October 12th, 2018 6:11 PM GERMANY UNDER MERKEL Curt Doolittle Merkel is an east german educated by soviets and pursuing the soviet social strategy using soviet political techniques, within the german ethical moral, and political structure. there is a lot to be said of soviet political teachings, even if we find it unethical. Unfortunately without a ‘man’ in there and the restoration of the military under him it will be a serious problem for germans as this generation dies off. Sarunas Navickis I was born and grew up under soviet rule (thought I am Lithuanian and most of us considered soviets as occupants and oppressors) and now I live in Germany (western part) – I see these things first hand. There is problem over problem and over problem… Worst part of it is that some (most?) of these problems cannot be understood here any longer… Fuck… How could we get to this point of stupidity?! Curt Doolittle BY DESIGN. Sarunas Navickis You know, this is one of these times when I’d like to disagree even with my blood – and I cant…
Theme: Crisis
-
France Is the Enemy of Europe (really) and The West
October 12th, 2018 1:26 PM FRANCE IS THE ENEMY OF EUROPE (Really) AND THE WEST [L]ong term, while She can feed herself, and provide her own energy, and capture enough taxation to project local power, France has been, and will continue to be, the Enemy of European civilization – attempting at all times to drag her into feminine mediterraneanism and semiticism, while Germany must continuously expand her trade to maintain her position, and integrate with eastern europe, and russia for agrarian production (poland, ukraine), labor (poland, ukraine, russia), and resources (russia), while maintaining her relations with italy (seaports, aesthetics). Only Russia understands the threat to eurasia because only Russia faces it all along her borders. France has surrendered to it, but then France of the north may be German, but France of the south is Mediterranean, and Paris is but new Jerusalem in postmodern sophist rather than semitic supernatural prose, sold to gullible women and men of the academy who cannot produce by commercial, scientific, and military means. (WHY IS CURT STARTING THIS DISCUSSION? France, not Germany, is positioned to dominate europe upon the withdrawal of the USA from functioning as the word’s police force.)
-
GERMANY UNDER MERKEL Curt Doolittle Merkel is an east german educated by soviets
GERMANY UNDER MERKEL
Curt Doolittle
Merkel is an east german educated by soviets and pursuing the soviet social strategy using soviet political techniques, within the german ethical moral, and political structure. there is a lot to be said of soviet political teachings, even if we find it unethical. Unfortunately without a ‘man’ in there and the restoration of the military under him it will be a serious problem for germans as this generation dies off.
Sarunas Navickis
I was born and grew up under soviet rule (thought I am Lithuanian and most of us considered soviets as occupants and oppressors) and now I live in Germany (western part) – I see these things first hand. There is problem over problem and over problem… Worst part of it is that some (most?) of these problems cannot be understood here any longer… Fuck… How could we get to this point of stupidity?!
Curt Doolittle
BY DESIGN.
Sarunas Navickis
You know, this is one of these times when I’d like to disagree even with my blood – and I cant…
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-12 18:11:00 UTC
-
The Fragility of our Harbors
October 11th, 2018 12:24 PM [T]he Tzar Bomba was 26×6 feet, meaning it fits in a container or in the back of a regular truck. One each in LA and NY Harbors would pretty much wipe out the entire united states for all intents and purposes. It would not be difficult for this attack to take place. That bomb, the biggest one to date, did not include an accelerator, which would have doubled it to 100m. It would break windows in Oregon. Burn much of california to the border, and restore the desert within 60m of the blast.
