Theme: Crisis

  • YOU CAN”T GET AROUND THE PROBLEM. Rule of Law, or Social Democracy, or National

    YOU CAN”T GET AROUND THE PROBLEM.

    Rule of Law, or Social Democracy, or National Socialism, or World Communism.

    Um. Labor costs are regional and national, while market prices are global. With ‘free trade’, arbitrage means that we seek lower prices and higher consumption at the cost of redistribution of employment from advanced to advancing countries.

    How you interpret that fact is determined by whether you seek to bring everyone on earth to an average at the expense of those who are already prosperous, or whether you seek to maintain income equality within your polity for the purpose of preserving harmony.

    National Rule of Law, not National Socialism. They result in the same thing by use of full accounting under rule of law.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 15:52:00 UTC

  • “And so, faced with irrelevance, the Establishment howls, froths at the mouth an

    —“And so, faced with irrelevance, the Establishment howls, froths at the mouth and chews the carpet, raging at President Trump. Like a madman whose derangement is killing him, it screams meaningless words, most ending in “ism”, as it dies. I’m sure the President will give it a grand funeral.”— William S. Lind


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 15:03:00 UTC

  • WHY IS THE RIGHT SO ANGRY? THE SAME REASON AS THE FAR LEFT. Civilization-cide, c

    WHY IS THE RIGHT SO ANGRY? THE SAME REASON AS THE FAR LEFT.

    Civilization-cide, culture-cide, famil-cide, genocide, are good reasons to be angry. Especially since the means of destroying the great civilizations of the ancient world by supernatural and pseudo-historical deceits that take advantage of trust and tolerance, and the means of destroying the great civilization of the modern world by pseudoscientific, pseudo-historical, and pseudo-rational deceits that take advantage of trust and tolerance is identical and perpetuated by the same classes and ethnicities of peoples.

    You cannot choose the future for others and not have them retaliate against you.

    The only restitution for genocide, is genocide. The only restitution for culture-cide is culture-cide. The only restitution for Civilization-cide is Civilization-cide.

    So be careful what you seek to impose on one another, whether dysgenic left or eugenic right. The only possible solution to this conflict of genetic interest is separation into separate states.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 11:01:00 UTC

  • Why does the SHTA get blamed rather than the creation of the Fed? Why does the F

    Why does the SHTA get blamed rather than the creation of the Fed? Why does the Fed get blamed rather than the industrialization of farming? Why does farming get blamed rather than immigration? Nothing evenly rotates. Everything starts with demographics – not markets or money.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-06 18:34:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1026536891712253953

    Reply addressees: @Race_Skin @ThomasSowell @PeterSchiff @zerohedge @JohnStossel @mises @LearnLiberty @TrueDilTom @TruthGundlach @realDonaldTrump @DA_Stockman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1026473515476811776


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Race_Skin

    Why does the stock market get blamed for the #GreatDepression and not the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of the 1930’s?

    @ThomasSowell @PeterSchiff @zerohedge @JohnStossel @mises @LearnLiberty @curtdoolittle @TrueDilTom @TruthGundlach @realDonaldTrump @DA_Stockman

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1026473515476811776

  • wow. videos of antifa vs patriots in Portland is obviously class warfare

    wow. videos of antifa vs patriots in Portland is obviously class warfare.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-05 21:38:00 UTC

  • India can’t modernize, and all of south America is collapsing. Brazil and Venezu

    India can’t modernize, and all of south America is collapsing. Brazil and Venezuela in particular. Yet the american left wants to achieve here what has caused those nations to fail.

    Why does european mixed economy survive and the rest of the world fail? American payment of the cost of protecting the network of law, finance, and trade on the one hand, and simple demographics on the other.

    The simple painful truth is that the eugenicists were 100% right and the left has worked daily to undermine their science.

    The difference between peoples is 100% the product of the size of the underclass in relation to the professional.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-05 11:04:00 UTC

  • Our History of Destruction. What Do We Do?

    Um, you know. The aryans destroyed most of the people of northern europe. The romans committed a genocide against my celtic ancestors and sewed their own defeat by making possible the migration period. The Jews and Muslims destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world, and created the dark ages. The Europeans destroyed (temporarily) the Amerindian (siberian). The Anglos and Russians destroyed german civilization in the greatest crime since the fall of rome. The Bantu are destroying the boer. The jews and muslims are destroying the west. The question is what we do. I want to separate. Or at least separate by political preference. The only alternatives are war and genocide. I won’t let my people become the Boers. I don’t want any of us to prey upon one another or make a genocide of one another. The only solution is separation (europe) or degeneration (india, south america, the levant). The east asians are right. Expansion was a bad idea.

