Theme: Cooperation
-
The question is, how does one know one is poor except by relative differences in
The question is, how does one know one is poor except by relative differences in inventory and consumption? Poverty is the natural condition of man. Property and mutual insurance of it, lift us out of poverty. THE ORIGIN OF THE CONCEPT ‘POOR’ “poor’ evolved from pre-Latin *pau-paros “producing little; getting little,” a compound from the roots of paucus “little” (from PIE root *pau- (1) “few, little”) and parare “to produce, bring forth” (from PIE root *pere-(1) “to produce, procure”). In other words, the original meaning of poor in proto indo european (well before the invention of money or money substitutes) was ‘one who produces very little.” And this remains the cause of poverty. One who produces very little and therefore consumes very little. The evolution of money requires the production of surpluses that cannot be consumed and can (must) be traded across production groups in order to obtain that which is not self produced. Barter-price (cattle, chicken, lambs, etc) can function for certain transactions, if those items can serve as a store value (they do). But money must be portable, have a high weight/volume to value (time savings), be unitary measure and divisible, and universally (within the trade network) liquid (in demand). -
What we can learn from Economics, Weber, Pareto, Fukuyama, Macdonald and myself,
What we can learn from Economics, Weber, Pareto, Fukuyama, Macdonald and myself, is that without explaining the competition we live under we merely justify (make excuses) and moralize. When in fact all groups compete by genetic, normative, institutional, and cultural means.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:35:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973704246402088960
Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDonald (admittedly) merely suggested it was genetic, I’ve addressed how it is both genetic, cultural, and a particular verbal technology this time using pseudoscience rather than theology or pilpul.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDonald (admittedly) merely suggested it was genetic, I’ve addressed how it is both genetic, cultural, and a particular verbal technology this time using pseudoscience rather than theology or pilpul.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968
-
4 – Haidt’s work is perhaps best because it tests for virtue signals as positive
4 – Haidt’s work is perhaps best because it tests for virtue signals as positives not against them.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 17:48:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973616869109305344
Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973613656192704512
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973613656192704512
-
3 – So people’s reactions are a test of pedomorphism and kin selection that is l
3 – So people’s reactions are a test of pedomorphism and kin selection that is logical, rational, and acting otherwise would be irrational, because all cooperation comes at an opportunity cost. And we are excellent masters of physical, emotional, mental, and cooperative costs.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 17:47:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973616606952730624
Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973613656192704512
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973613656192704512
-
2 – People’s demonstrated reactions to faces show bias for pedomorphic(neotonic,
2 – People’s demonstrated reactions to faces show bias for pedomorphic(neotonic, or domesticated) traits and kin selection. We can graph these reactions pretty easily via remote observation. (I did it in college with video cameras). We estimate probability of cooperation well..
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 17:45:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973616089233084418
Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973613656192704512
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973613656192704512
-
@jordanbpeterson Man is not moral,or immoral,but amoral and rational. It’s just
@jordanbpeterson Man is not moral,or immoral,but amoral and rational. It’s just that cooperation when at least marginally reciprocal produces such outsized returns(logarithmic) that it’s nearly always preferable to act reciprocally(moral). We’re self domesticating superpredators.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 17:11:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973607418084122624
-
10 – for the simple reason that it is status signals in support of that group ev
10 – for the simple reason that it is status signals in support of that group evolutionary strategy that each group member seeks to persist – particularly among intellectuals (who have nothing else to offer) vs military and commercial who rely far less on such narratives.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-12 12:09:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973169180320108544
Reply addressees: @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972432694675058688
IN REPLY TO:
@nathancofnas
My analysis of Kevin MacDonald’s pseudoscience: https://t.co/eRfp6B8g0e
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972432694675058688
-
MEN FORM TRIBES. CHICKS FORM UNIVERSALS. BETAS FOLLOW CHICKS. Conflicting tribes
MEN FORM TRIBES.
CHICKS FORM UNIVERSALS.
BETAS FOLLOW CHICKS.
Conflicting tribes is a GOOD THING.
Encourage your brothers to advocate for their tribe.
Humor them.
That is how you handle it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-11 13:12:00 UTC
-
Men Form Tribes. Chicks Form Universals. Betas Follow Chicks.
Conflicting tribes is a GOOD THING. Encourage your brothers to advocate for their tribe. Humor them. That is how you handle it. -
Men Form Tribes. Chicks Form Universals. Betas Follow Chicks.
Conflicting tribes is a GOOD THING. Encourage your brothers to advocate for their tribe. Humor them. That is how you handle it.