Theme: Cooperation
-
Consensus Produces Monopolies And Monopolies Fail To Serve Market Demands
(important) We all need mindfulness in a method available to us. We all need a strategy using methods and resources available to us. We all need myths(narratives), ideologies (propaganda), philosophies(methods of reasoning), and sciences(methods of measurements) with which to decide how to act to pursue that strategy. The reason being we marginally indifferent enough to communicate within limits and cooperate within limits. But we are marginally different in our genetic, social, economic, physical, intellectual, and emotional abilities. Different enough to require different mindfulness, strategies, and means of surviving, prospering, and enjoying. So we are left with the problem of cooperating on means, despite different ends, and despite different genetic, social, economic, physical intellectual, and emotional abilities. And the only way to do so is markets of voluntary reciprocity at every scale from association to production to reproduction to commons to polities to nations. And the only way to facilitate that is multiple economies slave(prisoner), serf(laborer), freeman(craftsman), citizen(managerial), sovereign(executive). Because the slave needs direction, the serf security, the craftsman opportunity, the citizen liberty, and the sovereign institutions. And our folly has been the post enlightenment effort to produce a monopoly economy instead of a monopoly rule of law and a market for economies given the various needs and abilities. We instinctually pursue consensus and numbers beyond the scale of their utility the same way we extend our perception of ethics, economics, and physics beyond the scale of human perception, and to the point of their failure. The maximum value of consensus is the law of reciprocity. Beyond that the maximum value of any given consensus is that which can be achieved by reciprocity. This is the lesson of the past two centuries. Tripartism was a western practice because like all else in western civilization it was an empirical observation of existential reality – not a comforting lie. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine. -
1 – Reciprocity is an evolutionary necessity for any species that is capable of
1 – Reciprocity is an evolutionary necessity for any species that is capable of voluntary cooperation. 2 – The test of reciprocity is prior investment (cost/expenditure) 3 – Reciprocity is decidable independent of preference. 4 – Local allocations of decidability over property (investments) evolved to preserve reciprocity and prevent retaliation cycles. 5 – The principle determinants of property allocations are marriage and inheritance structures, which in turn are dependent upon agrarian, pastoral demands, and hunter gatherer phases. 6 – The six moral intuitions can be divided into defense of private investment, and defense of commons. 7 – Male and Female brain structures and reproductive strategies, and moral biases vary (predictably), producing the demonstrated distributions that exist everywhere. -
1 – Reciprocity is an evolutionary necessity for any species that is capable of
1 – Reciprocity is an evolutionary necessity for any species that is capable of voluntary cooperation. 2 – The test of reciprocity is prior investment (cost/expenditure) 3 – Reciprocity is decidable independent of preference. 4 – Local allocations of decidability over property (investments) evolved to preserve reciprocity and prevent retaliation cycles. 5 – The principle determinants of property allocations are marriage and inheritance structures, which in turn are dependent upon agrarian, pastoral demands, and hunter gatherer phases. 6 – The six moral intuitions can be divided into defense of private investment, and defense of commons. 7 – Male and Female brain structures and reproductive strategies, and moral biases vary (predictably), producing the demonstrated distributions that exist everywhere. -
1 – Reciprocity is an evolutionary necessity for any species that is capable of
1 – Reciprocity is an evolutionary necessity for any species that is capable of voluntary cooperation.
2 – The test of reciprocity is prior investment (cost/expenditure)
3 – Reciprocity is decidable independent of preference.
4 – Local allocations of decidability over property (investments) evolved to preserve reciprocity and prevent retaliation cycles.
5 – The principle determinants of property allocations are marriage and inheritance structures, which in turn are dependent upon agrarian, pastoral demands, and hunter gatherer phases.
6 – The six moral intuitions can be divided into defense of private investment, and defense of commons.
