America: children, totally absent a mother’s attention, housed in and driven to boredom and immobility in schools, causing them extensive developmental brain damage, who then are so desperate for stimulation they cling to consumer goods, only to find later in life that they are alone, unwanted, unuseful, and easily buried and forgotten. America, the land where ‘decent’ and disciplined (moral) people work their assess off to pay absurd mortgage rates by borrowing from themselves (omfg), so that they can afford to move away from ‘indecent’ undisciplined (immoral) people, rather than paying trivial costs for trivial homes, where indecent people are prohibited from living. Make industrialization of home production unprofitable. And watch what happens….. America, the land of lonely people surrounded by consumer goods, taking opiates for physical pain and anti-depressants for mental pain. People who work long hours, without walking or running, under information saturation, and in artificial light saturation, in seasonally dark climates, will develop majority depressive symptoms in the population. Let me put it another way: the government is killing us.
Theme: Crisis
-
The End of the Era of Strategic Patience
“THE END OF THE ERA OF STRATEGIC PATIENCE” Pence said that yesterday, and it sums up our era: conservatives have ended the era of paternal patience. At some point the father decides the child is a net loss if left to his own devices, while the mother preserves motherly blindness, empathy, and hope. I called the previous generations of conservatives and libertarians the ‘hopeful’ era, and that our era is defined by our loss of hope. Our loss of hope can be seen in our initial optimism, increasing frustration, last ditch efforts, and finally, our loss of hope, and our development of conviction.
-
The End of the Era of Strategic Patience
“THE END OF THE ERA OF STRATEGIC PATIENCE” Pence said that yesterday, and it sums up our era: conservatives have ended the era of paternal patience. At some point the father decides the child is a net loss if left to his own devices, while the mother preserves motherly blindness, empathy, and hope. I called the previous generations of conservatives and libertarians the ‘hopeful’ era, and that our era is defined by our loss of hope. Our loss of hope can be seen in our initial optimism, increasing frustration, last ditch efforts, and finally, our loss of hope, and our development of conviction.
-
Noah J Revoy White people need to get married and have more children. Femini
Noah J Revoy
White people need to get married and have more children. Feminism, MGTOW, easy divorce, compulsory education (indoctrination) and population replacement (immigration) are leading to a demographic winter (genocide) for our people. No more white people means no more civil rights, no more technological progress, no more civilisation. Ok, so what are you doing about it? We have two options, 1) fight and 2) breed. We will need to do both to survive. Other people are starting to fight back, but very few are tackling the demographic winter. What can you do to ensure that we will have a next generation? – Get help. – Join up with others and form your tribe. – Get married. – Have more kids. – Encourage other white people to do the same. – Push back against nihilism of Feminism and MGTOW. – Join a community and share relationship wisdom. www.smv4k.com -
If Christianity is Dead, We Still Have a Problem. But At Least We Know Most of the Answer
IF CHRISTIANITY IS DEAD, WE STILL HAVE A PROBLEM Christianity as we know it is dead. The rituals are not unique nor terribly effective compared to the alterative major religions. The myths and lessons are suitable to those living at subsistence levels. The priesthoods are populated by those who can console us from the forces of nature, but not those who can educate, advise, lead, and decide, and as such,, form both a local head of community of common interest, and counter to the state. But the philosophy is exceptional as it seems to create trust, ‘openness’, encourage salvation through action, creates commercial prosperity everywhere it goes. This combination of interpersonal optimism and the Aryan predilection for markets, and stoic natural law is nearly as effective as our greco-roman civilization. So assuming the word ‘philosophy‘ means ‘method of decision making’, then of the spectrum of Religion, Political philosophy, Ethical Philosophy, Personal Philosophy, Law, and Science, I would state that transcendence, sovereignty, natural law, male stoicism/female epicureanism, the common empirical law, and Testimonialism are probably the optimum combination for those who wish to LEAD humanity, rather than to be led by others, by some some other strategy.
