Theme: Crisis

  • “ITS ALT-RIGHT NOW OR ALT-WARFARE LATER.” —Uncontrolled migration = invasion.

    “ITS ALT-RIGHT NOW OR ALT-WARFARE LATER.”

    —Uncontrolled migration = invasion. Invasion = warfare. Unopposed warfare = conquest (defeat). Curt Doolittle is right: it’s the reaction to conquest. Alt-Right now, or Alt-warfare later.”—j p JP Miller


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-31 10:37:00 UTC

  • THE IS NOTHING NEW ABOUT WHITE GENOCIDE. The rest of the world has been conducti

    THE IS NOTHING NEW ABOUT WHITE GENOCIDE.

    The rest of the world has been conducting it for 3500 years.

    It’s only since the enfranchisement of women that they have been successful.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-31 04:17:00 UTC

  • THE REASON THEY ALL DESIRE WHITE GENOCIDE IS THAT WE ARE THE ARISTOCRACY AND ALW

    THE REASON THEY ALL DESIRE WHITE GENOCIDE IS THAT WE ARE THE ARISTOCRACY AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN.

    Without us they can return to Levantine degeneracy.

    Man prefers to be an animal, and we force his transcendence into gods against his will.

    We must understand our achievement and revel in it.

    And return to it.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-31 04:01:00 UTC

  • THE OLD RIGHT VS NEW RIGHT The Old Right was “It’s Hopeful If We Are Patient”, a

    THE OLD RIGHT VS NEW RIGHT

    The Old Right was “It’s Hopeful If We Are Patient”, and the New Right is “It’s Hopeless”. The hopeful right was a resistance movement hopeful that the leftists would ‘learn’. The right is a hopeless movement that is resigned to the inability others to adopt the contractual order we call ‘conservatism’, but is just the traditional western aristocratic order of cooperation between classes with different abilities.

    MORAL VERSUS SCIENTIFIC

    The Old Right of American conservatism evolved from the religio-moral language set (think of Kirk), and the jeffersonian set (constitutionalists). But the conservatives never achieved success in articulating conservatism in rational or scientific language.

    We’ve endured a hundred and fifty years of pseudoscience (Freud/psychology, marx/economics-sociology, Boaz/anthropology, Frankfurt school/culture) combined with propaganda made possible with new media on a scale never seen before, combined with post war economic windfall and the conversion of upper proletarians and lower middle class into property owners with disposable income. Between government seeking votes, the academy seeking to sell nonsense-diplomas, and the media selling commercials, and the consumer product companies selling household goods to newly liquid families, the environment for falsehood was fertile ground.

    The New Right is armed with science and evidence that Darwin and Spencer (despite Spencer’s Lamarckian error his statements remain true). The old right didn’t have this evidence and our generation does.

    But we face a problem: the reason for the west’s dramatic success is largely that we were the most eugenic order and used upward redistribution of calories for upward redistribution of reproduction, and we use some combination of winters, manorialism, taxation, late marriage, aggressive hanging, and for-profit warfare to eradicate the lower classes for thousands of years.

    We call it meritocracy, the charitable call it ‘civilizing’, the honest call it ‘domesticating’, and the pejorative term is ‘human husbandry’: culling the unproductive humans from the herd, and leaving only the productive humans behind to reproduce.

    The underclasses of course think they were oppressed. They can’t imagine that they’re uncivilized, and that by breeding they’re decivilizing. And we aren’t honest about it, because it interferes with our narrative that we were justified in using democracy (we weren’t) to seize power from the landed nobility.

    THE NEW RIGHT MOVEMENTS CORRESPOND TO CLASS STRUCTURES

    The New Right consists of multiple frames of argument that correspond to class structures. Just like neocons, libertine libertarians, and socialists on the left, the New Right consists of multiple frames of arguments that correspond to class membership:

    CLASSES:

    NEW RIGHT (Philosophy/NaturalLaw) (Unrepentant Martial/Aristocratic Class)

    – Propertarianism (That’s me)

    – Ricardo Duchesne ( the uniqueness of Western Civilization)

    THE SCIENTIFIC RIGHT (Science) (Scholarly Class)

    – HBD-Chick (familism, groupishness, genetics)

    – Jayman – Genetics, Race, class

    – Sailer – IQ, race, class, education culture

    – Nassim Taleb – Finance, Economics, and Decidability.

