Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • TRIBAL VERSUS CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS –“A condition of liberty is not forcefully

    TRIBAL VERSUS CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS

    –“A condition of liberty is not forcefully removing anyone from your tribe and starting interventionist wars with socialists.”–

    I tribe is an involuntary genetic relation.

    A contract is a voluntary legal association.

    If you remove someone from a tribe, that has nothing to do with voluntary legal association, just as removing someone from the property of a voluntary legal association has nothing to do with their tribal membership.

    It is a condition of liberty to remove people from your property.

    It is an impossibility to construct a voluntary relation from an involuntary relation and visa versa.

    If behavior is prohibited it is.

    Mothers evolved dysgenic behaviors as a consequence of producing an irrational sacrificial redistributive moral intuition necessary for the development of highly dependent offspring. Female reproductive strategy is to bear offspring, to further their interests at the expense of the tribe. And to place the burden of their upkeep upon the tribe as frequently as possible – by seeking redistributions, rents and privileges. This intuition is not meaningful except in that circumstance. Even in that circumstance mothers of serial killers, career criminals, socially and reproductive undesirable, as well as unproductive and imbecilic offspring, all demonstrate suspension of disbelief in the merits of their children, and often in the merits of the children of others. This is non-sentient behavior. Conversely, retention of such individuals is a luxury – not a good – by which we satisfy the emotions of such pre-sentient humans. Taken to the extreme, it is dangerous to allow those who would abandon all care-taking of the infirmed in and less able or worse – engage in disregard for the experience of such individuals. Not because these individuals are valuable to mankind, but because people who are careless of others present a risk to us all, and an abrogation of the contract for mutual insurance we demonstrate to all kin out of cooperative necessity.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-18 02:08:00 UTC

  • AGAINST RACISM (sketch) I advocate aristocratic egalitarianism and aristocratic

    AGAINST RACISM

    (sketch)

    I advocate aristocratic egalitarianism and aristocratic tribalism: the responsibility of aristocracy of every tribe to work with the aristocracy of every tribe to construct a moral world. My ambition is the organized suppression of the immoral, and the organized spread of aristocratic egalitarianism wherever moral man is to be found. I do not tolerate either racism or the multiculturalism of the corporate state – but instead, the re-nationalization of liberty and prosperity and the advancement of all moral families, tribes and peoples. Bring truth, trust, rule of law and capital to people, not people to capital and law.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-17 05:01:00 UTC

  • “It does not follow that because I love my family, I therefore, hate yours.”– J

    –“It does not follow that because I love my family, I therefore, hate yours.”– James Santagata

    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-16 00:35:00 UTC

  • Another argument against racism: You know, bitching about other tribes is a litt

    Another argument against racism:

    You know, bitching about other tribes is a little like blaming the messenger. If you aren’t able to compete with other tribes, and they can parasite upon you, invade you, convert you, steal your women’s genes, or conquer you – then you need to look in the mirror at why you are so inferior that they can do so.

    My specialty has become deconstruction and remedy for anglo, german, and jewish failures. But you now WE ARE ALL FAILURES because ALL our enlightenments were failures. Otherwise we would not now be genocidally exterminated.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-14 09:58:00 UTC

  • Great conversation with Eli Harman today. I tried to cover how voluntary exchang

    Great conversation with Eli Harman today. I tried to cover how voluntary exchange between compatible moral biases in the choice of investments in commons, provides us with an information system that facilitates utilization of the temporal division of labor between the biases, in the same way that prices provide us with an information system about the wants of others.

    This is one of the more important insights you can get from Propertarianism.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-14 09:10:00 UTC

  • “Can’t We All Get Along? Sunni-Shi’a Commonalities”— Just read this. You know,

    —“Can’t We All Get Along? Sunni-Shi’a Commonalities”—

    Just read this. You know, getting along as far as I can tell, is just a matter of not fighting until you have an opportunity to win without fighting.

    Polities don’t ‘get along’ because if they did they’d lose the genetic battle. Polities merely cooperate until they can conquer one another.

    Yeah, well sorry, but I can’t look at history and conclude anything else.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-10 10:16:00 UTC

  • Argument, persuasion and advice, are far less powerful at changing people than l

    Argument, persuasion and advice, are far less powerful at changing people than loving them is.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-09 07:42:00 UTC

  • PARTNERSHIP AS THE MORAL RULE OF BUSINESS If you are lucky enough to choose the

    PARTNERSHIP AS THE MORAL RULE OF BUSINESS

    If you are lucky enough to choose the right people, and you work hard at it, the feeling of having partners in business, or in the business of building a nest, or in the business of raising a family – there is nothing like it.

