The Right? All I See is Fear https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/23/the-right-all-i-see-is-fear/
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 20:31:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286398466885849089
The Right? All I See is Fear https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/23/the-right-all-i-see-is-fear/
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 20:31:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286398466885849089
—-” I hear “I have a plan, “some thing is coming”, “just wait, our time is coming”, is the deepest of all copes. They don’t have a plan, they have nothing to look forward to and they’re just full of shit 9/10. When the “time” actually comes to implement their plan or to put it in action, they’ll usually fail or ask for more “time”.”—Tim Allen Muse
I dunno. My plan is published (seconddeclaration.org) in public and the plan’s has been constant for almost ten years. The team knows most of the ‘revolutionary plan of action’. So that plan exists. So There is a plan, a solution, and it will work. But the right is so broken I don’t think it’s possible to make it happen. The right is loud, demanding, and aggressive – just to mask their true panic and cowardice.
—“It’s my ball and if we don’t play my rules I’m going home”—Everyone on the right
Let me clue the right: it’s the left’s ball. And they’re playing, and you’re on the bench. All I see is fear. Demand for certainty. But what if, but what if, but what if? Cowardice. It’s just demand for other better men to do the work of men. Nothing but manbois with pride they haven’t earned, demanding respect they aren’t due, with courage they don’t have, with the promise of effort they never demonstrate. The left shows up. My guys show up for the plan. They sign a document exposing themselves for the plan. I don’t see anyone else with a plan, or anyone else showing up. And even if you do they want you to be ‘stupid’ rather than strategic. Mostly Boys. Not men. Hiding. As if prepping is bravery rather than admission they’re unlikable, untrustworthy, borderline schizophrenic from the feeling of powerlessness. Everyone gives up on the right as trailer trash. I”m not giving up yet. But man it’s difficult to keep pressing on, when really, the right is largely cowering medieval peasantry waving internet white flags of Christian simpering, and micro-penis nazi flags, waiting for the Vikings to show up and lead the crusades. Mostly they make me sick. But someone’s gotta care for the kids on the slow bus. I think anyway.
—-” I hear “I have a plan, “some thing is coming”, “just wait, our time is coming”, is the deepest of all copes. They don’t have a plan, they have nothing to look forward to and they’re just full of shit 9/10. When the “time” actually comes to implement their plan or to put it in action, they’ll usually fail or ask for more “time”.”—Tim Allen Muse
I dunno. My plan is published (seconddeclaration.org) in public and the plan’s has been constant for almost ten years. The team knows most of the ‘revolutionary plan of action’. So that plan exists. So There is a plan, a solution, and it will work. But the right is so broken I don’t think it’s possible to make it happen. The right is loud, demanding, and aggressive – just to mask their true panic and cowardice.
—“It’s my ball and if we don’t play my rules I’m going home”—Everyone on the right
Let me clue the right: it’s the left’s ball. And they’re playing, and you’re on the bench. All I see is fear. Demand for certainty. But what if, but what if, but what if? Cowardice. It’s just demand for other better men to do the work of men. Nothing but manbois with pride they haven’t earned, demanding respect they aren’t due, with courage they don’t have, with the promise of effort they never demonstrate. The left shows up. My guys show up for the plan. They sign a document exposing themselves for the plan. I don’t see anyone else with a plan, or anyone else showing up. And even if you do they want you to be ‘stupid’ rather than strategic. Mostly Boys. Not men. Hiding. As if prepping is bravery rather than admission they’re unlikable, untrustworthy, borderline schizophrenic from the feeling of powerlessness. Everyone gives up on the right as trailer trash. I”m not giving up yet. But man it’s difficult to keep pressing on, when really, the right is largely cowering medieval peasantry waving internet white flags of Christian simpering, and micro-penis nazi flags, waiting for the Vikings to show up and lead the crusades. Mostly they make me sick. But someone’s gotta care for the kids on the slow bus. I think anyway.
