Justification (lying). Falsify the proposition that cooperation is necessary for survival, that ethics refers to cooperation….
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 07:55:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717984012162215936
Theme: Cooperation
-
nope. I must cooperate to survive competition from those who do. Manners/Ethics/
nope. I must cooperate to survive competition from those who do. Manners/Ethics/Morals have no meaning ex cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 07:53:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717983535152427008
Reply addressees: @mdavilamartinez
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717982492628660224
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717982492628660224
-
Justificationism. Falsify the statement that manners/ethics/morality equate to n
Justificationism. Falsify the statement that manners/ethics/morality equate to necessary laws of cooperation.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 07:47:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717982143406850048
Reply addressees: @mdavilamartinez
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717981207993036800
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717981207993036800
-
If you mean, can Natural Law (necessary rules of cooperation) be reduced to surv
If you mean, can Natural Law (necessary rules of cooperation) be reduced to survivable scientific propositions, then yes.;)
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 07:16:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717974330165084160
Reply addressees: @mdavilamartinez
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717973480751271936
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717973480751271936
-
Islam: We Are Competitors, Not Allies, Not Friends, Not Kin
[W]E ARE COMPETITORS NOT ALLIES, NOT FRIENDS, NOT KIN 1) we are competitors not allies. We cooperate economically for mutual gain. But if cooperation requires that we sacrifice to increase the numbers of our competitors then this is not beneficial but parasitic and suicidal. 2) you do not understand economics. To move every human in a network requires the application of marginal differences in incentives. This requires vast capital. It is through vast capital applied as incentives that we produce the voluntary organization of production.
3) The mistakes you are making are a) that we are kin rather than competitors, b) that it is possible to organize by any other means c) that the world poor would not continually breed us into perpetual poverty d) that the objective we must pursue is the prevention of the poor from reproducing. 4) Islam is a cancer that the west, the Russians, the Africans, the Hindus, and the East Asians need eradicate from this earth. Muslims are the only remaining uncivilized people on earth – and outside of Africa’s good christians, the dumbest people on earth. We must end Islam forever. Is that clear enough? -
Islam: We Are Competitors, Not Allies, Not Friends, Not Kin
[W]E ARE COMPETITORS NOT ALLIES, NOT FRIENDS, NOT KIN 1) we are competitors not allies. We cooperate economically for mutual gain. But if cooperation requires that we sacrifice to increase the numbers of our competitors then this is not beneficial but parasitic and suicidal. 2) you do not understand economics. To move every human in a network requires the application of marginal differences in incentives. This requires vast capital. It is through vast capital applied as incentives that we produce the voluntary organization of production.
3) The mistakes you are making are a) that we are kin rather than competitors, b) that it is possible to organize by any other means c) that the world poor would not continually breed us into perpetual poverty d) that the objective we must pursue is the prevention of the poor from reproducing. 4) Islam is a cancer that the west, the Russians, the Africans, the Hindus, and the East Asians need eradicate from this earth. Muslims are the only remaining uncivilized people on earth – and outside of Africa’s good christians, the dumbest people on earth. We must end Islam forever. Is that clear enough? -
The Contract of Aristocratic Cooperation
(repost thx to a friend) [W]e prefer to cooperate morally – meaning beneficially – with you.
If we cannot cooperate beneficially with you on fully moral terms – meaning without parasitism, then we have only four choices: 1) Pay the cost of your parasitism and suffer the consequences, in exchange for avoiding the cost of defending against your parasitism. 2) Boycott you and bearing the costs of boycotting you in exchange for avoiding the cost of transforming you into a moral individual or group. 3) Colonize you and bear the cost of evolving you, in exchange for creating a valued member of mankind. 4) Conquering you and bearing the cost of exterminating you in exchange for freedom from your parasitism. So, you have a choice: limit your actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, constrained to externalities under the same conditions. Or we will eventually colonize and reform you, or conquer and exterminate you. You may have the ambition of mere survival. Our ambition is to make mankind moral. For it is only in moral mankind that the evil and immoral are exterminated forever. – Aristocratia – -
The Contract of Aristocratic Cooperation
(repost thx to a friend) [W]e prefer to cooperate morally – meaning beneficially – with you.