    I had a twenty year marriage with a partner I trusted and could talk to. I had a twenty year business relationship with a partner who I could (most of the time) talk to. An I have had investor relationships that you can talk to even under the most hostile of conditions, even when you are absolutely competitors, and you still understand one another and can act with trust.

    Right now I have people who work with me as partners. And when you can just hammer on an issue, and come to one resolution after another with some comfort that you all have done your work of prosecuting an idea to the best extent that you can, there is no feeling in the world like it.

    I see a lot of my fellow younger libertarians and I realize that the only thing stopping them from doing the same, is sufficient capital to prosecute and test an idea. One of the things I will always support the american way of life over any other country,is that it is far easier to do this in american than in any other place in the world I have yet found. our founders were business people and they made it possible and as yet the socialists haven’t succeeded in seeking sufficient rents against us that we are hobbled like europeans are.

    White Europeans worry. White Americans just try. And you can see it spread into black and Hispanic populations. Jews have it by nature. Asians just need permission to separate from the group.

    The secret to partnership is trying to make the other person happier than you make yourself. The secret to marriage is the same. The secret to commerce is the same.

    The secret to life is the same.

    The golden rule – do unto others.

    The silver rule – do not unto others

    And partnership means applying both.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-08 07:22:00 UTC

  • ALTRUISM IS NOT POSSIBLE AS A GENERAL RULE – IT CAN ONLY BE PRACTICED AS A HAND-

    ALTRUISM IS NOT POSSIBLE AS A GENERAL RULE – IT CAN ONLY BE PRACTICED AS A HAND-CRAFT

    (choice words)(great paragraphs)

    —“Altruism is not a mindless general rule to be obeyed as an act of faith independent of measurement – it is a hand-craft to be mastered by individuals, and put to wise use – it is a local activity, limited to personal experience, that must be personally judged, and can never be centralized in the state, or church. It must always be limited to the individual and his voluntary decisions. The only thing that we can centralize is war, and the only certainty we can depend upon is truth-telling and a jury’s judgement of that truth, and the ruthless punishment of liars, obscurers and deceivers, and the careful cautious demand for restitution from those who merely err.”—

    –“Redistribution of dividends from the respect for property rights, and contributions to the normative and physical commons that make the voluntary organization of production we call capitalism possible – is not a matter of altruism. It’s merely a matter of COMPENSATION. Yes we compensate each other in exchange when engaged in investment, production, distribution and trade. But for investment, production, distribution and trade to be possible we must possess property rights, and we possess property rights only because they are paid for by the forgone opportunities of all of us whether we are engaged in production or not. So what is the cost of constructing the voluntary structure of production we call capitalism, then? It is the difference in wealth between anarchy (no respect for property) and the respect for property, minus the wealth created by those engaged in production. The consequence of this logic is quite obvious: taking care of those who respect all norms necessary for the formation of property via dividends is merely just compensation for service performed. Conversely, those who do not, deserve nothing – and those who do not conform to the full spectrum of norms that reduce transaction costs in all walks of life, necessary for the formation of that voluntary organization of production, are not contributing ‘diversity’ but merely thieves. Race is irrelevant to the degree that one’s impulses are marginally indifferent. But norms are not. If you do not adopt the norms you are seeking rents, and are not due dividends.”–

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-08 02:11:00 UTC

  • ALTRUISM IS NOT A GENERAL RULE – IT IS A HAND-CRAFT (choice words)(great paragra

    ALTRUISM IS NOT A GENERAL RULE – IT IS A HAND-CRAFT

    (choice words)(great paragraphs)

    —“Altruism is not a mindless general rule to be obeyed as an act of faith – it is a craft to be mastered and put to wise use – it is a local activity, limited to personal experience, that must be personally judged, and can never be centralized in the state, or church. It must always be limited to the individual and his voluntary decisions. The only thing that we can centralize is war, and the only certainty we can depend upon is truth-telling and a jury’s judgement of that truth, and the ruthless punishment of liars, obscurers and deceivers, and the careful cautious demand for restitution from those who merely err.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-07 09:54:00 UTC