Curt Doolittle

Theme: Crisis

  • THERE IS GOING TO BE A REVOLUTION – I KNOW. BECAUSE I’M ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO WI

    THERE IS GOING TO BE A REVOLUTION – I KNOW. BECAUSE I’M ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO WILL START IT.

    1. Moral men need a reason for rebellion. (they have it: rule by credit, familicide, genocide, culturecide, civilization. )

    2. They need an institutional solution implementable as law, to demand that resolves their issues, (we have it) and to which they can feel, claim, argue, and fight for, as a moral high ground (they can).

    3. They need a plan of transition to the new institutional system that they can envision bringing to fruition. (we have it)

    4. They need a strategy and a plan of action making use of available means by which to conduct a rebellion that will succeed. (we have it)

    5. They need an opportunity to seize under which the revolution can be visibly successful (we do – no civilization in history has been more fragile)

    6. They need a communication system by which to coordinate their efforts over large territories that are impossible for standard police, emergency, and military to concentrate power against. (we have it).

    7. If possible they need an icon behind which to anthropomorphize their actions (we have it)

    (Some of us have been at this a while)

    Sovereignty. Rule of Natural Judge Discovered, Common Law. Direct Democracy over a Market Commons with Houses for the Classes. Direct redistribution of proceeds from the commons, and liquidity from the treasury to the citizenry. An end to Fiat Credit Capitalism, an end to Politicians, and an end to propaganda, misrepresentation, pseudoscience, and deceit in the informational commons (public discourse). And the creation of opportunities in every state by the decentralization of power, and the devolution of the federal government to regions.

    The American Empire was useful in the conquest of the continent. It was useful in the preservation of the British Empire’s patterns of finance and trade. It was useful in the defeat of world communism. But it is not useful in the defeat of Islamism, nor our own suicidal pseudoscientific secular humanism – it is the sponsor of both in the deep state’s pursuit of customers from both.

    We are going to end the empire. Preserve the military as overwhelmingly powerful domestic rather than overstretched international force. Preserve the systems of insurers of last resort. But eliminate the discretion of the federal government over our daily lives. We are not equal. We do not have equal desires. And both the European imperial and American imperial systems must end. Or like all empires, they will kill the host that made them possible.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-04 09:19:00 UTC

  • OUR GENERATION’S MISSION: PREVENT ANOTHER DARK AGE The left (Jewish Cosmopolitan

    OUR GENERATION’S MISSION: PREVENT ANOTHER DARK AGE

    The left (Jewish Cosmopolitanism and Puritan Feminism) has failed in every generation to succeed by persuasion, revolution, demonstration, moral narrative. And almost succeeded – since 1965 – by creating more clients for the state, and using the state to impose their pseudoscientific religion upon us, through massive immigration of the underclasses that we have worked for millennia to rid ourselves of.

    Make no mistake: this is how the destroyed western civilization the first time: through Jewish monotheistic mysticism, and the forcible takeover of the rational state by Justinian’s eastern (non-european) church. And the last time they gave us a dark age.

    It is up to the men of our current generations to restore truth and science and reason, and rule of natural law, and to outlaw this new pseudoscientific religion, or we may lose all of europe to it again. And if we do, another dark age as bad or worse than the last may truncate our ambitions to transcend the animal man to the stars, and the gods we seek to be.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 08:23:00 UTC

  • The experiment of universal enfranchisement has failed. We have spent down thous

    The experiment of universal enfranchisement has failed. We have spent down thousands of years of capital.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-31 15:30:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793112880421953536

    Reply addressees: @LilDocCollins @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793078994413510657

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/793078994413510657

  • “I was asked why I am voting for Trump versus Clinton. It’s actually pretty easy

    —“I was asked why I am voting for Trump versus Clinton.

    It’s actually pretty easy to explain once we look outside the circus atmoshere the American media and left have made of our election process.

    The left is all about appearances versus results or policy, thus their fixation on the Trumps mistakes in life instead of what he proposes to improve the lives of the average American. The left came up with the PC culture to inhibit speech, not make it more polite. The left fixates on source versus fact.

    I could go on and on, but the biggest threat from HIllary Clinton, is her admitted commitment to change the Constitution through appointments to the Supreme Court and like IL Duce Obama, executive orders with the power of law, until a court says otherwise.

    This brings us to the basic difference between democrats and republicans…….our governing document, The United States Constitution is unique among all government charters in the world as it was first and foremost written as a charter to limit government and make the citizen sovereign.

    The agenda of Hillary Clinton and the democrat party seeks to “improve” our lives, by making us subservient to their regulations, laws, and bureaucrats. For our own good of course.

    They believe rewards are equally deserved by all regardless of the effort put out to earn those rewards. They believe that success is a matter of right, not something that earned through dedication and hard work.

    By their logic misery is ok. as long as all suffer equally, except for the ruling elite of course. Extra effort for extra reward has no place in the liberal mentality.

    There is slim history pointing to the success of this thought process, in fact none. But the left pursues it with a dogma and dedication despite facts and historical evidence, that borders on a religion of extremism, while maintaining that religion is a hoax.

    Hillary Clinton is perhaps the best example of the failure of the political process as one can imagine. She has been reviled by her workmates since her days on the Watergate Committee staff. She has a ruthlessness that puts Al Capone to shame. She has never earned a living as you and I would be familiar with. Outside of a short career at Rose Law, when she got professional at being a felon, she hasn’t worked a day in private industry yet is worth hundreds of millions.

    As is her husband, who hasn’t worked in the private sector his entire adult life. Yet these are the folks that American workers are supposed to trust with their future and their democracy.

    I don’t like Donald Trump. But I don’t fear his plans for our economy or world affairs. I do Hillary as she has helped put us in the position on the world stage where our friends no longer respect us and our enemies no longer fear us.

