Theme: Cooperation

  • Man Is Amoral

    Man is wired (evolved) to know what is in his interests, what will cause retaliation, and what will purchase options on future cooperation, and that he must punish cheaters(defectors). It’s just in our interests, increasingly, to act morally, because of the returns on moral cooperation, but if you look at history and if you look at the total absence outside of western civilizatino of high trust other than perhaps japane (which sacrifices truth for it), then the answer is just the opposite. If I accomplish anything I hope to eradictate is christian/rousseauian/feminine fantasy that man is wired for morality. Man evolved to be eminently practical: the act predatorially, parasiticlaly, reciproccally, and to invest, as opportunity presents itself. We are just an extension of the laws of physics, and our only difference is the ability to use memory to keep accounting of whether we’re gaining or losing over time in an environment of possible cooperation.

  • Man Is Amoral

    Man is wired (evolved) to know what is in his interests, what will cause retaliation, and what will purchase options on future cooperation, and that he must punish cheaters(defectors). It’s just in our interests, increasingly, to act morally, because of the returns on moral cooperation, but if you look at history and if you look at the total absence outside of western civilizatino of high trust other than perhaps japane (which sacrifices truth for it), then the answer is just the opposite. If I accomplish anything I hope to eradictate is christian/rousseauian/feminine fantasy that man is wired for morality. Man evolved to be eminently practical: the act predatorially, parasiticlaly, reciproccally, and to invest, as opportunity presents itself. We are just an extension of the laws of physics, and our only difference is the ability to use memory to keep accounting of whether we’re gaining or losing over time in an environment of possible cooperation.

  • The Reason Most People Are Confused Is Simply a Failure to Speak in Operational Grammar,

    RECIPROCITY 1) Acting Reciprocally is necessary for cooperation to survive in any life form (or post-life for that matter). All life forms that do not practice reciprocity must go extinct, because consumption (use of resources) is not calculable. TRAINING 2) Tit for tat, and exhaustive tit for tat, are strategies to train for preserving reciprocity. (an investment) However, they require memory. Hence why it’s only possible for creatures with memory. MORALITY 3) Morality is the name for the value judgement we assign to reciprocity. ( a value judgement). Actions are moral, amoral, or immoral, if they are reciprocal, fully internal, or irreciprocal. MORAL NORMS 4) Moral Rules (moral norms) are those surviving habits of reciprocity in any social order. ETHICAL, MORAL, AUTISTIC 5) Ethics refers to conditions of the interpersonal (non-anonymous but informationally asymmetric), and Morals refers to conditions of the extra personal (anonymous and informationally asymmetric). Technically actions that are neither interpersonal nor anonymous (affecting only the self) are “Autistic”. — is = exists as. If you think you know what you’re talking about don’t use is, are, was, were, etc. It will demonstrate whether you do or not if you can manage to make a complete and grammatically correct statement without the ‘fudge’ words (verb to be) that mean everything deducible from your statement (premise) is false. I’m very careful with it. is/are=exists as. The reason most people are confused is simply a failure to speak in operational (correct) grammar, while trying to make arguments requiring infungible premises. Every moron who argues with me (present company not included) will jump on teh autistic bandwagon not realizing that if they cannot speak precisely and operationally they are either hand waving to cover their reliance on intuition rather than argument, or engaging in rationalism (justification) which is the intellectual cancer Kant imposed upon our poor european cousins.

  • The Reason Most People Are Confused Is Simply a Failure to Speak in Operational Grammar,

    RECIPROCITY 1) Acting Reciprocally is necessary for cooperation to survive in any life form (or post-life for that matter). All life forms that do not practice reciprocity must go extinct, because consumption (use of resources) is not calculable. TRAINING 2) Tit for tat, and exhaustive tit for tat, are strategies to train for preserving reciprocity. (an investment) However, they require memory. Hence why it’s only possible for creatures with memory. MORALITY 3) Morality is the name for the value judgement we assign to reciprocity. ( a value judgement). Actions are moral, amoral, or immoral, if they are reciprocal, fully internal, or irreciprocal. MORAL NORMS 4) Moral Rules (moral norms) are those surviving habits of reciprocity in any social order. ETHICAL, MORAL, AUTISTIC 5) Ethics refers to conditions of the interpersonal (non-anonymous but informationally asymmetric), and Morals refers to conditions of the extra personal (anonymous and informationally asymmetric). Technically actions that are neither interpersonal nor anonymous (affecting only the self) are “Autistic”. — is = exists as. If you think you know what you’re talking about don’t use is, are, was, were, etc. It will demonstrate whether you do or not if you can manage to make a complete and grammatically correct statement without the ‘fudge’ words (verb to be) that mean everything deducible from your statement (premise) is false. I’m very careful with it. is/are=exists as. The reason most people are confused is simply a failure to speak in operational (correct) grammar, while trying to make arguments requiring infungible premises. Every moron who argues with me (present company not included) will jump on teh autistic bandwagon not realizing that if they cannot speak precisely and operationally they are either hand waving to cover their reliance on intuition rather than argument, or engaging in rationalism (justification) which is the intellectual cancer Kant imposed upon our poor european cousins.