-
Quoted in the Post
October 11th, 2018 6:26 PM
—“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– John Mark
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/ CONTENT HERE: Two events from the last two days stand out. The first came Monday night with President Trump’s forceful yet compassionate speech at the swearing in of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. The president opened with an extraordinary apology on behalf of the country to Kavanaugh and his family“for the terrible pain and suffering” they endured during the historically brutal confirmation process. He said the unfounded allegations violated fairness and “the presumption of innocence.” Trump also tenderly addressed Kavanaugh’s young daughters, telling them “your father is a great man, a man of decency, character, kindness and courage.” The event was something of a spike-the-football moment in front of a cheering White House audience and as such was a clever piece of stagecraft, where Republican Sens. Mitch McConnell, Charles Grassley, Lindsey Graham and Susan Collins were saluted. But the ceremony was much more than mere boosterism. With the eight other Supremes sitting in the front row, Trump aimed to restore dignity to the judiciary at a time when the dirtiest tricks of politics have buried the court in a mountain of mud. The president is right to worry that the character-assassination attempt on Kavanaughmay turn out to be a seminal moment in American political and cultural history. The ideas that the court is just another political branch and that the presumption of innocence no longer applies if you are on the other team represent a seismic shift in how we look at each other and the nation as a whole. If those ideas stick, we are in more trouble than we can imagine. And while Trump has at times unnecessarily contributed to the rancor, he was terrific Monday in trying to repair what Senate Democrats and their media handmaidens tried to destroy. Which brings me to the second event of note: Hillary Clinton’s statement Tuesday that Democrats “cannot be civil” as long as Republicans hold the White House and Congress. “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,” Clinton told CNN. “That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength.” There you have it — a declaration of war and a license for violence. Where is the media outrage? Clinton knows we are already in the danger zone when it comes to the political temperature. Her comments, then, are as reckless as bringing a can of gasoline to a bonfire. She’s stoking trouble to gain a foothold in the 2020 race — and damn the consequences. Her claim that civility can return when Dems have power is an admission that the ends justify the means. Then again, she never fails to disappoint. As I wrote Sunday, she has spent the last two years casting doubt on the legitimacy of the Trump presidency because the election didn’t go her way. That makes her guilty of the very thing she found “horrifying” when Trump suggested he might not abide by the results if he thought they were rigged. “He is denigrating — he is talking down our democracy. And I am appalled that someone who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that position,” she said in their final debate, in October 2016. She added, “That is not the way our democracy works.” But it does work exactly that way when Democrats are denied what they feel entitled to. They should be careful what they wish for. For if the Kavanaugh experience revealed anything, it is that Trump’s GOP knows how to fight back and win. It is hard to imagine that Kavanaugh would have survived such an onslaught under any other recent Republican candidate or president. There were so many reasons, and so much media pressure, that it would not have been surprising if a bloc of senators called the allegations a “distraction” and waved a white flag. They didn’t because Trump and Kavanaugh didn’t back down. Still, there is danger when two sides both think they can outlast the other. Responding to my concern that America might be sleepwalking into a second civil war, a number of readers agreed. Some said they welcomed it. Curt Doolittle wrote this: “We aren’t sleepwalking into it, we know exactly what we’re doing and why. The hard right and hard left are planning on it, ready for it, and looking for an opportunity.” He said the pressure has been building and that “the only reason it hasn’t turned hot is the outlier of Trump’s election. If Clinton had won, we’d already be there.”
City Hall in the X-treme
The City Hall press release was overflowing with superlatives. The action was “historic,” a “landmark” and “groundbreaking.” Did Mayor Putz find a cure for homelessness? Did he solve the problem of failing schools? Did he fix public housing or the subways? Nah, the small stuff is beneath him. His “stop the presses” accomplishment was signing legislation putting a third gender on city birth certificates. As his office described it, “In addition to the ‘male’ and ‘female’ designations, birth certificates will also show an ‘X,’ allowing gender non-binary people who identify neither as men nor women to have a birth certificate that more accurately reflects their identities.” The law takes effect Jan. 1 and removes the requirement that a medical or mental health professional affirm an individual’s gender to change the certificate. The effect is that anyone can simply demand a new birth certificate and choose a new gender. It’s not clear if there are age requirements or limits to the number of times an individual can make changes. To the roster of activist groups hailing the action, the change is something of a Holy Grail. First lady Chirlane McCray suggested it was just a first step, saying, “We will not stop there — we strive to extend that dignity to every aspect of life.” I don’t doubt that gender identity is a serious, complex issue for some people. But I do wonder about the impact of this dramatic change on society, including gender roles in everything from sports to toilets, and about the priorities of the mayor and City Council. Do they have the same passion for public safety and good schools? Do they care as much about the unfairness of the tax system? My fear is that they don’t, and that their intensity about narrow issues is a fig leaf hiding their surrender on broad ones. There are superlatives for that, too. Disgraceful, cowardice and shameful come to mind.
-
The Fragility of our Harbors
October 11th, 2018 12:24 PM [T]he Tzar Bomba was 26×6 feet, meaning it fits in a container or in the back of a regular truck. One each in LA and NY Harbors would pretty much wipe out the entire united states for all intents and purposes. It would not be difficult for this attack to take place. That bomb, the biggest one to date, did not include an accelerator, which would have doubled it to 100m. It would break windows in Oregon. Burn much of california to the border, and restore the desert within 60m of the blast.
