Theme: Crisis

  • “So we pray you take heed. Do not dismiss our entreaty. Our demands are right, j

    —“So we pray you take heed. Do not dismiss our entreaty. Our demands are right, just, possible and in the interests of our peoples. And if demanding fails we shall compel. And if we compel, we will make the Horrors of the French Revolution turn so feeble, that men will remember our prosecution for ten thousand years. For when all our ancestors that have been before, and all our descendants that have yet to be, demand our lives in their honor, we will not shirk our duty to them. And we will have no mercy in our execution.”— The Second American Declaration


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-13 10:50:00 UTC

  • I TOLD YOU SO… A Moral License A Set of Demands A Means of Transition A Method

    I TOLD YOU SO…
    A Moral License
    A Set of Demands
    A Means of Transition
    A Method of altering the status quo.

    Welcome to the revolution.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 21:23:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083836877055148033

  • ON AMERICA AT THE EDGE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BclcpfVn2rgZEIHAN ON AMERICA AT THE EDGE.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 18:54:00 UTC

  • IT!!!! by Pat Buchanan, today. In the long run, history will validate Donald Tru

    https://www.wnd.com/2019/01/memo-to-trump-declare-an-emergency/#0x9xMvKsy7YcjCRg.99DO IT!!!!

    by Pat Buchanan, today.

    In the long run, history will validate Donald Trump’s stand on a border wall to defend the sovereignty and security of the United States.

    Why? Because mass migration from the global South, not climate change, is the real existential crisis of the West.

    The American people know this, and even the elites sense it.

    Think not? Well, check out the leading liberal newspapers Thursday.

    The Washington Post and the New York Times each had two front-page stories about the president’s battle with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer on funding the border wall.

    Inside the first section, the Post had more stories, including one describing walls in history from China’s Great Wall to the Berlin Wall to the Israeli West Bank wall to the wall separating Hungary from Serbia.

    Inside the Times was a story on a new anti-immigration party, Vox, surging in Andalusia in Spain, and a story about African migrants being welcomed in Malta after being denied entry into Europe.

    Another Times story related how the new president of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, has pulled out of a U.N. pact on migration, declaring, “Brazil has a sovereign right to decide whether or not it accepts immigrants.”

    Half the columns on the op-ed pages of the papers dealt with Trump, immigration and the wall. And there was nothing significant in either on the Democrats’ hot new issue, a Green New Deal.

    Consider. In 1992, this writer’s presidential campaign had to fight to have inserted in the GOP platform a call for “structures” on the border.

    Now, the whole Western world is worried about its borders as issues of immigration and identity convulse almost every country.

    Looking ahead, does anyone think Americans in 2030 are going to be more concerned about the border between North Korea and South Korea, or Turkey and Syria, or Kuwait and Iraq, or Russia and Ukraine, than about the 2,000-mile border between the U.S. and Mexico?

    Does anyone think Pelosi’s position that a wall is immoral will not be regarded as absurd?

    America’s southern border is eventually going to be militarized and defended, or the United States, as we have known it, is going to cease to exist. And Americans will not go gentle into that good night.

    Whatever one may think of the face-off Tuesday with “Chuck and Nancy,” Trump’s portrait of an unsustainable border crisis is dead on: “In the last two years, ICE officers made 266,000 arrests of aliens with criminal records, including those charged or convicted of 100,000 assaults, 30,000 sex crimes and 4,000 violent killings.”

    The Democrats routine retort, that native-born Americans have a higher crime rate, will not suffice as new atrocities, like those Trump related, are reported and repeated before November 2020.

    What should Trump do now? Act. He cannot lose this battle with Pelosi without demoralizing his people and imperiling his presidency.

    Since FDR, we have had presidential government. And when U.S. presidents have been decisive activists, history has rewarded their actions.

    Lincoln suspended habeas corpus. On taking office, FDR declared a bank holiday. When Britain was barely hanging on in World War II, he swapped 50 destroyers for British bases. He ordered U.S. ships to chase down German submarines and lied about it. Truman fired Gen. MacArthur.

    Reagan fired the striking air controllers and ordered the military to occupy Grenada to stop Marxist thugs who had taken over in a coup from taking 500 U.S. medical students hostage.

    Critics raged: Reagan had no right to invade. But the American people rewarded Reagan with a 49-state landslide.

    Trump should declare a national emergency, shift funds out of the Pentagon, build his wall, open the government and charge Democrats with finding excuses not to secure our border because they have a demographic and ideological interest in changing the face of the nation.

    For the larger the share of the U.S. population that requires welfare, the greater the need for more social workers, and the more voters there will be to vote to further grow the liberal welfare state.

    The more multiracial, multiethnic, multicultural, multilingual America becomes – the less it looks like Ronald Reagan’s America – the more dependably Democratic it will become.

