Liar. Soft eugenics just continues natural selection so that we prevent cognitive, economic, political, and health declines. There is no ‘genocide’ in maintaining a healthy population fit for continuous social, technical, political evolution. The opposite – it eliminates racism.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-24 14:49:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452286232084557846
Reply addressees: @seyrup
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1452285061076856842
The contemporary crisis begun with Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Bohr, then Keynes, Gramsci, Marcuse, Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin, Friedan, Steinem, Stiglitz and Krugman consists of little more than female tendency of feels over reals justified by magical thinking applied to pseudoscience.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-23 13:40:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451906462465331216
Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451904886333976584
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@BobMurphyEcon Human beings are neither Hobbesian, Lockean, or Rousseauian, but amoral. All evidence from all history, all history of legal proceedings, and all scientific research, demonstrates man is amoral and only as moral as he must be, and maximizes immorality whenever he can justify it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1451904886333976584
It’s time to separate: a National divorce. The experiment has failed. All that has happened is the gradual destruction of the highest trust, most meritocratic, civilization ever known to man. You won’t adapt to the high cost of our civilization, and we can’t bear the cost of you.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-23 02:25:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451736451524268034
Reply addressees: @ElieNYC @mattyglesias
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451261318674227208
RT @epkaufm: 6 in 10 French voters agree with the following statement:
“European, white and Christian populations being threatened with ext…
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-22 19:13:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451627752147324933
(Sad) (Every year. This time. Winter comes to Russia. Some of the ‘living rough’ crowd don’t find shelter. And so begins the weekly task of digging frozen solid alcoholics out of the snow. … At least Russians have the good humor to post the videos.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-22 03:18:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451387428267339799
(Manosphere) I just don’t get it. Relationships are simple. Women are not complicated. Men are not complicated. Social media, dating apps, woke, desocialization are a catastrophe for the lower middle and down classes. Because neither sex has been ‘cultured’ enough to marry.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-21 03:29:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451027765721972736
Seriously. I can deal with a lot of negativity, and even the attacks and stupidity. But, if I spend much more time on the destruction of the male female relationships, I’m going to be as depressed as everyone else.
This is a horrible cycle of decline.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-20 19:05:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1450900893377966080
@RadioFreeNorthwest, (all of of our folk)
Our People overthink these things. The FBI is looking for people who are showing signs of mental instability and signaling individual or group potential for violence. They’ve asked me to be careful what I say, precisely because of the number of mentally unstable young men out there in the current generations, who are easily influenced.
They are biased against the right because we are constraining state power, in an era where (beginning with Clinton and Obama) the state became aware that the probability of civil war because of heterogeneity would rapidly increase, especially after the 1992 tipping point (which most of you won’t remember was ‘a thing’.)
The right is an existential threat to the state actors, as well as the financial sector, and the globalist financial sector, and the globalist movement that is just a reformation of communist authoritarianism, which was just a secular pseudoscientific reformation of the authoritarian monotheistic supernatural religions. So don’t posture with macho and bravado about violence or crime, but frame all your actions as political, not violent or criminal.
If you review the leaked information on federal communications monitoring, almost all of it is an attempt to discover Islamic terrorists transferring money, organizing, or planning some actions. I don’t have knowledge of post-jan6th changes, and the information they’re extracting from FB/Google etc hasn’t leaked enough that we know what’s happening there versus through the telcos (I have knowledge of those technologies and techniques).
The inequality of protection under the law between left and right was pretty obvious in the licensing of Globalist-Soros-Antifa-BLM terrorism, and the prosecution of the right’s opposition to their terrorism. The treatment of jan6th as some conspiracy theory rather than a protest that as one percent of the severity of any of the left protests during the sixties is demonstrated evidence of the government’s intention to eradicate the right, rule of law, the constitution, Christianity, the American experiment in a majority middle class meritocracy, and the whole of anglo, germanic, and broader European civilization.
We have a political case. But we also have both separatist, secessionist, and repetitions of the founder’s common-law suit against the state that created the USA as options., Its only once those are exhausted we must resort to force. Because it is only once we have exhausted those options that we hold the moral high ground. Why? Because we are fighting over the right to self-determination. And the only reciprocity (morality) possible is the reciprocal exchange of that right to self-determination by self-determined means.
And that requires we produce separate territories, polities, and governments.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-20 15:55:30 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107134669968834615
THE DIRECTION OF DATING, MARRIAGE, MATING OVER THIS CENTURY I’m trying to predict the direction of marriage over the next century, especially as we pass through the coming shocks. And we’re increasingly returning to historical norms of serial relationships at the bottom and long-term relations at the top, mediated by predictable trait differences, and sexual phenotypical market value. In other words, just as we lifted many lower classes into middle-class consumption during the industrial revolution and postwar income bubble, we’re seeing a return to type as the economic capacity of middle, lower middle, working, laboring, and underclass males are no longer able to produce competitive advantage sufficiently to afford long term exclusive access to a female – and females can afford to NOT pay for the cost of maintaining a male. Marriage is an economic institution, and the insurance of marriage is a public good that prevents male-male violence, and females with children that must be supported through redistribution, because of the moral hazard of not doing so. We have un-insured marriage. And we have undermined the economy sufficiently such that women can survive in lower-income occupations for the first time – at least while they’re young – and men cannot produce sufficient income to generate demand for supply of resources in exchange for regular access to sex and reproduction. This means that we have destroyed the incentive for reproduction EXEPT for the UNDERCLASSES leading to expansion of dysgenia, crime, social conflict, political conflict, economic, technological, and scientific competitiveness necessary for preservation of statndards of living. In my work i’m trying to discover the policy and legal changes necessary to restore the market for reproduction, as well as production, and commons. Because without reproduction, we don’t have production and commons.
THE DIRECTION OF DATING, MARRIAGE, MATING OVER THIS CENTURY I’m trying to predict the direction of marriage over the next century, especially as we pass through the coming shocks. And we’re increasingly returning to historical norms of serial relationships at the bottom and long-term relations at the top, mediated by predictable trait differences, and sexual phenotypical market value. In other words, just as we lifted many lower classes into middle-class consumption during the industrial revolution and postwar income bubble, we’re seeing a return to type as the economic capacity of middle, lower middle, working, laboring, and underclass males are no longer able to produce competitive advantage sufficiently to afford long term exclusive access to a female – and females can afford to NOT pay for the cost of maintaining a male. Marriage is an economic institution, and the insurance of marriage is a public good that prevents male-male violence, and females with children that must be supported through redistribution, because of the moral hazard of not doing so. We have un-insured marriage. And we have undermined the economy sufficiently such that women can survive in lower-income occupations for the first time – at least while they’re young – and men cannot produce sufficient income to generate demand for supply of resources in exchange for regular access to sex and reproduction. This means that we have destroyed the incentive for reproduction EXEPT for the UNDERCLASSES leading to expansion of dysgenia, crime, social conflict, political conflict, economic, technological, and scientific competitiveness necessary for preservation of statndards of living. In my work i’m trying to discover the policy and legal changes necessary to restore the market for reproduction, as well as production, and commons. Because without reproduction, we don’t have production and commons.