Lisa Outhwaite CORRECTLY APPORTIONS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAILURE OF THE WEST
—“Curt Doolittle, You personally do not. There is nothing MGTOW about you.
<q>”…women are how the marxist,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496025007661061&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:55:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189571632559460352
–“Despite all your rage you are still just a rat in a cage.”–
Revolution comes.
( Liberties taken. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 14:05:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189543974534602752
“NOTHING ELSE REALLY DEFINES ALTERNATIVES WITH ACTIONABLE SOLUTIONS.”
(worth repeating)
—“Millenials and Gen Z are mad that we have no community, society, fair ratio of marriageable women, reason to invest at all. Most of us would trade what we have now for communism, anarchy or any number of flawed systems.
Philosophically speaking, fight club or the joker are more compelling than most or the abstract appeals pitched at us in the past 50 years. Except for P. Nothing else really defines or offers appealing alternatives with actionable solutions.”— GL Sevier
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:28:00 UTC
THE POLICE ARE DEPENDENT ON GASOLINE TOO
In Houston I have gone 5 days without electricity or EMS/Police service due to hurricanes.
The first thing to go is gasoline. It was creepy to listen on my police scanner as they refused 911 calls because they didn’t have enough fuel to drive to the location.
Now I fill several 5-gallon fuel cans when a hurricane approaches. Get a few of these and put them in your attic. Fill them when danger approaches…
—Bill Shevick Jager
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:17:00 UTC
THE CURRENT CONDITION OF PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE AND WESTERN CIVILIZATION
(important)(profound)
—“The best practical use of analytic philosophy was rooting out methodological problems in scientific inquiry that arise from conceptual confusion or can otherwise be treated with conceptual analysis. The process of formalization of a language of inquiry failed, but it was only a means to the end of improving scientific methodology.”—Duke Newcomb
Sort of. This isn’t quite correct. The process of formalization failed, and in doing so took philosophical rationalism, and the claim that philosophy was a means of developing truth by proof, down with it. There is no closure outside of first order logic, and there is no ‘proof’ to be had in argument like there is in mathematics. Even in mathematics, it is only possible because it’s axiomatic (declared), and scale independence(there is no scale independence outside of the arrow range of human senses). The result is that the logics are only falsificationary. That’s all. So, popper’s program of falsification, which he evolved from jewish via-negativa pilpul and critique, was incomplete, and the anglo-germanic analytic via-positiva program was incomplete, and the pursuit of scientific method was incomplete – all for the same reason: all epistemology is eliminative (falsificationary) just like all market activity: trial and error by which that which is not false, survives competition between reason, action, and the results of action in reality.
—“Continental philosophy is perfectly fine philosophy, if you judge it by the standard of concept production. It’s just poorly written and maliciously employed. However, some interesting, important, and insightful concepts have been produced in the mess of the Continental tradition. It would also be possible to construct an anti-Abrahamic Continental philosophy, starting with Heidegger and Nietzsche. Granted, it would be mostly just another kind of pilpul, but it could be effective.”—Duke Newcomb
Again, agreed, but I might state this a little more precisely. The continental tradition advances the human technique of fiction we call parable, storytelling, mythology, and theology (free association – utility) requiring the least knowledge, into the human technique of idealism (hypothesis – good) requiring we falsify by reason with more knowledge, before we use the human technique we call science (theory – truth) where we falsify by evidence with the most knowledge.
Someone brought up Compte last night and I suppose I should do us a favor and drawing the historical parallels as we developed social science over the past few centuries, by the same means Compte suggested in continental prose and I’ve formalized in anglo legal prose.
And so it is perhaps better to say that a Reasonable Preference or Reciprocal Good aren’t decidable by Truth – only by preference and shared preference. Conversely, a Truth isn’t decidable by preference or good, only by decidability independent of preference or good.
So the value of the continental method is in the reorganization of paradigms, for the choice and production of preferences and goods, because it served by the subjective and empathic, and communicated by the subjective empathic, and the question of the truth or falsehood, gain or loss, reciprocity or parasitism, that would falsify that claim of preference or good, is the function of science – or what I call Testimonial Truth under the Law of Reciprocity.
So ideas move up and down the hierarchy, between fictions, ideals(preferential and good), and reals(Decidable), where we suggest, inform, agree, and falsify upon ideals, stated as fictions, ideals, or reals according depending upon our ability, experience(age), and knowledge(information).