7 – Male and Female brain structures and reproductive strategies, and moral biases vary (predictably), producing the demonstrated distributions that exist everywhere.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-03 18:27:00 UTC
-
Cooperation < Non-cooperation < Predation
COOPERATION < NON-COOPERATION < PREDATION Cooperation is only valuable if it is more valuable than non cooperation. Non cooperation is only valuable if it is more valuable than predation. If cooperation is no longer valuable then non-cooperation must be possible. If the state or some other organization prohibits non-cooperation, then predation is preferable to forced interaction, and forced cooperation. After all. That is what slavery means. -
Cooperation < Non-cooperation < Predation
COOPERATION < NON-COOPERATION < PREDATION Cooperation is only valuable if it is more valuable than non cooperation. Non cooperation is only valuable if it is more valuable than predation. If cooperation is no longer valuable then non-cooperation must be possible. If the state or some other organization prohibits non-cooperation, then predation is preferable to forced interaction, and forced cooperation. After all. That is what slavery means. -
COOPERATION < NON-COOPERATION < PREDATION Cooperation is only valuable if it is
COOPERATION < NON-COOPERATION < PREDATION
Cooperation is only valuable if it is more valuable than non cooperation. Non cooperation is only valuable if it is more valuable than predation. If cooperation is no longer valuable then non-cooperation must be possible. If the state or some other organization prohibits non-cooperation, then predation is preferable to forced interaction, and forced cooperation.
After all. That is what slavery means.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-29 13:00:00 UTC
-
The Origins Of Extension Of Kinship Love To Non-Kin: Militia.
In English, the word ‘brother’ in military context, is a ‘term of art’, meaning that one will remain loyal under duress. (See Shakespeare). In other words, you can trust one another to ‘cover your ass’ on the battlefield. We often claim that this extension of kinship ‘love’ to non-kin has it’s origins in Christianity. But it was the first principle of the initiatic brotherhood of warriors from which all monotheistic religions evolved. So no, the extension of kinship love was dominant in militial prehistoric, and pre-christian europe, and the christianization of it as a means of rebellion against aristocracy by resistance using submission, was merely an attempt to replace the heroism and loyalty of Achilles and his tragedy, with the submission of jesus and his tragedy. The universe is a very simple place. Humans are simple creatures. Our problem is not so much in discovering new truths, but in discarding old lies. -
The Origins Of Extension Of Kinship Love To Non-Kin: Militia.
In English, the word ‘brother’ in military context, is a ‘term of art’, meaning that one will remain loyal under duress. (See Shakespeare). In other words, you can trust one another to ‘cover your ass’ on the battlefield. We often claim that this extension of kinship ‘love’ to non-kin has it’s origins in Christianity. But it was the first principle of the initiatic brotherhood of warriors from which all monotheistic religions evolved. So no, the extension of kinship love was dominant in militial prehistoric, and pre-christian europe, and the christianization of it as a means of rebellion against aristocracy by resistance using submission, was merely an attempt to replace the heroism and loyalty of Achilles and his tragedy, with the submission of jesus and his tragedy. The universe is a very simple place. Humans are simple creatures. Our problem is not so much in discovering new truths, but in discarding old lies. -
THE ORIGINS OF EXTENSION OF KINSHIP LOVE TO NON-KIN: MILITIA. In English, the wo
THE ORIGINS OF EXTENSION OF KINSHIP LOVE TO NON-KIN: MILITIA.
In English, the word ‘brother’ in military context, is a ‘term of art’, meaning that one will remain loyal under duress. (See Shakespeare). In other words, you can trust one another to ‘cover your ass’ on the battlefield. We often claim that this extension of kinship ‘love’ to non-kin has it’s origins in Christianity. But it was the first principle of the initiatic brotherhood of warriors from which all monotheistic religions evolved. So no, the extension of kinship love was dominant in militial prehistoric, and pre-christian europe, and the christianization of it as a means of rebellion against aristocracy by resistance using submission, was merely an attempt to replace the heroism and loyalty of Achilles and his tragedy, with the submission of jesus and his tragedy.
The universe is a very simple place. Humans are simple creatures. Our problem is not so much in discovering new truths, but in discarding old lies.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-28 10:55:00 UTC