Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • 2023-03-02 Staff Meting – Scott Adams, Racism, Possibilities of Cooperation

    2023-03-02 Staff Meting – Scott Adams, Racism, Possibilities of Cooperation

    https://youtu.be/Nq0-oarpI20

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-02 18:58:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631368296514609172

  • IT’S JUST THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT THAT IS OUR ENEMY. (explaining differences that

    IT’S JUST THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT THAT IS OUR ENEMY.
    (explaining differences that cause conflicts)

    I would say that the Chinese GOVERNMENT is our enemy. But, the Chinese people are as much a victim of their government as are the Russian, Iranian, and North Korean people.

    WHITENESS is a technology (science) that is the optimum for human cooperation at the cost of higher stress because of the psychological and emotional costs of whiteness, in exchange for the high trust and vast rewards of high trust whiteness produces.

    And that all of these GOVERNMENTS are resisting modernity (WHITENESS) because they are low trust people, with despotic governments. And despotic governments emerge as diversity increases, and conflict increases. In the case of Russia and China, they are a low-trust people, and an empire over conquered people. In the case of Iran, they are a low trust and low IQ people in the world’s most diverse region. In the case of North Korea, they were influenced by Chinese authoritarianism, and authoritarianism because of a history of Chinese continuous colonization and conquest. And they cannot compete with the more advanced south Koreans.

    Likewise, because they are vehicles for the retention of tribalism (low trust ethics) at the cost of the commons(high trust ethics), where westerners have eliminated tribalism and clannishness to produce commons, I would say the Jewish and Muslim RELIGIONS are an enemy of western civilization.

    There is a problem of race differences in neoteny and therefore aggression. And there is a problem of race differences in class size, and therefore adaptation.

    And so there is a problem of cultural differences that accommodate and must accommodate race and class differences in culture.

    There is a problem of sex differences in cognitive and moral bias, within each race, class, and culture.

    But very few humans, at least within a standard deviation in IQ, really have a problem with one another. The problem is groups and proximity of groups, because groups express, and must express, cumulative needs of their demographic distribution of neoteny, aggression, sex bias, and intelligence.

    Cheers
    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-02 18:09:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631356165564030987

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631350354037346304

  • BOWLING ALONE? SHOVELING ALONE? Driving back from the Dr’s office, and see this

    BOWLING ALONE? SHOVELING ALONE?
    Driving back from the Dr’s office, and see this little old lady, maybe 90lbs, shoveling a bit at the edge of the end of her driveway. I impulsively pull over, get out, and ask her to let me do it for her. She was surprised at first, but then said she was done, and was happy to get the exercise. She smiled and thanked me. (Putting aside the fact that I probably shouldn’t be shoveling snow either.)

    My great-grandfather used to take his sons (including my grandfather) around their small town and shovel neighbor’s driveways. I know because It was in the newspaper clippings. 😉 And, when I grew up, helping old folks would have been an ordinary occurrence. And almost expected of fellow small-town citizens. And the fact that it isn’t, … well, it makes me sad. Because we don’t take care and responsibility for each other.

    “Bowling alone” isn’t limited to bowling. The high trust ‘little England’ or ‘village Europe’ ethic that we brought to america is being destroyed by the pretense that government and economies can make us happy.

    The opposite seems increasingly true.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-02 01:05:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631098474031636484

  • And if we can’t alter a genetic or cultural bias we can only explain and demonst

    And if we can’t alter a genetic or cultural bias we can only explain and demonstrate why separation into many different polities gives us societies that don’t conflict but still cooperate by trade.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 19:07:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631008181231951875

    Reply addressees: @GregDelaney15 @radiofreenw @patriciamdavis @ScottAdamsSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631004120797642777

  • Countersignaling is fine and creates the virtuous condition of good cop bad cop.