—“Which is something you have to do when you’re managing with “the population you have, not the one you want””—Moritz Bierling
Its a fight between forces of hierarchy and kinship in correspondence with reality versus a fight for equality and
—“So it really is a fight between civicism and religion for supremacy”—Moritz Bierling
I didn’t make the connection clear, sorry. 1) BIOLOGICAL VS INFORMATIONAL The people you have (biological, behavioral) and the people you have (knowledge, understanding, values) are not the same criteria. Governing with the people you have (incentives, constant) is a question of possibility, and governing with the people you have (education) is merely a question of costs and externalities. we can continue to kick the can down the road and NOT produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization, that would solve the problem or we can solve the problem despite its cost, in a period where there is high demand for the solution to the problem. 2) THE UNDERLYING PROBLEM IS THE SAME Civicism, localism, nationalism, evolution, competition vs religion, universalism, globalism, devolution, corruption. Al these problems are the same source: easy female dysgenic and boil the frog vs hard male eugenic and transcend. Our intuitions are to not pay the cost of adaptation. We have to pay that cost and train people to pay that cost without stress. Only Europeans did it. How can we evolve our concepts, norms, traditions, institutions, so that we continue to evolve man rather than regress? We know now. The problem is solvable. but it is only solvable if we win the war against the female dysgenic intuition by either conquest or separation and competitive evolution. Of those two separation is the most beneficial and the fastest since we get rid of our own. 3) THE ILLUSION WE HAVE TIME It’s not like we have an infinite amount of time. The frequency of geological events capable of wiping out humans is higher than the frequency of climate variations. The frequency of astronomic events is lower, but it’s still continuous. The future of mankind is decided right now. this year, next year. A few more years and its over. there are no ‘undiscovered countries’ with reserves of ability remaining. We have exploited the pool of humans as thoroughly as exploiting the world’s resources.
—“Which is something you have to do when you’re managing with “the population you have, not the one you want””—Moritz Bierling
Its a fight between forces of hierarchy and kinship in correspondence with reality versus a fight for equality and
—“So it really is a fight between civicism and religion for supremacy”—Moritz Bierling
I didn’t make the connection clear, sorry. 1) BIOLOGICAL VS INFORMATIONAL The people you have (biological, behavioral) and the people you have (knowledge, understanding, values) are not the same criteria. Governing with the people you have (incentives, constant) is a question of possibility, and governing with the people you have (education) is merely a question of costs and externalities. we can continue to kick the can down the road and NOT produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization, that would solve the problem or we can solve the problem despite its cost, in a period where there is high demand for the solution to the problem. 2) THE UNDERLYING PROBLEM IS THE SAME Civicism, localism, nationalism, evolution, competition vs religion, universalism, globalism, devolution, corruption. Al these problems are the same source: easy female dysgenic and boil the frog vs hard male eugenic and transcend. Our intuitions are to not pay the cost of adaptation. We have to pay that cost and train people to pay that cost without stress. Only Europeans did it. How can we evolve our concepts, norms, traditions, institutions, so that we continue to evolve man rather than regress? We know now. The problem is solvable. but it is only solvable if we win the war against the female dysgenic intuition by either conquest or separation and competitive evolution. Of those two separation is the most beneficial and the fastest since we get rid of our own. 3) THE ILLUSION WE HAVE TIME It’s not like we have an infinite amount of time. The frequency of geological events capable of wiping out humans is higher than the frequency of climate variations. The frequency of astronomic events is lower, but it’s still continuous. The future of mankind is decided right now. this year, next year. A few more years and its over. there are no ‘undiscovered countries’ with reserves of ability remaining. We have exploited the pool of humans as thoroughly as exploiting the world’s resources.
