Theme: Cooperation

  • INNOVATION Most meaningful innovation that benefits mankind consists of decrease

    INNOVATION
    Most meaningful innovation that benefits mankind consists of decreases in the cost of energy, decreases in the cost of distance, decreases in the cost of cooperation, decreases in the cost of knowledge, and decreases in the cost of time and/or some combination of those decreases.

    This framing is important because it deprives us of the pretense of endless growth. Instead, we approach the minimum possible cost for the maximum possible return across all those dimensions of decreases.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-04 12:49:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1709551274599862272

  • RT @J58039716: The happiest people are the ones who live in a society that feels

    RT @J58039716: The happiest people are the ones who live in a society that feels like family. How do you get there? Need to have at least a…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-30 01:25:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707929561554403524

  • RT @Lord__Sousa: The natural law is universal for all sentient beings capable of

    RT @Lord__Sousa: The natural law is universal for all sentient beings capable of voluntary cooperation because it is but an extension of ph…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 17:18:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707082393608237219

  • TOP TEN REASONS FOR THE PRESENT CONFLICT CAUSED BY THE UNTRAINED INSTINCTS OF WO

    TOP TEN REASONS FOR THE PRESENT CONFLICT CAUSED BY THE UNTRAINED INSTINCTS OF WOMEN IN A POLITY.

    Ok. You’re a good person.

    But let me help you understand the problem between the sexes manifesting in the breakdown of relationships family, reproduction, economic conditions, mental illness, suicide, loss of American competitiveness, decline in education, and the current escalation in the past sixty years of political conflict started by the postwar left – by the predictability of your response.

    1. All women think they are the exception
    2. All women practice the NAXALT/AXALT fallacy.
    3. All women reverse approval-disapproval with true-false because all women empathize first and then justify their feelings, while at least ten percent of men understand first and then falsify their understanding – with feelings rarely mattering. We think in facts.
    4. All women’s difference in cognition from men is reducible to the female evasion of responsibility for self regulation, other-regulation, and the commons, as that responsibility exposes them to risk of conflict, and that risk would require self regulation rather than continuously defaulting to emotion and experience and empathy.
    5. All women’s claims of oppression are demands from males that women bear responsibility for their display word and deeds at the expense of giving into their emotions – just like men must. So all female claims of oppression are evidence of immaturity (inner child) seeking to evade responsibility for impulse and action.
    6. All women defend against the effort of self regulation, truth before face, and responsibility for self and commons, by social construction of falsehoods and baiting into hazard by undermining, canceling and reputation destruction by the process we call gossiping, shaming, rallying, psychologizing, moralizing, undermining, sedition, and treason.
    7. All women are only devote in time but not loyal over time, so women cannot achieve the same successes in science, business, economics and politics as men – because loyalty is necessary to bear the cost and risks of competition together.
    8. All women are hyperconsumptive hypergamic selfish consumers who seek to access the capital produced by responsibility through men that they cannot access themselves, because their intolerance for conflict, risk, truth, and self regulation and accumulation of responsibility.
    9. We are in a period of time where women have had enough ability to express these antisocial, anti economic, and anti political, and frankly devolutionary and destructive instincts and especially seek to undermine all male history of capital accumulation in genetics, behavior, knowledge, institutions, and physical capital and territory, so that women can hyper consume all that accumulated inheritance for nothing more than self gratification by the elimination of their need to share responsibility because they are able to share political choice.
    10. There is a reason why no polities survive when run by women – because the purpose of a polity is to accumulate capital and responsibility for it. And the western group strategy has always been the maximization of individual responsibility in exchange for climbing the ladder of individual freedom liberty citizenship and sovereignty.

    And when a man says women or all women he’s thinking of a normal distribution, because that’s how men view the world, as unequal distributions around a general trend or tendency.

    Why would you even think that a man would presume it was necessary to respond with ‘not all X are like that’? Because it would never occur to men to think that we were the exception while at the same time anyone would conceive of a group of people as other than an unequal distribution around a general tendency or trend.

