Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • MISSING LIBRARY SECTION Ramsey Mekdaschi SECTION: COMMONS Ostrom, Elinor (1990).

    MISSING LIBRARY SECTION

    Ramsey Mekdaschi

    SECTION: COMMONS

    Ostrom, Elinor (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.

    Ostrom, Elinor; Schroeder, Larry; Wynne, Susan (1993). Institutional incentives and sustainable development: infrastructure policies in perspective.

    Ostrom, Elinor; Walker, James; Gardner, Roy (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources.

    Ostrom, Elinor; Walker, James (2003). Trust and reciprocity: interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research.

    Ostrom, Elinor (2005). Understanding institutional diversity.

    Ostrom, Elinor; Kanbur, Ravi; Guha-Khasnobis, Basudeb (2007). Linking the formal and informal economy: concepts and policies.

    Ostrom, Elinor; Hess, Charlotte (2007). Understanding knowledge as a commons: from theory to practice.

    The Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs

    The Economy of Cities by Jane Jacobs

    Cities and the Wealth of Nations by Jane Jacobs

    Moral Basis of a Backward SocietyFeb 1, 1967 by Edward C. Banfield

    The Unheavenly City RevisitedNov 1, 1990 by Edward C. Banfield

    Mancur Olsen (Everything really)

    The City: A Global History by Joel Kottkin

    Tribes by Joel Kottkin

    (QUESTIONABLE)

    Segregation: A Global History of Divided Cities by Wendy Pullan.

    Urban centres across the world were built for racial separation

    The Oxford Handbook of Cities in World History, Edited by Peter Clark

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-11 04:47:00 UTC

  • ****All philosophical systems merely seek to justify the evolutionary strategy o

    ****All philosophical systems merely seek to justify the evolutionary strategy of the group. Ergo, the none are ‘correct’ other than voluntary exchange between groups, which facilitates the incremental, evolutionary calculation of the common good for mankind: eugenic evolution.****

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-10 04:20:00 UTC

  • Universal, Majoritarian, Single-House, Democracy, is not an immutable law of coo

    Universal, Majoritarian, Single-House, Democracy, is not an immutable law of cooperation. It is a violation of it. Changing This Is Enough.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-06 07:04:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/728480415909031937

  • Universal, Majoritarian, Single-House, Democracy, is not an immutable law of coo

    Universal, Majoritarian, Single-House, Democracy, is not an immutable law of cooperation. It is a violation of it. Changing This Is Enough.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-06 03:04:00 UTC

  • Commons via Externality of Teaching Sacredness

    [S]acred rituals (church/temple in particular) reward us with the pack response (spirituality/elation) and inclusive signals in exchange for learning the skill of suppression of our impulses.

    The most aggressive and demanding ritual is that of islam’s multitude of demands and daily repetitions, the most intellectually demanding judaism, the least demanding and most disorganized christianity, the most spiritual buddhism, the most ritualistic and perhaps best Japanese co-religions of shinto and buddhism, the most difficult and most beneficial stoicism combined with aristotelian empiricism (law and science).

    These rituals are necessary in every society if for no other reason than to train us to show piety (respect), for the commons.

    Westerners were able to develop commons in some part, because the church suppressed impulse through their ritual.

    The sacred = that which I must not impose any cost upon, whatsoever.

  • Commons via Externality of Teaching Sacredness

    [S]acred rituals (church/temple in particular) reward us with the pack response (spirituality/elation) and inclusive signals in exchange for learning the skill of suppression of our impulses.

    The most aggressive and demanding ritual is that of islam’s multitude of demands and daily repetitions, the most intellectually demanding judaism, the least demanding and most disorganized christianity, the most spiritual buddhism, the most ritualistic and perhaps best Japanese co-religions of shinto and buddhism, the most difficult and most beneficial stoicism combined with aristotelian empiricism (law and science).

    These rituals are necessary in every society if for no other reason than to train us to show piety (respect), for the commons.

    Westerners were able to develop commons in some part, because the church suppressed impulse through their ritual.

    The sacred = that which I must not impose any cost upon, whatsoever.

  • Sacred rituals (church/temple in particular) reward us with the pack response (s

    Sacred rituals (church/temple in particular) reward us with the pack response (spirituality/elation) and inclusive signals in exchange for learning the skill of suppression of our impulses.

    The most aggressive and demanding ritual is that of islam’s multitude of demands and daily repetitions, the most intellectually demanding judaism, the least demanding and most disorganized christianity, the most spiritual buddhism, the most ritualistic and perhaps best Japanese co-religions of shinto and buddhism, the most difficult and most beneficial stoicism combined with aristotelian empiricism (law and science).

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-05 04:34:00 UTC

  • Moral

    Amoral (no cooperativo) Objetivamente moral (necesario para la formación de una política cooperativa) Normativamente moral (adaptaciones para estructuras de reproducción, producción y bienes) Asumiendo que una norma moral pueda ser moral, si no amoral o inmoral. Moral contractual ( adaptaciones para estructuras de reproducción / producción / bienes) Asumiendo que un contrato moral puede ser moral, si no es amoral o inmoral. Legalmente moral (codificaciones de estructuras de reproducción / producción / bienes) Asumiendo que una ley puede ser moral, si no es amoral o inmoral La legislación es o moral, amoral o inmoral. Las regulaciones son o morales, amorales o inmorales. La discreción es moral, amoral o inmoral

  • Moral

    Amoral (no cooperativo) Objetivamente moral (necesario para la formación de una política cooperativa) Normativamente moral (adaptaciones para estructuras de reproducción, producción y bienes) Asumiendo que una norma moral pueda ser moral, si no amoral o inmoral. Moral contractual ( adaptaciones para estructuras de reproducción / producción / bienes) Asumiendo que un contrato moral puede ser moral, si no es amoral o inmoral. Legalmente moral (codificaciones de estructuras de reproducción / producción / bienes) Asumiendo que una ley puede ser moral, si no es amoral o inmoral La legislación es o moral, amoral o inmoral. Las regulaciones son o morales, amorales o inmorales. La discreción es moral, amoral o inmoral

  • Inequality is the result of diversity. Why? Kin redistribute. Competitors don’t.

    Inequality is the result of diversity. Why? Kin redistribute. Competitors don’t. So, no more ideology or pseudoscience. #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-04 12:28:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/727837182866690048