WHY CAN”T WE RESPOND TO COVID (THE DEEP ANSWER)
—“Curt: Would a communist government solve the COVID problem better?”–
Communism is impossible, for reasons we have known for a century now: (a) human cognition is acquisitive (a) humans require good incentive or will find worse ones, (b) economic calculation is impossible (although this is still a matter of scholarly debate). Capitalism isn’t possible for reasons we now know. And we know that the Cosmopolitan Capitalist movement was a war on European Rule of Law of Reciprocity. European rule of law will produce markets and will produce capital concentration, and the gains of consumer capitalism, but will not allow for internationalization (export) of profits and will require nationalization of profits (conversion of profits into commons for the people.) So the communism-capitalism debate was always another Marxist fraud. Communism and Capitalism are ‘rule by men’. Rule of Law prohibits rule by men, and prohibits the corruption of communism, and the criminality of capitalism. DO YOU MEAN THE CHINESE MODEL? If you mean is the Chinese Authoritarian, Expansionist, Racist, Nationalist, State Capitalist model superior? Well, The Chinese didn’t copy the communists – they aren’t a communist government. Instead, they copied the Nazis – they are a Fascist Government. And what they have done, as the Germans did, is prove that Fascism, not democracy, not social democracy, not communism, won the war of political models of the 19th and 20th Centuries. Why? Because (a) intolerance for political competition, (good), (b) desperate attempt to maintain legitimacy by keeping the people happy, (good), (c) using debt (state capitalism) instead of forced labor (state socialism), (good), (e) creating an economy rather than a military (good), (f) using that economy to build the world’s dominant military (good), (g) CONTEXT This is a great example of repeating my message that there is only one possible form of economy: mixed economy of state labor, subsidized labor, market organization of market labor, private investment in short term returns, and state investment in long term capital investment returns; and there is only only one possible form of government: dynamic Military-Authoritarian, Republic Market, and Social Democratic Redistributive, depending upon conditions. Because there is no steady-state in nature, and all civilizations must constantly adapt to change. The Romans understood this and we don’t. There is a good reason for constitutional military aristocracy and monarchs in times of war and crisis, upper-middle class and republican governments in peace, and lower houses of parliament for common people in times of windfalls. The only problem is developing the method of shifting from primarily republican (economic), to monarchic (war), to redistribution (windfalls). This is, as I understand it, the only remaining question in political theory: that criteria. CREATING OUR FRAGILITY The Jewish postwar anti-European initiative to move the failed communist movement to America and to change first to neo-marxism (cultural marxism) to undermine western law tradition history and culture, then Postmodernism (social construction of falsehoods through repetition) and feminism (undermining the family and tradition) was successful in demilitarizing western civilization in Europe postwar, in America in response to Vietnam. The military still conducts continuous exercises and frequent self-falsification exercises. Meaning they run war games. These wargames serve to train for emergencies, and test the organization. But without traditional military service or militia service by a large number of men, or a requirement for military service to serve in politics, ‘empirical pessimistic, risk-driven, military epistemology’ has been eradicated from not only the political sphere, but the bureaucracy, and the public. We have failed to maintain traditional European “anti-fragility”. And instead, become fragile – unable to adapt to shocks. It’s the military experience that makes organizations able to adapt to shocks, rather than ‘settle into sedentary expectations of continuous growth’. Instead, as happens in all organizations not subject to stress and shocks, work expands to fill all available time, and ‘employee income and benefits’ seek to consume all available capital – and the core mission is sacrificed for bureaucratic consumption. This applies to state monopolies and publicly traded companies alike. The only continuous market pressure that maintains ‘good civic behavior’ is in the small and medium business owners, and independent craftsmen and laborers. this is why there is such a political divide: the chief function of a college education is to allow people to exit the market and responsibility for outcomes. And with the decline in farming as the primary small business, and with the intentional absence of required education in economics and law to make the public informed, we create an ignorant population, lacking both republican (economic), and aristocratic (military) education – and able to adapt to change and shocks. So when we encounter a shock, it is not possible to switch from social democratic redistributive governance, bureaucratic, social, and economic organization, to republican and govern like statesmen independent of one’s political party, but we can’t any longer imagine shifting to the military order, in which all of us must sacrifice for the common good. THE COVID FAILURE The WHO is first and foremost a political organization founded in the postwar period where Americans maintained the British empire, took over the UK Pound as the World Reserve Currency, and using its navy, regulated the world standard of political behavior. But today it is paid for, and not by Americans – but by Chinese – so it is a compromised organization of no value whatsoever. The WHO, World Bank, UN, and NATO are effectively anti-European political organizations. But at least they aren’t domestic government organizations. Conversely. Homeland Security and CDC are both failures and they will continue to be. The HS, Disaster Recovery, and CDC do not regularly run self-falsifying war games that are designed to test their points of failure. They have no influence or responsibility for transforming American manufacturing to the production of strategic necessities for emergencies of national scale. They were designed for the ‘small’ problem of hurricanes not for the large problems