September 18th, 2018 12:20 PM
[H]appily married masculine men and feminine women are not the problem. They embrace the compromise of exchange. It’s the people who want outsized returns in the short term whether male or female that seek parasitism by circumvention of the compromise of exchange.
September 18th, 2018 12:18 PM IS THERE A PLACE FOR THE LEFT?
—“Under your natural law, Is there a place for the left?”—
[T]here is a place for EXCHANGE between anyone, but predation and parasitism by no one. It’s not true that left wingers invent more than right. It’s true that leftists and rightists innovate in different areas: left consumption and release of normative constraint vs right order and release of existential constraints. I mean, I have absurd orderliness, and I still was voted most likely to succeed as a practicing artist by the faculty two years in a row. creativity occurs across the spectrum, but it’s creativity in WHAT? There is a place for everyone, there is just no place for parasitism and the left innovates means of parasitism and consumption to obtain its freedom from the right, and the right innovations suppression of parasitism and consumption in order to obtain its freedom from the left. The left and the feminine mind it evolved from cannot compete so it engages in rents, parasitism and predation to obtain what they see as proportionality independent of merit, and what we see as proportionality by merit. They have lower agency. They are not fully human. And this is why we must separate if possible, so that we can continue to speciate by proportionality: whether equalitarian and irreciprocal, or meritocratic and reciprocal. REVOLT, SEPARATE, PROSPER, SPECIATE. They will devolve and we will evolve and leave them behind.
September 18th, 2018 12:18 PM IS THERE A PLACE FOR THE LEFT?
—“Under your natural law, Is there a place for the left?”—
[T]here is a place for EXCHANGE between anyone, but predation and parasitism by no one. It’s not true that left wingers invent more than right. It’s true that leftists and rightists innovate in different areas: left consumption and release of normative constraint vs right order and release of existential constraints. I mean, I have absurd orderliness, and I still was voted most likely to succeed as a practicing artist by the faculty two years in a row. creativity occurs across the spectrum, but it’s creativity in WHAT? There is a place for everyone, there is just no place for parasitism and the left innovates means of parasitism and consumption to obtain its freedom from the right, and the right innovations suppression of parasitism and consumption in order to obtain its freedom from the left. The left and the feminine mind it evolved from cannot compete so it engages in rents, parasitism and predation to obtain what they see as proportionality independent of merit, and what we see as proportionality by merit. They have lower agency. They are not fully human. And this is why we must separate if possible, so that we can continue to speciate by proportionality: whether equalitarian and irreciprocal, or meritocratic and reciprocal. REVOLT, SEPARATE, PROSPER, SPECIATE. They will devolve and we will evolve and leave them behind.
September 18th, 2018 9:46 AM SUMMERS ON THE CANCER OF RUNAWAY R-EXPRESSION
—“Society is yet another biome – an ecosystem. Even vultures have an important role to play. It’s when the /r tries to replace (or successfully overruns) the apex /K that we get system imbalance and social cancer.”—Anne Summers
[I] hadn’t thought of that analogy but yes, cancer is uncontrolled hyper consumption growth that breaks the balance between cells and the host. So yes, r overringing K is simply the sociological expression of cancer by behavioral information rather than genetic information.
September 18th, 2018 9:46 AM SUMMERS ON THE CANCER OF RUNAWAY R-EXPRESSION
—“Society is yet another biome – an ecosystem. Even vultures have an important role to play. It’s when the /r tries to replace (or successfully overruns) the apex /K that we get system imbalance and social cancer.”—Anne Summers
[I] hadn’t thought of that analogy but yes, cancer is uncontrolled hyper consumption growth that breaks the balance between cells and the host. So yes, r overringing K is simply the sociological expression of cancer by behavioral information rather than genetic information.
We can’t reinstitute monogamy, only end subsidy and malincentive, and produce status, tax, and rights incentives. Monogamy will return to the majority in whose interest it is, and not for that minority in whose interest it is not. In practice this will mean that reproductively desirable will restore reproduction and those others shall not.
We can’t reinstitute monogamy, only end subsidy and malincentive, and produce status, tax, and rights incentives. Monogamy will return to the majority in whose interest it is, and not for that minority in whose interest it is not. In practice this will mean that reproductively desirable will restore reproduction and those others shall not.
And yes, when cooperating, deception as a means of externalizing risk or obtaining discounts is the OPTIMUM strategy as long as you don’t run out of possible cooperators (cities). This is why constant suppression and homogeneity and reputations matter: so you quickly exhaust your market for deception. The problem for whites is that while we developed the first high trust civilization we are (as Kevin MacDonald has stated) extremely vulnerable to use of our trust signals. The principle reason being that we have eliminated the entire suite of means of suppression deception from our civilization.
And yes, when cooperating, deception as a means of externalizing risk or obtaining discounts is the OPTIMUM strategy as long as you don’t run out of possible cooperators (cities). This is why constant suppression and homogeneity and reputations matter: so you quickly exhaust your market for deception. The problem for whites is that while we developed the first high trust civilization we are (as Kevin MacDonald has stated) extremely vulnerable to use of our trust signals. The principle reason being that we have eliminated the entire suite of means of suppression deception from our civilization.
And yes, when cooperating, deception as a means of externalizing risk or obtaining discounts is the OPTIMUM strategy as long as you don’t run out of possible cooperators (cities).
This is why constant suppression and homogeneity and reputations matter: so you quickly exhaust your market for deception.
The problem for whites is that while we developed the first high trust civilization we are (as Kevin MacDonald has stated) extremely vulnerable to use of our trust signals.
The principle reason being that we have eliminated the entire suite of means of suppression deception from our civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-12 08:51:00 UTC