Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • Is Keynsian Economics Better For America Than Austrian Economics?

    THIS IS THE MOST ACCURATE FRAMING OF THE ECONOMIC MOVEMENTS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TO US.

    1 – Austrian economics seeks to eliminate asymmetries of knowledge so that people can cooperate voluntarily under the optimum possible conditions.  So as a movement, Austrian economics was a social science.  In other words, they want to improve our information.

    2 – American (Chicago) economics seeks to identify rule of law, so that economics can be constructed as a formula under rule of law – eliminating discretionary toying with the economy, just as rule of law eliminates discretionary toying with the polity.  In other words, they want to manipulate information as little as possible.


    3 – Saltwater (New York/California) economics seeks to identify the maximum disinformation that the government can insert into the economy with which to farm taxes, consume, and redistribute them, while preserving the incentive to keep working and risking capital (the hamster wheel), and to create sufficient knowledge of how to use disinformation that policy makers have full discretion.


    https://www.quora.com/Is-Keynsian-economics-better-for-America-than-Austrian-economics

  • know. Libertarians just try to justify free riding. They’re no different than li

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/04/27/its-up-to-rothbardians-to-demonstrate-that-they-are-not/I know. Libertarians just try to justify free riding. They’re no different than liberals except they don’t directly want to steal from you. they just want to do it indirectly. By free riding.

    Everyone fights, no one quits. If you do, then you’re a thief. It’s that simple.

    A FEW RELATED POSTS ON LIBERTARIANS AS PROGRESSIVE LIBERTINES

    WE ARE MORALLY BLIND

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/04/27/we-are-morally-blind-limited-in-our-perceptions-and-memory-and-severely-in-our-reason-the-last-thing-we-should-do-is-construct-large-risk-prone-intentionally-managed-states/

    LIBERTINE COGNITIVE BIAS

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/04/27/libertarian-moral-spectrum-blindness/

    ITS UP TO ROTHBARDIANS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE NOT MORALLY BLIND

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/04/27/its-up-to-rothbardians-to-demonstrate-that-they-are-not/

    THE DECEPTION OF “PSYCHIC BENEFIT”

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/04/27/the-moral-deception-of-the-ethical-standard-of-psychic-benefit/

    REFORMING LIBERTARIAN ETHICS

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/02/15/reforming-libertarian-ethics/

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-16 15:29:00 UTC

  • FOUNDATIONS AS REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES RESULTING FROM GENDER BIAS IN COOPERATION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/09/28/moral-foundations-as-property-rights/MORAL FOUNDATIONS AS REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES RESULTING FROM GENDER BIAS IN COOPERATION

    FEMININE COOPERATION BIAS (BUILD OFFSPRING)

    1. Proportionality/cheating, Justice, treating others in proportion to their actions. (The asset of goods.)

    2. Care/harm for others, protecting them from harm. (The asset of life and body.)

    MASCULINE (BETA) COOPERATION BIAS (OBTAIN OFFSPRING)

    3. Liberty/Oppression, characterizes judgments in terms of whether subjects are tyrannized. (The asset of time, opportunity.)

    MASCULINE (ALPHA) COMMONS BIASES (COMPETITIVE TRIBE OF MALES)

    And three others can be expressed as community property rights covering social capital.

    4. In-Group Loyalty/In-Group Betrayal to/of your group, family, nation, polity.

    5. Respect/Authority/Subversion for tradition and legitimate authority.

    6. Purity/Sanctity/Degradation/Disgust, avoiding disgusting things, foods, actions.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-16 05:30:00 UTC

  • Love is part of our movement. We must teach men to love one another again. Becau

    Love is part of our movement.

    We must teach men to love one another again.

    Because with love we speak the truth, build trust, build commons.

    “I love you man” is the best signal I know how to send.

    The best bond I know how to build.

    The best promise I know how to make.

    The best loyalty I know how to maintain.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-15 17:22:00 UTC

  • NAP: Asserting that Out-group non-retaliation was a rule for in-group cooperation

    [N]AP was employed by separatists to attempt to assert that out-group non-retaliation was a rule for in-group cooperation. Jewish law, culture, and religion attempt to preserve separatism so that they gain the benefits of the host’s commons production, without paying for the normative commons. Just as Gypsies do, but gypsies keep the cost low enough, and appeal to our altruism enough, that the cost of extermination is more than we are willing to pay. Jews do not limit their parasitism, and perform it largely through externality or deception, and this is why they are, over the centuries, repeatedly retaliated against: because the cost has become high enough that hosts must. This is not unknown since jewish authors discuss this problem openly.

  • NAP: Asserting that Out-group non-retaliation was a rule for in-group cooperation

    [N]AP was employed by separatists to attempt to assert that out-group non-retaliation was a rule for in-group cooperation. Jewish law, culture, and religion attempt to preserve separatism so that they gain the benefits of the host’s commons production, without paying for the normative commons. Just as Gypsies do, but gypsies keep the cost low enough, and appeal to our altruism enough, that the cost of extermination is more than we are willing to pay. Jews do not limit their parasitism, and perform it largely through externality or deception, and this is why they are, over the centuries, repeatedly retaliated against: because the cost has become high enough that hosts must. This is not unknown since jewish authors discuss this problem openly.

  • The Family Institution…

    [W]ithout the family we create great incentive for defectors, and we increase vastly the cost of individual housing, insurance, and sustenance and survival, That’s all. Marriage makes people wealthier by lowering costs, and creating a higher barrier to reproduction that prevents the underclasses from reproductive parasitism. So it is less important that our BEST breed a LOT, than it is for our worst not to breed even a little. IT IS LESS IMPORTANT FOR OUR BEST TO BREED A LOT THAN IT IS FOR OUR WORST NOT TO BREED EVEN A LITTLE

  • The Family Institution…

    [W]ithout the family we create great incentive for defectors, and we increase vastly the cost of individual housing, insurance, and sustenance and survival, That’s all. Marriage makes people wealthier by lowering costs, and creating a higher barrier to reproduction that prevents the underclasses from reproductive parasitism. So it is less important that our BEST breed a LOT, than it is for our worst not to breed even a little. IT IS LESS IMPORTANT FOR OUR BEST TO BREED A LOT THAN IT IS FOR OUR WORST NOT TO BREED EVEN A LITTLE

  • Without the family we create great incentive for defectors, and we increase vast

    Without the family we create great incentive for defectors, and we increase vastly the cost of individual housing, insurance, and sustenance and survival, That’s all.

    Marriage makes people wealthier by lowering costs, and creating a higher barrier to reproduction that prevents the underclasses from reproductive parasitism.

    So it is less important that our BEST breed a LOT, than it is for our worst not to breed even a little.

    IT IS LESS IMPORTANT FOR OUR BEST TO BREED A LOT THAN IT IS FOR OUR WORST NOT TO BREED EVEN A LITTLE

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-14 05:56:00 UTC

  • ***NAP was employed by separatists to attempt to assert that out-group non-retal

    ***NAP was employed by separatists to attempt to assert that out-group non-retaliation was a rule for in-group cooperation.*** Jewish law, culture, and religion attempt to preserve separatism so that they gain the benefits of the host’s commons production, without paying for the normative commons. Just as Gypsies do, but gypsies keep the cost low enough, and appeal to our altruism enough, that the cost of extermination is more than we are willing to pay. Jews do not limit their parasitism, and perform it largely through externality or deception, and this is why they are, over the centuries, repeatedly retaliated against: because the cost has become high enough that hosts must.****

    This is not unknown since jewish authors discuss this problem openly.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-14 01:30:00 UTC