Theme: Crisis

  • The feeling at the time has little impact on the understanding over time. I have

    The feeling at the time has little impact on the understanding over time.
    I have three opinions.
    1. First, everyone wants the Palestinians to ‘go away’ because no one wants them or they’d take them in. They have their opportunity to create a viable polity and they don’t – instead they live on various international charities, and entertaining themselves with terrorism. While it’s one thing to fight and use terror it’s another to use islamic brutality. And Palestinians show no interests in doing otherwise. Israel must occupy both territories and end the threat or between reproductive differences and costs of producing a jew vs an arab mean Israel, especially with the large number of fundamentalist ‘parasites’ on the rest of the population, mean israel is unsustainable. As such I see Israel continuing until the west bank at least is under full control and settlement driving out the Palestinians. I can see them allowing the gaza strip. I see the USA continuing to wait out russia, iran, and china. I see israel giving the USA cause for attacking Iran. The USA won’t do that until israel gives it no choice.
    2. Second, strategically it is valuable to maintain Israel as the only high tech economy, with a strong education system, and a good government in the region. This is akin to china being threatened by a democratic hong kong and Taiwan, to Russia being threatened by a democratic Ukraine, and Iran being threatened by a democratic and successful Israel – because their success brings into question the legitimacy of the governments of China, Russia, and Iran for their populations.
    3. Third, by and large, the world hates the jews like the Palestinians and the Jews hate each other. So no one wants the jews or the Palestinians. In fact, most countries would love it if they could deport Jews to Israel without fear of international demonization. So, I don’t expect anyone to allow the collapse of Israel for the simple reason that it’s both strategically valuable and no one wants them to move elsewhere.

    Reply addressees: @hyperlambda


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 22:30:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795945805607505921

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795942346766553135

  • THERE ARE ONLY THREE PROBLEMS IN BRINGING ABOUT A REVOLUTION. You an prepare for

    THERE ARE ONLY THREE PROBLEMS IN BRINGING ABOUT A REVOLUTION.
    You an prepare for it thoroughly. But the Overton window is always the cause of the trigger event. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1795634488048865625

  • TLDR impatient version; The muslim conquest was only possible because europe and

    TLDR impatient version; The muslim conquest was only possible because europe and Persia had exhausted each other with war. The subsequent raiding of trade and piracy on the seas destroyed the capacity of europe and persia to conduct trade. Islam was spread because one had to pay a 30% tax NOT to practice islam. Each generation of middle eastern conquerors took control by the same means – joining the military and administration then taking it over by force. So islam succeeds by destroying teh trade of more advanced civilizations, destroying it’s institutions, reducing people to muslim levels of ignorance, and then parasitically living off the silk road which was the only means of trade across the ‘world island’.
    When the turks took Constantinople and closed the ports toe Europe in order to do the same thing to europe, the Europeans invented the age of sail, destroyed the market for overland trade, ended the silk road as viable, and without the ability to parasitically live off that trade, the middle east have consistently fallen behind.

    Reply addressees: @NuSecretShopper


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 19:51:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795905796909228033

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795901328260059204

  • No he wasn’t. What geostrategist or economist of any merit has that opinion? He

    No he wasn’t. What geostrategist or economist of any merit has that opinion? He did NOTHING. He met with no one. He gave china open license. And he’s the reason for the decline in american influence that gave china and russia the incentive to return to expansionary militarism.

    Are you crazy?

    General academic thought is this: some f the population want’s a mommy or priest to make theme feel good (soothe their anxiety) because they both feel out of control, and can’t understand the world we live in. Some of the population wants the opposite because they do understand the world we live in.

    Obama satisfied the former and failed the latter.

    One of the worst presidents in history with one of the most disastrous legacies.

    Reply addressees: @bendreyfuss


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 18:42:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795888371631288320

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795818042703974489

  • “Q: Curt: Do you have a guide on how to stage a revolution?”– No joke: The FBI

    –“Q: Curt: Do you have a guide on how to stage a revolution?”–

    No joke: The FBI has repeatedly asked (threatened) me over further discussion of that topic. So I’ll publish it as ‘The Course and Conduct of A Revolution’ if and when the time comes. At present, it’s more important that we finish the work of (a) what we are demanding and why it’s just, and (b) the legal, constitutional, institutional, procedural and policy reforms (c) such that if a revolution does begin we know what to fight for and what to do if we win (d) in order to remove maximum resistance from the moral population, and increase the government’s inability to resist.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @R__Credo


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 15:33:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795840797775937536

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795832044209283290

  • I’m saying people act in their self interest and do so when they run out of opti

    I’m saying people act in their self interest and do so when they run out of options. We are running out of options rather quickly. Wether social, political, economic, demographic, or geostrategic. And we’re running out of them all at the same time. So expect people to act…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 02:38:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795645801529561334

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795640371885793462

  • It’s called the world wars. You destroyed it. The fact that we are now hosting t

    It’s called the world wars. You destroyed it.
    The fact that we are now hosting the marxists instead ofyou this time is the problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-27 21:53:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795211751228596482

    Reply addressees: @antigg860413 @AutistocratMS @evansrc717 @SteveSchmidtSES @IHeartUkraine