The principle difference being that the continental(ideal) method like the magical, occult (fictional) method, is open to use for deceit – especially the abrahamic deceits which evolved to take advantage of them – and between story on one end, and testimony on the other, we have room for supernatural abuse of storytelling, sophomoric abuse of idealism, and pseudoscientific abuse of testimony.
Human Cognition
Intuition—————–Reason————-Operationalism
Free Association ——-Hypothesis——————Theory
Empathy—————-Sympathy—————–Evidence
Story ——————– Ideal —————— Testimony
Fiction—–Theology — Sophistry — Pseudoscience —-Lie
Internal Market – Interpersonal Verbal Market – Action Market
Competition————Competition ———–Competition
—“The problem is conceptual analysis isn’t enough.”–
Let’s complete that sentence. Enough for what? To meet the demand for infallibility in the given question? It’s not enough to warranty due diligence that a preference or good is’t an act of fraud or deceit.
Do you see what I did there? I removed the (foolish) presumption of intellectual honesty, reciprocity, and presumption of error, and moved the point of demarcation for lying from presumption to demonstrated.
This is why the law of speech has to change. A high trust people able to presume intellectual honesty limited to error, because of thousands of years of (a)militia service for standing, training in reporting, and the criminality of courage (b) the oath upon adulthood, (b) our law to enforce it regardless of rank even if proportional in cost and disincentive, (c) punishment by one’s parents, kin, community, nobility, or aristocracy.
We were invaded yet again in the modern world, because of our high trust and presumption of innocence, as we were invaded by jews and christianity (making us vulnerable to islam) using the lies of religion in the ancient world; this time with false promise of marxism (class and pseudoscience), feminism (gender and denialism), postmodernism (identity and sophism). And like the ancient world women were the target because they evolved not to speak truth but to obtain conformity from children through continuous false statements, and resources of men through continuous false promise – because that was their evolutionary necessity. Not truth before face and eugenic hierarchy, but dysgenic survival of children regardless of merit, and alliance with women against dominant males for the same reason, at the cost of being continuously undermined by women who do not form a hierarchy of rule, but complete for attention in a rotating market for female sexual, caretaking and social, value.
—“There are a lot of practical technical problems in empirical methodology of science, as well as in mathematical statistics, the real language of science.”—
As far as I know, yes, but these are problems of failure of due diligence in the limitation of claims made from the data, because we have created a market under which publication regardless of merit must be justified in order to obtain funding. Which we can easily correct.
In statistics, which does nothing more than seek to provide commensurability between different distributions at different scales, assisting us in the discovery of hypotheses, we can then attempt to operationalize, there is a very simple test:
(a) are you engaging in conflation (almost always)
(a) can you construct an operational hypothesis, theory, or description (meaning operational name) that reproduces those statistics – particularly those statistics that involve rational choice (See Gary Becker’s works) in psychology, or sociology, or politics, or group strategy. In mathematics are you doing the same? (almost never outside of applied mathematics). In physics are you doing the same (absolutely not – Bohr brought postmodernism AND idealism back into physics. And this is the problem with the copenhagen interpretation, and the vast woo woo and mathematical “wooo woo” and pseudoscience that has emerged from it. the failure of mathematicians to develop operational rather than statistical and probabilistic models to describe the wave form we call string that produce the wave form we call quantum fields, that produce the density of quantum fields we call particles. As far as I know the problem is operational acna cannot be solved by mathematics upon which the entire discipline wastes its time, only by trial and error construction of primitive geometries in the manner of protein folding. Why? There is nothing left to “average” below the quantum fields’ underlying wave form, the String. (I doubt very very much I will err in this prediction, since I am simply predicting the dominance of this category of error, given the history of this category of error prohibiting human innovation. )
So, If we required operationalization of all statistical claims, and due diligence against categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, and reciprocal inconsistency and therefore inflation and conflation, and obscurantism, very few statistical claims would be published. And those that did would be truth candidates rather than misleading or deceptive, or in furtherance of fraud, for personal, group, political advantage or destruction.