  • Our History of Destruction. What Do We Do?

    Um, you know. The aryans destroyed most of the people of northern europe. The romans committed a genocide against my celtic ancestors and sewed their own defeat by making possible the migration period. The Jews and Muslims destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world, and created the dark ages. The Europeans destroyed (temporarily) the Amerindian (siberian). The Anglos and Russians destroyed german civilization in the greatest crime since the fall of rome. The Bantu are destroying the boer. The jews and muslims are destroying the west. The question is what we do. I want to separate. Or at least separate by political preference. The only alternatives are war and genocide. I won’t let my people become the Boers. I don’t want any of us to prey upon one another or make a genocide of one another. The only solution is separation (europe) or degeneration (india, south america, the levant). The east asians are right. Expansion was a bad idea.

  • Paradigm Shifts

    Author: William S. Lind CD: 1 – Unipolar Power (Monopoly) vs return to balance of powers – nationalism (Markets). 2 – An Endless Supply of Money vs Return to ‘harder’ money (markets) 2 – Wilsonianism (Expansionary Democracy) vs Nationalism (Markets) 3 – Cultural Marxism (Anti-Whitism) vs Nationalism (Markets) 4 – The End of White Acquiescence. By William S Lind. The Establishment knows how to succeed in obtaining what it cares about, power and money, within the current paradigms. Those paradigms include America as the only real world power, before which all other nations must bow; an endless supply of money; Wilsonianism, i.e. forcing “democracy” down all other countries’ throats; and cultural Marxism, which seeks to put women over men, blacks over whites, and gays over straights (where they conflict, cultural Marxism takes precedence over democracy). But those paradigms are all beginning to shift. President Trump represents, at least in part, new paradigms which leave today’s Establishment irrelevant, isolated, and powerless. In response, the Establishment howls in fear and in hatred, especially hatred of a President who represents the heartland instead of the coastal elites. If we look at each of the above paradigms, we can see the shifts occurring. Not only does America lack the military power, money, and moral credit to dictate to every other country, all countries now face the challenge of Fourth Generation war, war waged by entities other than states. This challenge renders competition between states obsolete, something President Trump seems instinctively to grasp, at least in part. He knows a post-Communism Russian-American rivalry makes no strategic sense; he correctly thinks NATO is obsolete; and he may sense that states everywhere face crises of legitimacy, although of widely varying intensity. The Establishment howls because one of its major components, the Military-Industrial-Congressional complex must have “peer competitors”, other states it can inflate as threats, in order to justify the trillion dollars a year we spend on national security. F-35s, Ford-class aircraft carriers, and opposed amphibious landings have little relevance to 4GW. Meanwhile, the money is running out. The U.S., and most of the rest of the world, is heading for a colossal debt crisis. When it hits, we may not be able to afford $100 billion a year in defense, much less a trillion. This points to a third paradigm shift: the end of Wilsonianism. Our “defense” budget is really an offense budget. It supports a military that is supposed to force “democratic capitalism”, which is really oligarchic rent-seeking, down the throats of every people on earth — along with cultural Marxism and its definitions of “human rights”. Even if the money were not about to run out, Wilsonianism would be doomed from the start. Russell Kirk wrote, “There is no surer way to make a man your enemy than telling him you are going to remake him in your image for his own good.” Even Robespierre, too late, said that missionaries with bayonets are seldom welcome. President Trump grasps that attempts to turn places such as Afghanistan into Switzerland are foolish nonsense. Yet at the same time, he chose a neo-con, one of the people who tried to turn Iraq into a peaceful, secular democracy by invading it and destroying the state, as his national security advisor. So he still has a ways to go to ride this paradigm shift. ( cd: my view is that trump sees punishment until defeat and making ‘better choices’ rather than reconstruction in our demon-cratic image as his strategy and it’s working.) The last shift he not only grasps but rode into the White House on: the revolt of America’s heartland against political correctness, e.i., cultural Marxism. The Establishment either believes in cultural Marxism (most democrats) or is too cowardly to challenge it (most Republicans). Heartland voters are fed up with it, its advocates, and its sacred “victims” groups, most of whom distinguish themselves by their bad behavior. In a political battle between the coastal elites and their clients on the one hand and the heartland on the other, the heartland will win. Look at the percentage of whites among people who actually vote in all the swing states. The collapse of white acquiescence in cultural Marxism, both here and in Europe, may be the biggest paradigm shift of them all. And so, faced with irrelevance, the Establishment howls, froths at the mouth and chews the carpet, raging at President Trump. Like a madman whose derangement is killing him, it screams meaningless words, most ending in “ism”, as it dies. I’m sure the President will give it a grand funeral.