    The Democratic Party is hostile to white men, because the smaller the share of the U.S. population that white men become, the sooner that Democrats inherit the national estate.

    The only way to greater “diversity,” the golden calf of the Democratic Party, is to increase the number of women, African-Americans, Asians and Hispanics, and thereby reduce the number of white men.

    The decisive issues on which Trump was elected were not the old Republican litany of tax cuts, conservative judges and increased defense spending.

    They were securing the borders, extricating America from foolish wars, eliminating trade deficits with NAFTA nations, the EU and China, making allies pay their fair share of the common defense, resurrecting our manufacturing base and getting along with Russia.

    “America First!” is still a winning hand.

    Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2019/01/memo-to-trump-declare-an-emergency/#0x9xMvKsy7YcjCRg.99


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-11 17:47:00 UTC

  • We are gonna have to go to war men. Not much else to be done

    We are gonna have to go to war men.

    Not much else to be done.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-09 20:01:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083091353532329985

  • We are gonna have to go to war men. Not much else to be done

    We are gonna have to go to war men.

    Not much else to be done.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-09 15:01:00 UTC

  • Sorry Tyler, but as much as I’m a fan, we are in fact going to have a revolution

    Sorry Tyler, but as much as I’m a fan, we are in fact going to have a revolution. Whether it is the traditional legal anglo, or the bloody french, undermining jewish, or invasive musim is irrelevant. I know. Because I’m one of the many people that is organizing it.
    @tylercowen


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-08 12:19:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1082612862625955840

  • TACTICS – LIBERATING SPAIN by Noah J Revoy ( see ) Gerald the Fearless was very

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_the_FearlessREVOLUTIONARY TACTICS – LIBERATING SPAIN

    by Noah J Revoy

    ( see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_the_Fearless )

    Gerald the Fearless was very successful in suppressing the muslim occupation of Portugal with just a handful of men. They would dress as simple travelers armed only with fighting knives, sneak into forts using grappling hooks, kill all the guards with sneaky attacks and start a fire to cover their escape.

    They even snuck into the house of the guy in change of Evora, killing him and his whole family.

    They would do this until no one wanted to guard the walls or run the city because it was too risky. Eventually the muslims abandoned entire cities because less than 20 guys were causing such havoc and destroying their moral.

    Hit and run tactics are very effective.

    The outnumbered Christians could never take the heavily fortified city by force. There is still a massive wall around the whole old city.

    Sometimes 10 men can do the job 10,000 cant.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-08 07:21:00 UTC

  • We are going to rise alright. But the consequences will be the opposite of those

    We are going to rise alright. But the consequences will be the opposite of those you anticipate.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 21:24:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081300376828215296

    Reply addressees: @RashidaTlaib

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081195487917682690


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RashidaTlaib

    This is not just about Donald Trump. This is about all of us. In the face of this constitutional crisis, we must rise.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081195487917682690

  • MORE ON THE VULNERABILITY OF WESTERN NATIONS (Rule of Threes…three weeks witho

    MORE ON THE VULNERABILITY OF WESTERN NATIONS

    (Rule of Threes…three weeks without power, three months without order…)

    —“an Iranian military journal has floated around the idea of launching an EMP attack as the key to defeating the U.S. In an article titled “Electronics to Determine Fate of Future Wars,” the journal explains how an EMP attack on America’s electronic infrastructure would bring the country to its knees.

    “Once you confuse the enemy communication network, you can also disrupt the work of the enemy command- and decision-making center,” the article states. “Even worse today when you disable a country’s military high command through disruption of communications, you will, in effect, disrupt all the affairs of that country. If the world’s industrial countries fail to devise effective ways to defend themselves against dangerous electronic assaults, then they will disintegrate within a few years. American soldiers would not be able to find food to eat nor would they be able to fire a single shot.”

    Reporting to Congress, the EMP Commission concluded that little in the private sector is hardened to withstand an EMP attack, and even the U.S. military itself has only limited protection. In 2005, Former CIA chief James Woolsey affirmed these facts and urged the country to take steps necessary to protect against the potentially devastating consequences. In testimony before the House International Terrorism and Non-Proliferation Subcommittee, Woolsey referred to the nuclear EMP threat as “a SCUD in a bucket” whereby:

    “…a simple ballistic missile from a stockpile somewhere in the world outfitted on something like a tramp steamer and fired from some distance offshore into an American city or to a high altitude, thereby creating an electromagnetic pulse effect, which could well be one of the most damaging ways of using a nuclear weapon.”

    “…We do not have the luxury of assuming that Iran, if it develops fissionable materials, for example, would not share it under some circumstances with al-Qaida operatives. We don’t have the luxury of believing that just because North Korea is a communist state, it would not work under some circumstances to sell its fissionable material to Hezbollah or al-Qaida.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-04 14:29:00 UTC