Repairing the incentives means only (b) restoring government research grants to basic knowledge of the universe, within a list of publicly available known problems, with military (political physical), applied technological(commercial physical), basic bio (political biological), applied medical(commercial bio) and in the private sector – because this is all that is economically possible and demonstrably and operationally successful. (c) separating funds of teaching (undergrad, grad) from research (phd postgrad) in universities by hard financial, legal, and institutional walls.
—“However, I think much of analytic philosophy would be useful training for a broad spectrum analytic methodologist who aims to improve the structure and interpretation of scientific practice. That should be a career field with specific vocational preparation: analytic methodologist. Analytic philosophy is just a proper subset of this.”—Duke Newcomb
Scriptural, textual, spoken interpretation is dead. Things don’t speak. Only people do. Things have no intent, people do. All speech is testimonial(due diligence) or honest(warrantied), or dishonest(Fraud). Analytic philosophy is dead. It was killed when Godel wrote his sentence, dying when Popper wrote his, and dead when Kripke gave his first lecture, and Strawson gave the eulogy. Hayek understood he just couldn’t bring it across the line. He didn’t have Turing and Chomsky. I did.
So we will have no more presumption of honesty and reciprocity until we have restored truthful speech as we have in the past through aggressive suppression, with every man a sheriff, in policing display word and deed for failure of due diligence, failure of warranty, fraud and theft. Until once again we are the able to speak truth regardless of cost, ake nothing not paid for regardless of need, defend the commons regardless of cost.
The soft eugenics of truth, duty, and reciprocity.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
October 2019.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:05:00 UTC
Lisa Outhwaite CORRECTLY APPORTIONS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAILURE OF THE WEST
—“Curt Doolittle, You personally do not. There is nothing MGTOW about you.
<q>”…women are how the marxist, postmodernists, and feminists, brought their repetition of the destruction of civilization into ours.”</q>
This point, and the general spirit of the original post fell short in terms of fairly apportioning responsibility and, therefore, will have fallen short in terms of re-building legitimate male strength, which must be founded on a more serious appraisal of past mistakes and a full acknowledgement of the burden of blame.
The:
<q>”women have destroyed Western civilisation'</q>
… argument has become almost a rallying call to less discerning, disenfranchised males and it’s in dire need of correction, or balance certainly, by more superintendent males.”— Lisa Outhwaite
Correct.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:55:00 UTC
It is very likely to go hot any time between december and october, with peak in late spring. It is always and everywhere our advantage to act early, and in winter, because like russia it is our friend.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 22:15:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189304666766614533
Reply addressees: @thanos_pope @canucklander
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189303252568985601
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189303252568985601
Questions
- The issues raised by identity politics are real and significant? His distinction between “tactical choices” and “general positions”?
- That climate change is an existential threat?
- His assertion that the right is devoted to the destruction of units of organized society as evidenced by withdrawal from the Paris Agreement?
- How about his take on the extreme anti-war left of the 60’s?
- Public vs. private media? The Founders believing that the government should have an active role in the promotion of the free press?
- American libertarianism being the ultra right advocacy of private tyrannies?
—A follower
[A]ll political conflict in the west was made possible only by the inclusion of women into the franchise without providing them with a separate house, thereby preserving the ability of the classes to negotiate for their interests in honest public discourse, while adding the participation women who have opposing genetic interests and intuitions to that of men, as another class with yet another set of intersets. So, all political conflict consists of the unstated and political unpleasant: it’s just the eugenic masculine european right against dysgenic feminine and anti-european left and in the postwar period the suppression of eugenics has created the crisis of the age, and threatened to reverse all human civlization to another semitic dark age.