  • Paradigm Shifts

    Author: William S. Lind CD: 1 – Unipolar Power (Monopoly) vs return to balance of powers – nationalism (Markets). 2 – An Endless Supply of Money vs Return to ‘harder’ money (markets) 2 – Wilsonianism (Expansionary Democracy) vs Nationalism (Markets) 3 – Cultural Marxism (Anti-Whitism) vs Nationalism (Markets) 4 – The End of White Acquiescence. By William S Lind. The Establishment knows how to succeed in obtaining what it cares about, power and money, within the current paradigms. Those paradigms include America as the only real world power, before which all other nations must bow; an endless supply of money; Wilsonianism, i.e. forcing “democracy” down all other countries’ throats; and cultural Marxism, which seeks to put women over men, blacks over whites, and gays over straights (where they conflict, cultural Marxism takes precedence over democracy). But those paradigms are all beginning to shift. President Trump represents, at least in part, new paradigms which leave today’s Establishment irrelevant, isolated, and powerless. In response, the Establishment howls in fear and in hatred, especially hatred of a President who represents the heartland instead of the coastal elites. If we look at each of the above paradigms, we can see the shifts occurring. Not only does America lack the military power, money, and moral credit to dictate to every other country, all countries now face the challenge of Fourth Generation war, war waged by entities other than states. This challenge renders competition between states obsolete, something President Trump seems instinctively to grasp, at least in part. He knows a post-Communism Russian-American rivalry makes no strategic sense; he correctly thinks NATO is obsolete; and he may sense that states everywhere face crises of legitimacy, although of widely varying intensity. The Establishment howls because one of its major components, the Military-Industrial-Congressional complex must have “peer competitors”, other states it can inflate as threats, in order to justify the trillion dollars a year we spend on national security. F-35s, Ford-class aircraft carriers, and opposed amphibious landings have little relevance to 4GW. Meanwhile, the money is running out. The U.S., and most of the rest of the world, is heading for a colossal debt crisis. When it hits, we may not be able to afford $100 billion a year in defense, much less a trillion. This points to a third paradigm shift: the end of Wilsonianism. Our “defense” budget is really an offense budget. It supports a military that is supposed to force “democratic capitalism”, which is really oligarchic rent-seeking, down the throats of every people on earth — along with cultural Marxism and its definitions of “human rights”. Even if the money were not about to run out, Wilsonianism would be doomed from the start. Russell Kirk wrote, “There is no surer way to make a man your enemy than telling him you are going to remake him in your image for his own good.” Even Robespierre, too late, said that missionaries with bayonets are seldom welcome. President Trump grasps that attempts to turn places such as Afghanistan into Switzerland are foolish nonsense. Yet at the same time, he chose a neo-con, one of the people who tried to turn Iraq into a peaceful, secular democracy by invading it and destroying the state, as his national security advisor. So he still has a ways to go to ride this paradigm shift. ( cd: my view is that trump sees punishment until defeat and making ‘better choices’ rather than reconstruction in our demon-cratic image as his strategy and it’s working.) The last shift he not only grasps but rode into the White House on: the revolt of America’s heartland against political correctness, e.i., cultural Marxism. The Establishment either believes in cultural Marxism (most democrats) or is too cowardly to challenge it (most Republicans). Heartland voters are fed up with it, its advocates, and its sacred “victims” groups, most of whom distinguish themselves by their bad behavior. In a political battle between the coastal elites and their clients on the one hand and the heartland on the other, the heartland will win. Look at the percentage of whites among people who actually vote in all the swing states. The collapse of white acquiescence in cultural Marxism, both here and in Europe, may be the biggest paradigm shift of them all. And so, faced with irrelevance, the Establishment howls, froths at the mouth and chews the carpet, raging at President Trump. Like a madman whose derangement is killing him, it screams meaningless words, most ending in “ism”, as it dies. I’m sure the President will give it a grand funeral.