My point is almost always the same. All the good people come from suppressing the reproduction of the bad people, just as all trust comes from suppressing theft, just as all truth comes from eliminating the false and deceptive.
Eliminate the bad and false and only the good and the true can remain.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-10 22:17:00 UTC
[I] will say it again. Of course I love my family and tribe above all. But I also wish every other family and tribe to prosper, evolve, and transcend. As far as I can tell, our differences are just differences in skills when we practice truthfulness in all walks of life. And yes, I understand that some groups practice untruthfulness and parasitism as strategies. But that is not a genetic necessity it is a cultural utility. And yes, I understand that some peoples cannot compete without parasitism and untruthfulness. I do not see why to harm them, but I see no value in expanding them. Any man who fights for truth and liberty is my brother. Any man who uses truth and liberty to advance his family and tribe is a nobleman whom I will reciprocally insure. This is how our families and tribes rase each other into transcendence. And it is the way we build numbers in the world with which to domesticate or eliminate the hordes of animals unable to transcend from beast into man.
[I] will say it again. Of course I love my family and tribe above all. But I also wish every other family and tribe to prosper, evolve, and transcend. As far as I can tell, our differences are just differences in skills when we practice truthfulness in all walks of life. And yes, I understand that some groups practice untruthfulness and parasitism as strategies. But that is not a genetic necessity it is a cultural utility. And yes, I understand that some peoples cannot compete without parasitism and untruthfulness. I do not see why to harm them, but I see no value in expanding them. Any man who fights for truth and liberty is my brother. Any man who uses truth and liberty to advance his family and tribe is a nobleman whom I will reciprocally insure. This is how our families and tribes rase each other into transcendence. And it is the way we build numbers in the world with which to domesticate or eliminate the hordes of animals unable to transcend from beast into man.
[I] will insure the liberty of any man of any race in any territory, by use of art and arms, who will insure my liberty in return by use of art and arms. This is Paternalism. Sovereignty. Nobility. Aristocracy. To raise mankind from beast to god – one generation, one father, at a time.
[I] will insure the liberty of any man of any race in any territory, by use of art and arms, who will insure my liberty in return by use of art and arms. This is Paternalism. Sovereignty. Nobility. Aristocracy. To raise mankind from beast to god – one generation, one father, at a time.
I will insure the liberty of any man of any race in any territory, by use of art and arms, who will insure my liberty in return by use of art and arms.
This is nobility. Paternalism. Sovereignty. To raise mankind from beast to god – one generation, one father, at a time.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 05:53:00 UTC
PAIR BONDING VS LOYALTY
( HBD_Chick and Rachael Colleen )
What is the relationship between pair bonding and loyalty?
We know all groups demonstrate loyalty. It varies only in the nearness of relations, from offspring, to kin, to those we cooperate with, to abstract moral commitment. In other words, we demonstrate kin selection and cooperation selection, and potential cooperation selection, and all else is open to competition, parasitism or predation.
In other words, is clannishness / pair bonding a discreet behavior in itself, or is it another defense of ‘property’ that we call ‘loyalty’. Are we just protecting investments?
Is it the case that the more different we are the more valuable is pair bonding? The more similar we are (the more dim we are) the less value is pair bonding? I mean, we know people are attracted to similar value judgements.
Is there a relationship between iq and pair bonding?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-05 05:16:00 UTC
i will say it again. of course I love my family and tribe above all. but I also wish every other family and tribe to prosper, evolve, and transcend. As far as I can tell, our differences are just differences in skills when we practice truthfulness in all walks of life.
And yes, I understand that some groups practice untruthfulness and parasitism as strategies. But that is not a genetic necessity it is a cultural utility. And yes, I understand that some peoples cannot compete without parasitism and untruthfulness. I do not see why to harm them, but I see no value in expanding them.
Any man who fights for truth and liberty is my brother. Any man who uses truth and liberty to advance his family and tribe is a nobleman whom I will reciprocally insure.
this is how our families and tribes rase each other into transcendence.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-04 07:36:00 UTC
—“One man can’t stand alone against the world. But a few in confederation can hold the looting hoards at bay indefinitely.”—- Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-04 04:15:00 UTC
Yet it is ONLY the voluntary organization of production that defeats malthus.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-01 15:44:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/704693763483045888
Reply addressees: @ForeignPolicy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/704692931450564608
IN REPLY TO:
@ForeignPolicy
Not all of Bolivia’s indigenous people are happy with Evo Morales, the country’s first indigenous president. https://t.co/0StAWxrcsl
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/704692931450564608