of war on our economy, war on our infrastructure, war by plague, by accidental plague, or by say, volcanic eruption. Why? Because it’s expensive and that would mean devoting money to TESTING whether they were capable rather than employee intellectual satisfaction, career advancement, income consumption, and benefits consumption. (which is how those organizations work). The only organization capable of performing crisis-organization is the military. And thanks to the Clinton-Obama undermining of the military by turning it from purely empirical, purely, results-oriented, purely crisis-oriented mission, into a social program for redistribution of income, away from working-class American males, it doesn’t appear our military can perform that crisis function any longer either. The simple example to illustrate the problem is that Prussia alone created European martial excellence and created the german economic miracle by consequence of its discipline -where the french had to have a bloody revolution that they have not an never will recover from. The Chinese had the red army and could recover – India doesn’t have that army and can’t. The Arab world can’t even make an army and has to rely on terrorists to get their strategic work done. Hence the rise of Turkey again. The foundation of western civilization is the military tradition. It’s where our politics, laws, technology, commerce, our reason, empiricism, science, medicine, and rapid evolution came from. It’s where our adaptability came from. It’s where our roman adaptive government came from. It’s where our commercial and technological adaptability came from. And for reasons historians will explain in great detail – but are primarily due to the postwar movement of civilizational undermining from Europe – where it succeeded in creating the destruction by Jewish Bolshevism in Russia, and causing European fascism to resist it, creating the second world war that destroyed the European civilization and empires – to America, where the Jewish bolshevik communist, neo-Marxist, postmodernist, anti-male-feminist, Human Difference Denial movement (really, the counter-eugenics movement). The most likely candidate for our decline is upon granting women the franchise in exchange for their entry into the workforce thanks to automation, we failed to give women a separate house of government from men. Because in retrospect, as in Rome, it was women and the underclasses that fell for the false promises of Marxism, Postmodernism, feminism, and political correctness – just as women and slaves (the underclass) fell for the false promise of Christianity and gave us the dark ages. Welcome to the next dark age. Welcome to our failure to pass the great filter. Welcome to the recognition of why the universe is empty of advanced life. The miracle of cooperation. The miracle of the division of labor. Contains the seeds of its own demise: The failure to persist the martial empiricism The failure to persist selection pressure by market means. And the exhaustion of planetary resources
WHY CAN”T WE RESPOND TO COVID (THE DEEP ANSWER)
—“Curt: Would a communist government solve the COVID problem better?”–
Communism is impossible, for reasons we have known for a century now: (a) human cognition is acquisitive (a) humans require good incentive or will find worse ones, (b) economic calculation is impossible (although this is still a matter of scholarly debate). Capitalism isn’t possible for reasons we now know. And we know that the Cosmopolitan Capitalist movement was a war on European Rule of Law of Reciprocity. European rule of law will produce markets and will produce capital concentration, and the gains of consumer capitalism, but will not allow for internationalization (export) of profits and will require nationalization of profits (conversion of profits into commons for the people.) So the communism-capitalism debate was always another Marxist fraud. Communism and Capitalism are ‘rule by men’. Rule of Law prohibits rule by men, and prohibits the corruption of communism, and the criminality of capitalism. DO YOU MEAN THE CHINESE MODEL? If you mean is the Chinese Authoritarian, Expansionist, Racist, Nationalist, State Capitalist model superior? Well, The Chinese didn’t copy the communists – they aren’t a communist government. Instead, they copied the Nazis – they are a Fascist Government. And what they have done, as the Germans did, is prove that Fascism, not democracy, not social democracy, not communism, won the war of political models of the 19th and 20th Centuries. Why? Because (a) intolerance for political competition, (good), (b) desperate attempt to maintain legitimacy by keeping the people happy, (good), (c) using debt (state capitalism) instead of forced labor (state socialism), (good), (e) creating an economy rather than a military (good), (f) using that economy to build the world’s dominant military (good), (g) CONTEXT This is a great example of repeating my message that there is only one possible form of economy: mixed economy of state labor, subsidized labor, market organization of market labor, private investment in short term returns, and state investment in long term capital investment returns; and there is only only one possible form of government: dynamic Military-Authoritarian, Republic Market, and Social Democratic Redistributive, depending upon conditions. Because there is no steady-state in nature, and all civilizations must constantly adapt to change. The Romans understood this and we don’t. There is a good reason for constitutional military aristocracy and monarchs in times of war and crisis, upper-middle class and republican governments in peace, and lower houses of parliament for common people in times of windfalls. The only problem is developing the method of shifting from primarily republican (economic), to monarchic (war), to redistribution (windfalls). This is, as I understand it, the only remaining question in political theory: that criteria. CREATING OUR FRAGILITY The Jewish postwar anti-European initiative to move the failed communist movement to America and to change first to neo-marxism (cultural marxism) to undermine western law tradition history and culture, then Postmodernism (social construction of falsehoods through repetition) and feminism (undermining the family and tradition) was successful in demilitarizing western civilization in Europe postwar, in America in response to Vietnam. The military still conducts continuous