-
Quoted in the Post
October 11th, 2018 6:26 PM
—“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– John Mark
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/ CONTENT HERE: Two events from the last two days stand out. The first came Monday night with President Trump’s forceful yet compassionate speech at the swearing in of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. The president opened with an extraordinary apology on behalf of the country to Kavanaugh and his family“for the terrible pain and suffering” they endured during the historically brutal confirmation process. He said the unfounded allegations violated fairness and “the presumption of innocence.” Trump also tenderly addressed Kavanaugh’s young daughters, telling them “your father is a great man, a man of decency, character, kindness and courage.” The event was something of a spike-the-football moment in front of a cheering White House audience and as such was a clever piece of stagecraft, where Republican Sens. Mitch McConnell, Charles Grassley, Lindsey Graham and Susan Collins were saluted. But the ceremony was much more than mere boosterism. With the eight other Supremes sitting in the front row, Trump aimed to restore dignity to the judiciary at a time when the dirtiest tricks of politics have buried the court in a mountain of mud. The president is right to worry that the character-assassination attempt on Kavanaughmay turn out to be a seminal moment in American political and cultural history. The ideas that the court is just another political branch and that the presumption of innocence no longer applies if you are on the other team represent a seismic shift in how we look at each other and the nation as a whole. If those ideas stick, we are in more trouble than we can imagine. And while Trump has at times unnecessarily contributed to the rancor, he was terrific Monday in trying to repair what Senate Democrats and their media handmaidens tried to destroy. Which brings me to the second event of note: Hillary Clinton’s statement Tuesday that Democrats “cannot be civil” as long as Republicans hold the White House and Congress. “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,” Clinton told CNN. “That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength.” There you have it — a declaration of war and a license for violence. Where is the media outrage? Clinton knows we are already in the danger zone when it comes to the political temperature. Her comments, then, are as reckless as bringing a can of gasoline to a bonfire. She’s stoking trouble to gain a foothold in the 2020 race — and damn the consequences. Her claim that civility can return when Dems have power is an admission that the ends justify the means. Then again, she never fails to disappoint. As I wrote Sunday, she has spent the last two years casting doubt on the legitimacy of the Trump presidency because the election didn’t go her way. That makes her guilty of the very thing she found “horrifying” when Trump suggested he might not abide by the results if he thought they were rigged. “He is denigrating — he is talking down our democracy. And I am appalled that someone who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that position,” she said in their final debate, in October 2016. She added, “That is not the way our democracy works.” But it does work exactly that way when Democrats are denied what they feel entitled to. They should be careful what they wish for. For if the Kavanaugh experience revealed anything, it is that Trump’s GOP knows how to fight back and win. It is hard to imagine that Kavanaugh would have survived such an onslaught under any other recent Republican candidate or president. There were so many reasons, and so much media pressure, that it would not have been surprising if a bloc of senators called the allegations a “distraction” and waved a white flag. They didn’t because Trump and Kavanaugh didn’t back down. Still, there is danger when two sides both think they can outlast the other. Responding to my concern that America might be sleepwalking into a second civil war, a number of readers agreed. Some said they welcomed it. Curt Doolittle wrote this: “We aren’t sleepwalking into it, we know exactly what we’re doing and why. The hard right and hard left are planning on it, ready for it, and looking for an opportunity.” He said the pressure has been building and that “the only reason it hasn’t turned hot is the outlier of Trump’s election. If Clinton had won, we’d already be there.”
City Hall in the X-treme
The City Hall press release was overflowing with superlatives. The action was “historic,” a “landmark” and “groundbreaking.” Did Mayor Putz find a cure for homelessness? Did he solve the problem of failing schools? Did he fix public housing or the subways? Nah, the small stuff is beneath him. His “stop the presses” accomplishment was signing legislation putting a third gender on city birth certificates. As his office described it, “In addition to the ‘male’ and ‘female’ designations, birth certificates will also show an ‘X,’ allowing gender non-binary people who identify neither as men nor women to have a birth certificate that more accurately reflects their identities.” The law takes effect Jan. 1 and removes the requirement that a medical or mental health professional affirm an individual’s gender to change the certificate. The effect is that anyone can simply demand a new birth certificate and choose a new gender. It’s not clear if there are age requirements or limits to the number of times an individual can make changes. To the roster of activist groups hailing the action, the change is something of a Holy Grail. First lady Chirlane McCray suggested it was just a first step, saying, “We will not stop there — we strive to extend that dignity to every aspect of life.” I don’t doubt that gender identity is a serious, complex issue for some people. But I do wonder about the impact of this dramatic change on society, including gender roles in everything from sports to toilets, and about the priorities of the mayor and City Council. Do they have the same passion for public safety and good schools? Do they care as much about the unfairness of the tax system? My fear is that they don’t, and that their intensity about narrow issues is a fig leaf hiding their surrender on broad ones. There are superlatives for that, too. Disgraceful, cowardice and shameful come to mind.
