Theme: Crisis

  • More time to build consensus on civil war is beneficial. More time to immigratio

    More time to build consensus on civil war is beneficial. More time to immigration is harmful. This is the last opportunity before winning is impossible, so the left will prevent tipping hands until they are in control. That means we have to ‘lead’ a revolution rather than wait.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-24 15:48:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1209501097301348352

    Reply addressees: @ZanzAbteilung

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1209500729951637504


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ZanzAbteilung Good question. Didn’t expect 1) exhaustion of the people to political overloading, 2) the negative impact the shooters would have on inspiration,3) the success at the suppression of dialog, 4) the confidence we have in trump’s re-election. Next events: virginia, summer, election.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1209500729951637504


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ZanzAbteilung Good question. Didn’t expect 1) exhaustion of the people to political overloading, 2) the negative impact the shooters would have on inspiration,3) the success at the suppression of dialog, 4) the confidence we have in trump’s re-election. Next events: virginia, summer, election.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1209500729951637504

  • Good question. Didn’t expect 1) exhaustion of the people to political overloadin

    Good question. Didn’t expect 1) exhaustion of the people to political overloading, 2) the negative impact the shooters would have on inspiration,3) the success at the suppression of dialog, 4) the confidence we have in trump’s re-election. Next events: virginia, summer, election.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-24 15:47:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1209500729951637504

    Reply addressees: @ZanzAbteilung

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1209498229169164289


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1209498229169164289

  • I mean, realistically, we either turn our civil war hot this year under our cont

    I mean, realistically, we either turn our civil war hot this year under our control or we turn it hot later under their control.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-24 01:21:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1209282876077985792

  • Is Virginia going to give us the kickoff of the hot civil war? Sure looks like J

    Is Virginia going to give us the kickoff of the hot civil war?

    Sure looks like January will consists of rallying the boys for the first opportunity for boogaloo.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-24 01:12:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1209280734860644354

  • RT @MartianHoplite: 2020 is the last national election Republicans have a shot a

    RT @MartianHoplite: 2020 is the last national election Republicans have a shot at. https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1209000530229571585

  • Dec 23, 2019, 6:59 PM

    https://conservativefiringline.com/are-we-ready-for-the-revolution-aoc-falsely-claims-us-not-an-advanced-society-evolving-into-fascism-under-trump-video/Updated Dec 23, 2019, 6:59 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-23 18:59:00 UTC

  • Traditional values were necessary under agrarianism. Today’s ‘opportunities’ are

    Traditional values were necessary under agrarianism. Today’s ‘opportunities’ are the product of american fiat credit made possible by american military (british empire).

    It is very easy to bring this to an end.
    Abrahamic Deceit + Debt + Immigration is all it is.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-23 13:23:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1209102307041763330

    Reply addressees: @galt_the

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1209092838987665408


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1209092838987665408

  • Again, the internet has made it possible for us to understand how much we actual

    Again, the internet has made it possible for us to understand how much we actually hate one another because we have very good reason to: we are incompatible and need to separate into feminine and masculine reproductive strategies. (Where the left will die off rather quickly). https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1207675114231402498

  • I don’t know what ‘liberalism’ means any longer. It used to mean constraining go

    I don’t know what ‘liberalism’ means any longer. It used to mean constraining government. But it meant that under parliamentary control. I think the western experiment in ‘aristocracy of everyone’ by continuous expansion of the franchise in order to justify taking political power(organization of the production of private and common) from the monarchy and the church, and to justify the expansion of taxation for the purposes of redistribution – is a clear failure.

    I don’t think you can get away from 1) rule of law and markets for adaptive velocity 2) state-private investment in increasingly complex and expensive investment in competitive innovation, 3) the need for ‘decider of last resort’, whether despot, monarchy, 4) money isn’t real any longer, so it’s just a tool of positive incentive (coercion?) and we will (shortly) see the end of the private global capitalists, and the universal adoption of the chinese method of state money and interest management.

    The liberal order was made possible by the European Colonial Expansion, and the relative weakness of (small) european governments compared to the strength of the emerging middle class, and the vast pool of middle class genetic reserves built up in europe over more than a thousand years. We have been in the post modern order since marx, freud, boas, cantor, adorno, friedan, rothbard/rand, trotsky/neocons sequentially tried to undermine men (marxism), culture (frankfurt), truth (derrida), women (feminism), and the western identity.

    We have been in the post liberal order since the bolsheviks started the revolt against it, and now the muslims are revolting against it – last century the jewish revolt, an this century the muslim revolt. The chinese and russians and now indians have been through their experiment and are returning to world norms. The west is more malinvested in the falsehood because of the jewish postwar influence in the academy to suppress all eugenics (study of human behavior)was successful at displacing the germanic martial aristocratic tradition, by rallying women and minorities using media, academy, democracy, immigration to destroy western civilization with false promise of freedom from darwinian necessity that made western excellences possible.