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795208903442985449

  • “The internet has made every woman delusional.”– (a woman) Context: The collaps

    –“The internet has made every woman delusional.”– (a woman)

    Context: The collapse of dating, mating, reproduction, family, intersexual relations, and political cooperation. Why? Because women are suggestible rather than rational, and the resulting success of the marxist sequence’s capture of European feminism (legal equality) with marxist sewing of sex, class, cultural, and racial conflict – in order to march through the institutions of cultural production, in order to destroy western knowledge, traditions, cultural memory, and institutions that are the LEAST divisive and LEAST constraining in the world, by claiming ‘whiteness’ is oppression rather than a demand for integration into middle class responsibility for self, the private, and the common.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-27 19:40:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795178401432502274

  • WHY DO MILLENNIALS AND Z’s FEEL PRIVILEGED IN THEIR CLAIMS OF SUFFERING? I guess

    WHY DO MILLENNIALS AND Z’s FEEL PRIVILEGED IN THEIR CLAIMS OF SUFFERING?
    I guess, the more interesting question is why Millennials and Gen Z feel more reactionary than did those of us in the Jones Generation. Because the seventies were even worse than the present decade in may… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1794484646366843252


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-25 22:37:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794498172267401469

  • GENERATION JONES SAW THE END OF THE BOOMER PERIOD OF PROSPERITY COME CRASHING DO

    GENERATION JONES SAW THE END OF THE BOOMER PERIOD OF PROSPERITY COME CRASHING DOWN AS THEY CAME OF AGE IN THE 70s. (AND SOME ADVICE)
    (FYI: A generation is produced by the social, economic, and political events that occur during the period at which you come of age)

    Generation Jones (Born 1954 to 1965, coming of age from 1972 to 1979 .. and some to the early 1980s) is the worldwide social cohort coming after (or is the latter half) of the baby boomer generation and before the first year of Generation X (1965 to 1980). The baby boomer generation longer than a generation, and is a demographic term, NOT a generational term – as we use the term generation.

    The term Generation Jones was first coined by the American cultural commentator Jonathan Pontell, who identified the cohort as those born from 1954 to 1965 in the U.S., who were children during Watergate, the oil crisis, and stagflation rather than during the 1950s, but slightly before Gen X.
    Generation Jones did not grow up with World War II veterans as fathers, and, as they reached adulthood, there was no compulsory military service and no defining political cause.

    They have never lived in a world without television—similar to how many members of Generation Z (1997–2012), have never lived in a world without personal computers or the internet ,or mobile phones.

    The name “Generation Jones” has several connotations, including a large anonymous generation, a “keeping up with the Joneses” competitiveness, the ‘Yuppie Generation, and the Wall Street Generation”.

    They inherited an optimistic outlook as children in the 1960s (I dunno, I remember the 60s as the Vietnam war, the cold war nuclear scare, assassinations, race riots, constant left wing bombing, students advocating communism in constant protests, the downfall of our civilization, and the rise of perceivable crime in the middle class).

    But yes, the beginning of end of the postwar American economic advantage had ended before Generation Jones’ coming of age, and in the 70’s we would begin offshoring because of the power of unions and the use of unions by the left to advance communism – and yes it was deliberate. Because we understood by then that all socialism and communism were failing, and that the ‘great society project’ of Lyndon Johnson’s imitation of the soviets, had been a catastrophe. (And perhaps so was the civil rights movement – a cover for marxist undermining.)

    But they were then confronted with a different reality as they entered the workforce during Reaganomics and the shift from a manufacturing to a service economy, which ushered in a long period of mass unemployment. (When I graduated high school, only 40% of college graduates were finding jobs. Hence why I originally chose engineering rather than philosophy or fine art).

    Mortgage interest rates increased to above 12 percent in the mid-eighties, making it virtually impossible to buy a house on a single income. De-industrialization arrived in full force in the mid-late 1970s and 1980s; wages would be stagnant for decades, and 401Ks replaced pensions, leaving them with a certain yearning or “jonesing” quality for the more prosperous days of the past.

    There was a scarcity of resources and privileges available to them that were seemingly abundant to older Boomers. Therefore, there is a certain level of bitterness and “jonesing” for the level of doting and affluence granted to older Boomers but denied to them.

    So the Key characteristics assigned to members of Generation Jones are pessimism, distrust of government, and general cynicism. (OMG Yes. And then some. Hence the libertarian movement through 2010)

    (And FWIW, I experienced just what the present generation is experiencing in the past decade, and the only difference I can see is social media, dating sites, porn, immigration, and a total failure of the education sector, destroying the social cohesion and intersexual cohesion we had in my Jones Generation.

    But economically, I don’t have a lot of sympathy. Because we already went through it. And we fought and by some miracle the tech revolution saved us.

    Perhaps the AI revolution will save you economically.

    But socially and politically, you will need a threat of bloody revolution more intense than that the marxists used to bring about any chance of any quality of life for you and the generations that might follow you if you manage to reproduce at all.)

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @JamesMJohnson4 @keithinSimi


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-25 21:44:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794484646006149120

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794474945679880346