Oct 6, 2019, 9:55 AM When William Wallace defeated the english at Sterling Bridge, it was because the english assumed the Scotts would wait until they crossed and stood formation – as was custom – before the fight. Instead, Wallace waited until a defeatable number of the english crossed the bridge and then massacred them. They did not conform to the ritualization of warfare between aristocratic families and clans fighting over territories to tax at the minimum losses to the people and assets. Nor did they want to disincentive the common people from fighting. Western peoples have practiced ritualized warfare in order to domesticate our wars, pretty much forever – with the Westphalian peace that limited war to actions between states our most dominant present influence, and the false heroism of our European Civil Wars, and our current heroism by economic warfare, only slightly influencing our tradition. The supermajority of our people and our statesmen maintain a current obsession with the presumption of the continued domestication of warfare, both abroad and in the coming second American civil war. They presume we have not, by the restoration of Marxist Terrorism, and their imitators using Islamic Terrorism, observed that the Westphalian peace has ended; and our heroism in dragging mankind out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, suffering, and disease is ignored because of slavery practiced by every civilization back into eternity, with the muslims the most avid practitioners. This coming civil war will be more like Lebanon and Syria than the American civil war, and less disorganized than the second world war. It will be region by region, neighborhood by neighborhood, house to house, in spontaneously escalating, unorganized destruction of individual lives, leaving dense urban areas favelas, the near complete loss of industrial capacity, communications, and power. Russians can lose a third of their economy and resort to farming. If Americans lose a third of their economy we will lose a third of our people. And we will certainly lose more. If it lasts six months we will never recover. I work tirelessly to provide a constitution that will resolve this civil war by peaceful means, and incrementally escalate only upon failure to resolve it by peaceful means. But one thing is certain – the left will not survive as a movement. Ever. And this country will return to rule of law, or it will be reduced to a wasteland if we fail. Edit
Theme: Crisis
-
Oct 6, 2019, 11:33 AM —“If the Spanish Civil War was the “dress rehearsal for
Oct 6, 2019, 11:33 AM
—“If the Spanish Civil War was the “dress rehearsal for WWII,” the Syrian Civil War is the dress rehearsal for the Second American Civil War. Multiple factions, some with overlapping interests cooperating with one another, and the government is just one of the many factions.”—Alex Hill
-
Oct 6, 2019, 11:33 AM —“If the Spanish Civil War was the “dress rehearsal for
Oct 6, 2019, 11:33 AM
—“If the Spanish Civil War was the “dress rehearsal for WWII,” the Syrian Civil War is the dress rehearsal for the Second American Civil War. Multiple factions, some with overlapping interests cooperating with one another, and the government is just one of the many factions.”—Alex Hill
-
The Conflict Between Democracy and Eugenics
The Conflict Between Democracy and Eugenics https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/the-conflict-between-democracy-and-eugenics/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 18:52:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265717423551938561
-
The Conflict Between Democracy and Eugenics
Oct 6, 2019, 12:34 PM The First Cause of Western Decline is the conflict between Democracy and Eugenics caused by the industrial revolution. The enemy may Lie and Deny reality, but Western people will not face the truth themselves: we outpaced the rest because our civilization has been eugenic since its founding, and survived the middle ages despite the Church’s attempt to reverse that dysgenia through maximizing reproduction. Contractualism, Manorialism, Law, Hanging, Plagues, Winter, War, and the Reformation achieved what the church fought against, and what Women and the Left fight against today, and what the Left weaponizes against western civilization: dysgenia destroys what the west has made.
-
The Conflict Between Democracy and Eugenics
Oct 6, 2019, 12:34 PM The First Cause of Western Decline is the conflict between Democracy and Eugenics caused by the industrial revolution. The enemy may Lie and Deny reality, but Western people will not face the truth themselves: we outpaced the rest because our civilization has been eugenic since its founding, and survived the middle ages despite the Church’s attempt to reverse that dysgenia through maximizing reproduction. Contractualism, Manorialism, Law, Hanging, Plagues, Winter, War, and the Reformation achieved what the church fought against, and what Women and the Left fight against today, and what the Left weaponizes against western civilization: dysgenia destroys what the west has made.