    Our constitution (Rule of Law of sovereignty and reciprocity ) is not rigid enough (like a scriptural document) to limit our conquest by democratic and propaganda means. ANd we did not understand our traditions we only practiced them. So we were easily sold false promise by sophism, pseudoscience in the modern world like our women and lower classes were sold false promise by sophism and supernaturalism in the ancient world – and this ‘second great failure’ is the end of the possibility of democratic majoritarianism – unless we can prohibit false promise of freedom from natural law from the informational commons. As far as I know there is no optimum social political and economic order, only a sliding scale of what is possible given a genetic distribution and the relative state of development. If it is possible to develop many small monarchies under the same rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity that is the optimum social and political order, as long as the ‘bottom’ is prohibited from reproduction as it was in the ancient world by nature, the middle world by manorialism, ad the present and future world by eugenic policy. Every other order declines in competitive utility from there.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 19:30:00 UTC

  • A SHORT TIMELINE OF PURCHASING POWER (from visual capitalist) 1900s After the Pa

    A SHORT TIMELINE OF PURCHASING POWER

    (from visual capitalist)

    1900s

    After the Panic of 1907, the National Monetary Commission is established to propose legislation to regulate banking.

    U.S. Money Supply: $7 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: A pair of patent leather shoes.

    1910s

    The Federal Reserve Act is signed in 1913 by President Woodrow Wilson.

    U.S. Money Supply: $13 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: A woman’s house dress.

    1920s

    U.S. dollar bills were reduced in size by 25%, and standardized in terms of design.

    The Fed starts using open market operations as a tool for monetary policy.

    U.S. Money Supply: $35 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: Five pounds of sugar.

    1930s

    To deal with deflation during the Great Depression, the United States suspends the gold standard. President Franklin D. Roosevelt signs Executive Order 6102, which criminalizes the possession of gold.

    By no longer allowing gold to be legally redeemed, this removes a major constraint on the Fed, which can now control the money supply.

    U.S. Money Supply: $46 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: 16 cans of Campbell’s Soup

    1940s

    The massive deficits of World War II are almost financed entirely by the creation of new money by the Federal Reserve.

    Interest rates are pegged low at the request of the Treasury.

    Under Bretton-Woods, the “gold-exchange standard” is adopted.

    U.S. Money Supply: $55 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: 20 bottles of Coca-Cola

    1950s

    The Korean War starts in 1950, and inflation is at an annualized rate of 21%.

    The Fed can no longer manage such low interest rates, and tells the Treasury that it can “no longer maintain the existing situation”.

    U.S. Money Supply: $151 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One Mr. Potato Head

    1960s

    An agreement, called the Treasury-Federal Reserve Accord, is reached to establish the central bank’s independence.

    By this time, U.S. dollars in circulation around the world exceeded U.S. gold reserves. Unless the situation was rectified, the country would be vulnerable to the currency equivalent of a “bank run”.

    U.S. Money Supply: $211 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: Two movie tickets.

    1970s

    In 1971, President Richard Nixon ends direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold.

    The period following the Nixon Shock is uncertain. The federal deficit doubles, stagflation hits, and the oil price skyrockets – all during the Vietnam War.

    Over the decade, the dollar loses 1/3 of its value.

    U.S. Money Supply: $401 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: Three Morton TV dinners.

    1980s

    The stock market crashes in 1987 on Black Monday.

    The Federal Reserve, under newly-appointed Alan Greenspan, issues the following statement:

    “The Federal Reserve, consistent with its responsibilities as the nation’s central bank, affirmed today its readiness to serve as a source of liquidity to support the economic and financial system.”

    The Dow would recover by 1989, with no prolonged recession occurring.

    U.S. Money Supply: $1,560 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One bottle of Heinz Ketchup.

    1990s

    This decade is generally considered to be a time of declining inflation and the longest peacetime economic expansion in U.S. history.

    During this decade, many improvements are made to U.S. paper currency to prevent counterfeiting. Microprinting, security thread, and other features are used.

    U.S. Money Supply: $3,277 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One gallon of milk.

    2000s

    After the Dotcom crash, the Fed drops interest rates to near all-time lows.

    In 2008, the Financial Crisis hits and the Fed begins “quantitative easing”. Later, this would be known as QE1.

    U.S. Money Supply: $4,917 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One Wendy’s hamburger.

    2010-

    After QE1, the Fed holds $2.1 trillion of bank debt, mortgage-backed securities, and Treasury notes. Shortly after, QE2 starts.

    In 2012, it’s time for QE3.

    Purchases were halted in October 2014 after accumulating $4.5 trillion in assets.

    U.S. Money Supply: $13,291 billion

    What $1 Could Buy: One song from iTunes.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-19 16:56:00 UTC