    I don’t make the laws of the universe.
    I just prevent people from lying about them and evading them at others’ expense – -which is what we call criminal unethical and immoral behavior.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @lleahgold @schizarella


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 15:47:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707059516079030272

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707044437681954838

  • WHY DO WOMEN AND THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM PRESUME THE FALSE DEFAULT OPTION INSTEAD

    WHY DO WOMEN AND THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM PRESUME THE FALSE DEFAULT OPTION INSTEAD OF TEACHING THE CHALLENGE OF COOPERATION AT SCALE?
    —“Never understood why politics isn’t taught in the light of the vast challenges of getting large groups of people to work together. Same with economics.”—

    This statement is more insightful than obvious at first glance. The question is why, in an educational environment (an artificial monopoly in of an artificial equality), do students and teachers assume the default position that it’s in our interest to always cooperate, when in almost any other circumstance, cooperation is itself a scarcity that must be constructed via incentives to encourage people to pursue the same interests rather than their separate interests, given that their separate interests always and everywhere diverge in context, place, and time?

    Normalcy bias (we think we’re average) and we presume everyone else shares our goals,, values, and interests, when the entirety of the value of human variation especially between the sexes, classes and individual abilities, is that we divide the time space and resources of the universe into individual chunks and therefore together maximize human discovery, innovation, adaptation. Of course we are different. If we were’t we wouldn’t need to be sentient. We are MORE different than other animals. That’s why we specialize in innnovation and adaptation itself, by memor, mind, ,consciousness and frequent cooperation – so that we evolve by ideas fast, not evolve by genetics slowly.

    There is a good reason the administration does not teach manners, ethics, and morality, basic economics, basic law, and basic politics – all of which are market activities within the despotic monopoly that is the education system whose teachers are most often from the bottom 15% of their graduating classes. And where professors are almost always temps instead of employees, and are also from the bottom of their profession. So we pay for professors and we get temps. And we get dumbed down classes for great expense that enslave our people in debt for the privilege of getting access to the labor market – when an IQ test would be sufficient.

    That reason is that the truth is offensive. and by putting face before truth by teaching a presumed falsehood they create political discord in the society rather than fulfilling their duty of producing citizens competent and morally able to participate in our advanced economy, legal system, and politics. And so discord results because they are effectively lied to consistently for the seventeen or more years of educational indoctrination into a falsehood.

    Teachers are fearful of children who return home and question why their parents are losers – because they have the knowledge to understand their parents failings. But this is precisely what is necessary to raise the polity one generation at a time, and continue the development of our collective condition as individuals, families, the economy, and the polity.

    We need to clear the decks in education and rebuild it with very different people teaching very different things, and end the destruction caused by women and the education system that has brought about the present catastrophe – because we didn’t teach our people, ,but more importantly our women correctly before giving them access to teaching, and voting.

    Reply addressees: @Jake385719


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 15:15:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707051266424094720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707032030985556330

  • RT @Jake385719: @curtdoolittle Never understood why politics isn’t taught in the

    RT @Jake385719: @curtdoolittle Never understood why politics isn’t taught in the light of the vast challenges of getting large groups of pe…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 14:56:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707046551846064374

  • RT @Homeschool_LLC: @NoahRevoy If a people cannot maintain a local commons, they

    RT @Homeschool_LLC: @NoahRevoy If a people cannot maintain a local commons, they will not be able to maintain a functioning community, a so…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 03:10:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706868787041959970

  • WHY ARE OUR PEOPLE SO IGNORANT OF OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT AND THAT ITS THE SCIE

    WHY ARE OUR PEOPLE SO IGNORANT OF OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT AND THAT ITS THE SCIENCE OF COOPERATION?
    I am pretty sure I can explain the american, anglo, germanic and greco-roman system of government, and history of our law, and why it’s an empirical science, better than almost anyone working today – and that in itself is frightening.

    It’s a very small number of principles. And I repeat them with frequency. But in the end, all you really need to understand is self-determination, sovereignty, duty: inalienability, reciprocity, truth, excellence, and beauty; then commonality in negativa law and concurrency in positiva legislation. Everything else just derives from there, just as everything there derives from self-determination and nothing more.

    You think it’s philosophy but it’s just science. That’s why we discovered science. Because we evolved it from our law.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 18:57:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706744882562318336

  • “can we really have opposite-sex friends?”– Short answer: Yes, as long as you a

    –“can we really have opposite-sex friends?”–
    Short answer: Yes, as long as you are both in secure relationships or you’ve been friends for a very long time.