[T]here is always room for new solutions consisting of trades between the classes, to compensate for vast almost unimaginable differences in ability between the classes, and the vast differences in productivity and value to mankind between the classes. There is never room for shaming, ridiculing, moralizing, psychologizing, gossiping, rallying, undermining, and reputation destruction for the vast genetic differences, vast productive differences, and vast value differences between the classes. Either an individual or group is engage in falsehood, irreciprocity, and particularly institutional irreciprocity we call ‘rent seeking’, or political rent seeking we call ‘corruption’, regardless of the proportionality of their returns on ability and effort, wherein we can take that individual or group to court for fraud and theft, or theft by rent seeking or corruption – or we can offer an exchange of trade by political negotiation for what we want, as long as we have something to offer. But without the other parties engaging in fraud, theft, rent seeking or corruption, the only reason a people have ‘wants’ is because they have failed to produce eugenically enough, and have failed to invest in their offspring enough, and failed to engaging in manners, norms, ethics, morals and commons enough, that they cannot themselves engage in fraud, theft(reallocation), or redistribution (rent seeking, corruption). You have less than others in a market economy because you and your family have chosen poorly. So how can you choose less poorly? Well you can demand rule of law instead of socialism. You can not seek redistribution, rent-seeking, or corruption. You can not engage in lying, fraud, theft, conspiracy. And you can ‘clean your room, clean your house, clean your hard, clean your neighborhood, and clean your city, clean your nation, and clean your government of human parasitic filth. Or you can do what islam does, and christianity encourages, which is reduce everyone in every civilization possible to the same low genetic, cultural, ethical, moral standard – and remain equal in superstition, ignorance, poverty and disease, and blame others for your condition.
[T]here is no threat from climate change, per say, it a byproduct of a threat to the planet due to over population of the underclasses outside of the first world, now invading the first world, and reversing genetic evolution, reversing institutional, cultural and knowledge evolution, and engaging in hyper-consmption to do so. In fact there is nothin dangerous to this planet and the ecosystem which extensive sterilization and universal one child policies will not solve in a few generations. There are no environmental problems that are not the result non-western people failing to repeat the western miracle of soft eugenic reduction of the underclasses through manorialism, requirement for property and income before marriage and reproduction, and the redistribution of reproduction from the underclasses that are genetic cultural informational, institutional, and genetic dead weight on man and planet.
[T]he right is devoted to the expansion of market economies and with it the eugenics that occur from the exchange of the value of reproduction to consumption. The right was stopped from the american eugenic program because of Hitler (even if he was right), and because the Nazi movement came after increases in underclass voting, and therefore it was impossible to restore institutional eugenics to compensate for new rates of reproduction. Instead, europe has gone from IQ parity with the Ashkenazi, and IQ superiority to asia, to rapidly approaching second if not third world intelligence levels – thus declining american productivity, financialization of the economy, and rapid underclass immigration to compensate for taxing the middle class out of reproductivity, all to maintain economic velocity, and as a consequence the generation of demand for redistribution and authoritarian state – ending western miracle of rule of law and markets in everything made possible by developing a ratio of talent to market productivity, because the underclasses are not competitive in the world economy given the present much higher standard of living in the western world.
[T]he war against communism is largely the cause of the crisis of western civilization, largely because the jewish intellectuals could obtain a foothold in overthrowing Russia that they could not obtain in other western countries. Then the could use Russia as the economic and military asset with which to destroy western civilization’s invention of Aristotelian reason, roman banking, templar banking, the Hanseatic League, the european age of sail, the empirical revolution, the scientific revolution, and the restoration of western civilization after the jewish, christian and islamic destruction and reduction to ignorance superstition poverty and dysgenia of every great civilization of the the ancient world by false promise of equality to women, slaves, underclasses and the dim and ignorant. The anti-war left was an intentional migration of the left wing from fomenting class warfare between the working and the middle classes, due to the worldwide failure of marxism and communism evident by 1960. The communists under the Frankfurt school had early recognized the impossibility of undermining the rule of law, and open economy of western civilization because it was raising humanity out of poverty so rapidly. The first use of undermining America in the Russian model was labor, then Frankfurt against art values history, and culture, then the Postmodern revolution by french jews under Derrida, which was used by Alinsky and others to transform the anti-war movement’s effort to undermine western defeat of communism and underclass reversal of eugenic and market civilization, to generation of identitarian conflict between races, regions, and to open the American doors via the immigration act to underclasses to help in undermining western civlization as they had undermined Slavic civlization and set them back two hundred years – and cost humanity 100M deaths. although we should note that the left would have failed in every single lie and false promise if not for radical immigration and the taxation of the middle classes out of reproduction. Now, within the past few years we have: (a) ended the pseudoscientific lie of the blank slate showing yes our differences are genetic not environmental (reversing boazianism); (b) ended the pseudoscientific lie of uniformity of cognition or other than rationality of human action (reversing freudianism); (c) ended the pseudoscientific lie that the genders are not profoundly different(reversing feminism); (d) ended the indifference of intelligence and character (postmodern, and feminist denialism); (e) and this year we are ending the indifference between the races and subraces. (e) And I”m in the process of ending the entire Abrahamic program of false promise, baiting into hazard, profiting from hazard, plausible deniability of blame due to the victim’s volition (instead of european warranty of due diligence, and your involuntary liability for those statements), using the abrahamic methods of pilpul (sophism) and critique (straw manning and undermining) – rather than providing a reciprocally beneficial alternative, and engaging in trades for mutual benefit, without tempting humans into hazard, causing their hazard, and profiting from the harm you did to them. ie: alcohol dealing, drug dealing, prostitution, pornography, usury, the pseudosciences (marxism, boazianism, fruedianism, frankfurtian critique), sophism (postmodernism) and denialisms (feminism) … … And the very big one: the myth that people are oppressed rather than converted from semi domesticated animals into fully domesticated animals the same way we domesticated every plant and animal: by controlling reproduction thru limiting reproduction to those that created value rather than loss, and culling from the herd those that created loss: shrills(women), gossips (women), liars(both), prostitutes (women), thieves(both), the risky, lazy, violent and disruptive (men), brigands(men), through aggressive use of punishment, public punishment, hanging everyone possible, asylums(mostly women), prisons(mostly men), men in war, winter starvation of the lazy, and a many people through endless recursive plagues.
