–“We’re telling you that criminals are running the place, their crimes are evident and demonstrable, and you can end their criminality, corruption, and or complacency, and this is how you can do so.”– Brandon Hayes
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 14:39:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638550941250060295
RT @andst7: New official data: Italy’s population continues to collapse. The population declined by 0.3% or 179,000 units over the previous…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 14:10:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638543749352505352
CITIES AND CIVIL WARS
Cities have about three days of food and water that will be hoarded in the first 24 hours. And in winter people can survive for no more than seven in the cold.
As every geostrategist knows, America’s an Island protects it from foreign invasion, but it’s extremely vulnerable from within because of the electrical grid, and transportation fragility. And that large hyper consumptive blue cities in an ocean of red transportation, can be turned into graveyards in about six weeks.
If you read white papers produced by think-tanks and generals that war about these things you’d know this. The US military cannot do anything against an internal insurrection without delegitimizing the military and the government, and the US geostrategic and Trade network – including the dollar.
This is why we can’t stop a civil war, but we can’t let a civil war occur. And instead need to devolve the federal government back to its design, and restore culture to local and state, leaving only inter-state dispute resolution, military, trade and insurance policy to the central government.
The USA was designed to replicate the 1000 year old Holy Roman Empire that is the foundation of modern western civilization, by combining it with anglo modern state and law, with some nod to french divisions of power.
Rolling back that centralization so that american states(countries), like european states (countries), can adopt social policies that suit the wants and needs of people.
Creating left, center, and right polities. And then we pay the cost of our good and bad judgments, using a market for the experimentation of political ideas.
Reply addressees: @HilelLowTech @formerlychucks2 @WUTangKids
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 20:26:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638275804089008128
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638269369934397440
CITIES AND CIVIL WARS
Cities have about three days of food and water that will be hoarded in the first 24 hours. And in winter people can survive for no more than seven in the cold.
As every geostrategist knows, America’s an Island protects it from foreign invasion, but it’s extremely vulnerable from within because of the electrical grid, and transportation fragility. And that large hyper consumptive blue cities in an ocean of red transportation, can be turned into graveyards in about six weeks.
If you read white papers produced by think-tanks and generals that war about these things you’d know this. The US military cannot do anything against an internal insurrection without delegitimizing the military and the government, and the US geostrategic and Trade network – including the dollar.
This is why we can’t stop a civil war, but we can’t let a civil war occur. And instead need to devolve the federal government back to its design, and restore culture to local and state, leaving only inter-state dispute resolution, military, trade and insurance policy to the central government.
The USA was designed to replicate the 1000 year old Holy Roman Empire that is the foundation of modern western civilization, by combining it with anglo modern state and law, with some nod to french divisions of power.
Rolling back that centralization so that american states(countries), like european states (countries), can adopt social policies that suit the wants and needs of people.
Creating left, center, and right polities. And then we pay the cost of our good and bad judgments, using a market for the experimentation of political ideas.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 20:26:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638275804256784415
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638269369934397440
Almost anything I read from that period in the 1960s was published between the 40’s and 50’s.
It’s trivial to observe the collapse of scholarship beginning in mid 50’s to 1960, and reaching maximum of pseudoscience in the early 70’s.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 19:20:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637897023633649664
Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You @MrWarrenBuffet @whatifalthist @elonmusk
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637829809077121026
Humorous. We have pretty good data on this question.
The bureaucrats MIGHT (very iffy) choose to side with the government. About 1/3 to 1/2 would join the revolt or ‘resist in place’. Only about 10% of the force would take action against the people.
And having already done a revolution myself “The minute the government shoots at you you win.” The government and the military lose all legitimacy, and all order breaks down. Because even the people who stay home ‘flip a switch’. The only mistake we made in Maydan is we didn’t hang enough politicians to send the message that this never will happen again. It’s about certain Americans will not make that same decision if it comes to it.
I work to prevent that happening by proposing a settlement between the urban irresponsibly hyperconsuming and the non-urban responsible hypercapitalizing factions. It’s possible. And it’s necessary. Because we are economically free of agrarianism, and we can an do want to create commons (localities) we prefer. We just want opposite localities ;). As such the centralization of culture in response to the civil war over control of the western expansion has to be reversed, restoring states and city states that can produce cultures they want within the. republican model of government under rule of law that allows for reconciliation of differences between localities.
A WAR
There is a woke component in the military.
There are at least three militaries: Those who fight, those who supply and maintain, and those who clerk and administer. Only the first group matters at all. The maximum number of those men is tiny.
The non-woke numbers outside of the military vastly out number the under 200K the military can field. There are at least eight million men on ‘the right’ who have some form of military experience.
Our military has lost every single war against guerillas.
Our infrastructure is the most fragile in the world.
Our transportation system is the most stressed in the world.
Our asymmetry is largely between few dense cities and vast red seas of ‘checkpoints’.
There won’t be any ‘groupings’ of conservatives to ‘shoot at’ other than the ‘nice Christian folk’ we send to protest.