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_424209615
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_4242096158391926784_o_10156700426017264.jpg —“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– @[100024151412040:2048:John Mark]
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113James SantagataNot surprising to see Curt quoted at all. It is actually brilliant by Goodwin, because he can surface this with a great quote/insight without mentioning Propertarianism, etc. yet Curt is a Google away. At same time, in typical Leftie bastion, I have been shocked to see the impact we are all having with them having to reconsider or try to counter “racism” as simply an outcome of “patterns and priors/probabilties”, and their introducing “natural law” — they use “” to show that they are not comfortable with it. But it is there.Oct 11, 2018, 6:43 PMJames SantagataMy view from Google……The people that matter, Left, Right, Center, will Google Curt, without “”….. and what they will find….. twitter, propertarian website and a couple youtube videos, and then pandora’s box is wide open.Oct 11, 2018, 6:45 PMAndrew ClaytonIt’s a pretty good quote :)Oct 11, 2018, 6:49 PMJon JonathanPretty on point for the NY CompostOct 11, 2018, 7:08 PMJohn MarkCurt should be quoted extensively by our descendants throughout their schooling.Oct 11, 2018, 7:16 PMCurt Doolittleit’s different in the USA. I’m an intellectual. We don’t arrest intellectuals. We arrest activists and organizers and people who do things.Oct 11, 2018, 7:31 PMSteve SlonkyI’d like to see your trial CurtOct 11, 2018, 7:37 PMCurt Doolittle( I have been told by multiple lawyers over the decades “The last thing I will do is put you on the stand just so you can make a circus of the courtroom.” Or “There is no way I’m putting you on the stand.” )Oct 11, 2018, 7:44 PMAndrew ClaytonGutless lawyers hahaOct 11, 2018, 7:47 PMCurt DoolittleI’m bad enough in deposition. Mostly because the attorneys can’t believe I won’t result to practicalities. I mean, last big suit I had, I said I was willing to take it to a jury and lose. If you maintain the moral high ground it is very difficult to use the system against you. I trust the jury. That’s what scares people. Juries are random numbers. Law may be law but juries will go with the moral high ground.
Only reason I got screwed in my divorce was that they forced me to choose between cancer surgery or holding out for six months to a year until I could have it. I was so sick you can’t imagine. I couldn’t stay healthy and ‘clear minded’ for more than two weeks at a time. The fact that the court tolerated using that tactic is one of the reasons I’m determined to revolt and reform the system so that such nonsense doesn’t happen to anyone else.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMJon JonathanI picture it going like the time Evola was on trial.
“During his trial in 1951, Evola denied being a fascist and instead referred to himself as a “superfascist”. “Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMCurt Doolittlenot gutless. smart.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMIgor RogovFamily courts are totally parasitised by the Left waging their war against “entitled white male”, even more here in Australia, and the lawyers are generally complicit in it, with few notable exceptions. Application of adversarial court system, feminist agenda and government oversight in shape of social workers and various government – affiliated agencies to family law is a true goldmine for the judiciary, social worker’s bloated bureaucracy, mediocre psychologists and billion dollar “Duluth model” industry. And it is absolutely ruinous for the nation, and for many individuals.Oct 11, 2018, 8:20 PMChristopher HallMost recently the good people at RAMOct 11, 2018, 8:39 PMHoward Van Der KlauwIgor Rogov exactly and completely trueOct 11, 2018, 8:40 PMJoe Boyumboxed wine resistance versus AR-15 nationalismOct 11, 2018, 10:58 PMAnjin BodhisattvaIs it ok to like both?Oct 12, 2018, 1:52 AMJoe FossReminds me when Styx pointed out MSM figures probably keep an eye on guys like him. Looks like you’re on their radar, tooOct 12, 2018, 8:03 AMMurphy CellNice to see an old Connecticut boy making waves with the Normies!Oct 12, 2018, 10:21 AMKevin CoxFranzia and SSRIs = hardened revolutionaries.Oct 13, 2018, 1:49 AM—“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– John Mark
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 18:26:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_424209615
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43684184_10156700426027264_4242096158391926784_o_10156700426017264.jpg —“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– @[100024151412040:2048:John Mark]