[T]he government had no interests in a free press, and while the second amendment had no debate whatsoever, because it was so obvious, the freedom of the press was the subject of hottest debate, and their inability to separate truthful from untruthful, speech because of the lingering presence of theology, and because they wanted to preserve the various protestant sects and their liberty in faith, they felt it necessary. The post office like the postwar highway system had nothing to do with freedom of speech it had everything to do with politics, war, holding new territory, and commerce, because time delays on this huge continent were a serious problem not satisfied until the telegraph. (My contribution is to repair this deficiency in our law by incorporating the criteria for reciprocal and truthful speech in public to the public on matters public.).
[T]he dominance and defensive position of corporations exists because of the excesses of labor as the industrial revolution kicked in, and the alliance of excess labor immigrated after the revolution kicked in, particularly after 1890 and up until the depression, with the communists, that put labor and industry at odds in politics. This is why businesses left the country. Instead of asking for defense against loss, the unions asked for premiums on labor that destroyed depression, postwar industrial international competitiveness, and forced companies to exit the USA labor market. It is one thing to not lose your job because your supervisor is a scumbag, or your business is trying to save nickel for shareholders, and another to extract pensions, high salaries, and benefits not available to the middle classes who are logarithmically more productive and valuable to the rest of the polity. But again labor was sold a false promise by communists using the abrahamic method of deceit to play upon their ignorance by casting genetic differences and economic realities as if they were family morality tales. The problem today has nothing to do with corporations which overpay everyone in very role because of the economic affects of concentration of markets in cities. It has everything to do cheap immigrant labor driving down unskilled and semi-skilled wages, and the financial system which again, takes advantage of false promise, baiting into hazard, justification using pilpul, and critique to distract you by calling it a business problem. There is absolutely no reason you pay interest on a house, a car, education, appliances, even clothes and furniture. Entertainment and food if you pay for with interest you deserve the hell you put yourself into – because your bad (defective, undomesticated) animal genes are showing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeWWz4y1coU
Questions
- The issues raised by identity politics are real and significant? His distinction between “tactical choices” and “general positions”?
- That climate change is an existential threat?
- His assertion that the right is devoted to the destruction of units of organized society as evidenced by withdrawal from the Paris Agreement?
- How about his take on the extreme anti-war left of the 60’s?
- Public vs. private media? The Founders believing that the government should have an active role in the promotion of the free press?
- American libertarianism being the ultra right advocacy of private tyrannies?
—A follower
[A]ll political conflict in the west was made possible only by the inclusion of women into the franchise without providing them with a separate house, thereby preserving the ability of the classes to negotiate for their interests in honest public discourse, while adding the participation women who have opposing genetic interests and intuitions to that of men, as another class with yet another set of intersets. So, all political conflict consists of the unstated and political unpleasant: it’s just the eugenic masculine european right against dysgenic feminine and anti-european left and in the postwar period the suppression of eugenics has created the crisis of the age, and threatened to reverse all human civlization to another semitic dark age.