Every single geostrategist and every single military strategists has said the same thing: “If the right chooses to act it’s over in days.”
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 15:53:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637844896055799810
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637267980538068992
Humorous. We have pretty good data on this question.
The bureaucrats MIGHT (very iffy) choose to side with the government. About 1/3 to 1/2 would join the revolt or ‘resist in place’. Only about 10% of the force would take action against the people.
And having already done a revolution myself “The minute the government shoots at you you win.” The government and the military lose all legitimacy, and all order breaks down. Because even the people who stay home ‘flip a switch’. The only mistake we made in Maydan is we didn’t hang enough politicians to send the message that this never will happen again. It’s about certain Americans will not make that same decision if it comes to it.
I work to prevent that happening by proposing a settlement between the urban irresponsibly hyperconsuming and the non-urban responsible hypercapitalizing factions. It’s possible. And it’s necessary. Because we are economically free of agrarianism, and we can an do want to create commons (localities) we prefer. We just want opposite localities ;). As such the centralization of culture in response to the civil war over control of the western expansion has to be reversed, restoring states and city states that can produce cultures they want within the. republican model of government under rule of law that allows for reconciliation of differences between localities.
A WAR
There is a woke component in the military.
There are at least three militaries: Those who fight, those who supply and maintain, and those who clerk and administer. Only the first group matters at all. The maximum number of those men is tiny.
The non-woke numbers outside of the military vastly out number the under 200K the military can field. There are at least eight million men on ‘the right’ who have some form of military experience.
Our military has lost every single war against guerillas.
Our infrastructure is the most fragile in the world.
Our transportation system is the most stressed in the world.
Our asymmetry is largely between few dense cities and vast red seas of ‘checkpoints’.
There won’t be any ‘groupings’ of conservatives to ‘shoot at’ other than the ‘nice Christian folk’ we send to protest.
Every single geostrategist and every single military strategists has said the same thing: “If the right chooses to act it’s over in days.”
Reply addressees: @WUTangKids
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 15:53:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637844895858667520
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637267980538068992
It’s just because you don’t have the knowledge base. So it’s rational you’d take that position.
1) Agrarian revolution -> Steppe Revolution -> Bronze Age collapse -> Indo-european Revolution -> Semitic counter-revolution.
2) Italian-anglo restoration of europeanism > anglo invention of the modern rule of law state, industry, trade, federations (replacing agrarian empires territory) > french counter-revolution > German counter-revolution > Jewish counter-revolution(mendolsohn, then the Marxist sequence) > Islamist counter-revolution > Western Trade/Federalism Exhaustion > Imperial Reassertion (Iran, China, Russia and those countries that failed the transformation)
3) All human differences originate in sex differences, from empathizing(prey)-systematizing(predator), to the four personality clusters, to the moral bias clusters, and especially the IQ vs Neoteny distribution, and you see a rather obvious means of explaining all human behavior. We are all some admixture of sex differences, and the population shows a pretty normal distribution of abut 1/3, 1/3, and 1/3 sex bias in perception, cognition, valuation, want, advocacy, and negotiation. What’s difficult for most of us, is that while we acknowledge the spectrum of means of ‘calculating’ from math to recipes, to rigorous arguments, we are less willing to ‘science’ our methods of lying. And how the sex differences in anti-natural law behavior, anti-social behavior, are facilitated by sex differences in methods of lying.
4) All civilizational differences originate in agrarian founding institutions and their path-dependent sequence of development. There are only three means of human coercion (Religion/Verbal: seduction/ostracization, State/Force: Order/Defense, and Trade/Boycott: law/commerce. With Religion(strong) > State(weak) > Law(fail) the worst (MENA) and Law(strong) > State (weak) > Religion(fail) the best (Europe), and State(strong) > Law (weak) > Religion (fail) the compromise (China). Combine the institutional sequence, with the geography, means of production, your homogeneity or heterogeneity, number of competitors, the technological difference between you and the competitors, the relationship between your aristocracy (military) and peasantry(producers), and you get all human civilizations as relatively obvious survivors of what’s possible in geographic, racial, and ethnic circumstances.
Now I’ve done all that work and more. So where you see moral conflict I see a bunch of bots – barely conscious children really – running around with flashcards of lies taped to their heads – trying to get attention so that they obtain some sort of status so that they can find allies, to maybe, possibly, feel less alienated in modernity, and somehow change their condition.
So I see a very childish world. Why? Because while what I do (what our institute staff do) is basically a mathematics – a formal logic. Now it’s ordinal and operational math (like computation and actions) and not cardinal math (like statistics and language) but it’s till math. And it’s rational for all you normals out there with your emotions alienation and flashcards on your foreheads to think we’re like you.
We aren’t. It’s just math to us.
We don’t often like what we find either.
And we know how Darwin and Galileo were treated.
And we don’t expect any differently.
Because the entire postwar pseudoscientific war against western civilization’s ‘science’, is a war against the Darwinian explanation of all existence. Not just biology – but everything. Including everything we intuit, feel, think, say and do.
