Curt Doolittle

Theme: Cooperation

  • KEY TO UNDERSTANDING PROPERTARIANISM by Luke Weinhagen Understanding this: —-“

    KEY TO UNDERSTANDING PROPERTARIANISM

    by Luke Weinhagen

    Understanding this:

    —-“There exist only three possible relations (avoidance, cooperation, conflict).”—-

    … and developing the skill to accurately identify these categories, makes everything Propertarianism is exploring understandable and in context.

    Where I’ve had misses in comprehension has consistently been where I’ve mis-categorized one or more of those three as another in whatever relation is being explored.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 13:28:00 UTC

  • THERE EXIST NO RIGHTS Rights do not exist between peoples. Power exists. Rights

    THERE EXIST NO RIGHTS

    Rights do not exist between peoples. Power exists. Rights are exchanged between kin for the purpose of cooperation in the pursuit of wealth and power. Everything else is just religious wishful thinking – the kind of thinking that makes people poor.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 12:30:00 UTC

  • Pareto Principle At Work (Power Law)

    THE PARETO PRINCIPLE AT WORK (A POWER LAW) by Noah J Revoy The worst 20% of the group creates 80% of the negative externalities. The worst 20% of that subgroup causes 80% of that groups negative externalities. Another way to say that is: Out of a population of 326 million people living in USA, 13 million (4%) create 64% of the harmful externalities. The best 20% of the group creates 80% of the positive externalities. The best 20% of that subgroup causes 80% of that groups positive externalities. Another way to say that is: Out of a population of 326 million people living in the USA, 13 million (4%) create 64% of the beneficial externalities. THe people at the bottom aren’t just unproductive, they’re harmful.

  • Pareto Principle At Work (Power Law)

    THE PARETO PRINCIPLE AT WORK (A POWER LAW) by Noah J Revoy The worst 20% of the group creates 80% of the negative externalities. The worst 20% of that subgroup causes 80% of that groups negative externalities. Another way to say that is: Out of a population of 326 million people living in USA, 13 million (4%) create 64% of the harmful externalities. The best 20% of the group creates 80% of the positive externalities. The best 20% of that subgroup causes 80% of that groups positive externalities. Another way to say that is: Out of a population of 326 million people living in the USA, 13 million (4%) create 64% of the beneficial externalities. THe people at the bottom aren’t just unproductive, they’re harmful.

  • Power Exists, Not Rights. Rights Must Be Exchanged And Enforced With Power.

    THERE EXIST NO RIGHTS Rights do not exist between peoples. Power exists. Rights are exchanged between kin for the purpose of cooperation in the pursuit of wealth and power. Everything else is just religious wishful thinking – the kind of thinking that makes people poor.

  • Power Exists, Not Rights. Rights Must Be Exchanged And Enforced With Power.

    THERE EXIST NO RIGHTS Rights do not exist between peoples. Power exists. Rights are exchanged between kin for the purpose of cooperation in the pursuit of wealth and power. Everything else is just religious wishful thinking – the kind of thinking that makes people poor.

  • (archived for others) PATERNALISM (ARYANISM) WILL HELP YOU LOVE PEOPLE AGAIN —

    (archived for others)

    PATERNALISM (ARYANISM) WILL HELP YOU LOVE PEOPLE AGAIN

    —“The more I learn, and ‘see’ what I learn in people and in the world, I can feel arising in me a tendency to just see most other people as non self aware, selfish actors who simply act (almost deterministically) according to their incentives, within the scope that they can understand…. which usually isn’t very large. On one hand this gives a certain amount of peace, but on the other is the temptation to simply feel atomised and a bit apathetic. Is it possible to love people and love the world despite losing so many illusions about them? And if so, how would you suggest cultivating more of that emotional state?”—Rob McMullan

    Well, this is what I hope ‘the precious few’ achieve: the understanding that propertarianism is as revolutionary as was empiricism, and that it’s not that we CAN’t have relatively free will but that we DON’T have relatively free will, because we are just negotiating machines on behalf of our genes using incentives.

    So, where you say ‘pathetic’ I”ll use the term “dehumanizing” which is how the christian world reacted against the findings of science, and in particular heliocentrism and darwinism.

    But once you ‘adapt’ to your new understanding, you will love people like I do, and like generals love their soldiers, like kings love their people, and mothers love their children.

    The miracle of it all is that IT WORKS. I mean, we actually manage to evolve and live together and drag ourselves into godhood despite being nearly automatons in doing so.

    It’s wondrous!!!

    I found I had an amazing sense of power (mindfulness), and i suspect otehrs do too. the problem is you can’t go around and change the world with the knowledge all that easily. It’s got to ‘grow’ in influence.

    Hence why I”m so concerned not with people agreeing, but with using force to impose the law, from which they will learn by environmental pressure and incentives rather than exposition and understanding.

    Once you return to being an Aryan, and seeing mankind as children and us as gods, you will just love them. It’s the christian falsehood of equality that deprives you of the option of paternalism and love for fellow man.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 11:44:00 UTC

  • Forms of Decidability (government) at Different Scales

    Capitalism should be applied to strangers on a macro scale. (Market Relations) Socialism should be applied on normative organizational scale. (Normative Relations) Communalism should be applied with “family” on a micro scale. (Kin Relations) And Fascism should be applied to all in times of war. (Because only those methods of decision are available at each scale.) Pure capitalists get it wrong because they betray their immediate in-groups. Pure communists get it wrong because one in-group is impossible, and force others to betray in-groups. (original version by Justin Odiogn) Apr 19, 2018 8:49am

  • Forms of Decidability (government) at Different Scales

    Capitalism should be applied to strangers on a macro scale. (Market Relations) Socialism should be applied on normative organizational scale. (Normative Relations) Communalism should be applied with “family” on a micro scale. (Kin Relations) And Fascism should be applied to all in times of war. (Because only those methods of decision are available at each scale.) Pure capitalists get it wrong because they betray their immediate in-groups. Pure communists get it wrong because one in-group is impossible, and force others to betray in-groups. (original version by Justin Odiogn) Apr 19, 2018 8:49am

  • IT BEGINS WITH THE OATH Oath(Contract) > Reciprocity > Sovereignty > Natural Law

    IT BEGINS WITH THE OATH

    Oath(Contract) > Reciprocity > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Violence > Markets > Non Parasitic Order.

    You must make an oath to produce reciprocity; if you produce reciprocity you will as a consequence produce sovereignty; if you produce sovereignty, decisions are only decidable by natural law, and only enforceable by violence – the sum total of which results in markets, and because of markets, the result is a non-parasitic order.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 10:37:00 UTC