Theme: Crisis

  • YA. LIKE CLOCKWORK Apr 1, 2020, 8:38 PM

    https://asiatimes.com/2020/04/china-seizes-covid-19-advantage-in-south-china-sea/TOLD YA. LIKE CLOCKWORK

    https://asiatimes.com/2020/04/china-seizes-covid-19-advantage-in-south-china-sea/Updated Apr 1, 2020, 8:38 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 20:38:00 UTC

  • STATE BUREAUCRACIES MUST ORGANIZE FOR WAR I make the same argument. the CDC, Hom

    STATE BUREAUCRACIES MUST ORGANIZE FOR WAR

    I make the same argument. the CDC, Homeland Security, and Disaster Relief Organization, and The Treasury are either creating war plans and holding war games or they are wasting our time and money.

    Bureaucracies run by constant process rather than project deliverables, war plans, and shocks

    —“In 2015, I urged world leaders in a TED talk to prepare for a pandemic the same way they prepare for war — by running simulations to find the cracks in the system,” Gates wrote. “As we’ve seen this year, we have a long way to go. But I still believe that if we make the right decisions now, informed by science, data and the experience of medical professionals, we can save lives and get the country back to work.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 14:36:00 UTC

  • There is only one solution. “Conquest” so to speak. We have nowhere to run

    There is only one solution. “Conquest” so to speak.
    We have nowhere to run.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-01 02:14:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1245172762597089280

    Reply addressees: @scott_ensley @JohnMarkSays @IronEconomist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1245135265275891714

  • I MEAN. THAT’S … REALLY, REALLY, REALLY, BAD

    I MEAN. THAT’S … REALLY, REALLY, REALLY, BAD. https://ift.tt/33YUV1r


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-31 23:26:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1245130302080593920

  • Is it really going to be this perfect storm for us? I think so. damn. That was q

    Is it really going to be this perfect storm for us? I think so. damn. That was quick and out of nowhere.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-31 20:21:00 UTC

  • GUESS THAT MEANS WE HAVE A POOL OF MEN TO WORK WITH Mar 30, 2020, 9:06 PM

    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/30/coronavirus-job-losses-could-total-47-million-unemployment-rate-of-32percent-fed-says.htmlI GUESS THAT MEANS WE HAVE A POOL OF MEN TO WORK WITH

    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/30/coronavirus-job-losses-could-total-47-million-unemployment-rate-of-32percent-fed-says.htmlUpdated Mar 30, 2020, 9:06 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-30 21:06:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTANDING THE NEW FED-TREASURY by Daniel Roland Anderson (CD: Note: this is

    UNDERSTANDING THE NEW FED-TREASURY

    by Daniel Roland Anderson

    (CD: Note: this is why I bait these things. because external confirmation is more persuasive than my prognostication.)

    SUMMARY: “Trump has just built a system to collateralize the Fed with underlying real hard assets from the private sector.”

    From Daniel:

    I ran this by a contact with a solid background in banking and finance. He’s not as hard right as I am, but here’s his analysis:

    Oh, this is interesting. I glad you shared it! We knew the Fed was buying assets to provide liquidity to investment funds but not like this. Even the Communist infiltrators that formed the Fed in 1913 never intended for the Fed to do this. The Fed was formed to:1) Serve as the government’s own central bank, and 2) Monitor and regulate the banking system by implementing mandated monetary polices. In other words, the treasury decides what needs to be done for treasury operations and the Fed executes the directives while accounting and reporting back to the treasury.

    BlackRock is a huge, and historically excellent, fund creator/manager. What it appears Trump has done is appended a new huge division to Fed operations. Let’s call it “Private Market Asset Repurchase Operations”. Apparently up to $1T of private fund assets may be “purchased” by the Fed each month. That’s a huge number. So, if a mutual fund, ETF, etc. experiences a run on its fund by investors who want out, they just sell the underlying assets to the new Fed operation.

    Trump has hired BlackRock to run the operation and use the Fed’s balance sheet to account for the transactions. BlackRock will surely be paid a customary fee, like 375% annualized, to manage the new operation.

    The Fed has just been privatized in a sense because the direct private asset repurchase operations will ultimately dwarf traditional Fed operations. Somebody (or is it more accurate to say, “some buddy”) at BlackRock is really happy right now they stayed in Trump’s good graces.

    BTW, if the term “Repo” is being used in a traditional sense, the buyer (the Fed) gives the seller (the fund needing liquidity) a contract allowing the fund the repurchase those assets at some point in future according to agreed upon conditions. Hence the term “repo”.

    This is pure genius (and scary) at every level. There is also NO WAY Trump and Co. just dreamed this up. It has to have been in the works for a while.

    Genius? Yes. Here are a couple of thoughts.

    The Fed( now Trump), can decide what funds to let fail. Pissed Trump off in the past but now need liquidity? “Sorry Joe, the underlying assets in your fund don’t meet out investment standards. And when your fund fails? We are going to put you in prison for bilking your clients out of their money.”

    “Hey Chi-na! Need cash to rebuild and want to sell the Treasuries back you bought and thought would cause us to default when you demanded your capital back? Well, here you go, paid in full! We’ll just add them to our new BlackRock Treasury Fund.”

    Trump has just built a system to collateralize the Fed with underlying real hard assets from the private sector.

    How’s that for a primer?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-30 17:26:00 UTC

  • (If we make it to an election. But it’s just as likely that natural escalation o

    (If we make it to an election. But it’s just as likely that natural escalation of present circumstances produces deterministic ends.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-30 03:48:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244471418198331397

    Reply addressees: @scott_ensley @ArthurHolmberg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244467033405706241

  • The left is useful yes because we have a shared enemy preventing both sides from

    The left is useful yes because we have a shared enemy preventing both sides from success. The question is whether we agree to separate into regional differences or not. If not then… it’s just step one step two.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-30 01:23:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244434983483252737

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford @ArthurHolmberg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244434747864088576


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricLiford @ArthurHolmberg Well you have your opinion on whether the quarantine is fake but the data is the data and quarantines are working to flatten the curve, which is the only way to limit fatalities. Any business that doesn’t have 6 months cash dies. It will require vast war era programs to restart.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1244434747864088576

  • Well you have your opinion on whether the quarantine is fake but the data is the

    Well you have your opinion on whether the quarantine is fake but the data is the data and quarantines are working to flatten the curve, which is the only way to limit fatalities. Any business that doesn’t have 6 months cash dies. It will require vast war era programs to restart.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-03-30 01:22:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244434747864088576

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford @ArthurHolmberg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1244433800827985928