I have an enviable record of predicting future events. And this one is falling into place like clockwork. First the virus, second soros funds another Antifa-BLM rebellion, and pressing a POTUS, subject to conspiracy by the left, into a corner. It’s amazing. 😉 … Clockwork. https://t.co/SHewPNMP3t
I have an enviable record of predicting future events. And this one is falling into place like clockwork. First the virus, second soros funds another Antifa-BLM rebellion, and pressing a POTUS, subject to conspiracy by the left, into a corner. It’s amazing. 😉 … Clockwork. https://t.co/SHewPNMP3t
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-02 01:34:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267630618839592960
THE NATIONAL SOCIALISM QUESTION. IT WON THE 20TH RIGHT? I know history is currently overturning the mythology but I want to address the National Socialist community for a moment, even if it’s politically incorrect for now. My problem with supporting the NS political program is limited to the strange german obsession with recreating a secular religion to replace the devotion of the catholic church. It’s in everything they do. It’s also why they’re the most moral people on earth most of the time. So this remains one of my most frustrating problems: the germans have pretty much always ‘been right’, throughout all of history. And I know why (customary law). Am I right that we must create this formal law, but that we must also produce a secular political religion on top? NS won the 20th right? I mean, that’s what China is practicing, and that’s what Russia wants to practice – if we’d let them. Democracy failed as always. Representative democracy failed as always. and the only decent countries are those with intact monarchies, or politicians … … who in practice act as monarchs rather than CEO’s. Now. I prefer a monarchy, under our traditional rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, with the purpose of the government the intergenerational persistence of family and nation. Where the monarchy appoints a cabinet … … but in english fashion, a jury of the people (or multiple houses acting as juries) approve or veto requests from the cabinet, which are all to be structured as contracts of the commons. This depoliticizes society, which has been a catastrophe for western civlization. There is precious little evidence that political competition does anything except undermine the nation. And by limiting people to voluntary means of cooperating, we deprive them of pursuit of rents. But given our historical mistake of not making the state treasury the bank of the realm, and separating credit to the people, with credit in business and industry, we allowed creation of rents against the people that belong to them in the first place, not to the finance sector. This problem is easily rectified.
THE NATIONAL SOCIALISM QUESTION. IT WON THE 20TH RIGHT? I know history is currently overturning the mythology but I want to address the National Socialist community for a moment, even if it’s politically incorrect for now. My problem with supporting the NS political program is limited to the strange german obsession with recreating a secular religion to replace the devotion of the catholic church. It’s in everything they do. It’s also why they’re the most moral people on earth most of the time. So this remains one of my most frustrating problems: the germans have pretty much always ‘been right’, throughout all of history. And I know why (customary law). Am I right that we must create this formal law, but that we must also produce a secular political religion on top? NS won the 20th right? I mean, that’s what China is practicing, and that’s what Russia wants to practice – if we’d let them. Democracy failed as always. Representative democracy failed as always. and the only decent countries are those with intact monarchies, or politicians … … who in practice act as monarchs rather than CEO’s. Now. I prefer a monarchy, under our traditional rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, with the purpose of the government the intergenerational persistence of family and nation. Where the monarchy appoints a cabinet … … but in english fashion, a jury of the people (or multiple houses acting as juries) approve or veto requests from the cabinet, which are all to be structured as contracts of the commons. This depoliticizes society, which has been a catastrophe for western civlization. There is precious little evidence that political competition does anything except undermine the nation. And by limiting people to voluntary means of cooperating, we deprive them of pursuit of rents. But given our historical mistake of not making the state treasury the bank of the realm, and separating credit to the people, with credit in business and industry, we allowed creation of rents against the people that belong to them in the first place, not to the finance sector. This problem is easily rectified.
White Identity Arises in Response to Collective Threat https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/white-identity-arises-in-response-to-collective-threat/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 23:26:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267598313450332160
WHITE IDENTITY ARISES IN RESPONSE TO COLLECTIVE THREAT via: Patrick Smyth, Alain Dwight
“In summary, at their origins the Goths were significantly ethnic–in the fourth century around 20-50 percent being a freemen class with at least a sense of Gothic identity if not biological kinship […]. However, group identity was most important under conditions of threat or expansion. After attaining dominance in Spain, this group identity tended to dissipate, replaced by a class-structured society where elites were composed of both Romans and Goths, with a great deal of intermarriage. Family strategizing related to social class became more important than group identity. This is a good example of the weakness of extended kinship bonds among Western peoples and the tendency to splinter in the absence of threat.”
WHITE IDENTITY ARISES IN RESPONSE TO COLLECTIVE THREAT via: Patrick Smyth, Alain Dwight
“In summary, at their origins the Goths were significantly ethnic–in the fourth century around 20-50 percent being a freemen class with at least a sense of Gothic identity if not biological kinship […]. However, group identity was most important under conditions of threat or expansion. After attaining dominance in Spain, this group identity tended to dissipate, replaced by a class-structured society where elites were composed of both Romans and Goths, with a great deal of intermarriage. Family strategizing related to social class became more important than group identity. This is a good example of the weakness of extended kinship bonds among Western peoples and the tendency to splinter in the absence of threat.”