[T]here is always room for new solutions consisting of trades between the classes, to compensate for vast almost unimaginable differences in ability between the classes, and the vast differences in productivity and value to mankind between the classes. There is never room for shaming, ridiculing, moralizing, psychologizing, gossiping, rallying, undermining, and reputation destruction for the vast genetic differences, vast productive differences, and vast value differences between the classes. Either an individual or group is engage in falsehood, irreciprocity, and particularly institutional irreciprocity we call ‘rent seeking’, or political rent seeking we call ‘corruption’, regardless of the proportionality of their returns on ability and effort, wherein we can take that individual or group to court for fraud and theft, or theft by rent seeking or corruption – or we can offer an exchange of trade by political negotiation for what we want, as long as we have something to offer. But without the other parties engaging in fraud, theft, rent seeking or corruption, the only reason a people have ‘wants’ is because they have failed to produce eugenically enough, and have failed to invest in their offspring enough, and failed to engaging in manners, norms, ethics, morals and commons enough, that they cannot themselves engage in fraud, theft(reallocation), or redistribution (rent seeking, corruption). You have less than others in a market economy because you and your family have chosen poorly. So how can you choose less poorly? Well you can demand rule of law instead of socialism. You can not seek redistribution, rent-seeking, or corruption. You can not engage in lying, fraud, theft, conspiracy. And you can ‘clean your room, clean your house, clean your hard, clean your neighborhood, and clean your city, clean your nation, and clean your government of human parasitic filth. Or you can do what islam does, and christianity encourages, which is reduce everyone in every civilization possible to the same low genetic, cultural, ethical, moral standard – and remain equal in superstition, ignorance, poverty and disease, and blame others for your condition.
[T]here is no threat from climate change, per say, it a byproduct of a threat to the planet due to over population of the underclasses outside of the first world, now invading the first world, and reversing genetic evolution, reversing institutional, cultural and knowledge evolution, and engaging in hyper-consmption to do so. In fact there is nothin dangerous to this planet and the ecosystem which extensive sterilization and universal one child policies will not solve in a few generations. There are no environmental problems that are not the result non-western people failing to repeat the western miracle of soft eugenic reduction of the underclasses through manorialism, requirement for property and income before marriage and reproduction, and the redistribution of reproduction from the underclasses that are genetic cultural informational, institutional, and genetic dead weight on man and planet.
[T]he right is devoted to the expansion of market economies and with it the eugenics that occur from the exchange of the value of reproduction to consumption. The right was stopped from the american eugenic program because of Hitler (even if he was right), and because the Nazi movement came after increases in underclass voting, and therefore it was impossible to restore institutional eugenics to compensate for new rates of reproduction. Instead, europe has gone from IQ parity with the Ashkenazi, and IQ superiority to asia, to rapidly approaching second if not third world intelligence levels – thus declining american productivity, financialization of the economy, and rapid underclass immigration to compensate for taxing the middle class out of reproductivity, all to maintain economic velocity, and as a consequence the generation of demand for redistribution and authoritarian state – ending western miracle of rule of law and markets in everything made possible by developing a ratio of talent to market productivity, because the underclasses are not competitive in the world economy given the present much higher standard of living in the western world.