So no I don’t expect people to accept or like that the postwar intersection of Jewish thought, women in the workforce and politics, the television-cable-internet-social media revolution, hyperconsumption, debt capacity, and downregulation of education is just an expression of the lag institutional suppression of female antisocial behavior as it propagates through the civilization.
But it’s true. 🙁
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 13:54:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637814852486852610
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637808821727813635
It’s just because you don’t have the knowledge base. So it’s rational you’d take that position.
1) Agrarian revolution -> Steppe Revolution -> Bronze Age collapse -> Indo-european Revolution -> Semitic counter-revolution.
2) Italian-anglo restoration of europeanism > anglo invention of the modern rule of law state, industry, trade, federations (replacing agrarian empires territory) > french counter-revolution > German counter-revolution > Jewish counter-revolution(mendolsohn, then the Marxist sequence) > Islamist counter-revolution > Western Trade/Federalism Exhaustion > Imperial Reassertion (Iran, China, Russia and those countries that failed the transformation)
3) All human differences originate in sex differences, from empathizing(prey)-systematizing(predator), to the four personality clusters, to the moral bias clusters, and especially the IQ vs Neoteny distribution, and you see a rather obvious means of explaining all human behavior. We are all some admixture of sex differences, and the population shows a pretty normal distribution of abut 1/3, 1/3, and 1/3 sex bias in perception, cognition, valuation, want, advocacy, and negotiation. What’s difficult for most of us, is that while we acknowledge the spectrum of means of ‘calculating’ from math to recipes, to rigorous arguments, we are less willing to ‘science’ our methods of lying. And how the sex differences in anti-natural law behavior, anti-social behavior, are facilitated by sex differences in methods of lying.
4) All civilizational differences originate in agrarian founding institutions and their path-dependent sequence of development. There are only three means of human coercion (Religion/Verbal: seduction/ostracization, State/Force: Order/Defense, and Trade/Boycott: law/commerce. With Religion(strong) > State(weak) > Law(fail) the worst (MENA) and Law(strong) > State (weak) > Religion(fail) the best (Europe), and State(strong) > Law (weak) > Religion (fail) the compromise (China). Combine the institutional sequence, with the geography, means of production, your homogeneity or heterogeneity, number of competitors, the technological difference between you and the competitors, the relationship between your aristocracy (military) and peasantry(producers), and you get all human civilizations as relatively obvious survivors of what’s possible in geographic, racial, and ethnic circumstances.
Now I’ve done all that work and more. So where you see moral conflict I see a bunch of bots – barely conscious children really – running around with flashcards of lies taped to their heads – trying to get attention so that they obtain some sort of status so that they can find allies, to maybe, possibly, feel less alienated in modernity, and somehow change their condition.
So I see a very childish world. Why? Because while what I do (what our institute staff do) is basically a mathematics – a formal logic. Now it’s ordinal and operational math (like computation and actions) and not cardinal math (like statistics and language) but it’s till math. And it’s rational for all you normals out there with your emotions alienation and flashcards on your foreheads to think we’re like you.
We aren’t. It’s just math to us.
We don’t often like what we find either.
And we know how Darwin and Galileo were treated.
And we don’t expect any differently.
Because the entire postwar pseudoscientific war against western civilization’s ‘science’, is a war against the Darwinian explanation of all existence. Not just biology – but everything. Including everything we intuit, feel, think, say and do.
So no I don’t expect people to accept or like that the postwar intersection of Jewish thought, women in the workforce and politics, the television-cable-internet-social media revolution, hyperconsumption, debt capacity, and downregulation of education is just an expression of the lag institutional suppression of female antisocial behavior as it propagates through the civilization.
But it’s true. 🙁
Reply addressees: @enigma3078 @thenewMJG @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 13:54:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637814852197445640
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637808821727813635
I never attack people. especially races. I attack ideas.
And the majority of my work on first principles explains the present ‘crisis’ as the introduction of women, and the female instinct, intuition, bias, and means of conflict, into the postwar political system, and the reality is that Jewish religion, law, culture and tradition (as many before me, including Jewish thinkers) makes use of the female biases, just as much as European tradition makes use of the male biases. If you want me to deeply enumerate what’s ‘wrong’ (deviates from natural laws) in any civilization, especially our own, I can do so. But the primary conflict is between the two cognitive elites in the world, the masculine european and the feminine jewish. And this isn’t a bad thing once you grasp it. It’s just a matter of devolution of the federal government so that once again we can create communities that satisfy the differences in instinct between the masculine and feminine demands for different social orders.
So as in most things, if you’re not very bright, or not very educated, or not very informed, it’s possible to stick people into ‘gated institutional narratives’ as if all of us are emotionally ‘disabled’ like Millenials and GenZ. But not all of us are emotionally disabled, and instead we are still cognitively exceptional and can see the world as instincts and incentives rather than wars of oppression to justify whatever moral biased we ourselves are carrying – and think we’re smart of special or right, when in fact, it’s almost entirely genetic instinct.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-18 18:29:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637159316795826176
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637105207648632834