    – Kevin McDonald – group competitive strategies

    THE INFORMATIVE RIGHT (Information) (upper middle class)

    – Stephan Molyneux (slow conversion on his part but he’s getting there)

    – Tom Woods (even slower conversion but he’s getting there)

    – Charles Murray ( I can’t tell with charles where he is on hopeless/hopeful)

    – Thomas Sowell (was a first mover really)

    REACTION (criticism) (middle class)

    – Moldbug

    – Ramzpaul

    ALT-RIGHT (ridicule) (working class) (these folk know exactly what they’re doing by the way. They have adopted leftist ridicule and are actively manufacturing desensitization as a means of combating the flasehoods and pseudoscience of political correctness)

    – Various alt-right podcasts and web sites

    – Meme-Makers and Trolls

    THE ALT-RIGHT “OVEN MIT” CROWD (Upper Lower working)

    – 88’ers, anti-everyone’s, white nationalists, etc.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 08:18:00 UTC

  • MIKE: (And all others who are interested) THE OLD RIGHT VS NEW RIGHT The Old Rig

    MIKE: (And all others who are interested)

    THE OLD RIGHT VS NEW RIGHT

    The Old Right was “It’s Hopeful If We Are Patient”, and the New Right is “It’s Hopeless”. The hopeful Right was a resistance movement hopeful that the leftists would ‘learn’. The New Right is a hopeless movement that is resigned to the inability others to adopt the contractual order we call ‘conservatism’, but is just the traditional western aristocratic order of cooperation between classes with different abilities.

    MORAL VERSUS SCIENTIFIC

    The Old Right of American conservatism evolved from the religio-moral language set (think of Kirk), and the Jeffersonian set (constitutionalists). But the conservatives never achieved success in articulating conservatism in rational or scientific language.

    We’ve endured a hundred and fifty years of pseudoscience (Freud/psychology, marx/economics-sociology, Boaz/anthropology, Frankfurt school/culture) combined with propaganda made possible with new media on a scale never seen before, combined with post war economic windfall and the conversion of upper proletarians and lower middle class into property owners with disposable income. Between government seeking votes, the academy seeking to sell nonsense-diplomas, and the media selling commercials, and the consumer product companies selling household goods to newly liquid families, the environment for falsehood was fertile ground.

    The New Right is armed with science and evidence that Darwin and Spencer (despite Spencer’s Lamarckian error his statements remain true). The old right didn’t have this evidence and our generation does.

    But we face a problem: the reason for the west’s dramatic success is largely that we were the most eugenic order and used upward redistribution of calories for upward redistribution of reproduction, and we use some combination of winters, manorialism, taxation, late marriage, aggressive hanging, and for-profit warfare to eradicate the lower classes for thousands of years.

    We call it meritocracy, the charitable call it ‘civilizing’, the honest call it ‘domesticating’, and the pejorative term is ‘human husbandry’: culling the unproductive humans from the herd, and leaving only the productive humans behind to reproduce.

    The underclasses of course think they were oppressed. They can’t imagine that they’re uncivilized, and that by breeding they’re decivilizing. And we aren’t honest about it, because it interferes with our narrative that we were justified in using democracy (we weren’t) to seize power from the landed nobility.

