Theme: Crisis

  • FOR CANADAS CRASH?

    http://business.time.com/2012/11/30/oh-no-canada-as-household-debt-skyrockets-will-canadians-face-a-2007-style-crisis/TIME FOR CANADAS CRASH?


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-30 17:32:00 UTC

  • ON THE DEATH OF TWINKIES BY FED POLICY “There is plenty of blame to go around, i

    http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2012/11/hostess-fires-15000-workers-twinkies.htmlMISH ON THE DEATH OF TWINKIES BY FED POLICY

    “There is plenty of blame to go around, including untenable wages and benefits, leveraged debt, untenable management salaries etc.

    However, the enabling factor behind the debt is loose monetary policy by the Fed coupled with fractional reserve lending. Factor in unions and corrupt management and there is no way the company could make it without huge concessions from the union.

    The union will likely see pension benefits slashed by 50% or more when handed over to the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation (PBGC). The PBGC is of course US taxpayers who should not have to pick up any of this tab at all (but they will).”

    Read more at http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2012/11/hostess-fires-15000-workers-twinkies.html#VWB2xVMuqKHmsbxe.99


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-23 07:44:00 UTC

  • TWINKIES DISAPPEAR FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH Personally I like snowballs better

    http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/national-international/NATL-Twinkies-Maker-Hostess-Going-Out-of-Business-179643161.htmlCRISIS: TWINKIES DISAPPEAR FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH

    Personally I like snowballs better than TWINKIES.

    But this means the era of late night twinkies and pepsi from the office vending machine is forever gone. Along with green screens.

    The halcyon days of youth.

    πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-16 10:47:00 UTC

  • NO ONE KNOWS WHERE THE ECONOMY IS GOING Well. Less so than usual. It’s easy to l

    NO ONE KNOWS WHERE THE ECONOMY IS GOING

    Well. Less so than usual. It’s easy to look smart during a boom. The arrow is in flight. We only need to watch its arc.

    But Europe fell back into recession and its confirmed as of today. And I don’t see why the USA won’t as well. I thought that we’d stimulate like hell but I can’t see any sings that the status quo will change in congress or the fed.

    But I’m not following the numbers. I’m following the people that follow the numbers. And they are quiet and clueless still.

    I was pretty wrong on china. Late on the euro. Early on the states. And right on housing prices. So my record is now mixed.

    But I think I’ll be proven right about structural unemployment. Every contradictory paper I can find presupposes that demand will cause us to sop up people. And I agree a bit. I just don’t agree it’s meaningful. This unemployment will be with us I think.

    When I said 2014 at the earliest followed by the demographic cliff in 2017-2020 I sounded nuts. But it looks pretty rational now. Economics in the end, all other things being equal, is reducible to demographics.

    I stopped fussing with data and started focusing exclusively on political theory about a year ago. And the reason is that I don’t see that anything interesting will occur to get us out of this scenario for a couple of years.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-15 20:09:00 UTC

  • “THE POLARIZED STATES OF AMERICA” Why don’t we put that on our money instead?

    “THE POLARIZED STATES OF AMERICA”

    Why don’t we put that on our money instead?


    Source date (UTC): 2012-11-04 05:11:00 UTC

  • ANYONE ELSE TIRED OF EURO-BLOWHARDS restating the patently obvious? The northern

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/09/europes-crisisIS ANYONE ELSE TIRED OF EURO-BLOWHARDS

    restating the patently obvious? The northern and southern cultures are incompatible. Or better stated, the Protestant german speaking cultures are incompatible with the catholic countries. Is that difficult to understand?

    The euro was doomed from the start. Either the germanic peoples leave and save the south, or the south leaves and dies by suicide. Although some of our south american friends have proven even that is survivable if you have a parent currency to leverage.

    The Economist for some reason feels the need to print toilet tissue on the subject. But this is not a question of economic efficiency. It’s a question of cultures.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-09-21 00:01:00 UTC

  • PAPER ON HOUSING’S RELATIONSHIP TO THE ECONOMY “What made housing vulnerable to

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2139670&http%3A%2F%2Fpapers.ssrn.com%2Fsol3%2Fpapers.cfm%3Fabstract_id=2114620EXCEPTIONAL PAPER ON HOUSING’S RELATIONSHIP TO THE ECONOMY

    “What made housing vulnerable to a bubble? And why has the housing market been so impervious to attempts at resuscitation?

    This Article critically reviews the theories of the housing bubble. It argues that housing is unusually susceptible to booms and busts because credit conditions affect demand and because the market is incomplete and difficult to short. Housing market distress transmits to the macroeconomy through a balance sheet channel, a construction channel, and a collateral channel.

    Housing is unique as an asset class in that it is both a consumption and investment good. It is also the largest single consumer asset and debt class. Because housing is credit-backed and such a large asset class, failure will impact the financial system itself and pull down the economy as a whole. The dual-use of housing, its ubiquity on consumer balance sheets, its highly correlated pricing, and its linkage to the macroeconomy make it a particularly painful type of asset bubble to deflate.