If we cannot cooperate beneficially with you on fully moral terms – meaning without parasitism, then we have only four choices: 1) Pay the cost of your parasitism and suffer the consequences, in exchange for avoiding the cost of defending against your parasitism. 2) Boycott you and bearing the costs of boycotting you in exchange for avoiding the cost of transforming you into a moral individual or group. 3) Colonize you and bear the cost of evolving you, in exchange for creating a valued member of mankind. 4) Conquering you and bearing the cost of exterminating you in exchange for freedom from your parasitism. So, you have a choice: limit your actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, constrained to externalities under the same conditions. Or we will eventually colonize and reform you, or conquer and exterminate you. You may have the ambition of mere survival. Our ambition is to make mankind moral. For it is only in moral mankind that the evil and immoral are exterminated forever. – Aristocratia – -
All Groups Are ‘Different’ Morally, Including Jews…. and Westerners
—“Are Jews, (Gypsies, Arabs, Asians, Polynesians) inherently different, morally?”— [E]very group is different morally because every group modifies its strategy as needed in order to compete. Virtue is a competitive strategy, not necessarily an intrinsic good. a) Jews appear fairly constant in lower sexual dimorphism, and/or some reversal of sexual dimorphism (the women more masculine, the men more feminine) b) the religion promotes dual ethics, and is extremely immoral in practice. The jews have a habit of allying with the state against the population. They have a habit of professionalizing parasitism by various means of fraud, and hazard creation. (They have this because they cannot create a warrior caste necessary to hold territory.) And so between selective breeding in the middle ages, and what appears a likely initial bias toward effeminacy. they lack our ‘rednecks’ who function as most groups ‘warrior ants’.
c) Because of what I suspect are verbal bias, and feminine bias, they have been the primary creators of ‘the big lies’. The most advanced “Gossip” systems ever created by man. (and this is something that is fascinating and worth study). 1) Scriptural Monotheism 2) Dual Ethics 3) Pseudoscience. 4) Propaganda (postmodernism) 5) High-externality Financialism (financial parasitism) Bait with promise of discounts on reality, then draw resources parasitically through free riding, hazard, and fraud at scale. Once you understand it, it will make you hate them for a few years. After you get passed it, you just learn how easy it is to defeat it. Truth is enough. We tamed violence, but we did not yet tame fraud. It’s just time to tame fraud. Blaming them for specializing in fraud is like blaming women for specializing in extracting resources from us, or others blaming us for specializing in war and innovation. Tame fraud: Testimonialism. -
All Groups Are ‘Different’ Morally, Including Jews…. and Westerners
—“Are Jews, (Gypsies, Arabs, Asians, Polynesians) inherently different, morally?”— [E]very group is different morally because every group modifies its strategy as needed in order to compete. Virtue is a competitive strategy, not necessarily an intrinsic good. a) Jews appear fairly constant in lower sexual dimorphism, and/or some reversal of sexual dimorphism (the women more masculine, the men more feminine) b) the religion promotes dual ethics, and is extremely immoral in practice. The jews have a habit of allying with the state against the population. They have a habit of professionalizing parasitism by various means of fraud, and hazard creation. (They have this because they cannot create a warrior caste necessary to hold territory.) And so between selective breeding in the middle ages, and what appears a likely initial bias toward effeminacy. they lack our ‘rednecks’ who function as most groups ‘warrior ants’.
c) Because of what I suspect are verbal bias, and feminine bias, they have been the primary creators of ‘the big lies’. The most advanced “Gossip” systems ever created by man. (and this is something that is fascinating and worth study). 1) Scriptural Monotheism 2) Dual Ethics 3) Pseudoscience. 4) Propaganda (postmodernism) 5) High-externality Financialism (financial parasitism) Bait with promise of discounts on reality, then draw resources parasitically through free riding, hazard, and fraud at scale. Once you understand it, it will make you hate them for a few years. After you get passed it, you just learn how easy it is to defeat it. Truth is enough. We tamed violence, but we did not yet tame fraud. It’s just time to tame fraud. Blaming them for specializing in fraud is like blaming women for specializing in extracting resources from us, or others blaming us for specializing in war and innovation. Tame fraud: Testimonialism.