Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • Q&A: CURT: AND SOCIAL CAPITAL IN EUROPE? —“Would you also say, sir, that Europ

    Q&A: CURT: AND SOCIAL CAPITAL IN EUROPE?

    —“Would you also say, sir, that Europe’s Scientific and industrial Revolutions were the result of this high trust/social capital, as opposed to the prevailing narrative that colonialism = industrial/scientific revolution? It’s always been a theory of mine that social capital is what allowed Europe and Western Civilization to accelerate ahead of other Civs, which runs contrary to the Guns, Germs and Steel narrative”—

    Well, the tradition was there in the 700’s when the Friesians started immigrating to land in England. And by 1200’s Bacon had studied this contractualism and invented empiricism. And starting about the same time they started aggressively hanging vast numbers of troublemakers, and restoring the trade that would become the Hansa (Germanic) civilization.

    So my view is that the colonial expansion ARRESTED the growth of germanic north sea civilization, and that while there was amazing wealth generated in England, France, holland, Spain, and Portugal by this switch from north sea to Atlantic, that the reason for the division between germanic and English civilizations that culminated in the world wars, was this catastrophe we call colonialism.

    Now, Americans speak English, but we separated from England before England split from germanic civilization. The majority of American whites are from germanic decent. And the majority of anglo whites are from pre-Germanic split. So that is why we have the language of the English and a culture more Prussian-like the germans.

    And in my opinion, from what I’ve seen throughout history, as far as I can tell, the industrial revolution would have occurred in northern Europe just as it nearly occurred in Athens. England blew up just like Athens for the same reason – overreach.

    If you have an empirical society, with enough literacy, and enough cultural capital, you will eventually produce innovations, since there is no opportunity to survive and compete by parasitism.

    In other words, if we create rule of law we will continue to evolve. We have no choice. It’s the societies that dont create incremental suppression through natural law that stagnate.

    Becuase it is too easy to develop stagnating-corruption and parasitism.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-24 07:23:00 UTC

  • FORCING PEOPLE TO COME TO THE TABLE TO TRADE If you don’t understand what I’m do

    FORCING PEOPLE TO COME TO THE TABLE TO TRADE

    If you don’t understand what I’m doing, of course you’ll make the mistake of classifying me as right wing fascist – but it’s not true at all.

    Like my predecessors in sovereignty under judge-discovered, common, natural law, I am trying to limit people to fully informed, productive, voluntary exchanges, free of externalities of the same.

    So I advocate for the use of natural law, to incrementally suppress, parasitism by all means, through the use of common, judge discovered, empirical law. Strictly constructed from the first principle of natural law (NPP), consisting of whereas (problem), whereas (objective), therefore (prohibition), by (these means), claim (proof), warranty (judge).

    This creates (a) a market for reproduction: family, (b) a market for production of goods and services(consumption), and (c) a market for commons (investments).

    The only anywhere near-fascist part of my proposition is paying people who lack demonstrated ability to create the moral hazard of producing offspring, to not force their costs upon us, and to be punished if they do, like any other criminal.

    I do not understand why a person has some natural right to reproduction any more than the natural right to murder, violece, theft, and fraud in its many incarnations.

    They do not and cannot. And it was just as strange to our ancestors who passionately objected to our forcible prohibition on intertribal warfare, and inter-kinship feuds, and punishment of petty thefts, and standard of weights and measures, and prohibitions against frauds, and requirements against warranty. None of us wants constraints on our parasitism of others, because it increases the costs and effort we must bear if we are to persist.

    But that is what has been and will forever remain, good for mankind: the incremental suppression of parasitism by each means until there remains no possible method of parasitism available, and we have no other choice for survival than cooperation by engaging in fully informed, productive, voluntary exchange, limited to externality of the same criteria.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    [1] NPP refers to Non Parasitism Principle: the requirement for fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to externality of the same criteria.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-24 06:01:00 UTC

  • THOSE WHO FIGHT WITH ME SHALL BE MY BROTHERS (To continue to agitate my racist f

    THOSE WHO FIGHT WITH ME SHALL BE MY BROTHERS

    (To continue to agitate my racist friends a bit)

    He who fights with me shall be my brother.

