Got it.
So, judicial tests, court tests, standard measures, … Something in that category.
And Voluntary cooperation.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-15 19:56:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691539398628700161
Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691509536778022933
(NLI REVIEW REQUESTED) Is this getting closer to complete? More comprehensible?
–“
The maximization of evolutionary velocity,
by the accumulation of discounts on time,
by the evolutionary computation of innovation, adaptation, and evolution
by discovery and preservation of opportunities, means, and returns on cooperation,
by a body of people,
by exchange of responsibility
For the reciprocal insurance,
By force of arms,
Of Self-determination by Self-Determined Means,
By tests of Sovereignty in Demonstrated Interests,
By tests of suppression of and prohibition on the imposition of costs on the demonstrated interests of others,
By the test of Recprocity in display word and deed,
And insured by impersonal due process,
Producing Legitimacy of decidability,
Thereby suppressing retaliation, retaliation cycles, and malincintives not to cooperate,
That together insure preservation and expansion of cooperation, the private and common returns of it, fostering incentives to cooperate at ever greater complexity, and the benefits of that cooperative velocity, volume, and complexity for all.
“–
– Self Determination
– Sovereignty
– Reciprocity
– Voluntary Cooperation
– Legitimacy
– Due Process
– Decidability
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-15 19:55:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691539082948562944
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691503763280764933
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
(NLI REVIEW REQUESTED)
Is this getting closer to complete? More comprehensible?
–“The maximization of evolutionary velocity, by the accumulation of discounts on time, by the evolutionary computation of innovation, adaptation, and evolution by discovery and preservation of opportunities, means, and returns on cooperation, by any body of people, by exchange of responsibility for the reciprocal insurance, by force of arms, of individual Self determination by Self Determined Means, By tests of Sovereignty in demonstrated interests, by tests of suppression of and prohibition on the imposition of costs on the demonstrated intersts of others, by the test of Recprocity in display word and deed, insured by impersonal due process, producing Legitimacy of decidability, thereby suppressing retaliation, retaliation cycles, and malincintives not to cooperate, which together insure preservation of cooperation, the private and common returns of it, fostering incentives to cooperate at ever greater complexity, and the benefits of that cooperative velocity, volume, and complexity for all.”–
Self Determination
SOvreignty
Reciprocity
Legitimacy
Due Process
Decidability
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1691503763280764933
COOPERATION BY MECHANISM – NOT INTELLIGENCE
Re: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0a3xg4M9Oa8
Apologies for the reaction to well-intentioned pseudoscientific fictionalism for the purpose of promotion of science via appeal to populism through the continued abuse of the human want of anthropomorphic…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 18:00:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691147810115039237
COOPERATION BY MECHANISM – NOT INTELLIGENCE
Re: https://t.co/dXAh16TENb
Apologies for the reaction to well-intentioned pseudoscientific fictionalism for the purpose of promotion of science via appeal to populism through the continued abuse of the human want of anthropomorphic explanations – the very supernaturalism that we are still trying to escape that mysticism brought upon us.
And in particular, the new mysticism that has emerged from the revolution in pseudoscience – both in mathematical physics that’s stagnated the field, and in the behavioral ‘sciences’ in the 20th century.
I’d prefer we not drag biology back down into that trap as well.
So, I don’t like the analogy to intelligence or cognition, and would prefer the correct interpretation: *cooperation*. (a) The transition to the integration of mitochondrial cooperation, (b) to multicellular cooperation, (c) to specialization as cooperation, required a series of leaps, but I don’t think it’s truthful or testifiable to claim it’s intelligence.
We might discuss, as in physics as information, computation, and cooperation – but intelligence?
No. Prediction isn’t going on down there because memory isn’t going on down there. If recordkeeping of successful trial and error in the absence of prediction is occurring, that’s not intelligence (prediction) it’s trial and error.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 18:00:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691147809955655700
They attempted cooperation but in many cases it wasn’t possible. So cooperation is a good only if possible.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 03:27:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690928164346728448
Reply addressees: @NorseJarl
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690919713700818944
(worth repearing)
Cooperation is always disproportionately productive (Beneficial), and because man is a superpredator (continuous risk), avoiding provocation and retaliation, and investing in opportunities for cooperation, is the superior strategy for both the individual and group.
There is a reason for the singular direction of all human evolution: neoteny suppresses impulse and aggression in exchange for patience and agency, because that progress facilitates cooperation and the returns on cooperation are disproportionately valuable – a fact that is non-obvoius perhaps given that a superpredator such as man, is so precisely because he cooperates and divides labor between persistance hunting and food preparation. And because there is no end to the benefit of scaling that division of labor.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 02:43:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690917113756573696
yes though of course when talking of sex differences in antisocial behavior this doesnt apply to women and mothers like yourself who practice and teach prosocial behavior: responsibility. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-13 22:14:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690849314061369344
Reply addressees: @YYRedfeminist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690434213391286272
You will find that’s the worst possible agenda. Instead you want to create a set of institutions that facilitate cooperation and suppress reciprocity without requiring homogeneity of populations – or at least without requiring cognitive homogeneity given that kin preference…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-13 21:13:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690834091380244481
Reply addressees: @eatcheese625 @Gestalt_enjoyer @shiraeis @Plinz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690352634488922112
Divorce and Genetics
Neoteny = Class Distribution = IQ = Ability To Cooperate
Race………Divorce rate….Marriage rate
White……..15.1%……………..32.1%
Hispanic..18.5%……………..33.2%
Black……..30.8%…………….17.3% !!!!
Median Age of Mariage is
32 for men and 30 for women
Average Age of Divorce:
46 for Men, 44 for Women
Age Affect on Divorce
Divorce Rates Decrease from 50% when young, until age 32, and then increase by 5% per year after after that.
Education ………………Men…………Women
high school or less:..39% men, 37% women
bachelor’s degree: …29% men, 23% women
advanced degree: ….26% men, 30% women
Women’s Chance of Marriage Lasting 20 Years
78% of women with a bachelor’s degree
49% of women with some college
40% of women with a high-school education
Fully educated women divorce less, but are much more likely to initiate divorce.
Children’s Affect on Divorce
3 or More children decreases the rate of divorce. (oddly)
Single Parenthood Total
21% of children lived only with their mother in 2020
Single Parenthood by Race
67% Black
42% Hispanic
42% Mixed race
25% White
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-13 18:42:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690796102776152064
Bo, All
The difference?
The right’s mythology has been demonstrably successful at producing mindfulness, responsibility, social cohesion, and a high trust polity. It’s framed as silly supernatural nonsense but it’s not wrong.
The left’s mythology has produced more starvation, poverty, death, and destruction than anything in history other than the great plagues. It’s framed as pretentiously serious nonsense pseudoscience and propaganda and it’s wrong.
-Cheers
Reply addressees: @EPoe187
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-11 01:44:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689815137455091712
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1689655614258171904