Theme: Crisis

  • REVOLUTION: KILL THE BODY AND THE HEAD WILL DIE (You can behead a monarch, but y

    REVOLUTION: KILL THE BODY AND THE HEAD WILL DIE

    (You can behead a monarch, but you must poison the body of a state.)

    0) ORGANIZATION

    One must develop:

    A Political Arm, A Marketing Arm, A Violence Arm.

    1) POLITICAL ARM

    A set of demands, and someone the state can negotiate with.

    2) MARKETING ARM

    A small number of people to ‘stay on message’, provide status updates, encouragement, tactics, and communications.

    The central arguments are not complicated: we have been conquered by hostile forces determined to render us extinct.

    That any opposition is objectively immoral because our solution is objectively moral.

    That it is a non-difficult transition that will create greater wealth and prosperity.

    That we will save western civilization from the second great lie and the second great invasion.

    3 – VIOLENCE ARM

    1 – To Warn: Issue Demands (us) Ask the Military to support those demands with a coup.

    2 – To Start: Start Fires. Destroy gas stations. Short Power. Sever Communication. (individuals)

    3 – When they respond : use entrapment. and use fear to keep them in their barracks. (teams),

    4 – To Escalate: collapse bridges, break gas lines, water mains, railroad ties, pour nails on roads, shoot truck tires.

    5 – When they escalate: Banks, Radio, Television, Adversarian Media Personalities, (Bands)

    6 – When they escalate: politicians, entire bureaucracies.

    7 – Use success to Recruit through social media.

    Kill the body and the head will die.

    Fire is the only weapon necessary to start a revolution.

    Gone is the era of mass street protest.

    The state-organism’s ability to ‘heal’ (repair) is limited.

    We need only overwhelm it’s ability to ‘heal’ (repair).

    There are four hours of electricity.

    Three days of water.

    Seven days of food.

    Fewer days of gasoline.

    Fewer days of cash.

    FROM CRITICAL MASS, IT WILL TAKE US 30 TO 60 DAYS AT THE OUTSIDE. THE OUTSIDE WORLD WILL REACT WITH FEAR AND WE WILL OVERLOAD THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT.

    WHY IS THE WORLD SEEING 4GW?

    ***Yet, another factor is that political centers of gravity have changed. These centers of gravity may revolve around nationalism, religion, or family or clan honor.***

    The failure of state corporatism, the failure of corporate socialism, and the reemergence of nationalism, religion, family and clan. In other words, we are not alone in wanting this transformation. The entire world is with us. The USA and the Cathedral and their (ahem) assistants in media and finance, are the enemy of all mankind.

    4TH GENERATION WARFARE

    1st Generation: tactics of line and column; which developed in the age of the smoothbore musket. Lind describes First Generation of warfare as beginning after the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 ending the Thirty Years’ War and establishing the state’s need to organize and conduct war.[3] 1GW consisted of tightly ordered soldiers with top-down discipline. These troops would fight in close order and advance slowly. This began to change as the battlefield changed. Old line and column tactics are now considered suicidal as the bow and arrow/sword morphed into the rifle and machine gun.

    2nd Generation: tactics of linear fire and movement, with reliance on indirect fire. This type of warfare can be seen in the early stages of WWI where there was still strict adherence to drill and discipline of formation and uniform. However, there remained a dependence on artillery and firepower to break the stalemate and move towards a pitched battle.

    3rd Generation: tactics of infiltration to bypass and collapse the enemy’s combat forces rather than seeking to close with and destroy them; and defence in depth. The 3GW military seeks to bypass the enemy, and attack his rear forward, such as the tactics used by German Storm Troopers in WWI against the British and French in order to break the trench warfare stalemate. These aspects of 3GW bleed into 4GW as it is also warfare of speed and initiative. However, it targets both military forces and home populations.

    4TH-generation warfare is normally characterized by a violent non-state actor (VNSA) fighting a state. This fighting can be physically done, such as by modern examples Hezbollah or the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). In this realm, the VNSA uses all three levels of fourth generation warfare. These are the physical (actual combat; it is considered the least important), mental (the will to fight, belief in victory, etc.,) and moral (the most important, this includes cultural norms, etc.) levels.