    I may not want him to marry my sister, nor may he want me to marry his. But together, as brothers in arms, we create for one another the ability to make that choice. Apart, we do not. And this is but one of many choices we have or do not have if we fight or do not fight as brothers.

    So he who fights with me for sovereignty, property, family, tribe, and nation shall forever be my brother. There is no more to be said.

    Western Aristocratic Egalitarianism enfranchises All Men Who Fight As Brothers to preserve property and sovereignty for families, into the initiatic brotherhood of soldiers upon taking the irrevocable Oath.

    I see no color between brothers, only in the preservation and expansion of beauty of all colors within families who fight for property and sovereignty as defenders of self, property, families, tribes, and nations.

    Yes, our different tribes and races possess different adaptations. These are mostly in the distribution and sophistication of intellectual gender traits: masculine space, and feminine language. Yes we mature more and faster, and less, and slower. As such some of us are more pliable younger and longer, and others less pliable both younger and shorter. And as such more impulsive and less.

    But given that our differences are largely in the size of our underclasses, caused by our regional success at reducing them; and given the challenges of limiting the harm done by them, thereby inhibiting the good done by most of the rest, if then we help those that have greater problems domesticating their underclasses, and they help us by domesticating their underclasses, the differences between us with gradually reduce, and we can all transcend into the gods we seek.

    I do not hate on those who do not harm me and mine. And evidence of history is that small nations do least harm, and large empires do most.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-24 04:57:00 UTC

  • So you must describe reality in economics sufficiently to gain the consent of ot

    So you must describe reality in economics sufficiently to gain the consent of others that they will endure losses and gains.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 11:47:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768052066187087872

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767973853712687104

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767973853712687104

  • We are all unequal but all compatible if we trade with each other

    We are all unequal but all compatible if we trade with each other.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 11:02:00 UTC

  • ¿Por que me importa la clase trabajadora?

    [P]orque nosotros somos compatibles, y necesitamos el uno del otro. Alguno de nosotros trabajamos, otros trabajamos en gerencia, algunos calculamos y diseñamos, algunos de nosotros organizamos, y algunos otros decidimos qué organizar, calcular, diseñar, administrar y sobre que cosas trabajar. Es cuando nosotros determinamos de forma exitosa un método por el cual cada uno de nosotros se beneficia al cooperar con el resto, en vez de cooperar con otros al competir por oportunidades para hacer trabajos, administración, cálculos, organización y decisión que no somos sólo compatibles sino necesarios el uno para el otro. La aristocracia opera de forma empírica: Por medio de la compatibilidad. La compatibilidad en la reproducción (la unidad familiar como una unidad reproductiva), en materia de defensa (la jerarquía del mando), en producción (la jerarquía de la organización de la producción), y en política (la jerarquía de las clases) mientras preservamos y mantenemos la participación voluntaria en la selección de parejas, al unir ejércitos, al participar en la fuerza laboral, y entre las distintas divisiones de los poderes del estado. La compatibilidad voluntaria es un método que sirve para poder “calcular” el resultado óptimo de Nash sobre la marcha. El modelo de la aristocracia occidental fue científico. Hasta el siglo XX. A mi me importa la clase trabajadora porque ELLOS SON LOS QUE PELEAN. ¿Por que? Porque las élites crean la diferencia competitiva para las clases trabajadoras, y si ellas pelean por sus élites, y eligen las élites correctas, entonces tendrán que vivir bajo mejores condiciones que otras clases que eligen ser gobernados por élites peores. El problema con la forma de vida americana es que los socialistas creen que han hecho una franquicia exitosa a partir de la apropiación del movimiento de los trabajadores y han convertido compatibilidad en incompatibilidad. Los socialistas eligieron dividirnos y conquistarnos, obligando a nuestras élites a abandonar a sus clases trabajadoras. Si queremos una revolución, debemos actuar de forma compatible. Debemos tener élites que decidan y organicen, clases medias que calculen y teoricen, y clases trabajadoras que administren y actúen. Mi nombre es Legión. Y somos muchos Curt Doolittle. La Filosofía de la Aristocracia El Instituto Propietarista. Traducido por Alberto R. Zambrano U.

  • ¿Por que me importa la clase trabajadora?