    Her approach to economic issues is based on an endless supply of wealthy folks and corporations to steal money from in the form of taxes in order to pay for bread and circuses for the folks their policies have put out of work.

    Liberal economics is a contradiction in terms and the foreign policy of American democrats have helped cause every major war and conflict since WWII and is directly responsible for the rise of Islamic Radicalism that started with Jimmy Carter when he abandoned the Shah and told the French to let the Ayatollah get on a plane……Clinton continued it by letting Bin Laden get away, and Obama did the same by walking out on the elected Iraqi government because he didn’t approve of their social welfare policies..

    There is little chance that democrats will recognize their failures. As they have consistently redefined issues when their policies fail.

    Their answer to inflation was to remove food, fuel, and health care from the index. Their answer to dismal economic policies is to change the definition of unemployed.

    Ask a liberal the difference between money and currency and watch their eyes glaze over. How can anyone seriously claim legitimacy when they try to tell us that only 5% or so are unemployed, yet over 90 million of work age Americans don’t have a job out some 320 million.

    To answer that, look at Common Core – enforced stupidity at every level. Hillary Clinton is the embodiment of a myopic mentality that is infecting American politics. That’s why I’m voting for Donald Trump, he isn’t HIllary…………..”—

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-30 09:58:00 UTC

  • “Postmodernist society is incapable of creating new culture or symbols to define

    —“Postmodernist society is incapable of creating new culture or symbols to define itself or give its existence meaning or purpose. Hipsterism is the postmortem on the last 40 years of western cultural history. The age of irony, shitty music and boring fashion. We’re stuck in a perpetual feedback loop of faux liberation and rebellion. We should stop trying to salvage it and make something new and entirely separate. Or hit the reset button and try to avoid this postmodern milieu stage entirely. “—Murray Sell

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 21:53:00 UTC

  • The more advanced the economy,the greater the economic velocity,the greater the

    The more advanced the economy,the greater the economic velocity,the greater the expansion of credit,the more overextended the state=fragile.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 13:17:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790905210818420736

  • 4th Generation Civil War doesn’t require people in the streets.A minority disrup

    4th Generation Civil War doesn’t require people in the streets.A minority disrupt the fragility of the modern economy.Cascade does the rest.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 11:44:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790881617669742592

  • There are always agitated men. What they require is a moral justification for vi

    There are always agitated men. What they require is a moral justification for violence; an alternative to demand; and a crisis to exploit.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 11:39:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790880492535025664

  • BUTCH AND STEVE ON THE DECLINING COST OF CIVIL WAR “Remember, democracy never la

    BUTCH AND STEVE ON THE DECLINING COST OF CIVIL WAR

    “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”- John Adams

    Adams makes sense now. As the outcome of an election diverges from the outcome of a war, as more and more of those with no capacity to generate violence are allowed suffrage, then eventually the cost of war falls far enough below the cost of the election, that those with the capacity to generate violence rise up and take violent control of the state.— William Butchman

    And also, when revolutions occur they are due to the state ignoring the changes in sympathy of those with violent capacity. To rule, you must keep the violent majority on your side at all times.—Steve Pender

    —-original post—

    —“Democratic elections, being an alternative to war – a demonstration of violent capacity (in theory, no longer in practice) – to avoid the need for fighting by showing one’s strength without loss of life, was then subverted by universal suffrage which diluted the implied violence behind voting, without diluting the actual violent capacity. It’s now probable that a minority may have far more violent capacity than 51% of the voters.”—Steve Pender

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 11:38:00 UTC

  • DEFINITIONS: FRAGILITY OF AN ADVANCED ECONOMY Q&A: –Curt, what do you mean by a

    DEFINITIONS: FRAGILITY OF AN ADVANCED ECONOMY

    Q&A: –Curt, what do you mean by an ‘advanced economy’?—

    The more dependent the citizenry is on complex networks of production involving distributed capital, resources, and knowledge.

    In other words the degree to which the store of necessary consumption can be interrupted before the expansion of revolt over basic needs..

    In other words, people cannot return to the farm in the village to survive, and have no choice but to revolt.

    The more ‘efficient’ an economy in ‘modern economic terms’ which means the more risk it absobs in favor of discounts on consumption, the more vulnerable it is.

    The siezure of the british empire’s policing of world finance and trade, the defense of europe during its rebuilding, the prosecution of the cold war and communism, and the consequential prosecution of world islamism as the replacement for communism, while importing vast numbers of a new third-world underclass, – have caused an overextension of the economy and a weakening of civic bonds necessary to endure shocks and reversals.

    Minor disruptions in distribution of basic goods (commercial rail, roadway trucking, consumer gasoline, natural gas piplines, electricity transformers, internet phone and cable boxes and wires, and water pipelines, when combined with multiple, randomly set fires, each of which provides an opportunity to harm or kill repair workers and the police that attempt to defend them, will cause vast economic catastrophe even if prosecuted by a small number of people.

    if any given city were to experience as few as 25 people aggressively pursuing these tactics for 120 days, the military will have to intervene, and the government will lose what remaining credibility it has, and people will, after 180-270 days, be exhausted.

    This is enough time for the military and political opportunists in the world to seize openings due to weakness that the Obama administration has created through deprivation and reduction, and the demand for both internal and external force will be unbearable, and the citizenry will either end up in the streets, or demand immediate action.

    The goal of any such action is to force the military to take control and to implement constitutional, legal, and policy changes sufficient to restore order.

    The strategy is quite simple. Lay out demands that a majority of the population will accept, that will generate opportunity for change, and opportunity for multiple classes and groups to benefit from.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 09:53:00 UTC