    The credit-backed nature of housing is also the key to understanding why there was a bubble. We argue that the bubble must be understood as stemming from the change in the mortgage financing channel from Agency securitization to private-label securitization (PLS). This shift enabled financial intermediaries β€” economic, but not legal agents of borrowers and investors β€” to exploit the information problems inherent in PLS for their own short-term gain. In other words, a set of agency problems in financial intermediation was the critical factor in fomenting the housing bubble.”

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2139670&http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2139670&http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2114620

    Thanks to Adam Levitin at http://www.creditslips.org/


    Source date (UTC): 2012-08-31 21:32:00 UTC

  • FOR THE NEXT BUBBLE TO BURST? “Facebook will become the poster child for the cur

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-real-crash-is-dead-ahead-as-2008-is-forgotten-2012-07-31READY FOR THE NEXT BUBBLE TO BURST?

    “Facebook will become the poster child for the current social-media bubble, ..just as Pets.com was for the dot-com bubble.” – Economist Gary Shilling in his latest Forbes column.

    “Wall Street is repeating the 2000 dot-com crash as today’s social-media bubble crashes and burns.”

    – TOLD YA’ SO –

    And when I said in 2007, that the crash would be structural, would last through 2014, and that we’d have a brief respite before the boomer crash hit somewhere around 2017-2020, I got so much crap for it from every corner. But economics is driven by demographics. It’s a function of human capital. Plain and simple. The composition of your population matters. And the metrics of the postwar era are fanciful products of accidental circumstance not to be repeated – not the product of policy.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-08-01 02:23:00 UTC

  • QUESTION FROM QUORA: What is being done to prevent the development of a “cold wa

    QUESTION FROM QUORA: What is being done to prevent the development of a “cold war” between China and the US in the coming years?

    Answer by Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute.

    The USA is attempting to allow China to peacefully rise by use of commercial power rather than military power. Commerce creates consumption which addicts citizens to consumerism, which then makes it difficult for governments to jeopardize without insurrection. That is the only strategy. The USA prefers the world consist of good commercial citizens.

    The fundamental problem though, is that China is a populous and very poor country that also contains conquered and rebellious territories, open to insurrection, and the wealthy coasts can be militarily devastated, and driven to starvation by blockading access to the South China Sea. The Chinese are quite aware of this vulnerability, plus they have a ‘chip’ on their shoulders from both british conquest, the failure of Marxism, and extended poverty, and the impact of those events upon the cultural mythology of Chinese superiority as the center of the world.

    Furthermore, their rise is complicated by the fact that they do not subscribe to the western moral code that currently is enforced by the United States on world trade — a code we take for granted but is antithetical to the Chinese. (We resolve conflicts quickly and rely upon honesty and they wait for opportunity using deception. This difference in ethics pervades both cultures.)

    The USA currently polices the world system of trade (largely the seas) because it took over the British naval bases at the end of the world wars. And petrodollars allow us to fund that policing. We sell dollars to other countries as debt, which they then use to buy oil, and then we inflate away the debt. This is how we ‘tax’ the developed world for our expensive military ‘services’. Services which they object to, but in particular, Europe and Japan do not object to not having to pay for directly themselves (nor could they).

    However, this system of indirect taxation which is breaking down, and the USA can no longer count on those advantages because of demographic reasons, competitive reasons due to internationalization of labor and technology, and monetary reasons due to the use of other currencies as petroleum and reserve currencies.

    General consensus among strategic thinkers is that the USA’s power will decline slowly and that Chinese rise will be moderated at some near point by simple economic pressures. The more radical thinkers suggest that most empires like the USA do not decline slowly, but very rapidly over a period of less than 50 years, and that the standard of living of the average american will be so significantly affected by the loss in purchasing power, that existing political tensions will be drastically exacerbated, sufficiently so that we will have our own problems of insurrection.

    In other words, both countries are more vulnerable to internal pressures due to China’s rise than they are to conflict with one another. The alternative school of thought suggests that when empires succumb to internal conflict, then they exaggerate external threats in order to pressure the citizens to stay united (see Iran for example). So that once the states and china experience internal pressures they will conduct a war over it. I tend to think this is unlikely because the USA’s citizens will have internalized it’s decline by that time.

    As I understand it, that is the current thinking in as short a summary as I can place it.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-07-15 15:39:00 UTC

  • is no “we” in USA. The USA is not a superpower country it is an empire in declin

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/155585/americans-confidence-television-news-drops-new-low.aspxThere is no “we” in USA.

    The USA is not a superpower country it is an empire in decline.

    These numbers as well as the loss of confidence in the government are reflections of the loss of common purpose, and the insufficiency of shared reality.

    There is no “we”.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-07-10 18:07:00 UTC