    A 4GW opponent has the following characteristics: lack of hierarchical authority, lack of formal structure, patience and flexibility, ability to keep a low profile when needed, and small size. A 4GW adversary might use the tactics of an insurgent, terrorist, or guerrilla in order to wage war against a nation’s infrastructure. Fourth generation warfare takes place on all fronts: economical, political, the media, military, and civilian.

    Resistance can also be below the physical level of violence. This is via non-violent means, such as Gandhi’s opposition to the British Empire[citation needed] or Martin Luther King’s marches.[citation needed] Both desired their factions to deescalate the conflict while the state escalates against them, the objective being to target the opponent on the moral and mental levels rather than the physical level.[citation needed] The state is then seen as a bully and loses support.

    Unlike in third generation warfare, the VNSA’s forces are decentralized. With fourth generation warfare, there may even be no single organisation and that smaller groups organize into impromptu alliances to target a bigger threat (that being the state armed forces or another faction). As a result, these alliances are weak and if the state’s military leadership is smart enough they can split their enemy and cause them to fight amongst themselves.

    Fourth-generation warfare goals:

    a) Survival.

    b) To convince the enemy’s political decision makers that their goals are either unachievable or too costly for the perceived benefit.

    Disaggregated forces, such as guerrillas, terrorists, and rioters, which lack a center of gravity, deny to their enemies a focal point at which to deliver a conflict ending blow.[6] As a result, strategy becomes more problematic while combating a VNSA.

    It has been theorized that a state vs. state conflict in fourth-generation warfare would involve the use of computer hackers and international law to obtain the weaker side’s objectives, the logic being that the civilians of the stronger state would lose the will to fight as a result of seeing their state engage in alleged atrocities and having their own bank accounts harmed.

    Three principal attributes of the new-age terrorism were held to be their hybrid structure (as opposed to the traditional microscopic command and control pattern[8]), importance given to systemic disruption vis-a-vis target destruction, and sophisticated use of technological advancements (including social media and mobile communications technology).[9] A terrorist network could be designed to be either acephalous (headless like Al-Qaeda after Bin Laden) or polycephalous (hydra-headed like Kashmiri separatists). Social media networks supporting the terrorists are characterized by positive feedback loops, tight coupling and non-linear response propagation (viz. a small perturbation causing a large disproportionate response).


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-27 04:36:00 UTC

  • “Enjoy your last Christmas”– The Queen to BBC. We going to do a lot of killing.

    —“Enjoy your last Christmas”– The Queen to BBC.

    We going to do a lot of killing. We are going to do enjoy doing all that killing.

    http://yournewswire.com/queens-2015-christmas-message-enjoy-your-final-christmas/


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-27 03:33:00 UTC

  • WHAT WILL THE R-SELECTION-LEFT-PARASITES COUNTER WITH? I know they will counter-

    WHAT WILL THE R-SELECTION-LEFT-PARASITES COUNTER WITH?

    I know they will counter-revolt. I do not know how they will counter-revolt.

    1: ANCIENT:.Science vs Mysticism (supernaturalism)

    Agrarian Age of Large Scale Cooperation

    Evolution:….. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle

    Regression:..(Jesus, Paul, Peter and Aquinas)

    2: MODERN: Science vs Rationalism and Pseudoscience.

    Industrial Age of Large Scale Cooperation

    Evolution: …..Smith, Hume, Locke, Jefferson

    Regression:..(Kant, Marx, Keynes, Rawls)

    3: INFORMATION: Science vs (???? Silence? Subterfuge?)

    Information Age of Large Scale Cooperation

    Evolution:……Mises, Hayek, Popper, Doolittle (Bridgman, Brouwer)

    Regression:..(???) (I suspect public debate will end?)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-25 07:54:00 UTC

  • Why Do We Treat Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto any differently than we

    Why Do We Treat Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto any differently than we treat Mein Kampf? I mean, communism did far more damage to the world than the Nazis ever dreamed of. Yet nobody talks about banning those books? I’ve read them all and if you know a little economics there isn’t much to either of them. One is a sentimental journey, the other is pseudoscience.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-23 10:28:00 UTC

  • Creating a Moat Around Russia: Six Points Explaining Why Putin Is Acting Strategically