exercises and frequent self-falsification exercises. Meaning they run war games. These wargames serve to train for emergencies, and test the organization. But without traditional military service or militia service by a large number of men, or a requirement for military service to serve in politics, ‘empirical pessimistic, risk-driven, military epistemology’ has been eradicated from not only the political sphere, but the bureaucracy, and the public. We have failed to maintain traditional European “anti-fragility”. And instead, become fragile – unable to adapt to shocks. It’s the military experience that makes organizations able to adapt to shocks, rather than ‘settle into sedentary expectations of continuous growth’. Instead, as happens in all organizations not subject to stress and shocks, work expands to fill all available time, and ‘employee income and benefits’ seek to consume all available capital – and the core mission is sacrificed for bureaucratic consumption. This applies to state monopolies and publicly traded companies alike. The only continuous market pressure that maintains ‘good civic behavior’ is in the small and medium business owners, and independent craftsmen and laborers. this is why there is such a political divide: the chief function of a college education is to allow people to exit the market and responsibility for outcomes. And with the decline in farming as the primary small business, and with the intentional absence of required education in economics and law to make the public informed, we create an ignorant population, lacking both republican (economic), and aristocratic (military) education – and able to adapt to change and shocks. So when we encounter a shock, it is not possible to switch from social democratic redistributive governance, bureaucratic, social, and economic organization, to republican and govern like statesmen independent of one’s political party, but we can’t any longer imagine shifting to the military order, in which all of us must sacrifice for the common good. THE COVID FAILURE The WHO is first and foremost a political organization founded in the postwar period where Americans maintained the British empire, took over the UK Pound as the World Reserve Currency, and using its navy, regulated the world standard of political behavior. But today it is paid for, and not by Americans – but by Chinese – so it is a compromised organization of no value whatsoever. The WHO, World Bank, UN, and NATO are effectively anti-European political organizations. But at least they aren’t domestic government organizations. Conversely. Homeland Security and CDC are both failures and they will continue to be. The HS, Disaster Recovery, and CDC do not regularly run self-falsifying war games that are designed to test their points of failure. They have no influence or responsibility for transforming American manufacturing to the production of strategic necessities for emergencies of national scale. They were designed for the ‘small’ problem of hurricanes not for the large problems of war on our economy, war on our infrastructure, war by plague, by accidental plague, or by say, volcanic eruption. Why? Because it’s expensive and that would mean devoting money to TESTING whether they were capable rather than employee intellectual satisfaction, career advancement, income consumption, and benefits consumption. (which is how those organizations work). The only organization capable of performing crisis-organization is the military. And thanks to the Clinton-Obama undermining of the military by turning it from purely empirical, purely, results-oriented, purely crisis-oriented mission, into a social program for redistribution of income, away from working-class American males, it doesn’t appear our military can perform that crisis function any longer either. The simple example to illustrate the problem is that Prussia alone created European martial excellence and created the german economic miracle by consequence of its discipline -where the french had to have a bloody revolution that they have not an never will recover from. The Chinese had the red army and could recover – India doesn’t have that army and can’t. The Arab world can’t even make an army and has to rely on terrorists to get their strategic work done. Hence the rise of Turkey again. The foundation of western civilization is the military tradition. It’s where our politics, laws, technology, commerce, our reason, empiricism, science, medicine, and rapid evolution came from. It’s where our adaptability came from. It’s where our roman adaptive government came from. It’s where our commercial and technological adaptability came from. And for reasons historians will explain in great detail – but are primarily due to the postwar movement of civilizational undermining from Europe – where it succeeded in creating the destruction by Jewish Bolshevism in Russia, and causing European fascism to resist it, creating the second world war that destroyed the European civilization and empires – to America, where the Jewish bolshevik communist, neo-Marxist, postmodernist, anti-male-feminist, Human Difference Denial movement (really, the counter-eugenics movement). The most likely candidate for our decline is upon granting women the franchise in exchange for their entry into the workforce thanks to automation, we failed to give women a separate house of government from men. Because in retrospect, as in Rome, it was women and the underclasses that fell for the false promises of Marxism, Postmodernism, feminism, and political correctness – just as women and slaves (the underclass) fell for the false promise of Christianity and gave us the dark ages. Welcome to the next dark age. Welcome to our failure to pass the great filter. Welcome to the recognition of why the universe is empty of advanced life. The miracle of cooperation. The miracle of the division of labor. Contains the seeds of its own demise: The failure to persist the martial empiricism The failure to persist selection pressure by market means. And the exhaustion of planetary resources
FULL ANSWER OF WHY ROME FELL: OVEREXTENSION OF THE HEROIC POPULATION
Short Version: The western Roman empire dramatically overextended but would have recovered, even from the invasions except for the folly of slaves(immigrants) and Christianity(Judaism / Marxism / Neo-Marxism / Feminism / Postmodernism), and finally the Islamic invasion and destruction of the civilized worlds.
