1 – I don’t have any problem. Everything is going just as I expect it to – other than the deus ex machina of the virus accelerating the conditions.
2 – No one replaces philosophers. Others continue to improve on their innovations.
3 – I learn from every even trivial debate.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 19:51:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253773629676032000
Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253771695212527616
[S]tate bankruptcy is a long standing topic in bankruptcy reform, just as the EU is experiencing the problems of the catholic periphery vs the protestant core. It’s not a constitutional issue, b/c it’s one of the most important reasons for the formation of the federal system: unifying bankruptcy laws so interstate commerce and consequent scale was possible without continuous conflicts that constrained trade. Opponents would resist under the Contracts Clause but the court would eventually extend protection to the states since the states are not making the legal change, the federal government is, and despite the 10th (which is universally ignored anyway), the bankruptcy code is a power specifically granted to the federal government specifically for this reason. Add to the fact that it was done by false promise of ‘progressive’ (((socialist))) eternal growth on one end and financial (((rent seeking))) constructed using fractional reserves guaranteed by the federal government, and the credit expansion, all via the treasury and federal reserve, instead of retaining the returns for redistribution to the citizenry, and we have criminal conspiracy at least of conspiracy of interests not sufficiently defended against by a government lacking experience in financial corruption practiced in the Pale – especially ukraine and russia. (Where mises and rothbard inherited their ideas and tried to spread them to the west.) While screwing politicians, government employees, their unions, and investors that profited from seeking rents by offering credit that baits states into hazard, the populations of the states would benefit greatly from no longer spending their tax revenues on employee pensions as large as their medicare-medicaid expenses, leaving a single digit trickle of income for infrastructure and investment. Personally I would love to write a brief for the court on this, and bring the issue before the court because it would provide the impetus to end the fed, and nationalize the finance sector dependent upon treasury issue, and instead, force them to raise all capital from the private sector, forcing the sector to compete for savings rather than continuously destroy them. Biggest organized crime in human history.
[S]tate bankruptcy is a long standing topic in bankruptcy reform, just as the EU is experiencing the problems of the catholic periphery vs the protestant core. It’s not a constitutional issue, b/c it’s one of the most important reasons for the formation of the federal system: unifying bankruptcy laws so interstate commerce and consequent scale was possible without continuous conflicts that constrained trade. Opponents would resist under the Contracts Clause but the court would eventually extend protection to the states since the states are not making the legal change, the federal government is, and despite the 10th (which is universally ignored anyway), the bankruptcy code is a power specifically granted to the federal government specifically for this reason. Add to the fact that it was done by false promise of ‘progressive’ (((socialist))) eternal growth on one end and financial (((rent seeking))) constructed using fractional reserves guaranteed by the federal government, and the credit expansion, all via the treasury and federal reserve, instead of retaining the returns for redistribution to the citizenry, and we have criminal conspiracy at least of conspiracy of interests not sufficiently defended against by a government lacking experience in financial corruption practiced in the Pale – especially ukraine and russia. (Where mises and rothbard inherited their ideas and tried to spread them to the west.) While screwing politicians, government employees, their unions, and investors that profited from seeking rents by offering credit that baits states into hazard, the populations of the states would benefit greatly from no longer spending their tax revenues on employee pensions as large as their medicare-medicaid expenses, leaving a single digit trickle of income for infrastructure and investment. Personally I would love to write a brief for the court on this, and bring the issue before the court because it would provide the impetus to end the fed, and nationalize the finance sector dependent upon treasury issue, and instead, force them to raise all capital from the private sector, forcing the sector to compete for savings rather than continuously destroy them. Biggest organized crime in human history.
(sarcasm) [T]he french have a monopoly on the bad ideas of modernity. It’s sorta down hill after descartes. The ship of state leaks with the prosecution of the protestant business class. It’s a sinking-of-the-titanic by the French Revolution, and the peasantry’s genocide against the aristocracy. … There is no equal to russian literature. There is no equal to shakespeare. There is no equal to british empiricism and government. There is no equal to scottish enlightenment. There is no equal to italian art. No equal to german engineering. No equal to american law. …. Nor any equal to french folly. 😉 I love pissing on the french. lol ( Well, technically parisians. )
(sarcasm) [T]he french have a monopoly on the bad ideas of modernity. It’s sorta down hill after descartes. The ship of state leaks with the prosecution of the protestant business class. It’s a sinking-of-the-titanic by the French Revolution, and the peasantry’s genocide against the aristocracy. … There is no equal to russian literature. There is no equal to shakespeare. There is no equal to british empiricism and government. There is no equal to scottish enlightenment. There is no equal to italian art. No equal to german engineering. No equal to american law. …. Nor any equal to french folly. 😉 I love pissing on the french. lol ( Well, technically parisians. )
—“Far away in Ukraine, he suggests to disaffected men in the West that _they_ should start a civil war, (he’s the “ideas guy” you see), but using that word requires courage. Instead, he hides behind romantic words like “revolution”, as if war is some beautiful poem. … He’s a snake. … I followed him for years, recommended him to others to follow, even learned a few things I still hold dear as concepts. But the veil dropped once or twice and it was revealed how he uses his intelligence in a corrupting way.”— Phil@Readomain.com @readomain
[H]ere, in the USA, taking care of an ailing parent rather than putting her in a home, he shows up to fight in virginia, educates others one how our civilization was undermined, writes a reformation of the constitution to restore and preserve it, works within the law – until then. I’m a revolutionary. In the tradition of the founders and their constitution, the british constitution, the common law, the european development of rule of law of common law, the germanic law, and the western indo european law of the ancients and their predecessors. I pull from your face, your rhetoric, and your mind, the veil of ignorance, error, bias, and wishful thinking – that there is any solution possible other than the same revolution each of our ancestors has used to restore freedom, liberty, and sovereignty – and their fruits. I never wore such a veil over my mind. You were just terrified when I pulled the veil from yours. So man up, show up, fight, and win.