    [C]REATING A MOAT AROUND RUSSIA: SIX POINTS EXPLAINING WHY PUTIN IS ACTING STRATEGICALLY SIX POINTS 1) The fall of Ukraine was unexpected and Putin feared a spread to Moscow. Rather than call up the USA or Merkel and offer to lease Crimea for 99 years with an option to renew, and offer to exchange the Donbas (The Don Basin) for a large discount on gas for the same period, he ‘flinched’ because of the fear that he would lose his only warm water port. 2) He did expect some difficulties from the west but not the severity of impact on the economy. This was surprising to him – and everyone else for that matter. He is painfully aware that the west could shut off financial transactions with Russia and that would cause the rest of the economy to collapse. While he can threaten to turn off the oil to the west, this hurts him far more than the west – who merely has to buy more expensive oil on the world market – whereas Russia rapidly runs out of money to conduct trade (and internal bribes). 3) Putin wants to restore Russia to peer status in the world. He saw his civilization collapse and it framed him forever. He is not alone. To do this requires that he monopolize the oil revenues so that he can manage the economy through payments (dependents) the way germans manage with duty, brits with morality, and americans with law. Russia does not share our high trust traditions and so he must run the country as a mafia state until he can mature the institutions sufficiently that he does not need to use 50% of revenues to buy influence in order to keep the country running. This is a job that is very difficult that is hard for westerners to understand. Russia is and always has been run as a mafia state – for the same reason souther Italy was run as a mafia state: because no one in or out of the administration was trustworthy. 4) Putin (correctly I believe) wants to provide his people (and the world) with an alternative to the ‘suicidal decadence’ of the democratic secular hedonistic west. Prior to ‘flinching’ in Ukraine, he was the most respected politician in the world. He can quite easily enfranchise the western right and accomplish that goal if he lets go of Ukraine. He may not see that Ukraine is forever gone – the people have turned against Russia forever. (I live here in Ukraine). And that Ukraine will want membership in both the EU and NATO and if not, then the eastern european countries will form an alternative to NATO. 5) He has a muslim problem greater than that of Europe and America, and worse yet, he depends on Chechen muslims to do much of his ‘dirty work’. So he is empowering enemies. His reason for acting in Syria is three fold: (a) he wants to kill off as many muslims as possible so that they don’t expand to Russia. (b) most maps don’t show this well, but most of the oil in the world that is profitable to take out of the ground is in a narrow region between the saudi Peninsula and the Barents sea. Now,it’s one thing if radical muslims hold the southern half of that territory, but not if they terrorize Russia and get hold of the northern half. (c) Russia has not been able *yet* to produce a diverse economy so he needs no to fight a world war with muslims over the oil fields when he is in weakened position. 6) Russia’s most severe problem is that it cannot develop businesses because as soon as they are profitable some member of the upper echelon steps in, drives it to near bankruptcy and then buys it for a song. This has become the most serious issue to the economy other than the permanent problem with rule of law. The problem of ‘modernizing’ Russia is very difficult and he has actually made pretty significant progress during his tenure. PUTIN IS CONSISTENT We must not misinterpret Putin’s actions in Ukraine as a strategy, rather than an act of panic at the possible loss of the manufacturing base of the Russian military (in the Donbas) and the only warm water port possessed by the Russian military (crimea). Otherwise, Putin has a long term plan to create a traditional Russia by restoring the orthodox church, providing an impassable and state sponsored method of resisting islam,(400 new churches in Moscow alone), slowly reforming rule of law, and after the sanctions are lifted (they will be) using money to diversify the economy. (Russia cannot duplicate the Silicon Valley Model because of the low trust society and pervasive corruption, but it has the talent to do so. Russian psychology – skepticism, cunning, and pride – is very useful in the development of engineers.) Putin is making sure that Russia is an island insulated from Islamic brutality and Western depravity. He is building a fortress of defense against threats to his people. A better example is that he is building an Ark that will survive the coming turmoils. If you see it from this perspective, Putin is profoundly consistent, strategic and rational in the pursuit of his objectives. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Creating a Moat Around Russia: Six Points Explaining Why Putin Is Acting Strategically