REASONS
1 – Overextension of Colonization: Celtic holocaust created the opportunity for north germanic migration, just as defeating Germany and Europe in WW2 left a vacuum for marxism Judaism and Islam today. And leaving African colonialization incomplete left opportunity for Islam.
2 – Overextension of Range – from the Mediterranean coastal army, with naval transport and strike capability – which is cheap – to a primarily territorial military among hostile less developed people that was expensive. In other words, the cost of domesticating (settling, urbanizing, spreading literacy, commerce, and law) Europe was too high for the returns. (just like today)
3 – Overextension of Agrarian Economy – the empire needed industrialization. The greeks failed to reform their economy. The Romans improved administration and organization – second to none
4 – Overextension of Technology – the empire given the technology at the time, which led to corruption, assassinations, and use of force to obtain rents, rather than profitable service of the state, to obtain status. (just like today)
Bad Strategic Response to Overextension – Splitting the empire with the trade wealth in the greek east but the aristocracy in the roman west. Just like we have all these foreign costs in Europe and in the middle east just to protect Europe from oil price catastrophes – that don’t affect us.
Overextension of Elites Necessary To Govern – empire so that the ratio of elites and middle class to conquered and slaves was too high to rule, just like we have too many non-whites to rule today, and the middle east to govern thru Israel and the monarchies today.
Overextension of soldiery beyond supplying demographic – so that the military was no longer ‘citizens’ – but mercenaries – (Just like Hispanics, Blacks, and Muslims in the military today who are there for a jobs program not patriotism and ‘the people’)
Overextension of Immigration (Slaves): slaves were the old world’s version of third world immigrants today. These people lack the values traditions and culture and if brought in sufficient numbers will always rebel against the host population until they defeat them.
Overextension of TOLERANCE: Christianity undermined values like Christianity v2 (postmodernism-feminism-multiculturalism-equalitarianism) undermined our values. They shifted focus from European zest for life and achievement, for ignorance of life and fantasy after death. Christianity without warfare to dominate it, makes men weak. So Christianity prevented the restoration of the roman empire.
Overextension and Vulnerability to Plague: The soldiers brought back either measles or smallpox or the plague from the middle east and decimated the population.
Fragility to Shocks: The Muslim conquests destroyed the economies of the developed world, profit from conquest was exhausted by 1100, and islam’s mandatory ignorance reduced the developed civilizations to ashes.
Judaism to undermine. Christianity to weaken, Islam to destroy the cancer of the abaramic religions – the war on civilization, evolution, and life itself.
The answer for Rome and for America (europe) is the same: ethno-nationalization of the organs of state and organs of the state, and finance, at all levels, and specialization in running the state – not just here but anywhere we can function as a military, administrative, judicial elite (without outbreeding).
Gibbon gave a classic formulation of reasons why the Fall happened. He gave great weight to internal decline as well as to attacks from outside the Empire.