    Countersignaling is fine and creates the virtuous condition of good cop bad cop. That comparison is more educational than either alone. But That doesn’t mean we can’t maintain decorum. And for my own happiness I want to maintain it. We can’t persuade people to alter a bias.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 19:05:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631007735843115021

    Reply addressees: @GregDelaney15 @radiofreenw @patriciamdavis @ScottAdamsSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631004120797642777

  • Well it’s happening but slowly in Africa so it’s not impossible. It’s that proxi

    Well it’s happening but slowly in Africa so it’s not impossible. It’s that proximity produces pointless competition that would be better served by trade between polities. Status is a serious problem so proximity causes status conflict.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 19:01:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631006718527152128

    Reply addressees: @GregDelaney15 @patriciamdavis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630998216295546905

  • Correct. Economics of association are economics of trust are economics of margin

    Correct. Economics of association are economics of trust are economics of marginal indifference.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 04:29:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630787263280947200

    Reply addressees: @IdidaRod @JacksonPackson1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630786542246428674

  • Just, you use natural law in a manner that is a presumed law of nature, rather t

    Just, you use natural law in a manner that is a presumed law of nature, rather than the aristotelian-to-scholastic-to-modern sense of natural law as the ethics of cooperation. Not sure if it’s really a conflict or not, but it’s sure helpful vs harmful to the SUCCESSFUL implementation of the traditional sense of natural law. And so maybe it’s consistent. Hmmmm…. The difference between decidable and potential…. have to think about this a bit.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 00:41:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630729869507084288

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630720710195961857

  • Thanks. (Just waking up.) I can see how it might be confusing. 6 should be “…a

    Thanks. (Just waking up.) I can see how it might be confusing. 6 should be “…all people..”

    My point is that 1) cultural norms traditions and values are constantly reinforced by group membership, and 2) lower class members are more reliant on those traditions and tend to reinforce those traditions preventing immigration (Judaism less so, Islam more so). And for people with below threshold IQ, they will justify their inability to succeed in an advanced market civ, as oppression. And yes, this is what we observe.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 00:15:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630723373641658369

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630718817386270720

  • OUR GOOD PEOPLE ARE A VULNERABILITY: HOW GOOD PEOPLE WERE UNDERMINED. I love how

    OUR GOOD PEOPLE ARE A VULNERABILITY: HOW GOOD PEOPLE WERE UNDERMINED.
    I love how you feel. I wish how you felt were how more people felt. I love good people. Unfortunately, our good people are vulnerable to the enemy’s pretense of goodness, when they’re actually evil.

    Our country continued to be homogenous, ethnocentric, and fully integrated until about 1960. We had regular issues as the economy and industry changed us. But we remained ‘integrated’.

    The reason the enemy succeeded in undermine us and creating conflict requires a bit more explanation than I feel energized enough to write right now, but…

    Woke (Race Marxism) is just the most recent attempt to ‘destroy the institutions of western cultural production’ by generating conflict using the Marxist (class), neoMarxist(culture), Postmodern(truth), Feminist(sexes,family), Woke(Race) sequences of sedition to undermine the harmony we’d produced between the classes and sexes (and through integration other Europeans) into northern European **Trifunctional, Rule of Law, Natural law, Concurrent legislation, Common Law, Truth before Face, Duty before self, Christian Love and Charity, high trust, innovative, adaptive, prosperous civilization.***

    They did it on purpose by the ‘march thru the institutions’. They wrote, planned it, migrated here from Europe, financed it, and started with the academy, and from the academy to the media and to the government, and to education. Everything they do that they claim is virtue, instead claims our effort at peaceful integration as oppression.

    Why? Our western civilization is behaviorally costly both psychologically and emotionally. And whether or not other people are CAPABLE of that amount of self-regulation, self-discipline, delayed gratification, and mindfulness that ignores the trivialities and insults of others – they are clearly often, unwilling.

    Once it was clear that communism would not work, the class Marxists converted to race Marxists and then the race Marxists came to America to use American postwar opportunity and global dominance, and ‘freedom and Christian tolerance to intentionally destroy our culture from within.

    It took them seventy years. But perhaps. more interesting is that they did it by (a) our women, (b) immigration, because (c) western men have not changed substantially and still adhere to our Trifunctionalism the balance between the three sacred institutions of and all: God(Faith), Country(Constitution), and Guns(Military) surrounding the core institution: the nuclear family and individual responsibility.

    Cheers
    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 19:26:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630650756033290240

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630646434088230943