—“Far away in Ukraine, he suggests to disaffected men in the West that _they_ should start a civil war, (he’s the “ideas guy” you see), but using that word requires courage. Instead, he hides behind romantic words like “revolution”, as if war is some beautiful poem. … He’s a snake. … I followed him for years, recommended him to others to follow, even learned a few things I still hold dear as concepts. But the veil dropped once or twice and it was revealed how he uses his intelligence in a corrupting way.”— Phil@Readomain.com @readomain
[H]ere, in the USA, taking care of an ailing parent rather than putting her in a home, he shows up to fight in virginia, educates others one how our civilization was undermined, writes a reformation of the constitution to restore and preserve it, works within the law – until then. I’m a revolutionary. In the tradition of the founders and their constitution, the british constitution, the common law, the european development of rule of law of common law, the germanic law, and the western indo european law of the ancients and their predecessors. I pull from your face, your rhetoric, and your mind, the veil of ignorance, error, bias, and wishful thinking – that there is any solution possible other than the same revolution each of our ancestors has used to restore freedom, liberty, and sovereignty – and their fruits. I never wore such a veil over my mind. You were just terrified when I pulled the veil from yours. So man up, show up, fight, and win.
Remember when I was first struck by what was going wrong. It was in the early 80’s. Long enough for the false promises of the sixties and seventies to become presumptions, long enough for people to intuit something wasn’t right, but not long enough for them to be falsified. … It’s early summer. A woman was pushing a stroller across the street on Farmington avenue. I don’t know why but I understood from her body language something wasn’t right. And then I started seeing it everywhere. That nagging feeling that we should be happy but we aren’t.
Remember when I was first struck by what was going wrong. It was in the early 80’s. Long enough for the false promises of the sixties and seventies to become presumptions, long enough for people to intuit something wasn’t right, but not long enough for them to be falsified. … It’s early summer. A woman was pushing a stroller across the street on Farmington avenue. I don’t know why but I understood from her body language something wasn’t right. And then I started seeing it everywhere. That nagging feeling that we should be happy but we aren’t.
STATE BANKRUPTCY IS NECESSARY
State bankruptcy is a long standing topic in bankruptcy reform, just as the EU is experiencing the problems of the catholic periphery vs the protestant core.
It’s not a constitutional issue, b/c it’s one of the most important reasons for the formation of the federal system: unifying bankruptcy laws so interstate commerce and consequent scale was possible without continuous conflicts that constrained trade.
Opponents would resist under the Contracts Clause but the court would eventually extend protection to the states since the states are not making the legal change, the federal government is, and despite the 10th (which is universally ignored anyway), the bankruptcy code is a power specifically granted to the federal government specifically for this reason.
Add to the fact that it was done by false promise of ‘progressive’ (((socialist))) eternal growth on one end and financial (((rent seeking))) constructed using fractional reserves guaranteed by the federal government, and the credit expansion, all via the treasury and federal reserve, instead of retaining the returns for redistribution to the citizenry, and we have criminal conspiracy at least of conspiracy of interests not sufficiently defended against by a government lacking experience in financial corruption practiced in the Pale – especially ukraine and russia. (Where mises and rothbard inherited their ideas and tried to spread them to the west.)
While screwing politicians, government employees, their unions, and investors that profited from seeking rents by offering credit that baits states into hazard, the populations of the states would benefit greatly from no longer spending their tax revenues on employee pensions as large as their medicare-medicaid expenses, leaving a single digit trickle of income for infrastructure and investment.
Personally I would love to write a brief for the court on this, and bring the issue before the court because it would provide the impetus to end the fed, and nationalize the finance sector dependent upon treasury issue, and instead, force them to raise all capital from the private sector, forcing the sector to compete for savings rather than continuously destroy them.
Biggest organized crime in human history.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-23 08:27:00 UTC