@Travis_Hawks No. We understood. We would have ‘won’ but for immigration. What we didn’t see was immigration+pc-woke together.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 12:27:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107230111011135295
@Travis_Hawks No. We understood. We would have ‘won’ but for immigration. What we didn’t see was immigration+pc-woke together.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 12:27:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107230111011135295
RUSSIAN OPINION
(a) the west is seen as decadent and in decline in much of the world. And a visit to america, or just viewing american streets on google maps will confirm that without much difficulty.
(b) russians are frustrated because their economy was growing until 2014, but the consequences of handling the ukrainian revolution poorly have affected them disproportionately. Worse, all capital is being directed to moscow and st petersburg at the expense of the distant regions. (Again, this is a ‘gamble’ the russian government is taking, given that they expect a rapid collapse of the west – especially europe – witihn the near time horizon as demographic collapse hurts europe more so than the rest of the world.
(c) the entire world is economically equilibrating ending 600 years of european advantage in genetic destribution, institutions, culture, science, and technology, so the entire world will gravitate toward greater state responsibility for the economic condition – which is what we mean by socialism – since socialism always fails, it simply means are more mixed economy favoring state protection of labor markets and prices.
(d) We know what the future looks like and china has taught a very serious and uncomfortable lesson: the chinese are fascists not communists. They are imitating the national socialists not the communists, in every aspect of their society. IN doing so they are demonstrating that the fascists won the argument over the future economic model. Why? Because nationalism, ethonocentrism, heavy trade regulation, state as majority venture capitalism, and private sector as majority producer, is the optimum political model. The only difference is the degree of propaganda necessary to maintain the loyalty of the people to one another (nationalism, ethnocentrism), in proportion to the amount of stress that the people must endure while policy slowly take effect.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 15:23:57 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107225142902208525

HISTORY IS NOT GOING TO VIEW THE BTC EXPERIMENT KINDLY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgttWIfqwoU https://t.co/VH2k8UL8Qb

Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 14:18:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456627094046355464

THE FOUR CHOICES OF POLITICAL ECONOMY
Most economists are living in the 1970’s and are evidence of the decline in competency in the academy since 1960.
Re: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gv6130kSzEY https://t.co/ctktkdRHI5

Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 13:58:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456622066497622020
You have to live in Europe for a while to grasp how much poorer they are that the US. We’ll easily drop to EU levels of income. I expect Europeans to drop radically in income. This is because the world continues to equilibrate, demographics are unfavorable, and pax-USA is over. https://twitter.com/_Akhaten/status/1456444937805967376
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 02:21:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456446625325461505
Meanwhile the left is doubling down yet again on their series of failures from 1850 to the present by the attempt to create a monopoly regressive anti-Darwinian cult of destruction. But the window has passed. We are in a new age. The left’s theories were stillborn but rot slowly. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1456438922406506510
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 02:08:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456443348974284819
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1456438922406506510
There exists an unhealthy assumption that the stagnation that we have endured since the 70’s the declines in quality of genes, institutions, knowledge, education, science, tech, and employment will be offset by innovation. But history says we’re gonna be a lot poorer soon.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 01:51:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456438922406506510
You know, Carville has driven me nuts for years, because he’s purely results-oriented leftists. But sometimes those results-oriented leftists explain the failure of overextension of ideology past its utility. https://twitter.com/judymorris3/status/1456243920485109762
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 20:06:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456352171738517508
It’s fail.
Evidence of fail.
Seventy years of fail.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 18:59:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456335390013542404
Reply addressees: @ohmyrahb @AmarendraMahato @RationalMale
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456335244865544208
These books are nothing but therapy for the powerless. The problem is warfare against our civilization by destruction of our institutions of cultural production. There is only one solution to political conquest as there is only one to war.
70 years of fail should be enough.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 18:58:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456334970922967044
Reply addressees: @ohmyrahb @UnPussified @RationalMale
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456334206594920452