES @GaryMarcus
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 18:52:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776321950979063808
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776316562636677544
-
YES MORALITY IS DECIDABLE AND COMPUTABLE No. That would imply we all obey the sa
YES MORALITY IS DECIDABLE AND COMPUTABLE
No. That would imply we all obey the same rules, even though individual demand for terms of cooperation (what each person intuits is moral in his case) is universal rather than a reflection of his or her genetics, reproductive and cooperative value to others, and that races, ethnicities, states, and civilizations were equal in geographic, resource, and demographic composition, as well as threats from competitors.
I only said we can provide decidability into whether a conflict would be created by an act of irreciprocity.
I know that this is a complex issue that requires quite a bit of knowledge and some strict definition of terms. But yes, it is possible to measure whether an interaction consists of irreciprocal or reciprocal acts – and it’s not all that hard. In fact we have categorized over 130 questions. And we cannot find any moral question that is not decidable – even between groups.
That this is possible should be obvious given (a) the convergence of the sciences (b) the convergence of law (c) the convergence of economics.
I mean. the common law means ‘what we have found in common’. It’s the empirical evidence of what commonalities are found between different tribes and nations.
That decidability in those courts is reducible to tort (trespass). Cataloguing civilizational differences wasn’t even that difficult. The reason being there is a simple law of bias in three directions that all civilizations must choose in a priority. The the degree of homogeneity determines the completeness. Then the degree of development determines the flexibility to migrate toward individual choice and away from collective.
CheersReply addressees: @Y_I_K_ES @GaryMarcus
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 16:49:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776291180864536576
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776288209070116961
-
RT @ContraFabianist: Human rights elevate the individual as the primary unit of
RT @ContraFabianist: Human rights elevate the individual as the primary unit of moral decidability. By elevating the individual, the human…
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 15:34:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776272266939998709
-
FWIW: Bias is a tendency, inclination, or prejudice toward or against something
FWIW: Bias is a tendency, inclination, or prejudice toward or against something providing terms of decidability in a context. Thats all. All four are biases because there are alternative biases not demonstrated, but frequently demonstrated by others. A postmodernist might conflate preference with bias but that would conflate the good with he true – which is a cognitively feminine and as such left wing cognitive bias thats always false in questions of truth.
Reply addressees: @CherryCreekDez @whatifalthist @done_with_fish
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-04 02:14:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775708563924504576
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775703958696149025
-
Geoffrey, (all); I think you’re moving the goalpost of the original intent of th
Geoffrey, (all); I think you’re moving the goalpost of the original intent of the authors of he fallacy. The question is whether the person using the appeal is providing a suggestion that should be considered, or whether that person is claiming such an appeal provides decidability (must). If the latter it’s an appeal to authority.
That said your disambiguation of expertise from authority is excellent.
This category of question is common in philosophy, with the most famous being ‘free will’, whose authors were demonstrating that humans have the agency to take responsibility for the morality of their words and deeds.
It says nothing about the limits of human cognitive agency.
Cheers. 😉Reply addressees: @primalpoly
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-31 12:57:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774420642437156864
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774167932072796470