Theme: Crisis

THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION IS JUST PHYSICS WITH MEMORY OF DEBTS – AND CONSEQUENCES FOR PRESENT AND FUTURE CRISES

The left does not cognitively grasp argumentation because they cannot cognitively distinguish between desirability vs undesirability and truth vs alsehood, where truth (Decidability) refers to independence from opinion, desirability, preference (Choice).

This inversion of truth and desirability is the instinctual female cognitive weighting of value. This instinct evolved to incentivize males(Asset Obtainers and Controllers) to satisfy female wants and needs (Asset Consumers and Reproducers).

In fact, it’s more helpful to treat the left as pubescent females lacking offspring to absorb the expansion of their empathy and misapplying that evolutionary instinct evolved to satisfy caloric demands on their immediate behalf to broader political contexts outside their locus of control and accountability.

Females do not demonstrate this hypersensitivity to stress until puberty when their nervous system is amplified to extend its awareness (sensitivity) to their offspring, just as the male nervous system is oppositely suppressed forcing the expansion of their political (worldly) sensitivity preparing them for political life among males. While we see male and female behavioral tendencies in healthy children from birth, maturity exacerbates these differences, away from the ‘self’ and into empathy in females and analysis in males. Our sense of becoming worldly is not artificial – our nervous systems are altered by nature specifically for this purpose. At which point we focus less on learning (submissive and self-directed) and more on acting (dominance to externally directed).

We think largely of less subtle urges like hunger, thirst, attention, association, cooperation, and sex: capacities that must be fulfilled. And while we acknowledge boredom as a cognitive capacity that seeks fulfillment, and we infrequently admit that females seek fulfillment of cognitive want for attention and males seek fulfillment of cognitive want for tool use, we overlook that Empathy is a cognitive capacity that seeks cognitive load, just as male analysis is a cognitive capacity seeking load. This is why women with children, especially five or more (the historical norm) demonstrate conservative(hypercapitalizing) behaviors, and men without children demonstrate libertine(hyper consuming) behaviors. It’s why females seek chatter and gossip and men various material crafts (hobbies). And since most of us are some mixture of the two sets of influences (variations in cognitive dimorphism) we can demonstrate the spectrum.

In other words, we should not take women without children seriously in sociology, economics, politics, strategy, and war, any more than we should take the left without equal accountability seriously in those fields. In other words, in colloquial terms, leftism is the female expression of ‘sh-t testing’: generating demand from dominant(conservative) males to produce more desirable outcomes (hyperconsumption) or to be threatened with uncooperativeness, GSRRM (undermining), deprivation of attention, care, affection and sex. The difference being that we have no need for the left nor want for them and they have nothing to trade (and we nothing to trade with them).

The left is cognitively female (heightened sensitivity to fear, fear of lower priority, of inequality, of being left behind) and lacking cognitively male cognitive bias for political decisions (scarcity of resources infinity of demands), the necessity of capitalization (saving) and CONSTRAINING population within the polity (‘that equilibrium of population vs resource, vs competitors that is calculable’).

This is because (a) males cannot directly reproduce, and must capture territory, resources, and females from competitors, and constrain reproduction to their kin group in order to persist. This reproduction can be forcible as we see in most animals. It can be prolific and indiscriminate like we see in bonobos. It can include pairing off as we see in some species. Or it can be cooperative (calculating) as it evolved in humans (serial mating). (b) The female reproductive strategy is to capture the best genes she can while false-promising (seducing but not delivering, baiting into hazard) the maximum rents on the male population.

This is the origin of the Abrahamic method of deceit: (a) presumption of the value of cooperation (false). (b) avoidance of physical threats of violence (fast) and reliance on undermining(slow) as a proxy for violence (informational and social threats), (c) social construction of narrative of undermining as a means of organizing competition vs military and resource pursuit against competitors as a means of organizing competition, (d) plausible deniability of undermining (slow) vs violence (fast), (e) unaccountability by submission to evidentiary violence vs inescapability from plausibly deniable false accusation to undermine. (f) the use of pervasive lying in order to control children at low cost, by the construction of mythological narratives (sophistry, mysticism, pseudoscience). (g) and perhaps the most devastating: the desire to maintain this emotional coercive ability by infantilization of and perpetuation of ignorance in the population, vs male need for adult males with objective (truthful empirical) agency in order to resist competitors.