Acceleration? https://t.co/6aQcVezrcg
ACCELERATION? 2 things are happening simultaneously: 1) large numbers of additional nonwhites flow into the U.S. every year (70% of whom vote left & buy into anti-white commie narrative), and 2) more whites are getting redpilled to various degrees (harder to tell in what numbers). When we redpill whites, we’re mostly converting civnats (already Trump voters) and some centrists. Just making white men & their wives (the only demographic that votes majority right, & the only demographic that ever will) more based. This is absolutely essential because we need critical mass consensus on the grassroots Right around “no more nonwhite immigration”. However, we’re not really adding more Trump voters (just redpilling the current ones further). At least not nearly as fast as our enemy is importing leftist voters. Thus electoral politics in America is dead for the Right. It’s over. The system needs radical overhaul anyway. Good riddance, and the perfect opportunity to do so is coming. Thus the only question is, “What is the fastest way to get a critical mass of Trump voters to say ‘no more nonwhite immigration, period!’ – Trump winning in 2020, or losing? I could see an argument either way. If he wins, the race-realism-resistant magapedes will have their learning process delayed 4 more years. We’d likely avoid total censorship & the left will keep going nuts so that will help, but the resistance to race realism – the most important thing they must learn – could be even stronger (“See! We can still win elections! Go Candace Owens!”) If he loses, they will have to come to grips with why (nonwhites vote 70% left, even TX is going purple soon blue) 4 years sooner. Yes, the left will censor massively but that will work in our favor and even the mainstream Rush, Hannity etc will have to openly face the demographic reality of the Right winning no more elections. So I lean toward “let’s get this over with” but if Trump were to win in 2020 I won’t be upset. Either way we’re going to win. Because the acceleration will happen regardless, the demographic reality is coming regardless, and no matter what the timing of the acceleration, all acceleration benefits us because our enemies have no ability to project force to the extent necessary to control the grassroots Right once the grassroots Right has no more incentive to cooperate. Again, acceleration only helps us. Some of the anti-accelerationists are making the “later timing is better” argument. I don’t really have a problem with that. But some anti-accelerationists are hoping persuasion will work as an ultimate strategy and that somehow a real conflict can be avoided. (They’re just afraid. Or they haven’t done their homework on the scenario, 4G warfare etc. & thus they don’t understand that our enemy has no chance.) I do have a problem with that, because it’s delusional. The conflict is coming. Acceleration will come to a head. We are on a collision course with history. Just embrace it.
ACCELERATION? 2 things are happening simultaneously: 1) large numbers of additional nonwhites flow into the U.S. every year (70% of whom vote left & buy into anti-white commie narrative), and 2) more whites are getting redpilled to various degrees (harder to tell in what numbers). When we redpill whites, we’re mostly converting civnats (already Trump voters) and some centrists. Just making white men & their wives (the only demographic that votes majority right, & the only demographic that ever will) more based. This is absolutely essential because we need critical mass consensus on the grassroots Right around “no more nonwhite immigration”. However, we’re not really adding more Trump voters (just redpilling the current ones further). At least not nearly as fast as our enemy is importing leftist voters. Thus electoral politics in America is dead for the Right. It’s over. The system needs radical overhaul anyway. Good riddance, and the perfect opportunity to do so is coming. Thus the only question is, “What is the fastest way to get a critical mass of Trump voters to say ‘no more nonwhite immigration, period!’ – Trump winning in 2020, or losing? I could see an argument either way. If he wins, the race-realism-resistant magapedes will have their learning process delayed 4 more years. We’d likely avoid total censorship & the left will keep going nuts so that will help, but the resistance to race realism – the most important thing they must learn – could be even stronger (“See! We can still win elections! Go Candace Owens!”) If he loses, they will have to come to grips with why (nonwhites vote 70% left, even TX is going purple soon blue) 4 years sooner. Yes, the left will censor massively but that will work in our favor and even the mainstream Rush, Hannity etc will have to openly face the demographic reality of the Right winning no more elections. So I lean toward “let’s get this over with” but if Trump were to win in 2020 I won’t be upset. Either way we’re going to win. Because the acceleration will happen regardless, the demographic reality is coming regardless, and no matter what the timing of the acceleration, all acceleration benefits us because our enemies have no ability to project force to the extent necessary to control the grassroots Right once the grassroots Right has no more incentive to cooperate. Again, acceleration only helps us. Some of the anti-accelerationists are making the “later timing is better” argument. I don’t really have a problem with that. But some anti-accelerationists are hoping persuasion will work as an ultimate strategy and that somehow a real conflict can be avoided. (They’re just afraid. Or they haven’t done their homework on the scenario, 4G warfare etc. & thus they don’t understand that our enemy has no chance.) I do have a problem with that, because it’s delusional. The conflict is coming. Acceleration will come to a head. We are on a collision course with history. Just embrace it.