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113James SantagataNot surprising to see Curt quoted at all. It is actually brilliant by Goodwin, because he can surface this with a great quote/insight without mentioning Propertarianism, etc. yet Curt is a Google away. At same time, in typical Leftie bastion, I have been shocked to see the impact we are all having with them having to reconsider or try to counter “racism” as simply an outcome of “patterns and priors/probabilties”, and their introducing “natural law” — they use “” to show that they are not comfortable with it. But it is there.Oct 11, 2018, 6:43 PMJames SantagataMy view from Google……The people that matter, Left, Right, Center, will Google Curt, without “”….. and what they will find….. twitter, propertarian website and a couple youtube videos, and then pandora’s box is wide open.Oct 11, 2018, 6:45 PMAndrew ClaytonIt’s a pretty good quote :)Oct 11, 2018, 6:49 PMJon JonathanPretty on point for the NY CompostOct 11, 2018, 7:08 PMJohn MarkCurt should be quoted extensively by our descendants throughout their schooling.Oct 11, 2018, 7:16 PMCurt Doolittleit’s different in the USA. I’m an intellectual. We don’t arrest intellectuals. We arrest activists and organizers and people who do things.Oct 11, 2018, 7:31 PMSteve SlonkyI’d like to see your trial CurtOct 11, 2018, 7:37 PMCurt Doolittle( I have been told by multiple lawyers over the decades “The last thing I will do is put you on the stand just so you can make a circus of the courtroom.” Or “There is no way I’m putting you on the stand.” )Oct 11, 2018, 7:44 PMAndrew ClaytonGutless lawyers hahaOct 11, 2018, 7:47 PMCurt DoolittleI’m bad enough in deposition. Mostly because the attorneys can’t believe I won’t result to practicalities. I mean, last big suit I had, I said I was willing to take it to a jury and lose. If you maintain the moral high ground it is very difficult to use the system against you. I trust the jury. That’s what scares people. Juries are random numbers. Law may be law but juries will go with the moral high ground.
Only reason I got screwed in my divorce was that they forced me to choose between cancer surgery or holding out for six months to a year until I could have it. I was so sick you can’t imagine. I couldn’t stay healthy and ‘clear minded’ for more than two weeks at a time. The fact that the court tolerated using that tactic is one of the reasons I’m determined to revolt and reform the system so that such nonsense doesn’t happen to anyone else.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMJon JonathanI picture it going like the time Evola was on trial.
“During his trial in 1951, Evola denied being a fascist and instead referred to himself as a “superfascist”. “Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMCurt Doolittlenot gutless. smart.Oct 11, 2018, 7:50 PMAmir MetzgerSome lawyers are the most fucked up people in existence, no questionOct 11, 2018, 7:52 PMIgor RogovFamily courts are totally parasitised by the Left waging their war against “entitled white male”, even more here in Australia, and the lawyers are generally complicit in it, with few notable exceptions. Application of adversarial court system, feminist agenda and government oversight in shape of social workers and various government – affiliated agencies to family law is a true goldmine for the judiciary, social worker’s bloated bureaucracy, mediocre psychologists and billion dollar “Duluth model” industry. And it is absolutely ruinous for the nation, and for many individuals.Oct 11, 2018, 8:20 PMChristopher HallMost recently the good people at RAMOct 11, 2018, 8:39 PMHoward Van Der KlauwIgor Rogov exactly and completely trueOct 11, 2018, 8:40 PMJoe Boyumboxed wine resistance versus AR-15 nationalismOct 11, 2018, 10:58 PMAnjin BodhisattvaIs it ok to like both?Oct 12, 2018, 1:52 AMJoe FossReminds me when Styx pointed out MSM figures probably keep an eye on guys like him. Looks like you’re on their radar, tooOct 12, 2018, 8:03 AMMurphy CellNice to see an old Connecticut boy making waves with the Normies!Oct 12, 2018, 10:21 AMKevin CoxFranzia and SSRIs = hardened revolutionaries.Oct 13, 2018, 1:49 AM—“Hi Curt, it looks like you were quoted in the NY Post.”– John Mark
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres-the-outrage-over-hillarys-call-for-a-civil-war/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20181010&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-7363293-719682113
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 18:26:00 UTC
-
The Tzar Bomba was 26×6 feet, meaning it fits in a container or in the back of a
The Tzar Bomba was 26×6 feet, meaning it fits in a container or in the back of a regular truck. One each in LA and NY Harbors would pretty much wipe out the entire united states for all intents and purposes. It would not be difficult for this attack to take place.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 16:24:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050421913447747588