TESTS OF SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITION

We’ve identified simple tests of female cognitive bias and absence of cognitive agency (possibility of truth):

(a) Denial of scarcity

(b) Denial of meritocracy

(c) NAXALT(inability to distinguish a curve,

(d) desirability conflated with truth,

(e) denial of evidence

(f) Evasion by GSRRM,

(g) posturing false value of cooperation (sex proxy).

Like many things, once you identify the incentives, the evolutionary necessity, and the extension of that evolutionary necessity from physics, you find that all human behavior is just the need for acquisition, means of savings, vs reproductive strategy. and reproductive strategy is just female hyperconsumption vs male hyper capitalization.

And once you make it to that conclusion, you realize that males developed civilization in order to compete for females, but it was only possible upon the evolution of the ability to capitalize with property.

Ergo, civilization wasn’t possible until the domestication of plants, animals, and yes, man. And the control of territory to do so. And the production of commons (capital improvements) to territories that provided discounts (returns) of compound (repeating) value.

And here we find the crux of the political problem we face today: (a)incalculability because of digital fiat money, (b) incalculability of scale (democracy), (c) incommensurability of left and right political demands under these conditions. (d) the natural dysgenic collapse of equalitarian societies, (e) the natural eugenic evolution of meritocratic societies.

The hunter agrarian age is past. Agrarian group strategies, traditions< norms, morals<ethics, institutions<laws, paradigms<ideas are no longer the utility that they once were.

The agrarian age limited our evolution – froze us in time – in exchange for increasing our numbers and SLOWING what had been hyper rapid evolution over the past ten thousands of years.

The European age that re-united the world, let us discover our races and differences, again, stopped our speciation, slowed evolution, but accelerated technological adaptation, which in turn accelerated reproduction of genetic load- reversing the evolution that only East Asians and Western Europeans had created during the agrarian age.

Humans, like all other animals, and apparently more so given our rate of adaptation, accumulate defects (“genetic load”). We sort into classes: a hierarchy of sexual, social, economic, politicla, military value. And in most societies, we sort not by individuals but into clans by that social sexual economic, political, and military value. While through most of history about a third of females and as much as two-thirds of males failed to reproduce. And while in northern europe, under manorialism, most married much later, producing fewer offspring, and twenty percent or more failed to reproduce, the rest of the world continued reproduction at the bottom with warmer climates providing higher disease gradients but higher rates of reproductive survival at the bottom, and colder climates the opposite.

At present, after half a millennia of european conceptual, scientific, technological, economic, and political innovation, and after almost two centuries of the industrial revolution, we have equilibrated geographic and developmental differences. And we are wealthy enough for having done so to desire to, and demand, to fulfill our political preferences at the scale of states that we had fulfilled under villages and city-states.

We ended the eugenics program postwar, that was aboriginal a liberal program, even though the Germans – no matter how politically incorrect it is to say – were right. We ended limiting immigration to equally genetically pacified (evolved) peoples. And we have allowed anti-evolutionary religions of Judaism and Islam in particular into Europe despite Islam’s long-standing attempt to destroy European civilization, and Judaism’s continuous hostility to it. Because both of these religions are evolutionary for the masses which is why Judaism is the origin of Marxism, postmodernism, and HBD-denialism. (Socialism in the continental tradition rather than the Marxist is just a continuation of the policies of the Catholic Church – which again, was a devolutionary submissive religion only escaped by Protestantism and the eugenic consequences of Northern European manorialism.

There is only one solution: the solution the Europeans have practiced throughout our history: the restoration of political competition between states, each of which satisfies slightly different needs for the more eugenically evolved (northern Europe, less eugenically evolved, eastern Europe, and less eugenically evolved neolithic Europe of the south. And far less evolved rest of the world other than Han, Korean, and Japanese east who alone, like northern Europe, spent the past millennia in eugenic evolution. While the rest of the world expanded dysgenia.

So we can die off and fall to south American, Indian, middle eastern, or African dysgenia, ignorance, incompetence, and poverty, or we can separate as we have throughout our european history into a thousand nations, and let peoples make their own choices and pay the cost of their choices, and let evidence accomplish what opinion and argument cannot.