    I’m a Man not a Guy. And I’m career Tech CEO and very minor public intellectual.
    I talk to all sorts of women I’m not at all attracted to or interested in, and would never be. (Although young women today are obviously almost univerally broken – so I avoid them.)
    I do spend business time in public with women. It’s a necessity. Especially employees, salespeople, vendors, customers, activists and almost anyone who wants to speak with me.
    I have generally had executive assistants I spend a lot of time with and value deeply. (Work WIfe).
    I do not spend ‘friendship’ time with women unless in public, and only for coffee, lunch, or dinner.
    I have generally had female friends who provide good advice. Women have a different perspective and I value them.
    I prefer to spend time with a woman I am friends with along with her significant other – and mine. I would never make any man uncomfortable in any way – it would be ‘wrong’.
    I suspect this is because I am gregarious and confident and am totally uninterested in any woman other than the one I’m married or almost married to. 😉
    I used to make use of the girl-gossip network in my companies because the admins know everything and a good relationship with them means they alert you to potential problems. And that provoked some odd suspicion I had more than professional interests.
    Every time its been suggested that I have an interest in a woman in the workplace (or out of it for that matter) it’s been false. And I’ve even taken the heat for a business partner that was ‘enjoying’ one of my assistants.
    It’s very very common for younger women to pursue older successful male execs, and while it’s sometiems flattering it’s largely annoying. 😉 I can’t believe some of the things women have said to me despite knowing I have a long term girlfriend, or am married. Not all women are timid.

    Reply addressees: @datepsych


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 02:55:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706140288639496192

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706132235156418784

  • (NLI Community Love) Why Our Organization Succeeds One of the reasons our organi

    (NLI Community Love)
    Why Our Organization Succeeds

    One of the reasons our organization is so successful at producing work, and working together to produce it – and now, striving at putting it to practice, is that we are all on the hyper-moral end of the spectrum, and we love and respect eachother.

    In fact, I would venture that the people who stay in the organization vs those that move on, all do so partly because of the brotherhood (and sisters) that we’ve developed because we are full of love and moral conviction. Even when the truths we discover are uncomfortable for us (and certainly for others.)

    While we believe we are working to fix the problems facing the broken people, ‘the left and right extremes’, that’s why we don’t really have room in NLI for those broken people, all too often full of justifiable anxiety, frustration, anger and rage, because they can’t get past those feelings enough to abandon retribution instesad of seeking to do the right and moral thing for everyone – including the ‘evil’ folk who in our judgement need parenting and governing, and sometimes court, prosecution and punishment, until they are calm conscious, and moral too.

    Though you know, it’s rather apparent if you do this work for a while, that people often confuse what they percieve as good as moral, when it is very often not. I would say, that’s a normal human universal cognitive bias. It’s part of the normalcy bias.

    But the universe is evolutionary and merciless. The universe, solar system, the planet, and nature are not fair but brutal. And in that universe, life is not fair. But we can, at least try to make make it moral. Meaning we cannot accomplish all wanted goods, but we can with incremental effort, suppress all unwanted bads.

    Despite that many if not most people in pursuit of their presumed good ( really their personal advantage at the lowest cost and risk) will always and eerywhere act immorally at every opportunity that they can get away with.

    So it’s our job to finish the five thousand year work of western civilization in producing ascience of cooperation that we call the law, a constitution embodying it, and economy operating under it, and a society that is as moral as possible, given human abilities and frailties.

    We’ve actually done it. (No Really). And in restrospect, our founders, and their english predecessors, and their germanic predecessors, and their roman and greek predecessors, and thir corded ware predecessors, and thei indo european apreecessors had it far more right than you’d think. And far far more right than all other civilizations combined.

    It’s just coutner intutive.

    It means we all must bear the maximum responsibility for private and common, and create an perpetuate institutions that persist that responsibility – and this what ‘whiteness’ means: individual responsibility. Not individualism. But Individual responsibilty the product of which is the high trust society wa call ‘commons-osm’ instead.

    The natural common concurrent law of cooperation between the sexes classes and nations.

    Hugs

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 18:52:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706018805707632640