Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • TRUTHFUL ARGUMENT WITH FICTIONALISTS “If we are engaging in negotiation or argum

    TRUTHFUL ARGUMENT WITH FICTIONALISTS

    “If we are engaging in negotiation or argument, we want to know if we can cooperate with you. We prefer to cooperate with you only because cooperation in the long term is more rewarding than predation in the short term. The strategy of my people is maneuver: speed in adaptation. As such we practice Heroism, Sovereignty(Reciprocity), Contract, and Testimonial Truth. And because Maneuver using Heroism, Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial truth are the most expensive method of cooperation, it is only in our interest to cooperate with you if you can at least participate in Contract and Testimonial Truth. Otherwise, because of our use of Maneuver, by the high costs of Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial Truth, it is preferable to defeat you, kill or enslave, and take from you that which we cannot obtain by cooperation under contract and testimonial truth, rather than pay the unnecessary cost of your violation of contract, and your use of deceit. And so in negotiation and argument, if you cannot practice full reciprocity of sovereignty, and constrain yourself to that which you can testify to, then you are incapable of contract for reciprocal sovereign cooperation. And as such we need not discourse, only fight. So no, when you call upon your gods, you cannot testify to them because you cannot demonstrate them, only lie about them. While, if I call upon reason, I can demonstrate reason, and demonstrate all that follows from my reason, or I would not enter it into sovereign, reciprocal, discourse, negotiation, and debate. So if you rely upon that which you cannot demonstrate, then you cannot testify to it, and therefore you are incapable of truth, and therefore incapable of contract, and for these reasons we must, given no other choice, fight, defeat, kill or enslave, and take from you what we cannot obtain by cooperation.”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-05 08:43:00 UTC

  • Truthful Argument With Fictionalists

    “If we are engaging in negotiation or argument, we want to know if we can cooperate with you. We prefer to cooperate with you only because cooperation in the long term is more rewarding than predation in the short term. The strategy of my people is maneuver: speed in adaptation. As such we practice Heroism, Sovereignty(Reciprocity), Contract, and Testimonial Truth. And because Maneuver using Heroism, Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial truth are the most expensive method of cooperation, it is only in our interest to cooperate with you if you can at least participate in Contract and Testimonial Truth. Otherwise, because of our use of Maneuver, by the high costs of Sovereignty, Contract, and Testimonial Truth, it is preferable to defeat you, kill or enslave, and take from you that which we cannot obtain by cooperation under contract and testimonial truth, rather than pay the unnecessary cost of your violation of contract, and your use of deceit. And so in negotiation and argument, if you cannot practice full reciprocity of sovereignty, and constrain yourself to that which you can testify to, then you are incapable of contract for reciprocal sovereign cooperation. And as such we need not discourse, only fight. So no, when you call upon your gods, you cannot testify to them because you cannot demonstrate them, only lie about them. While, if I call upon reason, I can demonstrate reason, and demonstrate all that follows from my reason, or I would not enter it into sovereign, reciprocal, discourse, negotiation, and debate. So if you rely upon that which you cannot demonstrate, then you cannot testify to it, and therefore you are incapable of truth, and therefore incapable of contract, and for these reasons we must, given no other choice, fight, defeat, kill or enslave, and take from you what we cannot obtain by cooperation.”

  • Natural Law on Gender

    NATURAL LAW ON GENDER Whereas There exist but two genders. Male and Female. These genders are compatible. Both genders provide necessary reciprocity to one another in the production of family and offspring.  Both genders develop traits for each gender, and each gender divides the labor of transcendence with different traits, but with greater or lesser intensity of either. Individuals are born with determining genitalia and genetics. Individuals are born with in utero successes and in utero failures. Individuals mature with developmental successes and developmental failures. Individuals develop psychological successes and failures, primarily due to insufficient training by socialization, shocks or trauma that disrupt the psychological training. Whereas Defects of birth that cannot be changed or that individuals desire to preserve, must be either tolerated or not. Defects of development must be tolerated or not. But defects of training of one’s psychology need not be tolerated. And the export of the costs of one’s defects in utero, development, or training may not be imposed by any means onto the body of the people for whom the transcendence of man by the transcendence of their family is of necessity, and the accommodation and tolerance of failures in that transcendence a cost they may choose to bear or not. As such homosexuality may not be punished, nor accommodated. And all other deviations of gender need not be tolerated if they are perceivable in the commons. And deviations that threaten the young or less able, need be cured or the individual terminated. Therefore The Natural Law recognizes only two genders male and female, defects of birth, defects of training, and defects of choice. And therefore no imposition shall be forced upon those with defects other than that of birth defect, fraud of weights and measures,  or imposition of costs upon the commons. Therefore All public word, deed, and display shall conform to one’s gender such that none impose his defects upon others in the commons. And none shall impose upon private word, deed and display, unless it imposes costs upon those external to the voluntary exchange of word, deed, and display.CounselKnowledge of a thing’s existence is not the same as sense of its existence. It is only sense and cost of existence that the Law prohibits.