  • RECIPROCITY 1) Acting Reciprocally is necessary for cooperation to survive in an

    RECIPROCITY

    1) Acting Reciprocally is necessary for cooperation to survive in any life form (or post-life for that matter). All life forms that do not practice reciprocity must go extinct, because consumption (use of resources) is not calculable.

    TRAINING

    2) Tit for tat, and exhaustive tit for tat, are strategies to train for preserving reciprocity. (an investment) However, they require memory. Hence why it’s only possible for creatures with memory.

    MORALITY

    3) Morality is the name for the value judgement we assign to reciprocity. ( a value judgement). Actions are moral, amoral, or immoral, if they are reciprocal, fully internal, or irreciprocal.

    MORAL NORMS

    4) Moral Rules (moral norms) are those surviving habits of reciprocity in any social order.

    ETHICAL, MORAL, AUTISTIC

    5) Ethics refers to conditions of the interpersonal (non-anonymous but informationally asymmetric), and Morals refers to conditions of the extra personal (anonymous and informationally asymmetric). Technically actions that are neither interpersonal nor anonymous (affecting only the self) are “Autistic”.



    is = exists as. If you think you know what you’re talking about don’t use is, are, was, were, etc. It will demonstrate whether you do or not if you can manage to make a complete and grammatically correct statement without the ‘fudge’ words (verb to be) that mean everything deducible from your statement (premise) is false. I’m very careful with it. is/are=exists as.

    The reason most people are confused is simply a failure to speak in operational (correct) grammar, while trying to make arguments requiring infungible premises.

    Every moron who argues with me (present company not included) will jump on teh autistic bandwagon not realizing that if they cannot speak precisely and operationally they are either hand waving to cover their reliance on intuition rather than argument, or engaging in rationalism (justification) which is the intellectual cancer Kant imposed upon our poor european cousins.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 16:19:00 UTC

  • MAN IS AMORAL Man is wired (evolved) to know what is in his interests, what will

    MAN IS AMORAL

    Man is wired (evolved) to know what is in his interests, what will cause retaliation, and what will purchase options on future cooperation, and that he must punish cheaters(defectors).

    It’s just in our interests, increasingly, to act morally, because of the returns on moral cooperation, but if you look at history and if you look at the total absence outside of western civilizatino of high trust other than perhaps japane (which sacrifices truth for it), then the answer is just the opposite.

    If I accomplish anything I hope to eradictate is christian/rousseauian/feminine fantasy that man is wired for morality.

    Man evolved to be eminently practical: the act predatorially, parasiticlaly, reciproccally, and to invest, as opportunity presents itself.

    We are just an extension of the laws of physics, and our only difference is the ability to use memory to keep accounting of whether we’re gaining or losing over time in an environment of possible cooperation.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-05 17:06:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM. HOW WE ALL GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. by Richard Nikoley

    PROPERTARIANISM. HOW WE ALL GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR.
    by Richard Nikoley. He covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy. http://freetheanimal.com/2018/05/synchronicity-libertarians-conservatives.html


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 23:17:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992181278693904384

  • HOW WE ALL GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. by Richard Nikoley. He covers the i

    https://t.co/qHavlgG4CjPROPERTARIANISM. HOW WE ALL GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR.

    by Richard Nikoley. He covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy. https://t.co/qHavlgG4Cj


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 19:17:00 UTC

  • HOW WE ALL GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. by Richard Nikoley. He covers the i

    https://t.co/qHavlgG4CjPROPERTARIANISM. HOW WE ALL GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR.

    by Richard Nikoley. He covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 19:17:00 UTC

  • WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT. Richard Nikoley Covers th

    http://freetheanimal.com/2018/05/synchronicity-libertarians-conservatives.htmlHOW WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT.

    Richard Nikoley Covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 18:57:00 UTC