Theme: Crisis

  • “Shoigu, the Russian Minister of Stolen Toilets . . .”– Operator Starsky. (glad

    —“Shoigu, the Russian Minister of Stolen Toilets . . .”– Operator Starsky.

    (glad we can still find some humor in this tragedy.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-15 23:35:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691594492590076365

  • OVERSUPPLY OF IGNORANCE BY INDUSTRIALIZATION OF DEFECT. 😉 Um…. There is curre

    OVERSUPPLY OF IGNORANCE BY INDUSTRIALIZATION OF DEFECT. 😉
    Um…. There is currently an oversupply problem caused by the failure of quality control on 20th-century knowledge in the behavioral sciences and the liberal arts, exacerbated by mass production by the academy, media,… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1691557297183432818


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-15 22:22:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691576079465566696

  • Exactly. Kind of my point really. The question is whether we allow it to continu

    Exactly. Kind of my point really. The question is whether we allow it to continue to decay with the continued false promise of the leftist cult, or whether whether we fall by accident of incompetence to correct the course (once again), or by intent to correct the course to reform…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 20:47:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691189950258069504

    Reply addressees: @Kaspa49 @tysonmaly

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691156241215594497

  • THE OPTIONS FOR CONSERVATIVES ARE NARROW FOR OBVIOUS REASONS In the past I’ve sa

    THE OPTIONS FOR CONSERVATIVES ARE NARROW FOR OBVIOUS REASONS

    In the past I’ve said, ‘Conservatives have nothing to sell, only a necessity of defense”, because progressives sell irresponsibility (discount) and conservatives sell responsibility (cost), and since most people have a higher-shorter time preference, they will favor the progressive consumption now, at the cost of conservative capitalization and its benefits later.

    This is why you can’t solve the problem of ‘selling’ conservatism unless there is a catastrophic collapse from the accumulated consumption of capital instead of continued production of it. (particularly because of the distorting effects of the overproduction of elites and the overconcentration of capital through rent seeking.

    Ergo, there are two criteria for reform: either seize the opportunity of a collapse event, or create the opportunity for power assertion. The optimum is to use both simultaneously. And that looks like what is happening.

    Progressive = hyperconsumption (herd, female)
    Conservative = hypercapitalization (tribe, male)

    These are the correct terms. Because they describe the sortition of political bias into their biological (and physical) origins.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 15:22:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691107998515560450

  • IN EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT, BEING FIRST DOESN’T MATTER – ONLY BEING FASTEST. (W

    IN EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT, BEING FIRST DOESN’T MATTER – ONLY BEING FASTEST.

    (Why is MENA so far behind since 1000ad?)
    RE: Egypt.
    But they stagnated for thousands of years, and once they encountered the sea people (Europeans), they never recovered.

    It doesn’t matter who is…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 14:40:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691097455092289536

    Reply addressees: @WernerVonBurner @Dosadian @chedetofficial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691093502187446272

  • IN EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT, BEING FIRST DOESN’T MATTER – ONLY BEING FASTEST. (W

    IN EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT, BEING FIRST DOESN’T MATTER – ONLY BEING FASTEST.

    (Why is MENA so far behind since 1000ad?)
    RE: Egypt.
    But they stagnated for thousands of years, and once they encountered the sea people (Europeans), they never recovered.

    It doesn’t matter who is first. It matters only who is the fastest. Anyone can stumble on a technology, but the measure of a society, polity, or civilization is its application to evolutionary velocity – not its discovery.

    This is the least intuitive and most important evolutionary law that is most difficult to teach people today, precisely because of the many traditions we have of ‘being first’ because ‘being first’ is a contribution of innovation to the commons.

    However, the rate at which one can recursively innovate, adapt and evolve the commons determines the impact of the discovery or innovation, and who was first is largely irrelevant.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 14:40:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691097454987378689

  • 1) That’s because China and Europe went through the ‘warring states’ period of c

    1) That’s because China and Europe went through the ‘warring states’ period of civilizational consolidation thousands of years apart – and Islamic civilization is just going through it now.

    2) It’s also because the conflict between the spread of the curse of Abrahamic religions and the resulting regressive ignorance, superstition, and authoritarianism, versus the rise of modernity in Europe – and Islam is just beginning that transition.

    3) It’s also because (a) in an otherwise tedious consistency of life, wars are the only noticeable occurrences (b) europeans were pervasively literate during our ‘warring states’ period of development. (c) europeans alone solved the problem of government, and the problem of government involves the acts of government – including war.

    4) It’s also because Europe’s rapid technical innovation is due to the pressures created by the use of technology to defeat the southern authoritarian Abrahamic vs the northern germanic libertarian instead of religion, ideology, or population size – because europeans are the produce of the west indo european expansion who united horse, bronze, and wheel and by accident invented good government because of it AND the objective, empirical and finally scientific mind.

    5T there is no comparison between the number, and constancy wars of MENA, vs the other civilizations of Europe, China, and India, especially India’s natural peace, and europe’s great pax-romania, and pax-americana for the simple reason that MENA is at the axis of four continents, and four races with the agrarian revolution beginning in the levant anatolia and Mesopotamia, and being conquered by wave after wave of barbarians each of whom replaced the previous generation of barbarians – and unfortunately cost the world the Persians and NW Indians.

    6) There is no comparison between the Muslim destruction of the great civilizations of the ancient world and the reduction of them to ashes: north African, Egyptian, Levantine, Anatolian, Mesopotamian, Persian (3 times), northwest Indian, and even the simple people of the steppe, and the destruction of the advancement of old Europe, and the destruction een of the high culture of the Byzantines. Nor the degeneracy that Islam imposed on each after the recidivism of fundamentalism beginning in the tenth century.

    6) Europeans poorly unified the world with science, institutions and trade – by dragging primitive peoples into modernity kicking and screaming. But the evidence is obvious that those who were so ‘dragged’ are better off then those not today. Compare that to Islam that has had a devolutionary affect on everything it touches. Even today, nearly all terrorist groups are Muslim, and nearly all failed states are Abrahamic, and nearly all instability is either Islamic or the threat of Islam.

    SUMMARY
    Ignorance in Islam is pervasive and self justifying because of that ignorance.
    And, in other words, people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. The greatest cancer in human history is the abrahamic religions that taught men how to lie – and in doing so evade the one law of the universe, and the one law of god if there is one: discover, adapt, evolve – or die.

    Reply addressees: @chedetofficial


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 14:12:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691090408053362689

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632546288582688768

  • Yes we have a race problem in america

    Yes we have a race problem in america.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-13 21:45:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690842022163197952

    Reply addressees: @massshootingtrk

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690841084853649409

  • We will see a correction within a generation

    We will see a correction within a generation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-12 23:08:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690500561144053760

    Reply addressees: @lovelywhite110

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690498664706228224

  • Yes. It is PPP adjusted data. Its very obvious to americans traveling in the UK

    Yes. It is PPP adjusted data. Its very obvious to americans traveling in the UK that its a much poorer country.
    UK finacialized in the 19th century preawar era ceding education, industry, and science to Germany, the same way that american finacialized in late 20th ceding education and industry (and increasingly science) to china.
    These are normal human incentives that evolve if we do not specifically mandate governments against doing so. IN other words, governments need balance sheets not just income statements. And the left HATES balance sheets. Epecially balance sheets that track individuals – because almost all citizens other than white males over 35 are net losses even after high taxation.

    Reply addressees: @StevenKFinlay


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-12 17:15:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690411660794597377

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690402698737172480