  • Natural Law on Gender

    NATURAL LAW ON GENDER Whereas There exist but two genders. Male and Female. These genders are compatible. Both genders provide necessary reciprocity to one another in the production of family and offspring.  Both genders develop traits for each gender, and each gender divides the labor of transcendence with different traits, but with greater or lesser intensity of either. Individuals are born with determining genitalia and genetics. Individuals are born with in utero successes and in utero failures. Individuals mature with developmental successes and developmental failures. Individuals develop psychological successes and failures, primarily due to insufficient training by socialization, shocks or trauma that disrupt the psychological training. Whereas Defects of birth that cannot be changed or that individuals desire to preserve, must be either tolerated or not. Defects of development must be tolerated or not. But defects of training of one’s psychology need not be tolerated. And the export of the costs of one’s defects in utero, development, or training may not be imposed by any means onto the body of the people for whom the transcendence of man by the transcendence of their family is of necessity, and the accommodation and tolerance of failures in that transcendence a cost they may choose to bear or not. As such homosexuality may not be punished, nor accommodated. And all other deviations of gender need not be tolerated if they are perceivable in the commons. And deviations that threaten the young or less able, need be cured or the individual terminated. Therefore The Natural Law recognizes only two genders male and female, defects of birth, defects of training, and defects of choice. And therefore no imposition shall be forced upon those with defects other than that of birth defect, fraud of weights and measures,  or imposition of costs upon the commons. Therefore All public word, deed, and display shall conform to one’s gender such that none impose his defects upon others in the commons. And none shall impose upon private word, deed and display, unless it imposes costs upon those external to the voluntary exchange of word, deed, and display.CounselKnowledge of a thing’s existence is not the same as sense of its existence. It is only sense and cost of existence that the Law prohibits.

  • Do Americans Let Strangers Enter All Their Rooms At Home?

    Let me help you with something very important.

    Germanic peoples, meaning English and German speaking, are very ‘high trust’ cultures. That means you can leave your car unlocked, your door unlocked, let people walk around your house, and leave valuables lying around and no, people won’t touch them. We have many shops that leave merchandise outside overnight and no one steals it. This is not true in our ‘cities’ (immigrant cities) but it is true many other places.

    That’s why western civilization is ‘special’. It took us a very long time to build a high trust society.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-Americans-let-strangers-enter-all-their-rooms-at-home

  • Do Americans Let Strangers Enter All Their Rooms At Home?

    Let me help you with something very important.

    Germanic peoples, meaning English and German speaking, are very ‘high trust’ cultures. That means you can leave your car unlocked, your door unlocked, let people walk around your house, and leave valuables lying around and no, people won’t touch them. We have many shops that leave merchandise outside overnight and no one steals it. This is not true in our ‘cities’ (immigrant cities) but it is true many other places.

    That’s why western civilization is ‘special’. It took us a very long time to build a high trust society.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-Americans-let-strangers-enter-all-their-rooms-at-home

  • Why Can’t The Us Just Obliterate The Likes Of China And Russia?

    Because we are Europeans. We are the world’s Aristocracy. We invented aristocracy. We are also, unfortunately, Christians. Meaning we play ‘extremely forgiving tit for tat’. And so we don’t do that. We civilize people instead. It’s just more profitable.

    Look. when the Great Khan was to decimate China, his advisors told him how much money he could make by taxing them rather than just robbing and killing them.

    If you’re a westerner, with the only high trust civilization on earth, making customers is simply more profitable than killing them. 3500 years ago the Indo Europeans and conquered pretty much everything from the atlantic to the source of the Yellow River, and from the arctic circle to Egypt, with the Iranians dominating the warm climates and the europeans dominating the cooler climates.

    It’s just profitable to rule.

    It’s also really hard to profit from rule when almost everyone on earth is dead and the people who are left want to kill you.

    The real question is why the west and the russians don’t get together and kill everyone else and just enjoy the rest of history together.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-cant-the-US-just-obliterate-the-likes-of-China-and-Russia

  • THE LIMIT TO CHRISTIAN ETHIC: A CALCULATION PROBLEM (I love this because it illu

    THE LIMIT TO CHRISTIAN ETHIC: A CALCULATION PROBLEM

    (I love this because it illustrates the need for limits of any theory)

    by William Butchman

    The beneficial strategy of Christianity is its attempt to increase the size of the cooperative in-group, which has obvious positive outcomes.

    The problem is that the larger the group, the more calculation problems we get in trying to determine reciprocity, which is why there is a genetic (ethnic) limit: within a certain genetic distance it seems that we can manage it.

    I see that as part of the problem for Christianity: articulating the boundaries to in-group cohesion.

    There has to be a boundary, so maybe there was a gain by pushing it from clan > tribe > nation.

    But then there are limited returns beyond nation, although I think there is a racial interest to defend.

    —

    Curt: this is one of the most articulate expressions I’ve heard. “it’s a calculation problem”, and exceeding the limits of the theory invalidates the theory.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-29 09:43:00 UTC

  • Is There Such A Thing As “race”?

    People all over the world, in every aspect of lives demonstrate kin selection over non kin.

    In marriage, in reproduction, in friendships, in workplaces, in neighborhoods, in political parties.

    As far as I know the topic of “Racism” is just another means of rebelling against the aristocracy in a global order, as was rebelling against the landed nobility in the national order.

    It’s total nonsense. People are racist in every aspect of life.

    The difference is, that in the consumer market place, our money is all green, and in the court of law justice is blind.

    So, in the end, unless you want to steal from another ‘tribe’ that’s all that matters.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-there-such-a-thing-as-race-1

  • Lets reverse it: if women weren’t ‘crazy’ so to speak, they wouldn’t tolerate th

    Lets reverse it: if women weren’t ‘crazy’ so to speak, they wouldn’t tolerate the cost of such expensive offspring for such extended periods of time. Women evolved to work together to raise generations, and even then, half of their offspring died before the first cycle of maturity (age seven), and half of those before maturity. Women feel a sense of emotional ‘panic’ much earlier. Because children die so much more easily than adults. And men feel a sense of emotional panic so much less easily, because we are, frankly, by comparison, except for our top 1/3, relatively expendable.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-27 23:02:00 UTC