-
Return to Communism vs Naziism as The Basis of Argumentative Extremes
Oct 7, 2019, 10:28 AM by James Louis LaSalle As psychotically obsessed the Left is with racism, Nazis, and white supremacists, the Right should be just as obsessed with communism. To the point where we shouldn’t even acknowledge it when they say anything about racism, Nazis, or white supremacists. Ignore it completely. And don’t even be subtle about it. If a Leftist asks you if you’re a Nazi or some nonsense like that, don’t say a word about it; change the subject to the evils of communism immediately. “Are you a Nazi?” “Did you know communism was responsible for over 100 million deaths in the 20th century?” “What? I asked you if you were a Nazi. Answer the question!” “You know, the concept of a “means of production” is a total reification fallacy. It’s the human mind that decides whether things have value or not. That’s why communism is always communal ownership of the means of production in theory and state ownership of human beings in practice. Because human beings ARE the means of production.” Leftist: Why do you keep talking about communism? I’m trying to talk to you about the evils of Nazism! Rightist: Why don’t you want to talk about the evils of communism? Are you a communist? Do you support communism? Play their game against them, and be better at it. There have been many comments from the usual quarters about the supposed illegitimacy of putting the “alt right” and “antifa” on “the same moral plane.” But mostly, Alt-right and Antifa ARE on the same moral plane, the moral plane where you use force to counter an existential threat to you and to your group. The main difference is a factual one, not a moral one, in that alt-right represents normalcy to excellence, while Antifa represents defective and inferior people. The former can, in principle, be victorious, while the latter can never be. Even if they, Antifa, communists, degenerates, win, they still lose, because it is not merely superior people against whom they rebel, but the reality of their own inadequacy; which ever remains. Once they destroy their betters, antifa will have no one left to parasitize, and they, too, shall perish. Their grasping, covetous, and insatiable appetites are just as real as their inability to satisfy them without seeking discounts at the expense of others, more capable. But they have no choice but to try, because meritocracy, accountability, and responsibility in the face of abler competitors would prove just as lethal to them as devouring those finally and completely. Without knowing it, without being able to moderate themselves, they are actually trying to straddle these extremes to the only evolutionary strategy that can sustain them, parasitism that is not severe enough to kill their only food source. But don’t expect them to realize that. And there is nothing to lose by simply wiping them out, as one would any other species of pest. (There is a moral difference between parasites and producers.)
-
Return to Communism vs Naziism as The Basis of Argumentative Extremes
Oct 7, 2019, 10:28 AM by James Louis LaSalle As psychotically obsessed the Left is with racism, Nazis, and white supremacists, the Right should be just as obsessed with communism. To the point where we shouldn’t even acknowledge it when they say anything about racism, Nazis, or white supremacists. Ignore it completely. And don’t even be subtle about it. If a Leftist asks you if you’re a Nazi or some nonsense like that, don’t say a word about it; change the subject to the evils of communism immediately. “Are you a Nazi?” “Did you know communism was responsible for over 100 million deaths in the 20th century?” “What? I asked you if you were a Nazi. Answer the question!” “You know, the concept of a “means of production” is a total reification fallacy. It’s the human mind that decides whether things have value or not. That’s why communism is always communal ownership of the means of production in theory and state ownership of human beings in practice. Because human beings ARE the means of production.” Leftist: Why do you keep talking about communism? I’m trying to talk to you about the evils of Nazism! Rightist: Why don’t you want to talk about the evils of communism? Are you a communist? Do you support communism? Play their game against them, and be better at it. There have been many comments from the usual quarters about the supposed illegitimacy of putting the “alt right” and “antifa” on “the same moral plane.” But mostly, Alt-right and Antifa ARE on the same moral plane, the moral plane where you use force to counter an existential threat to you and to your group. The main difference is a factual one, not a moral one, in that alt-right represents normalcy to excellence, while Antifa represents defective and inferior people. The former can, in principle, be victorious, while the latter can never be. Even if they, Antifa, communists, degenerates, win, they still lose, because it is not merely superior people against whom they rebel, but the reality of their own inadequacy; which ever remains. Once they destroy their betters, antifa will have no one left to parasitize, and they, too, shall perish. Their grasping, covetous, and insatiable appetites are just as real as their inability to satisfy them without seeking discounts at the expense of others, more capable. But they have no choice but to try, because meritocracy, accountability, and responsibility in the face of abler competitors would prove just as lethal to them as devouring those finally and completely. Without knowing it, without being able to moderate themselves, they are actually trying to straddle these extremes to the only evolutionary strategy that can sustain them, parasitism that is not severe enough to kill their only food source. But don’t expect them to realize that. And there is nothing to lose by simply wiping them out, as one would any other species of pest. (There is a moral difference between parasites and producers.)
-
No Spengler Is Wrong. Too Much Middle East, Not Enough China and India
No Spengler Is Wrong. Too Much Middle East, Not Enough China and India https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/no-spengler-is-wrong-too-much-middle-east-not-enough-china-and-india/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 18:00:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265704482014445571
-
No Spengler Is Wrong. Too Much Middle East, Not Enough China and India
Oct 8, 2019, 1:26 PM
—“Somebody like Spengler would say that there is no way around the decline and eventual fall of the Faustian West, no matter what we do politically. What if like an individual human life, and indeed the universe itself, an expiration date is just destiny?”—
He’s demonstrably wrong. China and india are the examples, The problem for most western intellectuals is that fertile crescent begins both the agrarian and bronze ages, and that we were behind them because we didn’t have that climate with those rivers, and so agrarian production had to be distributed over broader colder territories. I can envision history now without semitic influences and the semitic dark ages of ignorance. The problem is we let our civilizations partly merge when rome was conquered by byzantium (se europeans, anatolians and syrians and levantines) and so almost all out intellectuals are infected by the european semitic competition rather than studying europe, semitia, india, and china as different models. The Chinese have always been right. Homogeneity. gradual genetic colonization. Isolation. and eradication of any and all competition. We failed because when we moved from land trade through the Bosporus, to the age of sail, we didn’t put a wall at gibraltar, the Bosporus, the caucuses, and between the caspian, the aral sea, and the himalayas. We didn’t wall ourselves off like the chinese. Civilizations and territories, and SPECIES: china, India, europa (to the urals), semitia, africa, austronesia, north and south america, and australia.