    THE NEW RIGHT MOVEMENTS CORRESPOND TO CLASS STRUCTURES

    The New Right consists of multiple frames of argument that correspond to class structures. Just like neocons, libertine libertarians, and socialists on the left, the New Right consists of multiple frames of arguments that correspond to class membership:

    CLASSES:

    NEW RIGHT (Philosophy/NaturalLaw) (Unrepentant Martial/Aristocratic Class)

    – Propertarianism (That’s me)

    – Ricardo Duchesne ( the uniqueness of Western Civilization)

    THE SCIENTIFIC RIGHT (Science) (Scholarly Class)

    – HBD-Chick (familism, groupishness, genetics)

    – Jayman – Genetics, Race, class

    – Sailer – IQ, race, class, education culture

    – Nassim Taleb – Finance, Economics, and Decidability.

    – Kevin McDonald – group competitive strategies

    THE INFORMATIVE RIGHT (Information) (upper middle class)

    – Stephan Molyneux (slow conversion on his part but he’s getting there)

    – Tom Woods (even slower conversion but he’s getting there)

    – Charles Murray ( I can’t tell with charles where he is on hopeless/hopeful)

    – Thomas Sowell (was a first mover really)

    REACTION (criticism) (middle class)

    – Moldbug

    – Ramzpaul

    ALT-RIGHT (ridicule) (working class) (these folk know exactly what they’re doing by the way. They have adopted leftist ridicule and are actively manufacturing desensitization as a means of combating the flasehoods and pseudoscience of political correctness)

    – Various alt-right podcasts and web sites

    – Meme-Makers and Trolls

    THE ALT-RIGHT “OVEN MIT” CROWD (Upper Lower working)

    – 88’ers, anti-everyone’s, white nationalists, etc.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 08:12:00 UTC

  • FIGHT THIS WAR NOT THE LAST ONE I wouldn’t recommend fighting a revolution in fa

    FIGHT THIS WAR NOT THE LAST ONE

    I wouldn’t recommend fighting a revolution in favor of fascism, any more than I would recommend conducting a war using horse cavalry.

    Every generation we get an opportunity to modernize our weapons.

    Truth is enough.

    Aristocratic Egalitarianism, Testimonial Truth, Propertarian Ethics. Nomocratic Rule of Law, with Natural Law, Market Government, And Treasury Credit.

    Deprive the financial sector off fiat money gains. Deprive the media of copyright. Deprive everyone of unwarranted statements in the commons. Grant everyone universal standing in matters of the commons.

    Lying, Statism and Corporatism will evaporate under the weight of our prosecutions.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-19 10:14:00 UTC

  • In a perfect world, extermination of post-communist corruption will coincide wit

    In a perfect world, extermination of post-communist corruption will coincide with collapse of the European project. https://twitter.com/carlbildt/status/766179916471730176

  • a perfect world, extermination of post-communist corruption will coincide with c

    https://t.co/LuDpE7woyuIn a perfect world, extermination of post-communist corruption will coincide with collapse of the European project.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-18 04:47:00 UTC

  • It will end with LR if not corrected. This is what’s disappointing for liberty

    It will end with LR if not corrected. This is what’s disappointing for liberty.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-17 20:01:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766002046625611776

    Reply addressees: @FemaBand @ThomasEWoods @lewrockwell @jeffdeist @jtsale

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766001925590487040


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @FemaBand @ThomasEWoods @lewrockwell @jeffdeist @jtsale Reforming MI is emotionally not logically or scientifically difficult.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/766001925590487040


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @FemaBand @ThomasEWoods @lewrockwell @jeffdeist @jtsale Reforming MI is emotionally not logically or scientifically difficult.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/766001925590487040

  • The Rule of Degeneracy…

    [T]he *Rule of Degeneracy (Escapism): – “Anything that is not explicitly conservative will devolve into something progressive” – “Anything not explicitly rational, will devolve into something magical”

    – “Anything that is not explicitly true, will devolve into something false.” – “Any system of thought that is not explicitly masculine and constructive, will devolve into the feminine and destructive.” – “Any system of thought that does not compel action through change will devolve in an excuse to avoid change through justifying inaction.” – “Any system of thought that is not explicitly eugenic, expansionary, heroic, and hierarchical, will eventually devolve into one that is dysgenic, sedentary, submissive, and equalitarian.” (Women and the weak destroy the world if we allow them.)