—“The story of its ruin is simple and obvious; and, instead of inquiring why the Roman empire was destroyed, we should rather be surprised that it had subsisted so long. The victorious legions, who, in distant wars, acquired the vices of strangers and mercenaries, first oppressed the freedom of the republic, and afterwards violated the majesty of the purple. The emperors, anxious for their personal safety and the public peace, were reduced to the base expedient of corrupting the discipline which rendered them alike formidable to their sovereign and to the enemy; the vigour of the military government was relaxed, and finally dissolved, by the partial institutions of Constantine; and the Roman world was overwhelmed by a deluge of Barbarians. … (AND) … As the happiness of a future life is the great object of religion, we may hear without surprise or scandal that the introduction, or at least the abuse of Christianity, had some influence on the decline and fall of the Roman empire… the soldiers’ pay was lavished on the useless multitudes of both sexes who could only plead the merits of abstinence and chastity… If the decline of the Roman empire was hastened by the conversion of Constantine, his victorious religion broke the violence of the fall, and mollified the ferocious temper of the conquerors.”—
-Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 14:31:00 UTC
WHY CAN”T WE RESPOND TO COVID (THE DEEP ANSWER)
—“Curt: Would a communist government solve the COVID problem better?”–
Communism is impossible, for reasons we have known for a century now: (a) human cognition is acquisitive (a) humans require good incentive or will find worse ones, (b) economic calculation is impossible (although this is still a matter of scholarly debate). Capitalism isn’t possible for reasons we now know. And we know that the Cosmopolitan Capitalist movement was a war on European Rule of Law of Reciprocity. European rule of law will produce markets and will produce capital concentration, and the gains of consumer capitalism, but will not allow for internationalization (export) of profits and will require nationalization of profits (conversion of profits into commons for the people.) So the communism-capitalism debate was always another Marxist fraud. Communism and Capitalism are ‘rule by men’. Rule of Law prohibits rule by men, and prohibits the corruption of communism, and the criminality of capitalism.
DO YOU MEAN THE CHINESE MODEL?
If you mean is the Chinese Authoritarian, Expansionist, Racist, Nationalist, State Capitalist model superior? Well, The Chinese didn’t copy the communists – they aren’t a communist government. Instead, they copied the Nazis – they are a Fascist Government. And what they have done, as the Germans did, is prove that Fascism, not democracy, not social democracy, not communism, won the war of political models of the 19th and 20th Centuries. Why? Because (a) intolerance for political competition, (good), (b) desperate attempt to maintain legitimacy by keeping the people happy, (good), (c) using debt (state capitalism) instead of forced labor (state socialism), (good), (e) creating an economy rather than a military (good), (f) using that economy to build the world’s dominant military (good), (g)
CONTEXT
This is a great example of repeating my message that there is only one possible form of economy: mixed economy of state labor, subsidized labor, market organization of market labor, private investment in short term returns, and state investment in long term capital investment returns; and there is only only one possible form of government: dynamic Military-Authoritarian, Republic Market, and Social Democratic Redistributive, depending upon conditions.
Because there is no steady-state in nature, and all civilizations must constantly adapt to change. The Romans understood this and we don’t. There is a good reason for constitutional military aristocracy and monarchs in times of war and crisis, upper-middle class and republican governments in peace, and lower houses of parliament for common people in times of windfalls. The only problem is developing the method of shifting from primarily republican (economic), to monarchic (war), to redistribution (windfalls). This is, as I understand it, the only remaining question in political theory: that criteria.
CREATING OUR FRAGILITY
The Jewish postwar anti-European initiative to move the failed communist movement to America and to change first to neo-marxism (cultural marxism) to undermine western law tradition history and culture, then Postmodernism (social construction of falsehoods through repetition) and feminism (undermining the family and tradition) was successful in demilitarizing western civilization in Europe postwar, in America in response to Vietnam.
The military still conducts continuous exercises and frequent self-falsification exercises. Meaning they run war games. These wargames serve to train for emergencies, and test the organization. But without traditional military service or militia service by a large number of men, or a requirement for military service to serve in politics, ‘empirical pessimistic, risk-driven, military epistemology’ has been eradicated from not only the political sphere, but the bureaucracy, and the public. We have failed to maintain traditional European “anti-fragility”. And instead, become fragile – unable to adapt to shocks. It’s the military experience that makes organizations able to adapt to shocks, rather than ‘settle into sedentary expectations of continuous growth’.
Instead, as happens in all organizations not subject to stress and shocks, work expands to fill all available time, and ‘employee income and benefits’ seek to consume all available capital – and the core mission is sacrificed for bureaucratic consumption. This applies to state monopolies and publicly traded companies alike. The only continuous market pressure that maintains ‘good civic behavior’ is in the small and medium business owners, and independent craftsmen and laborers. this is why there is such a political divide: the chief function of a college education is to allow people to exit the market and responsibility for outcomes. And with the decline in farming as the primary small business, and with the intentional absence of required education in economics and law to make the public informed, we create an ignorant population, lacking both republican (economic), and aristocratic (military) education – and able to adapt to change and shocks.
So when we encounter a shock, it is not possible to switch from social democratic redistributive governance, bureaucratic, social, and economic organization, to republican and govern like statesmen independent of one’s political party, but we can’t any longer imagine shifting to the military order, in which all of us must sacrifice for the common good.