    [C]REATING A MOAT AROUND RUSSIA: SIX POINTS EXPLAINING WHY PUTIN IS ACTING STRATEGICALLY SIX POINTS 1) The fall of Ukraine was unexpected and Putin feared a spread to Moscow. Rather than call up the USA or Merkel and offer to lease Crimea for 99 years with an option to renew, and offer to exchange the Donbas (The Don Basin) for a large discount on gas for the same period, he ‘flinched’ because of the fear that he would lose his only warm water port. 2) He did expect some difficulties from the west but not the severity of impact on the economy. This was surprising to him – and everyone else for that matter. He is painfully aware that the west could shut off financial transactions with Russia and that would cause the rest of the economy to collapse. While he can threaten to turn off the oil to the west, this hurts him far more than the west – who merely has to buy more expensive oil on the world market – whereas Russia rapidly runs out of money to conduct trade (and internal bribes). 3) Putin wants to restore Russia to peer status in the world. He saw his civilization collapse and it framed him forever. He is not alone. To do this requires that he monopolize the oil revenues so that he can manage the economy through payments (dependents) the way germans manage with duty, brits with morality, and americans with law. Russia does not share our high trust traditions and so he must run the country as a mafia state until he can mature the institutions sufficiently that he does not need to use 50% of revenues to buy influence in order to keep the country running. This is a job that is very difficult that is hard for westerners to understand. Russia is and always has been run as a mafia state – for the same reason souther Italy was run as a mafia state: because no one in or out of the administration was trustworthy. 4) Putin (correctly I believe) wants to provide his people (and the world) with an alternative to the ‘suicidal decadence’ of the democratic secular hedonistic west. Prior to ‘flinching’ in Ukraine, he was the most respected politician in the world. He can quite easily enfranchise the western right and accomplish that goal if he lets go of Ukraine. He may not see that Ukraine is forever gone – the people have turned against Russia forever. (I live here in Ukraine). And that Ukraine will want membership in both the EU and NATO and if not, then the eastern european countries will form an alternative to NATO. 5) He has a muslim problem greater than that of Europe and America, and worse yet, he depends on Chechen muslims to do much of his ‘dirty work’. So he is empowering enemies. His reason for acting in Syria is three fold: (a) he wants to kill off as many muslims as possible so that they don’t expand to Russia. (b) most maps don’t show this well, but most of the oil in the world that is profitable to take out of the ground is in a narrow region between the saudi Peninsula and the Barents sea. Now,it’s one thing if radical muslims hold the southern half of that territory, but not if they terrorize Russia and get hold of the northern half. (c) Russia has not been able *yet* to produce a diverse economy so he needs no to fight a world war with muslims over the oil fields when he is in weakened position. 6) Russia’s most severe problem is that it cannot develop businesses because as soon as they are profitable some member of the upper echelon steps in, drives it to near bankruptcy and then buys it for a song. This has become the most serious issue to the economy other than the permanent problem with rule of law. The problem of ‘modernizing’ Russia is very difficult and he has actually made pretty significant progress during his tenure. PUTIN IS CONSISTENT We must not misinterpret Putin’s actions in Ukraine as a strategy, rather than an act of panic at the possible loss of the manufacturing base of the Russian military (in the Donbas) and the only warm water port possessed by the Russian military (crimea). Otherwise, Putin has a long term plan to create a traditional Russia by restoring the orthodox church, providing an impassable and state sponsored method of resisting islam,(400 new churches in Moscow alone), slowly reforming rule of law, and after the sanctions are lifted (they will be) using money to diversify the economy. (Russia cannot duplicate the Silicon Valley Model because of the low trust society and pervasive corruption, but it has the talent to do so. Russian psychology – skepticism, cunning, and pride – is very useful in the development of engineers.) Putin is making sure that Russia is an island insulated from Islamic brutality and Western depravity. He is building a fortress of defense against threats to his people. A better example is that he is building an Ark that will survive the coming turmoils. If you see it from this perspective, Putin is profoundly consistent, strategic and rational in the pursuit of his objectives. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • I’m Not Trying To Start a Cult – But To Restore The West By Starting A War.

    (from elsewhere) I don’t understand Shaun. I think people who have been following me for a few years know why I use FB and why I run all these “tests”. Maybe it isn’t obvious any longer. I construct theories. I test them. These theories are designed to help me understand what I don’t. So I will spend a year making some set of arguments until nothing new is coming back..Ad move on to another of the same. I worked my way through the libertarian. I worked through the nrx. i’m working through the alt-right – and I try to understand. Along the way I need to pick up a few people who can construct arguments. That’s happening. I am not trying to start a cult. (i’m trying to create a plan to start a war)”

  • I’m Not Trying To Start a Cult – But To Restore The West By Starting A War.