But natural law is skeptical, and incomplete without christian optimism. In other words, christian optimism tells us that if enough of us invest in trust, and tolerate minor losses, we will produce it, and produce outsized gains. The problem we face, is we need a binding narrative, and we need better binding rituals and we need better local teachers, advisors, leaders. To create the mythos we must distill it from our many authors into our own ‘bible’. Because we learn from loose general principle, to more specific general rule, to more precise rules of science. And without the binding narrative it appears to be very difficult to bind general literary rules and precise rules of science into a portfolio of decisions across the entire possible spectrum in which we must make decisions in modernity. I have been struggling with this problem for two years now and while I have my ups and downs, the problem remains the same: without an effort equal to the council of nicea, or the first american constitutional convention, or a frankfurt school, it will be difficult to produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization – a ‘book’ that beyond which no man nor state may tread. It is necessary to restore teaching, advising, and leadership, and community. But also as a means of defense against the semitic technologies of deception that arose from the innovation of abrahamic deceit. And a ritual that is costly so that men defend the law in that book against all attacks. -
If Christianity is Dead, We Still Have a Problem. But At Least We Know Most of the Answer
IF CHRISTIANITY IS DEAD, WE STILL HAVE A PROBLEM Christianity as we know it is dead. The rituals are not unique nor terribly effective compared to the alterative major religions. The myths and lessons are suitable to those living at subsistence levels. The priesthoods are populated by those who can console us from the forces of nature, but not those who can educate, advise, lead, and decide, and as such,, form both a local head of community of common interest, and counter to the state. But the philosophy is exceptional as it seems to create trust, ‘openness’, encourage salvation through action, creates commercial prosperity everywhere it goes. This combination of interpersonal optimism and the Aryan predilection for markets, and stoic natural law is nearly as effective as our greco-roman civilization. So assuming the word ‘philosophy‘ means ‘method of decision making’, then of the spectrum of Religion, Political philosophy, Ethical Philosophy, Personal Philosophy, Law, and Science, I would state that transcendence, sovereignty, natural law, male stoicism/female epicureanism, the common empirical law, and Testimonialism are probably the optimum combination for those who wish to LEAD humanity, rather than to be led by others, by some some other strategy.
But natural law is skeptical, and incomplete without christian optimism. In other words, christian optimism tells us that if enough of us invest in trust, and tolerate minor losses, we will produce it, and produce outsized gains. The problem we face, is we need a binding narrative, and we need better binding rituals and we need better local teachers, advisors, leaders. To create the mythos we must distill it from our many authors into our own ‘bible’. Because we learn from loose general principle, to more specific general rule, to more precise rules of science. And without the binding narrative it appears to be very difficult to bind general literary rules and precise rules of science into a portfolio of decisions across the entire possible spectrum in which we must make decisions in modernity. I have been struggling with this problem for two years now and while I have my ups and downs, the problem remains the same: without an effort equal to the council of nicea, or the first american constitutional convention, or a frankfurt school, it will be difficult to produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization – a ‘book’ that beyond which no man nor state may tread. It is necessary to restore teaching, advising, and leadership, and community. But also as a means of defense against the semitic technologies of deception that arose from the innovation of abrahamic deceit. And a ritual that is costly so that men defend the law in that book against all attacks. -
IF CHRISTIANITY IS DEAD, WE STILL HAVE A PROBLEM Christianity as we know it is d
IF CHRISTIANITY IS DEAD, WE STILL HAVE A PROBLEM
Christianity as we know it is dead. The philosophy is exceptional as it seems to create commercial prosperity everywhere it goes. The narratives and the rituals
So assuming the word ‘philosophy’ means ‘method of decision making’, then of the spectrum of Religion, Political philosophy, Ethical Philosophy, Personal Philosophy, Law, and Science, I would state that transcendence, sovereignty, natural law, male stoicism/female epicureanism, the common empirical law, and Testimonialism are probably the optimum combination for those who wish to LEAD humanity, rather than be led by some other strategy.
But natural law is skeptical, and incomplete without christian optimism. In other words, christian optimism tells us that if enough of us invest in trust, and tolerate minor losses, we will produce it, and produce outsized gains.
The problem we face, is we need a binding narrative, and we must distill it from our many authors into our own ‘bible’. Because we learn from loose general principle, to more specific general rule, to more precise rules of science. And without the binding narrative it appears to be very difficult to bind general rules and precise rules of science into a portfolio of decisions across the entire possible spectrum in which we must make decisions.
I have been struggling with this problem for two years now and while I have my ups and downs, the problem remains the same: without an effort equal to the council of nicea, or the first american constitutional convention, or a frankfurt school, it will be difficult to produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization – a ‘book’ that is necessary if only as a means of defense against the semitic technologies of deception that arose from the innovation of abrahamic deceit. And a ritual that is costly so that men defend the law in that book against all attacks.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-28 17:27:00 UTC
-
KNOW YOUR HISTORY: UNDER STRESS THE ROMANS REVERTED TO “SOL INVICTUS”
KNOW YOUR HISTORY: UNDER STRESS THE ROMANS REVERTED TO
“SOL INVICTUS”
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-25 16:28:00 UTC
-
Trump betrays the base on the wall? I said that hillary would bring us immediate
Trump betrays the base on the wall? I said that hillary would bring us immediate civil war, and that trump would likely buy us time. The reason being that the presidency is not so powerful a position – unless you are willing to violate its premises as did FDR and Obama. So he is not. And he is not skilled enough in politics to revolutionize the base, or buy off opponents. So it is going to be up to the revolutionaries to build a revolt. Because he’s just done what the skeptics said: betrayed the base. I was willing to give him room to prove himself, but he seems to have proven skeptics right.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-25 07:48:00 UTC
-
( Based stick man and those who fight, spencer, and the McInnes voices own the m
( Based stick man and those who fight, spencer, and the McInnes voices own the movement now. Thats the direction of momentum, and path of escalation. It’s an identity and opposition movement. feed the flames. it’s not an intellectual movement, and doesn’t need to be. )
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-23 18:46:00 UTC