[T]he war against communism is largely the cause of the crisis of western civilization, largely because the jewish intellectuals could obtain a foothold in overthrowing Russia that they could not obtain in other western countries. Then the could use Russia as the economic and military asset with which to destroy western civilization’s invention of Aristotelian reason, roman banking, templar banking, the Hanseatic League, the european age of sail, the empirical revolution, the scientific revolution, and the restoration of western civilization after the jewish, christian and islamic destruction and reduction to ignorance superstition poverty and dysgenia of every great civilization of the the ancient world by false promise of equality to women, slaves, underclasses and the dim and ignorant. The anti-war left was an intentional migration of the left wing from fomenting class warfare between the working and the middle classes, due to the worldwide failure of marxism and communism evident by 1960. The communists under the Frankfurt school had early recognized the impossibility of undermining the rule of law, and open economy of western civilization because it was raising humanity out of poverty so rapidly. The first use of undermining America in the Russian model was labor, then Frankfurt against art values history, and culture, then the Postmodern revolution by french jews under Derrida, which was used by Alinsky and others to transform the anti-war movement’s effort to undermine western defeat of communism and underclass reversal of eugenic and market civilization, to generation of identitarian conflict between races, regions, and to open the American doors via the immigration act to underclasses to help in undermining western civlization as they had undermined Slavic civlization and set them back two hundred years – and cost humanity 100M deaths. although we should note that the left would have failed in every single lie and false promise if not for radical immigration and the taxation of the middle classes out of reproduction. Now, within the past few years we have: (a) ended the pseudoscientific lie of the blank slate showing yes our differences are genetic not environmental (reversing boazianism); (b) ended the pseudoscientific lie of uniformity of cognition or other than rationality of human action (reversing freudianism); (c) ended the pseudoscientific lie that the genders are not profoundly different(reversing feminism); (d) ended the indifference of intelligence and character (postmodern, and feminist denialism); (e) and this year we are ending the indifference between the races and subraces. (e) And I”m in the process of ending the entire Abrahamic program of false promise, baiting into hazard, profiting from hazard, plausible deniability of blame due to the victim’s volition (instead of european warranty of due diligence, and your involuntary liability for those statements), using the abrahamic methods of pilpul (sophism) and critique (straw manning and undermining) – rather than providing a reciprocally beneficial alternative, and engaging in trades for mutual benefit, without tempting humans into hazard, causing their hazard, and profiting from the harm you did to them. ie: alcohol dealing, drug dealing, prostitution, pornography, usury, the pseudosciences (marxism, boazianism, fruedianism, frankfurtian critique), sophism (postmodernism) and denialisms (feminism) … … And the very big one: the myth that people are oppressed rather than converted from semi domesticated animals into fully domesticated animals the same way we domesticated every plant and animal: by controlling reproduction thru limiting reproduction to those that created value rather than loss, and culling from the herd those that created loss: shrills(women), gossips (women), liars(both), prostitutes (women), thieves(both), the risky, lazy, violent and disruptive (men), brigands(men), through aggressive use of punishment, public punishment, hanging everyone possible, asylums(mostly women), prisons(mostly men), men in war, winter starvation of the lazy, and a many people through endless recursive plagues.
[T]he government had no interests in a free press, and while the second amendment had no debate whatsoever, because it was so obvious, the freedom of the press was the subject of hottest debate, and their inability to separate truthful from untruthful, speech because of the lingering presence of theology, and because they wanted to preserve the various protestant sects and their liberty in faith, they felt it necessary. The post office like the postwar highway system had nothing to do with freedom of speech it had everything to do with politics, war, holding new territory, and commerce, because time delays on this huge continent were a serious problem not satisfied until the telegraph. (My contribution is to repair this deficiency in our law by incorporating the criteria for reciprocal and truthful speech in public to the public on matters public.).
[T]he dominance and defensive position of corporations exists because of the excesses of labor as the industrial revolution kicked in, and the alliance of excess labor immigrated after the revolution kicked in, particularly after 1890 and up until the depression, with the communists, that put labor and industry at odds in politics. This is why businesses left the country. Instead of asking for defense against loss, the unions asked for premiums on labor that destroyed depression, postwar industrial international competitiveness, and forced companies to exit the USA labor market. It is one thing to not lose your job because your supervisor is a scumbag, or your business is trying to save nickel for shareholders, and another to extract pensions, high salaries, and benefits not available to the middle classes who are logarithmically more productive and valuable to the rest of the polity. But again labor was sold a false promise by communists using the abrahamic method of deceit to play upon their ignorance by casting genetic differences and economic realities as if they were family morality tales. The problem today has nothing to do with corporations which overpay everyone in very role because of the economic affects of concentration of markets in cities. It has everything to do cheap immigrant labor driving down unskilled and semi-skilled wages, and the financial system which again, takes advantage of false promise, baiting into hazard, justification using pilpul, and critique to distract you by calling it a business problem. There is absolutely no reason you pay interest on a house, a car, education, appliances, even clothes and furniture. Entertainment and food if you pay for with interest you deserve the hell you put yourself into – because your bad (defective, undomesticated) animal genes are showing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeWWz4y1coU
—“Q: Prediction?”—
I cannot separate my prediction of civil war and bias in favor of it, from the ‘noise’. I don’t see how they can pull it off. But it’s possible that they can. I do not think he will go down gently. So in many ways I want them to try. Because then we have our last moral license – coup.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 20:29:00 UTC