    (from elsewhere) I don’t understand Shaun. I think people who have been following me for a few years know why I use FB and why I run all these “tests”. Maybe it isn’t obvious any longer. I construct theories. I test them. These theories are designed to help me understand what I don’t. So I will spend a year making some set of arguments until nothing new is coming back..Ad move on to another of the same. I worked my way through the libertarian. I worked through the nrx. i’m working through the alt-right – and I try to understand. Along the way I need to pick up a few people who can construct arguments. That’s happening. I am not trying to start a cult. (i’m trying to create a plan to start a war)”

  • spook gossip is that Russia is using the Syrian conflict to add troops and weapo

    —-spook gossip is that Russia is using the Syrian conflict to add troops and weapons into Ukraine, and that an initiative is building—-


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-15 01:55:00 UTC

  • Q&A: “HOW DOES THE REVOLUTION OCCUR IN EUROPE?” (from a private message) Q: “How

    Q&A: “HOW DOES THE REVOLUTION OCCUR IN EUROPE?”

    (from a private message)

    Q: “How does propertarianism fit into a world of increasing network technology without previous geographic constraints?”

    Representatives are no longer necessary. We can instead return to the jury system, with jurors selected by lot. This makes corruption nearly impossible.

    The rest is quite complicated, and I don’t know if I want to go into it here but (a) title registries are now possible, (b) liquidity can be directly distributed to individuals (citizens) circumventing distribution through the financial system, (c) proposals can published online and subject to public scrutiny, (d) “full accounting” is possible, (e) a prohibition on ‘pooling and laundering’ is possible, … well, a lot of transparency is possible. And that’s the most of it. We can eliminate discretion from government (commons).

    Q: “You are American and a lot of what I interpret of the revolution appears to apply mostly, or be aimed at the American context. Have you written on how the revolution would differ in the various European countries? “

    America is just the most likely first candidate, because as a large heterogeneous polity reaching the point of revolution, it’s easiest to occur there.

    The value of propertarianism is the suppression of corruption and the increase in cooperation between the groups and classes creating an optimistic rather than pessimistic political economy. So I would expect that just as we need only ONE SECESSION to prove ‘smaller is better’, we need only ONE REVOLUTION to prove that market government is better.

    So I suspect that europeans will (as usual) be laggards and adopt it later on out of pressure from the people.

    What we will always be challenged with is the american desire for everyone to get ahead and that it’s heroic, and the european desire to keep everyone from getting ahead of them and that success is somehow immoral.

    (The hardest part I see, is the burden it puts on economists who lie through a conspiracy of ignorance today. The burden on people who talk pseudoscientific nonsense in the academy will be life altering for the pseudoscientists in all the social sciences..)

    Q:”Philosophically, in a vacuum your ideas seem universal but in application I’m sure the execution would differ nation to nation. I’m English. I don’t see or experience the spirit of revolution in the people here compared to what I sense in the US. The history of the nations explains the difference I am sure. Conservatives in the US aim to conserve the revolutionary defiance where as conservatives in the UK want to conserve order. (Basically counter revolutionary) day to day on the ground in the UK the only revolutionaries I meet are on the left where as in the US it is the reverse. Given this difference I have no idea how to network with these ideas in the UK/European context. Projecting from an American standpoint gets me blank faces.

    Q: “Is the revolution in Europe political or violent?

    Hopefully both. The right always does the fighting. I expect them to do it. As always. While the others free ride on the right’s risk. But I suspect europeans will find violence marginally unnecessary if it’s used elsewhere. The example will be enough.

    Q: “What groups do you know of with whom I can network with in the UK or Europe.”

    If I knew I wouldn’t say. My group feels we can do it alone. That’s probably not true. I don’t like single points of failure. My preference is to arm everyone with the moral justification for constitutional change, and to force it through violence and disruption if not. So I don’t care who gets it done or how it gets done, but we have to put an end to lies and pseudoscience and return western civilization to the path of excellence.

    Q: “I appreciate it. Thanks”

    I appreciate the opportunity to answer questions. 🙂 So thanks for asking.

    Cheers.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-12 11:38:00 UTC