Western Social Science: Natural Law: Acquisition, Property, Cooperation, Manners, Ethics, Morals, Liberty, Aristocracy. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-15 12:07:00 UTC
Western Social Science: Natural Law: Acquisition, Property, Cooperation, Manners, Ethics, Morals, Liberty, Aristocracy. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-15 12:07:00 UTC
(Isn’t it unravelling because we’ve reduced the normative cost of membership in the cult, and sense limited external threats?)
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-13 19:07:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720327520206200833
Reply addressees: @JonHaidt
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/705752375747874816
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/705752375747874816
Interesting. So biology does not determine the boundaries of cooperation?
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-13 15:19:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720270272062853120
Reply addressees: @BenedictKMiller @SpiritSplice
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720259684922474496
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720259684922474496
Moral = necessity for In-group Cooperation. Not Survival against out-group competition. so no.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-13 10:36:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720198911617536000
Reply addressees: @draknats @DJTWMAR
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720190063695409152
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720190063695409152
Naturalistic Fallacy Reigns in most fields. Humans choose cooperation or predation. The choice is rational: kill parasites and predators.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-13 08:32:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720167671728365568
Well, non-sentient creatures can’t cooperate or choose to cooperate. So they cannot choose not to either.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-13 08:23:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720165584000978944
Reply addressees: @fashbritwaifu @AidanTTierian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720164510653378561
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/720164510653378561
Naturalistic Fallacy Reigns in most fields. Humans choose cooperation or predation. The choice is rational: kill parasites and predators.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-13 04:32:00 UTC
So, what if you’re in a relationship for a couple of years and the other person doesn’t want to get married, because he or she says that “marriage isn’t for me”?
Now, myself, I would only say that because the relationship was convenient at present, but that over the long term I thought it wasn’t going to be a good idea, and that I wanted to keep my options open in case something better came along. I have been in relationships that were ‘good enough for now’ but not ‘good enough for life’. Many of us have been.
Usually when someone asks me a question like this I say “Well, the clock ticks on your life every moment. God only gives us one life. And relationships are an expensive investment of time in that one life. And every moment you invest in a ‘maybe not’ relationship is not being invested in a ‘we will try hard’ relationship. And over the long term, a relationship that lasts is the best investment you can make in time, just as a house is the best investment you can make with money.”
Wishing and hoping don’t make it so. Renting a house is money spent but not invested in the home you one day need not pay for. A ‘Maybe not” relationship is the same time spent but not invested in the long term relationship that sustains you in later years.
If a person ‘just isn’t that into you” then he or she just isn’t into you. It’s not complicated. People demonstrate their preferences. Their actions tell the truth that their words do not. Truth is there staring at you. You just have to come to terms with it.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-12 11:57:00 UTC
German success is reducible to the oath under nationalism. Anglo failure to the abandonment of the oath for market universalism: greed.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-12 08:32:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/719805429908434944
German success is reducible to the oath under nationalism. Anglo failure to the abandonment of the oath for market universalism: greed.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-12 04:32:00 UTC