THE COVID FAILURE
The WHO is first and foremost a political organization founded in the postwar period where Americans maintained the British empire, took over the UK Pound as the World Reserve Currency, and using its navy, regulated the world standard of political behavior. But today it is paid for, and not by Americans – but by Chinese – so it is a compromised organization of no value whatsoever. The WHO, World Bank, UN, and NATO are effectively anti-European political organizations. But at least they aren’t domestic government organizations.
Conversely. Homeland Security and CDC are both failures and they will continue to be. The HS, Disaster Recovery, and CDC do not regularly run self-falsifying war games that are designed to test their points of failure. They have no influence or responsibility for transforming American manufacturing to the production of strategic necessities for emergencies of national scale. They were designed for the ‘small’ problem of hurricanes not for the large problems of war on our economy, war on our infrastructure, war by plague, by accidental plague, or by say, volcanic eruption. Why? Because it’s expensive and that would mean devoting money to TESTING whether they were capable rather than employee intellectual satisfaction, career advancement, income consumption, and benefits consumption. (which is how those organizations work).
The only organization capable of performing crisis-organization is the military. And thanks to the Clinton-Obama undermining of the military by turning it from purely empirical, purely, results-oriented, purely crisis-oriented mission, into a social program for redistribution of income, away from working-class American males, it doesn’t appear our military can perform that crisis function any longer either.
The simple example to illustrate the problem is that Prussia alone created European martial excellence and created the german economic miracle by consequence of its discipline -where the french had to have a bloody revolution that they have not an never will recover from.
The Chinese had the red army and could recover – India doesn’t have that army and can’t. The Arab world can’t even make an army and has to rely on terrorists to get their strategic work done. Hence the rise of Turkey again.
The foundation of western civilization is the military tradition. It’s where our politics, laws, technology, commerce, our reason, empiricism, science, medicine, and rapid evolution came from. It’s where our adaptability came from. It’s where our roman adaptive government came from. It’s where our commercial and technological adaptability came from.
And for reasons historians will explain in great detail – but are primarily due to the postwar movement of civilizational undermining from Europe – where it succeeded in creating the destruction by Jewish Bolshevism in Russia, and causing European fascism to resist it, creating the second world war that destroyed the European civilization and empires – to America, where the Jewish bolshevik communist, neo-Marxist, postmodernist, anti-male-feminist, Human Difference Denial movement (really, the counter-eugenics movement).
The most likely candidate for our decline is upon granting women the franchise in exchange for their entry into the workforce thanks to automation, we failed to give women a separate house of government from men. Because in retrospect, as in Rome, it was women and the underclasses that fell for the false promises of Marxism, Postmodernism, feminism, and political correctness – just as women and slaves (the underclass) fell for the false promise of Christianity and gave us the dark ages.
Welcome to the next dark age.
Welcome to our failure to pass the great filter.
Welcome to the recognition of why the universe is empty of advanced life.
The miracle of cooperation.
The miracle of the division of labor.
Contains the seeds of its own demise:
The failure to persist the martial empiricism
The failure to persist selection pressure by market means.
And the exhaustion of planetary resources
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 11:44:00 UTC
THE FUTURE OF MANKIND IS DECIDED RIGHT NOW. THIS YEAR, NEXT YEAR.
—“So it really is a fight between civicism and religion for supremacy”—
The connection isn’t clear.
1) the people you have (biological, behavioral) and the people you have (knowledge, understanding, values) are not the same criteria.
Governing with the people you have (incentives, constant) is a question of possibility, and governing with the people you have (education) is merely a question of costs and externalities.
We can continue to kick the can down the road and NOT produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization, that would solve the problem.
Or we can solve the problem despite its cost, in a period where there is high demand for the solution to the problem.
2) civicism, localism, nationalism, evolution, competition vs religion, universalism, globalism, devolution, corruption.
Al these problems are the same source: easy female dysgenic and boil the frog vs hard male eugenic and transcend. It’s not like we have an infinite amount of time.
The frequency of geological events capable of wiping out humans is higher than the frequency of climate variations. The frequency of astronomic events is lower, but it’s still continuous.
The future of mankind is decided right now. this year, next year.
A few more years and its over. there are no ‘undiscovered countries’ with reserves of human ability remaining. We have exploited the pool of humans as thoroughly as exploiting the world’s resources.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 09:32:00 UTC