    [P]orque nosotros somos compatibles, y necesitamos el uno del otro. Alguno de nosotros trabajamos, otros trabajamos en gerencia, algunos calculamos y diseñamos, algunos de nosotros organizamos, y algunos otros decidimos qué organizar, calcular, diseñar, administrar y sobre que cosas trabajar. Es cuando nosotros determinamos de forma exitosa un método por el cual cada uno de nosotros se beneficia al cooperar con el resto, en vez de cooperar con otros al competir por oportunidades para hacer trabajos, administración, cálculos, organización y decisión que no somos sólo compatibles sino necesarios el uno para el otro. La aristocracia opera de forma empírica: Por medio de la compatibilidad. La compatibilidad en la reproducción (la unidad familiar como una unidad reproductiva), en materia de defensa (la jerarquía del mando), en producción (la jerarquía de la organización de la producción), y en política (la jerarquía de las clases) mientras preservamos y mantenemos la participación voluntaria en la selección de parejas, al unir ejércitos, al participar en la fuerza laboral, y entre las distintas divisiones de los poderes del estado. La compatibilidad voluntaria es un método que sirve para poder “calcular” el resultado óptimo de Nash sobre la marcha. El modelo de la aristocracia occidental fue científico. Hasta el siglo XX. A mi me importa la clase trabajadora porque ELLOS SON LOS QUE PELEAN. ¿Por que? Porque las élites crean la diferencia competitiva para las clases trabajadoras, y si ellas pelean por sus élites, y eligen las élites correctas, entonces tendrán que vivir bajo mejores condiciones que otras clases que eligen ser gobernados por élites peores. El problema con la forma de vida americana es que los socialistas creen que han hecho una franquicia exitosa a partir de la apropiación del movimiento de los trabajadores y han convertido compatibilidad en incompatibilidad. Los socialistas eligieron dividirnos y conquistarnos, obligando a nuestras élites a abandonar a sus clases trabajadoras. Si queremos una revolución, debemos actuar de forma compatible. Debemos tener élites que decidan y organicen, clases medias que calculen y teoricen, y clases trabajadoras que administren y actúen. Mi nombre es Legión. Y somos muchos Curt Doolittle. La Filosofía de la Aristocracia El Instituto Propietarista. Traducido por Alberto R. Zambrano U.

  • WHY COUNTERSIGNAL? —“Curt: Why go out of your way to counter-signal?”— I hav

    WHY COUNTERSIGNAL?

    —“Curt: Why go out of your way to counter-signal?”—

    I have followers from around the world, in all colors, and I view my work as a universal solution for advocating paternal nationalism under which all tribes can transcend the burdens of their lower classes, and predation by ruling classes – and to so morally.

    So as a general rule, I disassociate myself from anti-whatever organizations and advocate for solutions that enable each group to transcend.

    There is a great difference between resistance movements and revolutionary reformations. Resistance has not worked.

    WN is not successful and cannot be. Neo-reaction and paleo’s could be. The alt-right might evolve to influential. Of the older generations, The religious, The traditional(familial), jeffersonian(legal) have been only successful by stalling the onslaught.

    But The New Right will be. Because we give each group the argumentative, institutional, and revolutionary tools for positive change, rather than mere resistance.

    How you argue reflects your class, ability, and knowledge to argue.

    Aristocracy argues as a wise but determined father.

    That is our role as ‘warriors’, ‘head-men’, ‘chieftains’, ‘generals’, and ‘kings’: to JUDGE.

    We just needed a scientific method of judgment.

    And that’s what I’ve given us.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 04:09:00 UTC

  • RT @MartianHoplite: If harmony will ever prevail between western men and women,

    RT @MartianHoplite: If harmony will ever prevail between western men and women, men will impose it. Men naturally care for, maintain, and d…

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 17:53:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767057071871262720

  • Slight misrepresentation. Negotiated trade is superior to un-negotiated trade. F

    Slight misrepresentation. Negotiated trade is superior to un-negotiated trade. Free trade dead. Nonparasitic instead.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 17:52:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767056794497712129

    Reply addressees: @Heritage @DailySignal

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766966763934273536

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Heritage

    “Fair trade” rhetoric may sound appealing—but free trade is the surest path to true economic prosperity—and fairness https://t.co/ibJTHVnIrL

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/766966763934273536